Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States
The Eleventh Schedule added to the Constitution by the 73rd amendment lists 29 functions devolvable by states to rural local bodies. States were free to set the speed and design of their approach to decentralisation under the general framework of the Constitutional mandate. Fourteen years on, a quan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economic and political weekly 2007-06, Vol.42 (24), p.2275-2283 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2283 |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 2275 |
container_title | Economic and political weekly |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Indira Rajaraman Darshy Sinha |
description | The Eleventh Schedule added to the Constitution by the 73rd amendment lists 29 functions devolvable by states to rural local bodies. States were free to set the speed and design of their approach to decentralisation under the general framework of the Constitutional mandate. Fourteen years on, a quantitative measure is attempted in this paper of the extent to which functional transfers have been achieved through the budgetary transfer of funds, with respect to the fiscal year 2006-07, in four states: Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Orissa. The approach taken here is thus radically different from that in official documents, where functional transfer to rural local bodies is dealt with in a purely qualitative manner, based on administrative notifications. Without an associated budgetary provision these do not carry any operational significance. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_4419709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4419709</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4419709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j91t-5fe950224177ee1af2bafa526811335b680a0cdb737cfad4d80f438372ec9a353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjMFKxDAURYM4YJ3xD1zkBwJJXtIk7nS0jlAQdPbDa5pAS22kSQX_3hHd3MM5i3tBKgnKMWtVfUkqzoVkzpn6ilznPHIOEqyuyF2zzr4MacaJPoavNK2_Qkuib-tybm3y531I_RAyHWbapHWh7wVLyDuyiTjlcPPPLTk2T8f9gbWvzy_7-5aNThSmY3CaS6mEMSEIjLLDiFrWVggA3dWWI_d9Z8D4iL3qLY8KLBgZvEPQsCW3f7djLmk5fS7DBy7fJ6WEM9zBD50zQOc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Indira Rajaraman ; Darshy Sinha</creator><creatorcontrib>Indira Rajaraman ; Darshy Sinha</creatorcontrib><description>The Eleventh Schedule added to the Constitution by the 73rd amendment lists 29 functions devolvable by states to rural local bodies. States were free to set the speed and design of their approach to decentralisation under the general framework of the Constitutional mandate. Fourteen years on, a quantitative measure is attempted in this paper of the extent to which functional transfers have been achieved through the budgetary transfer of funds, with respect to the fiscal year 2006-07, in four states: Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Orissa. The approach taken here is thus radically different from that in official documents, where functional transfer to rural local bodies is dealt with in a purely qualitative manner, based on administrative notifications. Without an associated budgetary provision these do not carry any operational significance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2349-8846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sameeksha Trust</publisher><subject>Capital budgeting ; Demand schedule ; Employment ; Employment statistics ; Financial budgets ; Government budgets ; Grants ; Household budgets ; Revenue ; Rural development ; Special Articles</subject><ispartof>Economic and political weekly, 2007-06, Vol.42 (24), p.2275-2283</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4419709$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4419709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Indira Rajaraman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darshy Sinha</creatorcontrib><title>Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States</title><title>Economic and political weekly</title><description>The Eleventh Schedule added to the Constitution by the 73rd amendment lists 29 functions devolvable by states to rural local bodies. States were free to set the speed and design of their approach to decentralisation under the general framework of the Constitutional mandate. Fourteen years on, a quantitative measure is attempted in this paper of the extent to which functional transfers have been achieved through the budgetary transfer of funds, with respect to the fiscal year 2006-07, in four states: Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Orissa. The approach taken here is thus radically different from that in official documents, where functional transfer to rural local bodies is dealt with in a purely qualitative manner, based on administrative notifications. Without an associated budgetary provision these do not carry any operational significance.</description><subject>Capital budgeting</subject><subject>Demand schedule</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment statistics</subject><subject>Financial budgets</subject><subject>Government budgets</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Household budgets</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>Special Articles</subject><issn>0012-9976</issn><issn>2349-8846</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjMFKxDAURYM4YJ3xD1zkBwJJXtIk7nS0jlAQdPbDa5pAS22kSQX_3hHd3MM5i3tBKgnKMWtVfUkqzoVkzpn6ilznPHIOEqyuyF2zzr4MacaJPoavNK2_Qkuib-tybm3y531I_RAyHWbapHWh7wVLyDuyiTjlcPPPLTk2T8f9gbWvzy_7-5aNThSmY3CaS6mEMSEIjLLDiFrWVggA3dWWI_d9Z8D4iL3qLY8KLBgZvEPQsCW3f7djLmk5fS7DBy7fJ6WEM9zBD50zQOc</recordid><startdate>20070616</startdate><enddate>20070616</enddate><creator>Indira Rajaraman</creator><creator>Darshy Sinha</creator><general>Sameeksha Trust</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20070616</creationdate><title>Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States</title><author>Indira Rajaraman ; Darshy Sinha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j91t-5fe950224177ee1af2bafa526811335b680a0cdb737cfad4d80f438372ec9a353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Capital budgeting</topic><topic>Demand schedule</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment statistics</topic><topic>Financial budgets</topic><topic>Government budgets</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Household budgets</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>Special Articles</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Indira Rajaraman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darshy Sinha</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Economic and political weekly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Indira Rajaraman</au><au>Darshy Sinha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States</atitle><jtitle>Economic and political weekly</jtitle><date>2007-06-16</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>2275</spage><epage>2283</epage><pages>2275-2283</pages><issn>0012-9976</issn><eissn>2349-8846</eissn><abstract>The Eleventh Schedule added to the Constitution by the 73rd amendment lists 29 functions devolvable by states to rural local bodies. States were free to set the speed and design of their approach to decentralisation under the general framework of the Constitutional mandate. Fourteen years on, a quantitative measure is attempted in this paper of the extent to which functional transfers have been achieved through the budgetary transfer of funds, with respect to the fiscal year 2006-07, in four states: Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Orissa. The approach taken here is thus radically different from that in official documents, where functional transfer to rural local bodies is dealt with in a purely qualitative manner, based on administrative notifications. Without an associated budgetary provision these do not carry any operational significance.</abstract><pub>Sameeksha Trust</pub><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9976 |
ispartof | Economic and political weekly, 2007-06, Vol.42 (24), p.2275-2283 |
issn | 0012-9976 2349-8846 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_4419709 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Capital budgeting Demand schedule Employment Employment statistics Financial budgets Government budgets Grants Household budgets Revenue Rural development Special Articles |
title | Functional Devolution to Rural Local Bodies in Four States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A54%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20Devolution%20to%20Rural%20Local%20Bodies%20in%20Four%20States&rft.jtitle=Economic%20and%20political%20weekly&rft.au=Indira%20Rajaraman&rft.date=2007-06-16&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=2275&rft.epage=2283&rft.pages=2275-2283&rft.issn=0012-9976&rft.eissn=2349-8846&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E4419709%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4419709&rfr_iscdi=true |