Flexibler und Zielgerichteter Ausgleich — Eine am innerparteilichen Proporz orientierte Alternative zum geltenden Bundestagswahlrecht

The electoral system to the German Bundestag may not only lead to unnecessary enlargements of parliament but it is also not focused systematically on reducing the intraparty distortions. Those distortions played a substantial role in the political discussion as they are crucial for the acceptability...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 2016-01, Vol.47 (2), p.369-388
Hauptverfasser: Behnke, Joachim, Weinmann, Philipp
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ger
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 388
container_issue 2
container_start_page 369
container_title Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen
container_volume 47
creator Behnke, Joachim
Weinmann, Philipp
description The electoral system to the German Bundestag may not only lead to unnecessary enlargements of parliament but it is also not focused systematically on reducing the intraparty distortions. Those distortions played a substantial role in the political discussion as they are crucial for the acceptability of the electoral system. But aside from extreme solutions, none of the existing reform proposals is oriented systematically towards a pre-defined level of intraparty proportionality. Thus, a new procedure is proposed here, which consistently focuses on guaranteeing a minimum level of intraparty proportionality. It does not lead to unnecessary enlargements and may be adjusted via a parameter to deliver the desired balance between attenuation of intraparty distortions and parsimonious enlargements of parliament. Combined with a reform, which leads to far fewer overhang seats, it could eliminate the severest distortions and in most cases still keep within the regular size of parliament.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_43977125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43977125</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43977125</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_439771253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj71Ow0AQhE8IJCzIIyDtC1g6x39JGVAiSgoqmuhCBmfR-WztnflJRccL8IQ8CVvQp1rNfKMdzZnJikUzz-d1WZ2bzJaVzYu2XlyaWYy8s0Vjm9ou28x8bzw-eOchNIU9PTF8B-HnQ0JSbzXFzkMl_X790JoDyPXEIUBGJwnslSHQgwzjIEcahBESQxGtvH4ILvEb6Dj11EGNsNf0rVYhJtfFd3fwAm27NhcvzkfM_u-VudmsH-_u89eYBtmOwr2Tz21VLtu20Fmn-B8Yo1PM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flexibler und Zielgerichteter Ausgleich — Eine am innerparteilichen Proporz orientierte Alternative zum geltenden Bundestagswahlrecht</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Behnke, Joachim ; Weinmann, Philipp</creator><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Joachim ; Weinmann, Philipp</creatorcontrib><description>The electoral system to the German Bundestag may not only lead to unnecessary enlargements of parliament but it is also not focused systematically on reducing the intraparty distortions. Those distortions played a substantial role in the political discussion as they are crucial for the acceptability of the electoral system. But aside from extreme solutions, none of the existing reform proposals is oriented systematically towards a pre-defined level of intraparty proportionality. Thus, a new procedure is proposed here, which consistently focuses on guaranteeing a minimum level of intraparty proportionality. It does not lead to unnecessary enlargements and may be adjusted via a parameter to deliver the desired balance between attenuation of intraparty distortions and parsimonious enlargements of parliament. Combined with a reform, which leads to far fewer overhang seats, it could eliminate the severest distortions and in most cases still keep within the regular size of parliament.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-1758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1862-2534</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH &amp; Co. KG</publisher><subject>DOKUMENTATION UND ANALYSEN</subject><ispartof>Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 2016-01, Vol.47 (2), p.369-388</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43977125$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43977125$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinmann, Philipp</creatorcontrib><title>Flexibler und Zielgerichteter Ausgleich — Eine am innerparteilichen Proporz orientierte Alternative zum geltenden Bundestagswahlrecht</title><title>Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen</title><description>The electoral system to the German Bundestag may not only lead to unnecessary enlargements of parliament but it is also not focused systematically on reducing the intraparty distortions. Those distortions played a substantial role in the political discussion as they are crucial for the acceptability of the electoral system. But aside from extreme solutions, none of the existing reform proposals is oriented systematically towards a pre-defined level of intraparty proportionality. Thus, a new procedure is proposed here, which consistently focuses on guaranteeing a minimum level of intraparty proportionality. It does not lead to unnecessary enlargements and may be adjusted via a parameter to deliver the desired balance between attenuation of intraparty distortions and parsimonious enlargements of parliament. Combined with a reform, which leads to far fewer overhang seats, it could eliminate the severest distortions and in most cases still keep within the regular size of parliament.</description><subject>DOKUMENTATION UND ANALYSEN</subject><issn>0340-1758</issn><issn>1862-2534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFj71Ow0AQhE8IJCzIIyDtC1g6x39JGVAiSgoqmuhCBmfR-WztnflJRccL8IQ8CVvQp1rNfKMdzZnJikUzz-d1WZ2bzJaVzYu2XlyaWYy8s0Vjm9ou28x8bzw-eOchNIU9PTF8B-HnQ0JSbzXFzkMl_X790JoDyPXEIUBGJwnslSHQgwzjIEcahBESQxGtvH4ILvEb6Dj11EGNsNf0rVYhJtfFd3fwAm27NhcvzkfM_u-VudmsH-_u89eYBtmOwr2Tz21VLtu20Fmn-B8Yo1PM</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Behnke, Joachim</creator><creator>Weinmann, Philipp</creator><general>Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH &amp; Co. KG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Flexibler und Zielgerichteter Ausgleich — Eine am innerparteilichen Proporz orientierte Alternative zum geltenden Bundestagswahlrecht</title><author>Behnke, Joachim ; Weinmann, Philipp</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_439771253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>DOKUMENTATION UND ANALYSEN</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinmann, Philipp</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behnke, Joachim</au><au>Weinmann, Philipp</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flexibler und Zielgerichteter Ausgleich — Eine am innerparteilichen Proporz orientierte Alternative zum geltenden Bundestagswahlrecht</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>369-388</pages><issn>0340-1758</issn><eissn>1862-2534</eissn><abstract>The electoral system to the German Bundestag may not only lead to unnecessary enlargements of parliament but it is also not focused systematically on reducing the intraparty distortions. Those distortions played a substantial role in the political discussion as they are crucial for the acceptability of the electoral system. But aside from extreme solutions, none of the existing reform proposals is oriented systematically towards a pre-defined level of intraparty proportionality. Thus, a new procedure is proposed here, which consistently focuses on guaranteeing a minimum level of intraparty proportionality. It does not lead to unnecessary enlargements and may be adjusted via a parameter to deliver the desired balance between attenuation of intraparty distortions and parsimonious enlargements of parliament. Combined with a reform, which leads to far fewer overhang seats, it could eliminate the severest distortions and in most cases still keep within the regular size of parliament.</abstract><pub>Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH &amp; Co. KG</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-1758
ispartof Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 2016-01, Vol.47 (2), p.369-388
issn 0340-1758
1862-2534
language ger
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_43977125
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects DOKUMENTATION UND ANALYSEN
title Flexibler und Zielgerichteter Ausgleich — Eine am innerparteilichen Proporz orientierte Alternative zum geltenden Bundestagswahlrecht
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A55%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flexibler%20und%20Zielgerichteter%20Ausgleich%20%E2%80%94%20Eine%20am%20innerparteilichen%20Proporz%20orientierte%20Alternative%20zum%20geltenden%20Bundestagswahlrecht&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20Parlamentsfragen&rft.au=Behnke,%20Joachim&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=369-388&rft.issn=0340-1758&rft.eissn=1862-2534&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E43977125%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43977125&rfr_iscdi=true