Anti-Bigamy Bill in Maharashtra: Wider Debate Needed
In December 1995, the two houses of the Maharashtra legislature hastily passed the Anti-Bigamy Bill which now awaits the president's assent. The main purpose of the bill appears to be to penalise Muslim men rather than to protect women of any faith.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Economic and political weekly 1996-07, Vol.31 (29), p.1919-1921 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1921 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 29 |
| container_start_page | 1919 |
| container_title | Economic and political weekly |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Gangoli, Geetanjali |
| description | In December 1995, the two houses of the Maharashtra legislature hastily passed the Anti-Bigamy Bill which now awaits the president's assent. The main purpose of the bill appears to be to penalise Muslim men rather than to protect women of any faith. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_4404405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4404405</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4404405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j106t-ca5acb15456231c7b545dcef55701198673c9119a5c23f1f329e7442f92000cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjMtKAzEUQENR6Fj9gy7yA4Gb98RdWx8Vqm4Ul-VOJmkzTKsk2fTvHVA4cM7qzEgjpHKsbZW5Ig0AF8w5a-bkppQBQArZ6oao1bkmtk4HPF3oOo0jTWf6ikfMWI414z39Sn3I9CF0WAN9C6EP_S25jjiWcPfvBfl8evzYbNnu_flls9qxgYOpzKNG33GttBGSe9tN1fsQtbbAuWuNld5NgdoLGXmUwgWrlIhOAICPckGWf9-h1O-8_8nphPmyVwomtPwFWqg9TQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anti-Bigamy Bill in Maharashtra: Wider Debate Needed</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Gangoli, Geetanjali</creator><creatorcontrib>Gangoli, Geetanjali</creatorcontrib><description>In December 1995, the two houses of the Maharashtra legislature hastily passed the Anti-Bigamy Bill which now awaits the president's assent. The main purpose of the bill appears to be to penalise Muslim men rather than to protect women of any faith.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2349-8846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sameeksha Trust</publisher><subject>Bigamy ; Commentary ; Hindus ; Husbands ; Islamic law ; Marriage ; Men ; Muslims ; Polygamy ; Wives ; Womens rights</subject><ispartof>Economic and political weekly, 1996-07, Vol.31 (29), p.1919-1921</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4404405$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4404405$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gangoli, Geetanjali</creatorcontrib><title>Anti-Bigamy Bill in Maharashtra: Wider Debate Needed</title><title>Economic and political weekly</title><description>In December 1995, the two houses of the Maharashtra legislature hastily passed the Anti-Bigamy Bill which now awaits the president's assent. The main purpose of the bill appears to be to penalise Muslim men rather than to protect women of any faith.</description><subject>Bigamy</subject><subject>Commentary</subject><subject>Hindus</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Islamic law</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>Polygamy</subject><subject>Wives</subject><subject>Womens rights</subject><issn>0012-9976</issn><issn>2349-8846</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjMtKAzEUQENR6Fj9gy7yA4Gb98RdWx8Vqm4Ul-VOJmkzTKsk2fTvHVA4cM7qzEgjpHKsbZW5Ig0AF8w5a-bkppQBQArZ6oao1bkmtk4HPF3oOo0jTWf6ikfMWI414z39Sn3I9CF0WAN9C6EP_S25jjiWcPfvBfl8evzYbNnu_flls9qxgYOpzKNG33GttBGSe9tN1fsQtbbAuWuNld5NgdoLGXmUwgWrlIhOAICPckGWf9-h1O-8_8nphPmyVwomtPwFWqg9TQ</recordid><startdate>19960720</startdate><enddate>19960720</enddate><creator>Gangoli, Geetanjali</creator><general>Sameeksha Trust</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19960720</creationdate><title>Anti-Bigamy Bill in Maharashtra: Wider Debate Needed</title><author>Gangoli, Geetanjali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j106t-ca5acb15456231c7b545dcef55701198673c9119a5c23f1f329e7442f92000cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Bigamy</topic><topic>Commentary</topic><topic>Hindus</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Islamic law</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>Polygamy</topic><topic>Wives</topic><topic>Womens rights</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gangoli, Geetanjali</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Economic and political weekly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gangoli, Geetanjali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anti-Bigamy Bill in Maharashtra: Wider Debate Needed</atitle><jtitle>Economic and political weekly</jtitle><date>1996-07-20</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>29</issue><spage>1919</spage><epage>1921</epage><pages>1919-1921</pages><issn>0012-9976</issn><eissn>2349-8846</eissn><abstract>In December 1995, the two houses of the Maharashtra legislature hastily passed the Anti-Bigamy Bill which now awaits the president's assent. The main purpose of the bill appears to be to penalise Muslim men rather than to protect women of any faith.</abstract><pub>Sameeksha Trust</pub><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0012-9976 |
| ispartof | Economic and political weekly, 1996-07, Vol.31 (29), p.1919-1921 |
| issn | 0012-9976 2349-8846 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_4404405 |
| source | JSTOR |
| subjects | Bigamy Commentary Hindus Husbands Islamic law Marriage Men Muslims Polygamy Wives Womens rights |
| title | Anti-Bigamy Bill in Maharashtra: Wider Debate Needed |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A17%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anti-Bigamy%20Bill%20in%20Maharashtra:%20Wider%20Debate%20Needed&rft.jtitle=Economic%20and%20political%20weekly&rft.au=Gangoli,%20Geetanjali&rft.date=1996-07-20&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=29&rft.spage=1919&rft.epage=1921&rft.pages=1919-1921&rft.issn=0012-9976&rft.eissn=2349-8846&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E4404405%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4404405&rfr_iscdi=true |