SENTENCE AND POEM

Archibald Hill has proposed that the chaotic word order of a Cummings poem ("nonsun blob a") can be rearranged so that clear sentences emerge. He has made a version of the poem in this way, but that version is questionable, not on the ground that such work is out of order, but on the groun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Style (University Park, PA) PA), 1971-01, Vol.5 (1), p.26-36
1. Verfasser: Gunter, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Style (University Park, PA)
container_volume 5
creator Gunter, Richard
description Archibald Hill has proposed that the chaotic word order of a Cummings poem ("nonsun blob a") can be rearranged so that clear sentences emerge. He has made a version of the poem in this way, but that version is questionable, not on the ground that such work is out of order, but on the ground that the biases of a linguistic theory, generative grammar, have led Hill to treat each sentence separately, as if each were isolated from the rest of the poem. A second version of the poem, arrived at through rearrangement of the word order, but with an eye to the overall meaning of the poem, is offered as a counter to Hill's. The argument is made that users of language, when they are behaving naturally, always assume that there will be overall meaning in any text—conversation, novel or poem.A hearer or reader always interprets a sentence in light of the rest of the text. Sometimes he may be led to interpret erroneously, but he must interpret. A more prudent linguistic theory will take account of this fact.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_42945081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42945081</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42945081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_429450813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDC21DUxMrbgYOAqLs4yMDA0MrQw4mQQDHb1C3H1c3ZVcPRzUQjwd_XlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMsm6uIc4eulnFJflF8QVFmbmJRZXxJkaWJqYGFobGhOQBNlcgkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SENTENCE AND POEM</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Gunter, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Gunter, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Archibald Hill has proposed that the chaotic word order of a Cummings poem ("nonsun blob a") can be rearranged so that clear sentences emerge. He has made a version of the poem in this way, but that version is questionable, not on the ground that such work is out of order, but on the ground that the biases of a linguistic theory, generative grammar, have led Hill to treat each sentence separately, as if each were isolated from the rest of the poem. A second version of the poem, arrived at through rearrangement of the word order, but with an eye to the overall meaning of the poem, is offered as a counter to Hill's. The argument is made that users of language, when they are behaving naturally, always assume that there will be overall meaning in any text—conversation, novel or poem.A hearer or reader always interprets a sentence in light of the rest of the text. Sometimes he may be led to interpret erroneously, but he must interpret. A more prudent linguistic theory will take account of this fact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-4238</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Arkansas</publisher><subject>Birds ; Discourse ; Interrogative sentences ; Language ; Poetic themes ; Poetry ; Sentences ; Syntax ; Word order</subject><ispartof>Style (University Park, PA), 1971-01, Vol.5 (1), p.26-36</ispartof><rights>Copyright Department of English University of Arkansas, 1971</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42945081$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42945081$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gunter, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>SENTENCE AND POEM</title><title>Style (University Park, PA)</title><description>Archibald Hill has proposed that the chaotic word order of a Cummings poem ("nonsun blob a") can be rearranged so that clear sentences emerge. He has made a version of the poem in this way, but that version is questionable, not on the ground that such work is out of order, but on the ground that the biases of a linguistic theory, generative grammar, have led Hill to treat each sentence separately, as if each were isolated from the rest of the poem. A second version of the poem, arrived at through rearrangement of the word order, but with an eye to the overall meaning of the poem, is offered as a counter to Hill's. The argument is made that users of language, when they are behaving naturally, always assume that there will be overall meaning in any text—conversation, novel or poem.A hearer or reader always interprets a sentence in light of the rest of the text. Sometimes he may be led to interpret erroneously, but he must interpret. A more prudent linguistic theory will take account of this fact.</description><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Interrogative sentences</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Poetic themes</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Word order</subject><issn>0039-4238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1971</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDC21DUxMrbgYOAqLs4yMDA0MrQw4mQQDHb1C3H1c3ZVcPRzUQjwd_XlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMsm6uIc4eulnFJflF8QVFmbmJRZXxJkaWJqYGFobGhOQBNlcgkg</recordid><startdate>19710101</startdate><enddate>19710101</enddate><creator>Gunter, Richard</creator><general>University of Arkansas</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19710101</creationdate><title>SENTENCE AND POEM</title><author>Gunter, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_429450813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1971</creationdate><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Interrogative sentences</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Poetic themes</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Word order</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gunter, Richard</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Style (University Park, PA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gunter, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SENTENCE AND POEM</atitle><jtitle>Style (University Park, PA)</jtitle><date>1971-01-01</date><risdate>1971</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>26-36</pages><issn>0039-4238</issn><abstract>Archibald Hill has proposed that the chaotic word order of a Cummings poem ("nonsun blob a") can be rearranged so that clear sentences emerge. He has made a version of the poem in this way, but that version is questionable, not on the ground that such work is out of order, but on the ground that the biases of a linguistic theory, generative grammar, have led Hill to treat each sentence separately, as if each were isolated from the rest of the poem. A second version of the poem, arrived at through rearrangement of the word order, but with an eye to the overall meaning of the poem, is offered as a counter to Hill's. The argument is made that users of language, when they are behaving naturally, always assume that there will be overall meaning in any text—conversation, novel or poem.A hearer or reader always interprets a sentence in light of the rest of the text. Sometimes he may be led to interpret erroneously, but he must interpret. A more prudent linguistic theory will take account of this fact.</abstract><pub>University of Arkansas</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-4238
ispartof Style (University Park, PA), 1971-01, Vol.5 (1), p.26-36
issn 0039-4238
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_42945081
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Birds
Discourse
Interrogative sentences
Language
Poetic themes
Poetry
Sentences
Syntax
Word order
title SENTENCE AND POEM
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T15%3A56%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SENTENCE%20AND%20POEM&rft.jtitle=Style%20(University%20Park,%20PA)&rft.au=Gunter,%20Richard&rft.date=1971-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=26-36&rft.issn=0039-4238&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E42945081%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42945081&rfr_iscdi=true