The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review
This review summarizes experimental evidence from advertising and related disciplines on the effects of physically attractive communicators and models on opinion change, product evaluation, source perception, and recall, among other dependent measures. The evidence indicates that attractive (vs. una...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of advertising 1982-10, Vol.11 (3), p.15-24 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 24 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 15 |
container_title | Journal of advertising |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Joseph, W. Benoy |
description | This review summarizes experimental evidence from advertising and related disciplines on the effects of physically attractive communicators and models on opinion change, product evaluation, source perception, and recall, among other dependent measures. The evidence indicates that attractive (vs. unattractive) communicators consistently are liked more, are perceived in more favorable terms, and have a positive impact on the products with which they are associated. Source attractiveness is also related positively to agreement although the effects appear to be less consistent, especially when the communicator is female. The review includes a critical assessment of previous studies and presents specific directions for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00913367.1982.10672807 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_4188405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4188405</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4188405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-c889b57908a1389fdd709eb78a15faf32e5f3dc9954b1e96d54a00e5ad1dfd273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_QGTxvnWy2WwST5biFxQUqeeQbhKasm1qsm3Zf2-WWo-ay5CZ552BB6EbDCMMHO4ABCakYiMseJFaFSs4sBM0wJSynHGgp2jQQ3lPnaOLGJeQHhV4gB5mC5NNgtFu7hrXdpm32fuii65WTdNl47YNqm7dLkF-tdquU7_1Id5n4-zD7JzZX6Izq5porn7qEH0-Pc4mL_n07fl1Mp7mNalEm9ecizllArjChAurNQNh5ix9qVWWFIZaomshaDnHRlSalgrAUKWxtrpgZIhuD3s3wX9tTWzl0m_DOp2UBaloBYJWf0LASwoE95uqA1QHH2MwVm6CW6nQSQyyNyqPRmVvVB6NpuD1IbiMycFvqsScl0DTeHwYu7X1YaX2PjRatqprfLBBrWsXJfnnxDdBXYVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208450317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Joseph, W. Benoy</creator><creatorcontrib>Joseph, W. Benoy</creatorcontrib><description>This review summarizes experimental evidence from advertising and related disciplines on the effects of physically attractive communicators and models on opinion change, product evaluation, source perception, and recall, among other dependent measures. The evidence indicates that attractive (vs. unattractive) communicators consistently are liked more, are perceived in more favorable terms, and have a positive impact on the products with which they are associated. Source attractiveness is also related positively to agreement although the effects appear to be less consistent, especially when the communicator is female. The review includes a critical assessment of previous studies and presents specific directions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-3367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00913367.1982.10672807</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOADD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Provo: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Advertising research ; Automobiles ; Brands ; Children ; Communication models ; Consumers ; Credibility ; Effectiveness ; Empirical evidence ; Impacts ; Marketing ; Men ; Modeling ; Perceptions ; Physical ; Social psychology ; Women ; Writers</subject><ispartof>Journal of advertising, 1982-10, Vol.11 (3), p.15-24</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1982</rights><rights>Copyright 1982 American Academy of Advertising</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Advertising 1982</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-c889b57908a1389fdd709eb78a15faf32e5f3dc9954b1e96d54a00e5ad1dfd273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-c889b57908a1389fdd709eb78a15faf32e5f3dc9954b1e96d54a00e5ad1dfd273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4188405$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4188405$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joseph, W. Benoy</creatorcontrib><title>The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review</title><title>Journal of advertising</title><description>This review summarizes experimental evidence from advertising and related disciplines on the effects of physically attractive communicators and models on opinion change, product evaluation, source perception, and recall, among other dependent measures. The evidence indicates that attractive (vs. unattractive) communicators consistently are liked more, are perceived in more favorable terms, and have a positive impact on the products with which they are associated. Source attractiveness is also related positively to agreement although the effects appear to be less consistent, especially when the communicator is female. The review includes a critical assessment of previous studies and presents specific directions for future research.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Advertising research</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Communication models</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Empirical evidence</subject><subject>Impacts</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physical</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>0091-3367</issn><issn>1557-7805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_QGTxvnWy2WwST5biFxQUqeeQbhKasm1qsm3Zf2-WWo-ay5CZ552BB6EbDCMMHO4ABCakYiMseJFaFSs4sBM0wJSynHGgp2jQQ3lPnaOLGJeQHhV4gB5mC5NNgtFu7hrXdpm32fuii65WTdNl47YNqm7dLkF-tdquU7_1Id5n4-zD7JzZX6Izq5porn7qEH0-Pc4mL_n07fl1Mp7mNalEm9ecizllArjChAurNQNh5ix9qVWWFIZaomshaDnHRlSalgrAUKWxtrpgZIhuD3s3wX9tTWzl0m_DOp2UBaloBYJWf0LASwoE95uqA1QHH2MwVm6CW6nQSQyyNyqPRmVvVB6NpuD1IbiMycFvqsScl0DTeHwYu7X1YaX2PjRatqprfLBBrWsXJfnnxDdBXYVY</recordid><startdate>19821001</startdate><enddate>19821001</enddate><creator>Joseph, W. Benoy</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Board of Directors, American Academy of Advertising</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19821001</creationdate><title>The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review</title><author>Joseph, W. Benoy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-c889b57908a1389fdd709eb78a15faf32e5f3dc9954b1e96d54a00e5ad1dfd273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Advertising research</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Communication models</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Empirical evidence</topic><topic>Impacts</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physical</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joseph, W. Benoy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Archive</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of advertising</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joseph, W. Benoy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advertising</jtitle><date>1982-10-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>15-24</pages><issn>0091-3367</issn><eissn>1557-7805</eissn><coden>JOADD7</coden><abstract>This review summarizes experimental evidence from advertising and related disciplines on the effects of physically attractive communicators and models on opinion change, product evaluation, source perception, and recall, among other dependent measures. The evidence indicates that attractive (vs. unattractive) communicators consistently are liked more, are perceived in more favorable terms, and have a positive impact on the products with which they are associated. Source attractiveness is also related positively to agreement although the effects appear to be less consistent, especially when the communicator is female. The review includes a critical assessment of previous studies and presents specific directions for future research.</abstract><cop>Provo</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00913367.1982.10672807</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-3367 |
ispartof | Journal of advertising, 1982-10, Vol.11 (3), p.15-24 |
issn | 0091-3367 1557-7805 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_4188405 |
source | Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Advertising Advertising research Automobiles Brands Children Communication models Consumers Credibility Effectiveness Empirical evidence Impacts Marketing Men Modeling Perceptions Physical Social psychology Women Writers |
title | The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Credibility%20of%20Physically%20Attractive%20Communicators:%20A%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advertising&rft.au=Joseph,%20W.%20Benoy&rft.date=1982-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=15-24&rft.issn=0091-3367&rft.eissn=1557-7805&rft.coden=JOADD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00913367.1982.10672807&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4188405%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208450317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4188405&rfr_iscdi=true |