Lifting options for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering: advantages of tethered balloon systems

The Royal Society report Geoengineering the Climate identified solar radiation management using albedo-enhancing aerosols injected into the stratosphere as the most affordable and effective option for geoengineering, but did not consider in any detail the options for delivery. This paper provides ou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences physical, and engineering sciences, 2012-09, Vol.370 (1974), p.4263-4300
Hauptverfasser: Davidson, Peter, Burgoyne, Chris, Hunt, Hugh, Causier, Matt
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4300
container_issue 1974
container_start_page 4263
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences
container_volume 370
creator Davidson, Peter
Burgoyne, Chris
Hunt, Hugh
Causier, Matt
description The Royal Society report Geoengineering the Climate identified solar radiation management using albedo-enhancing aerosols injected into the stratosphere as the most affordable and effective option for geoengineering, but did not consider in any detail the options for delivery. This paper provides outline engineering analyses of the options, both for batch-delivery processes, following up on previous work for artillery shells, missiles, aircraft and free-flying balloons, as well as a more lengthy analysis of continuous-delivery systems that require a pipe connected to the ground and supported at a height of 20km, either by a tower or by a tethered balloon. Towers are shown not to be practical, but a tethered balloon delivery system, with high-pressure pumping, appears to have much lower operating and capital costs than all other delivery options. Instead of transporting sulphuric acid mist precursors, such a system could also be used to transport slurries of high refractive index particles such as coated titanium dioxide. The use of such particles would allow useful experiments on opacity, coagulation and atmospheric chemistry at modest rates so as not to perturb regional or global climatic conditions, thus reducing scale-up risks. Criteria for particle choice are discussed, including the need to minimize or prevent ozone destruction. The paper estimates the time scales and relatively modest costs required if a tethered balloon system were to be introduced in a measured way with testing and development work proceeding over three decades, rather than in an emergency. The manufacture of a tether capable of sustaining the high tensions and internal pressures needed, as well as strong winds, is a significant challenge, as is the development of the necessary pumping and dispersion technologies. The greatest challenge may be the manufacture and launch of very large balloons, but means have been identified to significantly reduce the size of such balloons or aerostats.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rsta.2011.0639
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_royal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_41582873</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41582873</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41582873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-b1afbf198274549db4d4a5612ecd00ec2572f963b5eb77816f828cd989c440553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEoqWwZQfykk0Gvx2zq8qjSCMh0YIqNsZJboKnmTjYTsXw6_GQMhJCwMqP8_lc-ZyieEzwimBdPQ8x2RXFhKywZPpOcUy4IiXVkt7NeyZ5KTC7OioexLjBGZOC3i-OKK2kVlofF5_Xrktu7JGfkvNjRJ0PKKZgk4_TFwiuQRaCj35APXgYezdCvh37F8i2N3ZMtoeIfIcSpIxDi2o7DN6PKO5igm18WNzr7BDh0e16Unx4_ery7Lxcv3vz9ux0XTZC0VTWxHZ1R3RFFRdctzVvuRWSUGhajKGhmeq0ZLWAWqmKyK6iVdPqSjecYyHYSfFs8Z2C_zpDTGbrYgPDYEfwczREZFtBSI7pvyhmVOXoKM7oakGbnEEM0JkpuK0NuwyZfQFmX4DZF2D2BeQHT2-953oL7QH_lXgG2AIEv8t5-MZB2pmNn8OYj3-3vf7Xq_cXl6c3TGFHtOIGV4xgwaQg5rubFqssGhfjDOYn8rv9n9OeLNM2Mflw-AMnIoeuWNbLRXe54m8H3YZrIxVTwnysuLl4uWafrs654ewHV5fPvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032736420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lifting options for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering: advantages of tethered balloon systems</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics &amp; Statistics</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Davidson, Peter ; Burgoyne, Chris ; Hunt, Hugh ; Causier, Matt</creator><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Peter ; Burgoyne, Chris ; Hunt, Hugh ; Causier, Matt</creatorcontrib><description>The Royal Society report Geoengineering the Climate identified solar radiation management using albedo-enhancing aerosols injected into the stratosphere as the most affordable and effective option for geoengineering, but did not consider in any detail the options for delivery. This paper provides outline engineering analyses of the options, both for batch-delivery processes, following up on previous work for artillery shells, missiles, aircraft and free-flying balloons, as well as a more lengthy analysis of continuous-delivery systems that require a pipe connected to the ground and supported at a height of 20km, either by a tower or by a tethered balloon. Towers are shown not to be practical, but a tethered balloon delivery system, with high-pressure pumping, appears to have much lower operating and capital costs than all other delivery options. Instead of transporting sulphuric acid mist precursors, such a system could also be used to transport slurries of high refractive index particles such as coated titanium dioxide. The use of such particles would allow useful experiments on opacity, coagulation and atmospheric chemistry at modest rates so as not to perturb regional or global climatic conditions, thus reducing scale-up risks. Criteria for particle choice are discussed, including the need to minimize or prevent ozone destruction. The paper estimates the time scales and relatively modest costs required if a tethered balloon system were to be introduced in a measured way with testing and development work proceeding over three decades, rather than in an emergency. The manufacture of a tether capable of sustaining the high tensions and internal pressures needed, as well as strong winds, is a significant challenge, as is the development of the necessary pumping and dispersion technologies. The greatest challenge may be the manufacture and launch of very large balloons, but means have been identified to significantly reduce the size of such balloons or aerostats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-503X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2962</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0639</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22869799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society Publishing</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Altitude ; Balloons ; Capital costs ; Climate Change ; Cost estimates ; Geoengineering ; Missiles ; Operating costs ; Stratosphere ; Stratospheric Particle Injection ; Tethered Balloons</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2012-09, Vol.370 (1974), p.4263-4300</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT © 2012 The Royal Society</rights><rights>This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-b1afbf198274549db4d4a5612ecd00ec2572f963b5eb77816f828cd989c440553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-b1afbf198274549db4d4a5612ecd00ec2572f963b5eb77816f828cd989c440553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41582873$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41582873$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,829,27905,27906,58002,58235</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22869799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgoyne, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causier, Matt</creatorcontrib><title>Lifting options for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering: advantages of tethered balloon systems</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</addtitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</addtitle><description>The Royal Society report Geoengineering the Climate identified solar radiation management using albedo-enhancing aerosols injected into the stratosphere as the most affordable and effective option for geoengineering, but did not consider in any detail the options for delivery. This paper provides outline engineering analyses of the options, both for batch-delivery processes, following up on previous work for artillery shells, missiles, aircraft and free-flying balloons, as well as a more lengthy analysis of continuous-delivery systems that require a pipe connected to the ground and supported at a height of 20km, either by a tower or by a tethered balloon. Towers are shown not to be practical, but a tethered balloon delivery system, with high-pressure pumping, appears to have much lower operating and capital costs than all other delivery options. Instead of transporting sulphuric acid mist precursors, such a system could also be used to transport slurries of high refractive index particles such as coated titanium dioxide. The use of such particles would allow useful experiments on opacity, coagulation and atmospheric chemistry at modest rates so as not to perturb regional or global climatic conditions, thus reducing scale-up risks. Criteria for particle choice are discussed, including the need to minimize or prevent ozone destruction. The paper estimates the time scales and relatively modest costs required if a tethered balloon system were to be introduced in a measured way with testing and development work proceeding over three decades, rather than in an emergency. The manufacture of a tether capable of sustaining the high tensions and internal pressures needed, as well as strong winds, is a significant challenge, as is the development of the necessary pumping and dispersion technologies. The greatest challenge may be the manufacture and launch of very large balloons, but means have been identified to significantly reduce the size of such balloons or aerostats.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Balloons</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Geoengineering</subject><subject>Missiles</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Stratosphere</subject><subject>Stratospheric Particle Injection</subject><subject>Tethered Balloons</subject><issn>1364-503X</issn><issn>1471-2962</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEoqWwZQfykk0Gvx2zq8qjSCMh0YIqNsZJboKnmTjYTsXw6_GQMhJCwMqP8_lc-ZyieEzwimBdPQ8x2RXFhKywZPpOcUy4IiXVkt7NeyZ5KTC7OioexLjBGZOC3i-OKK2kVlofF5_Xrktu7JGfkvNjRJ0PKKZgk4_TFwiuQRaCj35APXgYezdCvh37F8i2N3ZMtoeIfIcSpIxDi2o7DN6PKO5igm18WNzr7BDh0e16Unx4_ery7Lxcv3vz9ux0XTZC0VTWxHZ1R3RFFRdctzVvuRWSUGhajKGhmeq0ZLWAWqmKyK6iVdPqSjecYyHYSfFs8Z2C_zpDTGbrYgPDYEfwczREZFtBSI7pvyhmVOXoKM7oakGbnEEM0JkpuK0NuwyZfQFmX4DZF2D2BeQHT2-953oL7QH_lXgG2AIEv8t5-MZB2pmNn8OYj3-3vf7Xq_cXl6c3TGFHtOIGV4xgwaQg5rubFqssGhfjDOYn8rv9n9OeLNM2Mflw-AMnIoeuWNbLRXe54m8H3YZrIxVTwnysuLl4uWafrs654ewHV5fPvg</recordid><startdate>20120913</startdate><enddate>20120913</enddate><creator>Davidson, Peter</creator><creator>Burgoyne, Chris</creator><creator>Hunt, Hugh</creator><creator>Causier, Matt</creator><general>The Royal Society Publishing</general><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120913</creationdate><title>Lifting options for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering: advantages of tethered balloon systems</title><author>Davidson, Peter ; Burgoyne, Chris ; Hunt, Hugh ; Causier, Matt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-b1afbf198274549db4d4a5612ecd00ec2572f963b5eb77816f828cd989c440553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Balloons</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Geoengineering</topic><topic>Missiles</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Stratosphere</topic><topic>Stratospheric Particle Injection</topic><topic>Tethered Balloons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgoyne, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causier, Matt</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davidson, Peter</au><au>Burgoyne, Chris</au><au>Hunt, Hugh</au><au>Causier, Matt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lifting options for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering: advantages of tethered balloon systems</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</stitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</addtitle><date>2012-09-13</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>370</volume><issue>1974</issue><spage>4263</spage><epage>4300</epage><pages>4263-4300</pages><issn>1364-503X</issn><eissn>1471-2962</eissn><abstract>The Royal Society report Geoengineering the Climate identified solar radiation management using albedo-enhancing aerosols injected into the stratosphere as the most affordable and effective option for geoengineering, but did not consider in any detail the options for delivery. This paper provides outline engineering analyses of the options, both for batch-delivery processes, following up on previous work for artillery shells, missiles, aircraft and free-flying balloons, as well as a more lengthy analysis of continuous-delivery systems that require a pipe connected to the ground and supported at a height of 20km, either by a tower or by a tethered balloon. Towers are shown not to be practical, but a tethered balloon delivery system, with high-pressure pumping, appears to have much lower operating and capital costs than all other delivery options. Instead of transporting sulphuric acid mist precursors, such a system could also be used to transport slurries of high refractive index particles such as coated titanium dioxide. The use of such particles would allow useful experiments on opacity, coagulation and atmospheric chemistry at modest rates so as not to perturb regional or global climatic conditions, thus reducing scale-up risks. Criteria for particle choice are discussed, including the need to minimize or prevent ozone destruction. The paper estimates the time scales and relatively modest costs required if a tethered balloon system were to be introduced in a measured way with testing and development work proceeding over three decades, rather than in an emergency. The manufacture of a tether capable of sustaining the high tensions and internal pressures needed, as well as strong winds, is a significant challenge, as is the development of the necessary pumping and dispersion technologies. The greatest challenge may be the manufacture and launch of very large balloons, but means have been identified to significantly reduce the size of such balloons or aerostats.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society Publishing</pub><pmid>22869799</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsta.2011.0639</doi><tpages>38</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-503X
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2012-09, Vol.370 (1974), p.4263-4300
issn 1364-503X
1471-2962
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_41582873
source JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Aerosols
Altitude
Balloons
Capital costs
Climate Change
Cost estimates
Geoengineering
Missiles
Operating costs
Stratosphere
Stratospheric Particle Injection
Tethered Balloons
title Lifting options for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering: advantages of tethered balloon systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T01%3A33%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_royal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lifting%20options%20for%20stratospheric%20aerosol%20geoengineering:%20advantages%20of%20tethered%20balloon%20systems&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20A:%20Mathematical,%20physical,%20and%20engineering%20sciences&rft.au=Davidson,%20Peter&rft.date=2012-09-13&rft.volume=370&rft.issue=1974&rft.spage=4263&rft.epage=4300&rft.pages=4263-4300&rft.issn=1364-503X&rft.eissn=1471-2962&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsta.2011.0639&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_royal%3E41582873%3C/jstor_royal%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032736420&rft_id=info:pmid/22869799&rft_jstor_id=41582873&rfr_iscdi=true