Art is Messianicity: Radical Illustration in the Face of God - Romeo Castellucci and Antonello da Messina
Messianicity is not. Art is. Derrida, however, was not into pictures; his relationship with art remained in the quasi-transcendental mode of frames. Romeo Castellucci's use of a painting by Antonello da Messina exposes the Derridean non-messianism through art's power to illustrate - a mode...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Oxford literary review 2014-07, Vol.36 (1), p.37-47 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 47 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 37 |
| container_title | Oxford literary review |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Haverkamp, Anselm |
| description | Messianicity is not. Art is. Derrida, however, was not into pictures; his relationship with art remained in the quasi-transcendental mode of frames. Romeo Castellucci's use of a painting by Antonello da Messina exposes the Derridean non-messianism through art's power to illustrate - a mode abandoned by Derrida in the Heidegger-Schapiro debate on Van Gogh. In Castellucci, on the contrary, art illustrates what 'messianicity' is unable to illustrate and thus is bound to deny even in the negative. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3366/olr.2014.0085 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_43973747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43973747</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43973747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-8d108d26d0122a6cd339b6e1748536ac0abe486f9e2dcd19c395908e856774a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL9rGzEUgEVoIG6SMWNA0KXLufotXTdj6iTgUgjJLGRJTmTOkivphvz31XEhQ5ZOD977-Hh8ANxgtKRUiB9pyEuCMFsipPgZWGDJZYcFZV_AAlHEO8x6dQG-lnJASFCu2AKEVa4wFPjblxJMDDbUt5_w0bhgzQAfhmEsNZsaUoQhwvrq4cZYD9Me3iUHO_iYjj7BtSnVN9baAE10cBVrim2RoDOzOporcL43Q_HX7_MSPG9-Pa3vu-2fu4f1attZSnDtlMNIOSIcwoQYYR2l_U54LJniVBiLzM4zJfa9J8463Fva8x4pr7iQkhlBL8H32XvK6e_oS9XHUGx7xkSfxqKxkIpjTkjf0G-f0EMac2zfacKlxBxRLBvVzZTNqZTs9_qUw9HkN42RnsLrFl5P4fUUvvG3M38oNeUPmNFeUskmH5vv3oW4G_PL63jKrdF_tP8AvhmP2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2577150317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Art is Messianicity: Radical Illustration in the Face of God - Romeo Castellucci and Antonello da Messina</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Haverkamp, Anselm</creator><creatorcontrib>Haverkamp, Anselm</creatorcontrib><description>Messianicity is not. Art is. Derrida, however, was not into pictures; his relationship with art remained in the quasi-transcendental mode of frames. Romeo Castellucci's use of a painting by Antonello da Messina exposes the Derridean non-messianism through art's power to illustrate - a mode abandoned by Derrida in the Heidegger-Schapiro debate on Van Gogh. In Castellucci, on the contrary, art illustrates what 'messianicity' is unable to illustrate and thus is bound to deny even in the negative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-1498</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-1634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3366/olr.2014.0085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Edinburgh University Press</publisher><subject>Art objects ; Atheism ; Concept of being ; Cultural history ; Illustration ; Literary Studies ; Messianism ; Papers from Frankfurt ; Renaissance art ; Sons ; Theater ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Oxford literary review, 2014-07, Vol.36 (1), p.37-47</ispartof><rights>Edinburgh University Press 2014</rights><rights>Edinburgh University Press, 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Edinburgh University Press Jul 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43973747$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43973747$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,27922,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haverkamp, Anselm</creatorcontrib><title>Art is Messianicity: Radical Illustration in the Face of God - Romeo Castellucci and Antonello da Messina</title><title>Oxford literary review</title><description>Messianicity is not. Art is. Derrida, however, was not into pictures; his relationship with art remained in the quasi-transcendental mode of frames. Romeo Castellucci's use of a painting by Antonello da Messina exposes the Derridean non-messianism through art's power to illustrate - a mode abandoned by Derrida in the Heidegger-Schapiro debate on Van Gogh. In Castellucci, on the contrary, art illustrates what 'messianicity' is unable to illustrate and thus is bound to deny even in the negative.</description><subject>Art objects</subject><subject>Atheism</subject><subject>Concept of being</subject><subject>Cultural history</subject><subject>Illustration</subject><subject>Literary Studies</subject><subject>Messianism</subject><subject>Papers from Frankfurt</subject><subject>Renaissance art</subject><subject>Sons</subject><subject>Theater</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0305-1498</issn><issn>1757-1634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL9rGzEUgEVoIG6SMWNA0KXLufotXTdj6iTgUgjJLGRJTmTOkivphvz31XEhQ5ZOD977-Hh8ANxgtKRUiB9pyEuCMFsipPgZWGDJZYcFZV_AAlHEO8x6dQG-lnJASFCu2AKEVa4wFPjblxJMDDbUt5_w0bhgzQAfhmEsNZsaUoQhwvrq4cZYD9Me3iUHO_iYjj7BtSnVN9baAE10cBVrim2RoDOzOporcL43Q_HX7_MSPG9-Pa3vu-2fu4f1attZSnDtlMNIOSIcwoQYYR2l_U54LJniVBiLzM4zJfa9J8463Fva8x4pr7iQkhlBL8H32XvK6e_oS9XHUGx7xkSfxqKxkIpjTkjf0G-f0EMac2zfacKlxBxRLBvVzZTNqZTs9_qUw9HkN42RnsLrFl5P4fUUvvG3M38oNeUPmNFeUskmH5vv3oW4G_PL63jKrdF_tP8AvhmP2g</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Haverkamp, Anselm</creator><general>Edinburgh University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Art is Messianicity: Radical Illustration in the Face of God - Romeo Castellucci and Antonello da Messina</title><author>Haverkamp, Anselm</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-8d108d26d0122a6cd339b6e1748536ac0abe486f9e2dcd19c395908e856774a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Art objects</topic><topic>Atheism</topic><topic>Concept of being</topic><topic>Cultural history</topic><topic>Illustration</topic><topic>Literary Studies</topic><topic>Messianism</topic><topic>Papers from Frankfurt</topic><topic>Renaissance art</topic><topic>Sons</topic><topic>Theater</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haverkamp, Anselm</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Oxford literary review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haverkamp, Anselm</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Art is Messianicity: Radical Illustration in the Face of God - Romeo Castellucci and Antonello da Messina</atitle><jtitle>Oxford literary review</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>37-47</pages><issn>0305-1498</issn><eissn>1757-1634</eissn><abstract>Messianicity is not. Art is. Derrida, however, was not into pictures; his relationship with art remained in the quasi-transcendental mode of frames. Romeo Castellucci's use of a painting by Antonello da Messina exposes the Derridean non-messianism through art's power to illustrate - a mode abandoned by Derrida in the Heidegger-Schapiro debate on Van Gogh. In Castellucci, on the contrary, art illustrates what 'messianicity' is unable to illustrate and thus is bound to deny even in the negative.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Edinburgh University Press</pub><doi>10.3366/olr.2014.0085</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-1498 |
| ispartof | Oxford literary review, 2014-07, Vol.36 (1), p.37-47 |
| issn | 0305-1498 1757-1634 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_43973747 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Art objects Atheism Concept of being Cultural history Illustration Literary Studies Messianism Papers from Frankfurt Renaissance art Sons Theater Theology |
| title | Art is Messianicity: Radical Illustration in the Face of God - Romeo Castellucci and Antonello da Messina |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A55%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Art%20is%20Messianicity:%20Radical%20Illustration%20in%20the%20Face%20of%20God%20-%20Romeo%20Castellucci%20and%20Antonello%20da%20Messina&rft.jtitle=Oxford%20literary%20review&rft.au=Haverkamp,%20Anselm&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=37-47&rft.issn=0305-1498&rft.eissn=1757-1634&rft_id=info:doi/10.3366/olr.2014.0085&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43973747%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2577150317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43973747&rfr_iscdi=true |