Risk as a Category of Analysis for a Social History of the Twentieth Century: An Introduction
»Risiko als Analysekategorie für eine Geschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts: Eine Einführung«. Risks are of particular relevance for the social history of the twentieth century. On the one hand, Western societies' economic growth gave impetus to the rise of new technologies. Technology, we argue, bro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Historical social research (Köln) 2016-01, Vol.41 (1 (155)), p.7-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 29 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 (155) |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | Historical social research (Köln) |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Itzen, Peter Müller, Simone M. |
description | »Risiko als Analysekategorie für eine Geschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts: Eine Einführung«. Risks are of particular relevance for the social history of the twentieth century. On the one hand, Western societies' economic growth gave impetus to the rise of new technologies. Technology, we argue, brought with it new possibilities, but it was also loaded with new risks. On the other hand, societies discussed and explored new notions of responsibility for risks, their management and mitigation. Both aspects changed the meaning and perception of traditional risks, such as natural catastrophes, sickness or falling into poverty. In this introduction, we explore the use of risk as a category of analysis for a social history of the twentieth century. In a form of double-intervention on time and methodology, we, on the one hand, hold risks as a 'phenomenon' to be of particular relevance - even characteristic for - the twentieth century; on the other hand, we posit that risk as an analytical category offers us new avenues into understanding modern societies in three important ways: (1) the importance of time and future in human actions and debates, (2) the dual nature of risks as discursively constructed and simultaneously material, (3) the social justice implications of this dual nature that were often unequally shared, be it nationally or globally. In the end, we argue, by linking the materiality of challenges and risks with how these were perceived and discursively constructed, we are better able to understand the rules and the changes that underpin historical societies and which are - as our authors show in this HSR Special Issue - very often determined in reaction to risks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.12759/hsr.41.2016.1.7-29 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_43783675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43783675</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43783675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g330t-3f5a88c3bfec47a4038305dee4b78a01f277a956739a4e8bbc9125672dc77e7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotTt1KwzAYzYWCc_oEIuQFWvPXfql3o6gbDASdlzK-psmaOVtJMqRvv4q7OudwfjiE3HGWcwFF9dDFkCueC8bLnOeQieqCzBgHkZWKqStyHeOesZJxzmfk883HL4qRIq0x2d0QRjo4uujxMEYfqRvCZL0PxuOBLn1M50DqLN382j55mzpaT-QYxsepR1d9CkN7NMkP_Q25dHiI9vaMc_Lx_LSpl9n69WVVL9bZTkqWMukK1NrIxlmjABWTWrKitVY1oJFxJwCwKkqQFSqrm8ZUXExStAbAQiPn5P5_d_93cPsT_DeGcaskaFlCIU-661H6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk as a Category of Analysis for a Social History of the Twentieth Century: An Introduction</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Itzen, Peter ; Müller, Simone M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Itzen, Peter ; Müller, Simone M.</creatorcontrib><description>»Risiko als Analysekategorie für eine Geschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts: Eine Einführung«. Risks are of particular relevance for the social history of the twentieth century. On the one hand, Western societies' economic growth gave impetus to the rise of new technologies. Technology, we argue, brought with it new possibilities, but it was also loaded with new risks. On the other hand, societies discussed and explored new notions of responsibility for risks, their management and mitigation. Both aspects changed the meaning and perception of traditional risks, such as natural catastrophes, sickness or falling into poverty. In this introduction, we explore the use of risk as a category of analysis for a social history of the twentieth century. In a form of double-intervention on time and methodology, we, on the one hand, hold risks as a 'phenomenon' to be of particular relevance - even characteristic for - the twentieth century; on the other hand, we posit that risk as an analytical category offers us new avenues into understanding modern societies in three important ways: (1) the importance of time and future in human actions and debates, (2) the dual nature of risks as discursively constructed and simultaneously material, (3) the social justice implications of this dual nature that were often unequally shared, be it nationally or globally. In the end, we argue, by linking the materiality of challenges and risks with how these were perceived and discursively constructed, we are better able to understand the rules and the changes that underpin historical societies and which are - as our authors show in this HSR Special Issue - very often determined in reaction to risks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0172-6404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12759/hsr.41.2016.1.7-29</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Automobiles ; Disasters ; Health hazards ; Introduction ; Political debate ; Poverty ; Risk management ; Social history ; Social research ; Traffic accidents</subject><ispartof>Historical social research (Köln), 2016-01, Vol.41 (1 (155)), p.7-29</ispartof><rights>GESIS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43783675$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43783675$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27906,27907,57999,58232</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Itzen, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Simone M.</creatorcontrib><title>Risk as a Category of Analysis for a Social History of the Twentieth Century: An Introduction</title><title>Historical social research (Köln)</title><description>»Risiko als Analysekategorie für eine Geschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts: Eine Einführung«. Risks are of particular relevance for the social history of the twentieth century. On the one hand, Western societies' economic growth gave impetus to the rise of new technologies. Technology, we argue, brought with it new possibilities, but it was also loaded with new risks. On the other hand, societies discussed and explored new notions of responsibility for risks, their management and mitigation. Both aspects changed the meaning and perception of traditional risks, such as natural catastrophes, sickness or falling into poverty. In this introduction, we explore the use of risk as a category of analysis for a social history of the twentieth century. In a form of double-intervention on time and methodology, we, on the one hand, hold risks as a 'phenomenon' to be of particular relevance - even characteristic for - the twentieth century; on the other hand, we posit that risk as an analytical category offers us new avenues into understanding modern societies in three important ways: (1) the importance of time and future in human actions and debates, (2) the dual nature of risks as discursively constructed and simultaneously material, (3) the social justice implications of this dual nature that were often unequally shared, be it nationally or globally. In the end, we argue, by linking the materiality of challenges and risks with how these were perceived and discursively constructed, we are better able to understand the rules and the changes that underpin historical societies and which are - as our authors show in this HSR Special Issue - very often determined in reaction to risks.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Introduction</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Social history</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Traffic accidents</subject><issn>0172-6404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotTt1KwzAYzYWCc_oEIuQFWvPXfql3o6gbDASdlzK-psmaOVtJMqRvv4q7OudwfjiE3HGWcwFF9dDFkCueC8bLnOeQieqCzBgHkZWKqStyHeOesZJxzmfk883HL4qRIq0x2d0QRjo4uujxMEYfqRvCZL0PxuOBLn1M50DqLN382j55mzpaT-QYxsepR1d9CkN7NMkP_Q25dHiI9vaMc_Lx_LSpl9n69WVVL9bZTkqWMukK1NrIxlmjABWTWrKitVY1oJFxJwCwKkqQFSqrm8ZUXExStAbAQiPn5P5_d_93cPsT_DeGcaskaFlCIU-661H6</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Itzen, Peter</creator><creator>Müller, Simone M.</creator><general>GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Risk as a Category of Analysis for a Social History of the Twentieth Century: An Introduction</title><author>Itzen, Peter ; Müller, Simone M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g330t-3f5a88c3bfec47a4038305dee4b78a01f277a956739a4e8bbc9125672dc77e7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Introduction</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Social history</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Traffic accidents</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Itzen, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Simone M.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Historical social research (Köln)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Itzen, Peter</au><au>Müller, Simone M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk as a Category of Analysis for a Social History of the Twentieth Century: An Introduction</atitle><jtitle>Historical social research (Köln)</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1 (155)</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>7-29</pages><issn>0172-6404</issn><abstract>»Risiko als Analysekategorie für eine Geschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts: Eine Einführung«. Risks are of particular relevance for the social history of the twentieth century. On the one hand, Western societies' economic growth gave impetus to the rise of new technologies. Technology, we argue, brought with it new possibilities, but it was also loaded with new risks. On the other hand, societies discussed and explored new notions of responsibility for risks, their management and mitigation. Both aspects changed the meaning and perception of traditional risks, such as natural catastrophes, sickness or falling into poverty. In this introduction, we explore the use of risk as a category of analysis for a social history of the twentieth century. In a form of double-intervention on time and methodology, we, on the one hand, hold risks as a 'phenomenon' to be of particular relevance - even characteristic for - the twentieth century; on the other hand, we posit that risk as an analytical category offers us new avenues into understanding modern societies in three important ways: (1) the importance of time and future in human actions and debates, (2) the dual nature of risks as discursively constructed and simultaneously material, (3) the social justice implications of this dual nature that were often unequally shared, be it nationally or globally. In the end, we argue, by linking the materiality of challenges and risks with how these were perceived and discursively constructed, we are better able to understand the rules and the changes that underpin historical societies and which are - as our authors show in this HSR Special Issue - very often determined in reaction to risks.</abstract><pub>GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences</pub><doi>10.12759/hsr.41.2016.1.7-29</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0172-6404 |
ispartof | Historical social research (Köln), 2016-01, Vol.41 (1 (155)), p.7-29 |
issn | 0172-6404 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_43783675 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accidents Automobiles Disasters Health hazards Introduction Political debate Poverty Risk management Social history Social research Traffic accidents |
title | Risk as a Category of Analysis for a Social History of the Twentieth Century: An Introduction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A36%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20as%20a%20Category%20of%20Analysis%20for%20a%20Social%20History%20of%20the%20Twentieth%20Century:%20An%20Introduction&rft.jtitle=Historical%20social%20research%20(Ko%CC%88ln)&rft.au=Itzen,%20Peter&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1%20(155)&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=7-29&rft.issn=0172-6404&rft_id=info:doi/10.12759/hsr.41.2016.1.7-29&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E43783675%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43783675&rfr_iscdi=true |