An Empirical Analysis Of A Cumulative/Re-Work Testing Strategy: Its Effect On Student Performance in Principles Of Finance
This paper examines the effectiveness of a cumulative/rework testing strategy (CRTS) in principles offínance course. We find evidence suggesting that CRTS adversely affected student performance although students had a positive perception of CRTS. The empirical results are robust to different estimat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of financial education 2004-12, Vol.30, p.16-31 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 31 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 16 |
| container_title | Journal of financial education |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Chan, Kam C. Shum, Connie |
| description | This paper examines the effectiveness of a cumulative/rework testing strategy (CRTS) in principles offínance course. We find evidence suggesting that CRTS adversely affected student performance although students had a positive perception of CRTS. The empirical results are robust to different estimation methods and different performance measures. The fíndings of this study are in contrast with the literature in psychology and accounting. We conjecture that the mechanics of responding to CRTS may be different with respect to different disciplines or different student academic standings and students may not study as hard as they should since they know that they can rework the missed problems. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_41948472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41948472</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41948472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_419484723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjMFqwkAURYdiobH1EwrvB4JJJrWmuyCRdqVYQXcypG_k2clLeDMR0q-vLe5dXc45cO9UlGmdxXmW7kcqSpJCx7qYpQ9q7P0puXD6Mo_UT8lQNR0J1cZBycYNnjysLJSw6JvemUBnnG4w3rXyDVv0gfgIn0FMwOPwBh_BQ2Ut1gFWfPH9F3KANYptpTFcIxDDWohr6hz-Py-J_8KTurfGeZxc91E9L6vt4j0--dDKoRNqjAyHPC3yef6a6Vv9F76kShU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Empirical Analysis Of A Cumulative/Re-Work Testing Strategy: Its Effect On Student Performance in Principles Of Finance</title><source>JSTOR Complete Journals</source><creator>Chan, Kam C. ; Shum, Connie</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kam C. ; Shum, Connie</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the effectiveness of a cumulative/rework testing strategy (CRTS) in principles offínance course. We find evidence suggesting that CRTS adversely affected student performance although students had a positive perception of CRTS. The empirical results are robust to different estimation methods and different performance measures. The fíndings of this study are in contrast with the literature in psychology and accounting. We conjecture that the mechanics of responding to CRTS may be different with respect to different disciplines or different student academic standings and students may not study as hard as they should since they know that they can rework the missed problems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-3961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2332-421X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Financial Education Association</publisher><subject>Censorship ; Descriptive statistics ; Education credits ; Educational research ; Finance ; Financial accounting ; Grade point average ; Psychology ; Sampling bias ; Student surveys</subject><ispartof>Journal of financial education, 2004-12, Vol.30, p.16-31</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Journal of Financial Education, Jean L. Heck</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41948472$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41948472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shum, Connie</creatorcontrib><title>An Empirical Analysis Of A Cumulative/Re-Work Testing Strategy: Its Effect On Student Performance in Principles Of Finance</title><title>Journal of financial education</title><description>This paper examines the effectiveness of a cumulative/rework testing strategy (CRTS) in principles offínance course. We find evidence suggesting that CRTS adversely affected student performance although students had a positive perception of CRTS. The empirical results are robust to different estimation methods and different performance measures. The fíndings of this study are in contrast with the literature in psychology and accounting. We conjecture that the mechanics of responding to CRTS may be different with respect to different disciplines or different student academic standings and students may not study as hard as they should since they know that they can rework the missed problems.</description><subject>Censorship</subject><subject>Descriptive statistics</subject><subject>Education credits</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Financial accounting</subject><subject>Grade point average</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Sampling bias</subject><subject>Student surveys</subject><issn>0093-3961</issn><issn>2332-421X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFjMFqwkAURYdiobH1EwrvB4JJJrWmuyCRdqVYQXcypG_k2clLeDMR0q-vLe5dXc45cO9UlGmdxXmW7kcqSpJCx7qYpQ9q7P0puXD6Mo_UT8lQNR0J1cZBycYNnjysLJSw6JvemUBnnG4w3rXyDVv0gfgIn0FMwOPwBh_BQ2Ut1gFWfPH9F3KANYptpTFcIxDDWohr6hz-Py-J_8KTurfGeZxc91E9L6vt4j0--dDKoRNqjAyHPC3yef6a6Vv9F76kShU</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>Chan, Kam C.</creator><creator>Shum, Connie</creator><general>Financial Education Association</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>An Empirical Analysis Of A Cumulative/Re-Work Testing Strategy: Its Effect On Student Performance in Principles Of Finance</title><author>Chan, Kam C. ; Shum, Connie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_419484723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Censorship</topic><topic>Descriptive statistics</topic><topic>Education credits</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Financial accounting</topic><topic>Grade point average</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Sampling bias</topic><topic>Student surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shum, Connie</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of financial education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Kam C.</au><au>Shum, Connie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Empirical Analysis Of A Cumulative/Re-Work Testing Strategy: Its Effect On Student Performance in Principles Of Finance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of financial education</jtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>30</volume><spage>16</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>16-31</pages><issn>0093-3961</issn><eissn>2332-421X</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the effectiveness of a cumulative/rework testing strategy (CRTS) in principles offínance course. We find evidence suggesting that CRTS adversely affected student performance although students had a positive perception of CRTS. The empirical results are robust to different estimation methods and different performance measures. The fíndings of this study are in contrast with the literature in psychology and accounting. We conjecture that the mechanics of responding to CRTS may be different with respect to different disciplines or different student academic standings and students may not study as hard as they should since they know that they can rework the missed problems.</abstract><pub>Financial Education Association</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0093-3961 |
| ispartof | Journal of financial education, 2004-12, Vol.30, p.16-31 |
| issn | 0093-3961 2332-421X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_41948472 |
| source | JSTOR Complete Journals |
| subjects | Censorship Descriptive statistics Education credits Educational research Finance Financial accounting Grade point average Psychology Sampling bias Student surveys |
| title | An Empirical Analysis Of A Cumulative/Re-Work Testing Strategy: Its Effect On Student Performance in Principles Of Finance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Empirical%20Analysis%20Of%20A%20Cumulative/Re-Work%20Testing%20Strategy:%20Its%20Effect%20On%20Student%20Performance%20in%20Principles%20Of%20Finance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20financial%20education&rft.au=Chan,%20Kam%20C.&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=16-31&rft.issn=0093-3961&rft.eissn=2332-421X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E41948472%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41948472&rfr_iscdi=true |