Student use and perceptions of distance education technologies
We use a Sophomore-level wildlife conservation course to evaluate the effectiveness of distance education technologies. We examine student preferences for and the cost efficiency of videotape versus live broadcast technologies. Based on responses from in-class surveys we find that some technologies,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | NACTA journal 1998-03, Vol.42 (1), p.24-31 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 31 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 24 |
| container_title | NACTA journal |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Diebel, P.L McInnis, M.L Edge, W.D |
| description | We use a Sophomore-level wildlife conservation course to evaluate the effectiveness of distance education technologies. We examine student preferences for and the cost efficiency of videotape versus live broadcast technologies. Based on responses from in-class surveys we find that some technologies, such as a live phone bridge, were costly and ineffective forms of communication. Students preferred to spend extra time outside of lecture for discussion groups with an on-site faculty or other students. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_43765245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43765245</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43765245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f445-a2d63a83222993e6d688adddb1b24a322c65a9b5ec99e4fe7a0e98d45b11d6fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjMtKAzEUQLNQsFY_QcgPDOQ9k40gxRcUumhdD3dyb-qUOhmSzMK_V1FwdeAcOBdsJaTxjfFSXLHrUk5CKKm8XbH7fV2QpsqXQhwm5DPlQHMd01R4ihzHUmEKxAmXAD-aVwrvUzqn40jlhl1GOBe6_eOaHZ4eD5uXZrt7ft08bJtojG1AodPQaaWU95ocuq4DRBzkoAx86-As-MFS8J5MpBYE-Q6NHaREF0mv2d3v9lRqyv2cxw_In73RrbPK2P8eIfVwzGPp3_bS-1bY1mirvwDUw0rN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Student use and perceptions of distance education technologies</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Diebel, P.L ; McInnis, M.L ; Edge, W.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Diebel, P.L ; McInnis, M.L ; Edge, W.D</creatorcontrib><description>We use a Sophomore-level wildlife conservation course to evaluate the effectiveness of distance education technologies. We examine student preferences for and the cost efficiency of videotape versus live broadcast technologies. Based on responses from in-class surveys we find that some technologies, such as a live phone bridge, were costly and ineffective forms of communication. Students preferred to spend extra time outside of lecture for discussion groups with an on-site faculty or other students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-4910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>National Association of Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture</publisher><subject>ATTITUDES ; Broadcasting industry ; Cable television ; COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO ; COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN ; CONSERVACION DE LA NATURALEZA ; CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE ; COSTOS ; COSTS ; COUT ; Distance education ; DISTANCE TEACHING ; Economic costs ; EDUCACION ; EDUCATION ; ELEVE ; ENCUESTAS ; ENQUETE ; ESTUDIANTES ; FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES ; HUMAN BEHAVIOUR ; Lectures ; Magnetic storage ; METHODE PEDAGOGIQUE ; METODOS PEDAGOGICOS ; NATURE CONSERVATION ; OREGON ; School campuses ; STUDENTS ; SURVEYS ; Teachers ; TEACHING METHODS ; TECHNOLOGIE ; TECHNOLOGY ; TECNOLOGIA ; USES ; USOS ; UTILISATION ; VIDA SILVESTRE ; WILDLIFE ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>NACTA journal, 1998-03, Vol.42 (1), p.24-31</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43765245$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43765245$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diebel, P.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInnis, M.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edge, W.D</creatorcontrib><title>Student use and perceptions of distance education technologies</title><title>NACTA journal</title><description>We use a Sophomore-level wildlife conservation course to evaluate the effectiveness of distance education technologies. We examine student preferences for and the cost efficiency of videotape versus live broadcast technologies. Based on responses from in-class surveys we find that some technologies, such as a live phone bridge, were costly and ineffective forms of communication. Students preferred to spend extra time outside of lecture for discussion groups with an on-site faculty or other students.</description><subject>ATTITUDES</subject><subject>Broadcasting industry</subject><subject>Cable television</subject><subject>COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO</subject><subject>COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN</subject><subject>CONSERVACION DE LA NATURALEZA</subject><subject>CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE</subject><subject>COSTOS</subject><subject>COSTS</subject><subject>COUT</subject><subject>Distance education</subject><subject>DISTANCE TEACHING</subject><subject>Economic costs</subject><subject>EDUCACION</subject><subject>EDUCATION</subject><subject>ELEVE</subject><subject>ENCUESTAS</subject><subject>ENQUETE</subject><subject>ESTUDIANTES</subject><subject>FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES</subject><subject>HUMAN BEHAVIOUR</subject><subject>Lectures</subject><subject>Magnetic storage</subject><subject>METHODE PEDAGOGIQUE</subject><subject>METODOS PEDAGOGICOS</subject><subject>NATURE CONSERVATION</subject><subject>OREGON</subject><subject>School campuses</subject><subject>STUDENTS</subject><subject>SURVEYS</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>TEACHING METHODS</subject><subject>TECHNOLOGIE</subject><subject>TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>TECNOLOGIA</subject><subject>USES</subject><subject>USOS</subject><subject>UTILISATION</subject><subject>VIDA SILVESTRE</subject><subject>WILDLIFE</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0149-4910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFjMtKAzEUQLNQsFY_QcgPDOQ9k40gxRcUumhdD3dyb-qUOhmSzMK_V1FwdeAcOBdsJaTxjfFSXLHrUk5CKKm8XbH7fV2QpsqXQhwm5DPlQHMd01R4ihzHUmEKxAmXAD-aVwrvUzqn40jlhl1GOBe6_eOaHZ4eD5uXZrt7ft08bJtojG1AodPQaaWU95ocuq4DRBzkoAx86-As-MFS8J5MpBYE-Q6NHaREF0mv2d3v9lRqyv2cxw_In73RrbPK2P8eIfVwzGPp3_bS-1bY1mirvwDUw0rN</recordid><startdate>199803</startdate><enddate>199803</enddate><creator>Diebel, P.L</creator><creator>McInnis, M.L</creator><creator>Edge, W.D</creator><general>National Association of Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture</general><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199803</creationdate><title>Student use and perceptions of distance education technologies</title><author>Diebel, P.L ; McInnis, M.L ; Edge, W.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f445-a2d63a83222993e6d688adddb1b24a322c65a9b5ec99e4fe7a0e98d45b11d6fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>ATTITUDES</topic><topic>Broadcasting industry</topic><topic>Cable television</topic><topic>COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO</topic><topic>COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN</topic><topic>CONSERVACION DE LA NATURALEZA</topic><topic>CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE</topic><topic>COSTOS</topic><topic>COSTS</topic><topic>COUT</topic><topic>Distance education</topic><topic>DISTANCE TEACHING</topic><topic>Economic costs</topic><topic>EDUCACION</topic><topic>EDUCATION</topic><topic>ELEVE</topic><topic>ENCUESTAS</topic><topic>ENQUETE</topic><topic>ESTUDIANTES</topic><topic>FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES</topic><topic>HUMAN BEHAVIOUR</topic><topic>Lectures</topic><topic>Magnetic storage</topic><topic>METHODE PEDAGOGIQUE</topic><topic>METODOS PEDAGOGICOS</topic><topic>NATURE CONSERVATION</topic><topic>OREGON</topic><topic>School campuses</topic><topic>STUDENTS</topic><topic>SURVEYS</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>TEACHING METHODS</topic><topic>TECHNOLOGIE</topic><topic>TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>TECNOLOGIA</topic><topic>USES</topic><topic>USOS</topic><topic>UTILISATION</topic><topic>VIDA SILVESTRE</topic><topic>WILDLIFE</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diebel, P.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInnis, M.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edge, W.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>NACTA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diebel, P.L</au><au>McInnis, M.L</au><au>Edge, W.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Student use and perceptions of distance education technologies</atitle><jtitle>NACTA journal</jtitle><date>1998-03</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>24-31</pages><issn>0149-4910</issn><abstract>We use a Sophomore-level wildlife conservation course to evaluate the effectiveness of distance education technologies. We examine student preferences for and the cost efficiency of videotape versus live broadcast technologies. Based on responses from in-class surveys we find that some technologies, such as a live phone bridge, were costly and ineffective forms of communication. Students preferred to spend extra time outside of lecture for discussion groups with an on-site faculty or other students.</abstract><pub>National Association of Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0149-4910 |
| ispartof | NACTA journal, 1998-03, Vol.42 (1), p.24-31 |
| issn | 0149-4910 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_43765245 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | ATTITUDES Broadcasting industry Cable television COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN CONSERVACION DE LA NATURALEZA CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE COSTOS COSTS COUT Distance education DISTANCE TEACHING Economic costs EDUCACION EDUCATION ELEVE ENCUESTAS ENQUETE ESTUDIANTES FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES HUMAN BEHAVIOUR Lectures Magnetic storage METHODE PEDAGOGIQUE METODOS PEDAGOGICOS NATURE CONSERVATION OREGON School campuses STUDENTS SURVEYS Teachers TEACHING METHODS TECHNOLOGIE TECHNOLOGY TECNOLOGIA USES USOS UTILISATION VIDA SILVESTRE WILDLIFE Wildlife conservation Wildlife management |
| title | Student use and perceptions of distance education technologies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T12%3A34%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student%20use%20and%20perceptions%20of%20distance%20education%20technologies&rft.jtitle=NACTA%20journal&rft.au=Diebel,%20P.L&rft.date=1998-03&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=24-31&rft.issn=0149-4910&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_fao_a%3E43765245%3C/jstor_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43765245&rfr_iscdi=true |