Design and Environment [Dizajn i okolina]

This article discusses the differences between ecological and environmental approaches to design, where design is understood as a practice of vital importance both for human society and for the natural world. The author argues that an environmental approach to design is a sort of holistic method as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of design history 2017-01, Vol.30 (2), p.216-230
1. Verfasser: Meštrović, Matko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 230
container_issue 2
container_start_page 216
container_title Journal of design history
container_volume 30
creator Meštrović, Matko
description This article discusses the differences between ecological and environmental approaches to design, where design is understood as a practice of vital importance both for human society and for the natural world. The author argues that an environmental approach to design is a sort of holistic method as articulated by the key thinkers of the Hochschule für Gestaltung in Ulm (the Ulm School of Design). By defining the differences in intellectual understandings of ecological and environmental categories, the author brings the epistemic discourse of design theory and practice to the level of scientific discourse on social and economic relations. Through his critical discourse, the author tests the advantages and shortcomings of the Western scientific approach (embedded in capitalism), concluding that in order for change to occur it is the sociopolitical system and means of production that need to be changed first—not just design method.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_44652085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44652085</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44652085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j92t-22501086746609cb88adee202476aab318cfaf7c26a3672912f857e8289e30193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzMtKAzEUANBQFByrnyBk20Xg5uZxk6W09QEFN92JlNtpRjJtMzIZCvr1LnR1dmcmGk1WK0KKV6KB6FBZb-ONuK21BwBPWjdisUo1fxbJ5SDX5ZLHoZxTmeT7Kv9wX2SWw3E45cIfd-K641NN9__OxfZpvV2-qM3b8-vycaP6iJNCdKAheLLeQ2z3IfAhJQS05Jn3Roe2445a9Gw8YdTYBUcpYIjJgI5mLh7-2r5Ow7j7GvOZx--dtd4hBGd-AZmIOdk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design and Environment [Dizajn i okolina]</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Meštrović, Matko</creator><creatorcontrib>Meštrović, Matko</creatorcontrib><description>This article discusses the differences between ecological and environmental approaches to design, where design is understood as a practice of vital importance both for human society and for the natural world. The author argues that an environmental approach to design is a sort of holistic method as articulated by the key thinkers of the Hochschule für Gestaltung in Ulm (the Ulm School of Design). By defining the differences in intellectual understandings of ecological and environmental categories, the author brings the epistemic discourse of design theory and practice to the level of scientific discourse on social and economic relations. Through his critical discourse, the author tests the advantages and shortcomings of the Western scientific approach (embedded in capitalism), concluding that in order for change to occur it is the sociopolitical system and means of production that need to be changed first—not just design method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-4649</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-7279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of design history, 2017-01, Vol.30 (2), p.216-230</ispartof><rights>Design History Society 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44652085$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44652085$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meštrović, Matko</creatorcontrib><title>Design and Environment [Dizajn i okolina]</title><title>Journal of design history</title><description>This article discusses the differences between ecological and environmental approaches to design, where design is understood as a practice of vital importance both for human society and for the natural world. The author argues that an environmental approach to design is a sort of holistic method as articulated by the key thinkers of the Hochschule für Gestaltung in Ulm (the Ulm School of Design). By defining the differences in intellectual understandings of ecological and environmental categories, the author brings the epistemic discourse of design theory and practice to the level of scientific discourse on social and economic relations. Through his critical discourse, the author tests the advantages and shortcomings of the Western scientific approach (embedded in capitalism), concluding that in order for change to occur it is the sociopolitical system and means of production that need to be changed first—not just design method.</description><issn>0952-4649</issn><issn>1741-7279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotzMtKAzEUANBQFByrnyBk20Xg5uZxk6W09QEFN92JlNtpRjJtMzIZCvr1LnR1dmcmGk1WK0KKV6KB6FBZb-ONuK21BwBPWjdisUo1fxbJ5SDX5ZLHoZxTmeT7Kv9wX2SWw3E45cIfd-K641NN9__OxfZpvV2-qM3b8-vycaP6iJNCdKAheLLeQ2z3IfAhJQS05Jn3Roe2445a9Gw8YdTYBUcpYIjJgI5mLh7-2r5Ow7j7GvOZx--dtd4hBGd-AZmIOdk</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Meštrović, Matko</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Design and Environment [Dizajn i okolina]</title><author>Meštrović, Matko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j92t-22501086746609cb88adee202476aab318cfaf7c26a3672912f857e8289e30193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meštrović, Matko</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of design history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meštrović, Matko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design and Environment [Dizajn i okolina]</atitle><jtitle>Journal of design history</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>216</spage><epage>230</epage><pages>216-230</pages><issn>0952-4649</issn><eissn>1741-7279</eissn><abstract>This article discusses the differences between ecological and environmental approaches to design, where design is understood as a practice of vital importance both for human society and for the natural world. The author argues that an environmental approach to design is a sort of holistic method as articulated by the key thinkers of the Hochschule für Gestaltung in Ulm (the Ulm School of Design). By defining the differences in intellectual understandings of ecological and environmental categories, the author brings the epistemic discourse of design theory and practice to the level of scientific discourse on social and economic relations. Through his critical discourse, the author tests the advantages and shortcomings of the Western scientific approach (embedded in capitalism), concluding that in order for change to occur it is the sociopolitical system and means of production that need to be changed first—not just design method.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-4649
ispartof Journal of design history, 2017-01, Vol.30 (2), p.216-230
issn 0952-4649
1741-7279
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_44652085
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Design and Environment [Dizajn i okolina]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T05%3A52%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20and%20Environment%20%5BDizajn%20i%20okolina%5D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20design%20history&rft.au=Me%C5%A1trovi%C4%87,%20Matko&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=216&rft.epage=230&rft.pages=216-230&rft.issn=0952-4649&rft.eissn=1741-7279&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E44652085%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44652085&rfr_iscdi=true