Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States

The Eleventh Schedule added to the Constitution by the 73rd amendment lists 29 functions devolvable by states to rural local bodies. States were free to set the speed and design of their approach to decentralisation under the general framework of the Constitutional mandate. Fourteen years on, a quan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economic and political weekly 2007-06, Vol.42 (24), p.2275-2283
Hauptverfasser: Indira Rajaraman, Darshy Sinha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2283
container_issue 24
container_start_page 2275
container_title Economic and political weekly
container_volume 42
creator Indira Rajaraman
Darshy Sinha
description The Eleventh Schedule added to the Constitution by the 73rd amendment lists 29 functions devolvable by states to rural local bodies. States were free to set the speed and design of their approach to decentralisation under the general framework of the Constitutional mandate. Fourteen years on, a quantitative measure is attempted in this paper of the extent to which functional transfers have been achieved through the budgetary transfer of funds, with respect to the fiscal year 2006-07, in four states: Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Orissa. The approach taken here is thus radically different from that in official documents, where functional transfer to rural local bodies is dealt with in a purely qualitative manner, based on administrative notifications. Without an associated budgetary provision these do not carry any operational significance.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_4419709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4419709</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4419709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j91t-5fe950224177ee1af2bafa526811335b680a0cdb737cfad4d80f438372ec9a353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjMFKxDAURYM4YJ3xD1zkBwJJXtIk7nS0jlAQdPbDa5pAS22kSQX_3hHd3MM5i3tBKgnKMWtVfUkqzoVkzpn6ilznPHIOEqyuyF2zzr4MacaJPoavNK2_Qkuib-tybm3y531I_RAyHWbapHWh7wVLyDuyiTjlcPPPLTk2T8f9gbWvzy_7-5aNThSmY3CaS6mEMSEIjLLDiFrWVggA3dWWI_d9Z8D4iL3qLY8KLBgZvEPQsCW3f7djLmk5fS7DBy7fJ6WEM9zBD50zQOc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Indira Rajaraman ; Darshy Sinha</creator><creatorcontrib>Indira Rajaraman ; Darshy Sinha</creatorcontrib><description>The Eleventh Schedule added to the Constitution by the 73rd amendment lists 29 functions devolvable by states to rural local bodies. States were free to set the speed and design of their approach to decentralisation under the general framework of the Constitutional mandate. Fourteen years on, a quantitative measure is attempted in this paper of the extent to which functional transfers have been achieved through the budgetary transfer of funds, with respect to the fiscal year 2006-07, in four states: Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Orissa. The approach taken here is thus radically different from that in official documents, where functional transfer to rural local bodies is dealt with in a purely qualitative manner, based on administrative notifications. Without an associated budgetary provision these do not carry any operational significance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2349-8846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sameeksha Trust</publisher><subject>Capital budgeting ; Demand schedule ; Employment ; Employment statistics ; Financial budgets ; Government budgets ; Grants ; Household budgets ; Revenue ; Rural development ; Special Articles</subject><ispartof>Economic and political weekly, 2007-06, Vol.42 (24), p.2275-2283</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4419709$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4419709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Indira Rajaraman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darshy Sinha</creatorcontrib><title>Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States</title><title>Economic and political weekly</title><description>The Eleventh Schedule added to the Constitution by the 73rd amendment lists 29 functions devolvable by states to rural local bodies. States were free to set the speed and design of their approach to decentralisation under the general framework of the Constitutional mandate. Fourteen years on, a quantitative measure is attempted in this paper of the extent to which functional transfers have been achieved through the budgetary transfer of funds, with respect to the fiscal year 2006-07, in four states: Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Orissa. The approach taken here is thus radically different from that in official documents, where functional transfer to rural local bodies is dealt with in a purely qualitative manner, based on administrative notifications. Without an associated budgetary provision these do not carry any operational significance.</description><subject>Capital budgeting</subject><subject>Demand schedule</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment statistics</subject><subject>Financial budgets</subject><subject>Government budgets</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Household budgets</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>Special Articles</subject><issn>0012-9976</issn><issn>2349-8846</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjMFKxDAURYM4YJ3xD1zkBwJJXtIk7nS0jlAQdPbDa5pAS22kSQX_3hHd3MM5i3tBKgnKMWtVfUkqzoVkzpn6ilznPHIOEqyuyF2zzr4MacaJPoavNK2_Qkuib-tybm3y531I_RAyHWbapHWh7wVLyDuyiTjlcPPPLTk2T8f9gbWvzy_7-5aNThSmY3CaS6mEMSEIjLLDiFrWVggA3dWWI_d9Z8D4iL3qLY8KLBgZvEPQsCW3f7djLmk5fS7DBy7fJ6WEM9zBD50zQOc</recordid><startdate>20070616</startdate><enddate>20070616</enddate><creator>Indira Rajaraman</creator><creator>Darshy Sinha</creator><general>Sameeksha Trust</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20070616</creationdate><title>Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States</title><author>Indira Rajaraman ; Darshy Sinha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j91t-5fe950224177ee1af2bafa526811335b680a0cdb737cfad4d80f438372ec9a353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Capital budgeting</topic><topic>Demand schedule</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment statistics</topic><topic>Financial budgets</topic><topic>Government budgets</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Household budgets</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>Special Articles</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Indira Rajaraman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darshy Sinha</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Economic and political weekly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Indira Rajaraman</au><au>Darshy Sinha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States</atitle><jtitle>Economic and political weekly</jtitle><date>2007-06-16</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>2275</spage><epage>2283</epage><pages>2275-2283</pages><issn>0012-9976</issn><eissn>2349-8846</eissn><abstract>The Eleventh Schedule added to the Constitution by the 73rd amendment lists 29 functions devolvable by states to rural local bodies. States were free to set the speed and design of their approach to decentralisation under the general framework of the Constitutional mandate. Fourteen years on, a quantitative measure is attempted in this paper of the extent to which functional transfers have been achieved through the budgetary transfer of funds, with respect to the fiscal year 2006-07, in four states: Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Orissa. The approach taken here is thus radically different from that in official documents, where functional transfer to rural local bodies is dealt with in a purely qualitative manner, based on administrative notifications. Without an associated budgetary provision these do not carry any operational significance.</abstract><pub>Sameeksha Trust</pub><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9976
ispartof Economic and political weekly, 2007-06, Vol.42 (24), p.2275-2283
issn 0012-9976
2349-8846
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_4419709
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Capital budgeting
Demand schedule
Employment
Employment statistics
Financial budgets
Government budgets
Grants
Household budgets
Revenue
Rural development
Special Articles
title Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A54%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20Devolution%20to%20Rural%20Local%20Bodies%20in%20Four%20States&rft.jtitle=Economic%20and%20political%20weekly&rft.au=Indira%20Rajaraman&rft.date=2007-06-16&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=2275&rft.epage=2283&rft.pages=2275-2283&rft.issn=0012-9976&rft.eissn=2349-8846&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E4419709%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4419709&rfr_iscdi=true