THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS: AN IDENTITY CRISIS IN SOCIOLOGY?
As the discipline of American sociology enters its second century, the debate over its goals and purpose still remains. This philosophical debate can no longer continue if sociology expects to survive and thrive as a discipline in the twenty-first century. How will the discipline be judged by a soci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociological practice (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2004-04, Vol.6 (1), p.51-58 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 58 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | Sociological practice (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Hauser, William J. Feltey, Kathryn Glass, John E. Scarisbrick-Hauser, AnneMarie Stolley, Kathy Steele, Stephen F. |
description | As the discipline of American sociology enters its second century, the debate over its goals and purpose still remains. This philosophical debate can no longer continue if sociology expects to survive and thrive as a discipline in the twenty-first century. How will the discipline be judged by a society in need of solutions to problems? Does the discipline have an identity crisis or is it in urgent need of defining and setting its direction for the future? The following symposium discusses what twenty-first century sociology might look like and then links it back to the founding principles. It then discusses whether an identity crisis exists and how sociology can better be defined within and outside the discipline. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_43735891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43735891</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43735891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j92t-7286b6e326db6a69d18018d1e84370fe3862404af8c844d8f78a2faf560815a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjM1KxDAURoMoOI4-gpAXCCS5-bnVhZRa22BpYBLBWQ0Z24BFUdrZ-PaOjKvvwOF8Z2QltAVm0b6e_7GUDJSSl-RqWSbOOSDKFbmP7ca_NC2NbU07759d39CmK0O4o2VP3WPdRxe3tNq44AJ1PQ2-cr7zzfbhmlzk9LGMN_-7JvGpjlXLjtZVZcemQh6YlWj2ZgRphr1JphgEcoGDGFGB5XkENFJxlTK-oVIDZotJ5pS14Sh00rAmt6fbaTl8zbvv-f0zzT-7Yw0aCwG_eBc7Zw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS: AN IDENTITY CRISIS IN SOCIOLOGY?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hauser, William J. ; Feltey, Kathryn ; Glass, John E. ; Scarisbrick-Hauser, AnneMarie ; Stolley, Kathy ; Steele, Stephen F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hauser, William J. ; Feltey, Kathryn ; Glass, John E. ; Scarisbrick-Hauser, AnneMarie ; Stolley, Kathy ; Steele, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><description>As the discipline of American sociology enters its second century, the debate over its goals and purpose still remains. This philosophical debate can no longer continue if sociology expects to survive and thrive as a discipline in the twenty-first century. How will the discipline be judged by a society in need of solutions to problems? Does the discipline have an identity crisis or is it in urgent need of defining and setting its direction for the future? The following symposium discusses what twenty-first century sociology might look like and then links it back to the founding principles. It then discusses whether an identity crisis exists and how sociology can better be defined within and outside the discipline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-3442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-787X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Society for Applied Sociology and the Sociological Practice Association</publisher><subject>Applied sociology ; Group identity ; Identity crises ; Marxist sociology ; Objectivity ; Public sociology ; Reflections on Applied Sociology ; Social research ; Social theories ; Sociology ; Visual perception</subject><ispartof>Sociological practice (New York, N.Y.), 2004-04, Vol.6 (1), p.51-58</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43735891$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43735891$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hauser, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feltey, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glass, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarisbrick-Hauser, AnneMarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolley, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><title>THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS: AN IDENTITY CRISIS IN SOCIOLOGY?</title><title>Sociological practice (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>As the discipline of American sociology enters its second century, the debate over its goals and purpose still remains. This philosophical debate can no longer continue if sociology expects to survive and thrive as a discipline in the twenty-first century. How will the discipline be judged by a society in need of solutions to problems? Does the discipline have an identity crisis or is it in urgent need of defining and setting its direction for the future? The following symposium discusses what twenty-first century sociology might look like and then links it back to the founding principles. It then discusses whether an identity crisis exists and how sociology can better be defined within and outside the discipline.</description><subject>Applied sociology</subject><subject>Group identity</subject><subject>Identity crises</subject><subject>Marxist sociology</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Public sociology</subject><subject>Reflections on Applied Sociology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social theories</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><issn>1522-3442</issn><issn>1573-787X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjM1KxDAURoMoOI4-gpAXCCS5-bnVhZRa22BpYBLBWQ0Z24BFUdrZ-PaOjKvvwOF8Z2QltAVm0b6e_7GUDJSSl-RqWSbOOSDKFbmP7ca_NC2NbU07759d39CmK0O4o2VP3WPdRxe3tNq44AJ1PQ2-cr7zzfbhmlzk9LGMN_-7JvGpjlXLjtZVZcemQh6YlWj2ZgRphr1JphgEcoGDGFGB5XkENFJxlTK-oVIDZotJ5pS14Sh00rAmt6fbaTl8zbvv-f0zzT-7Yw0aCwG_eBc7Zw</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>Hauser, William J.</creator><creator>Feltey, Kathryn</creator><creator>Glass, John E.</creator><creator>Scarisbrick-Hauser, AnneMarie</creator><creator>Stolley, Kathy</creator><creator>Steele, Stephen F.</creator><general>The Society for Applied Sociology and the Sociological Practice Association</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS: AN IDENTITY CRISIS IN SOCIOLOGY?</title><author>Hauser, William J. ; Feltey, Kathryn ; Glass, John E. ; Scarisbrick-Hauser, AnneMarie ; Stolley, Kathy ; Steele, Stephen F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j92t-7286b6e326db6a69d18018d1e84370fe3862404af8c844d8f78a2faf560815a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Applied sociology</topic><topic>Group identity</topic><topic>Identity crises</topic><topic>Marxist sociology</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Public sociology</topic><topic>Reflections on Applied Sociology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social theories</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hauser, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feltey, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glass, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarisbrick-Hauser, AnneMarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolley, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Sociological practice (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hauser, William J.</au><au>Feltey, Kathryn</au><au>Glass, John E.</au><au>Scarisbrick-Hauser, AnneMarie</au><au>Stolley, Kathy</au><au>Steele, Stephen F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS: AN IDENTITY CRISIS IN SOCIOLOGY?</atitle><jtitle>Sociological practice (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>51-58</pages><issn>1522-3442</issn><eissn>1573-787X</eissn><abstract>As the discipline of American sociology enters its second century, the debate over its goals and purpose still remains. This philosophical debate can no longer continue if sociology expects to survive and thrive as a discipline in the twenty-first century. How will the discipline be judged by a society in need of solutions to problems? Does the discipline have an identity crisis or is it in urgent need of defining and setting its direction for the future? The following symposium discusses what twenty-first century sociology might look like and then links it back to the founding principles. It then discusses whether an identity crisis exists and how sociology can better be defined within and outside the discipline.</abstract><pub>The Society for Applied Sociology and the Sociological Practice Association</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-3442 |
ispartof | Sociological practice (New York, N.Y.), 2004-04, Vol.6 (1), p.51-58 |
issn | 1522-3442 1573-787X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_43735891 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Applied sociology Group identity Identity crises Marxist sociology Objectivity Public sociology Reflections on Applied Sociology Social research Social theories Sociology Visual perception |
title | THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS: AN IDENTITY CRISIS IN SOCIOLOGY? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A32%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THROUGH%20THE%20LOOKING%20GLASS:%20AN%20IDENTITY%20CRISIS%20IN%20SOCIOLOGY?&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20practice%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Hauser,%20William%20J.&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=51-58&rft.issn=1522-3442&rft.eissn=1573-787X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E43735891%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43735891&rfr_iscdi=true |