Benthic secondary production in eight oligotrophic arctic Alaskan lakes

Across aquatic ecosystems, benthic secondary production generally is thought to be limited by autochthonous primary production. We estimated secondary production in 8 oligotrophic arctic lakes of varying morphometric characteristics for which we also had estimates of pelagic and benthic primary prod...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the North American Benthological Society 2010-06, Vol.29 (2), p.465-479
Hauptverfasser: Northington, Robert M, Keyse, Matthew D, Beaty, Steven R, Whalen, Stephen C, Sokol, Eric R, Hershey, Anne E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 479
container_issue 2
container_start_page 465
container_title Journal of the North American Benthological Society
container_volume 29
creator Northington, Robert M
Keyse, Matthew D
Beaty, Steven R
Whalen, Stephen C
Sokol, Eric R
Hershey, Anne E
description Across aquatic ecosystems, benthic secondary production generally is thought to be limited by autochthonous primary production. We estimated secondary production in 8 oligotrophic arctic lakes of varying morphometric characteristics for which we also had estimates of pelagic and benthic primary production during the summer of 2001. Four of the lakes supported similar communities of fish, and 4 were fishless. The size–frequency method was used to calculate cohort production interval (CPI)-corrected lake benthic secondary production and production to biomass (P:B) ratios for all taxa in all lakes. Taxa examined from sediment samples included Baetis spp., Grensia praeterita, and larval chironomids. Larval chironomids had the greatest secondary production overall. Whole-lake benthic secondary production ranged from 1.02 to 20.52 g dry mass m−2 y−1. No significant relationship or trend was found between benthic secondary production and primary production (whole-lake, benthic, or pelagic). A stronger trend (p  =  0.2) suggested higher benthic secondary production in fishless lakes than in lakes with fish, but within fishless lakes, no pattern was found that suggested autochthonous control of benthic secondary production. Our study is unique in that we examined multiple oligotrophic lakes and demonstrated that the secondary production of benthic fauna was, at most, weakly related to autochthonous primary production. This result is in contrast to the commonly accepted paradigm that autochthonous production limits secondary production. We suggest that allochthonous organic matter sources were very important for supporting secondary production in these oligotrophic arctic lakes.
doi_str_mv 10.1899/09-026.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_bioon</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_40792650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1899/09-026.1</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1899/09-026.1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b346t-2c9370c3dc5f1142c38fd547f8351559daf1f7e040a550c6181f42180c56535f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKvgHxByEhG2ziSb_TjWolUoeFHwFtJs0m67bpZke_Dfm2VFT4IwMId5eOfhJeQSYYZFWd5BmQDLZnhEJljyPGE8fz8mEyiKPOGi5KfkLIQdAMM04xOyvDdtv601DUa7tlL-k3beVQfd166ldUtNvdn21DX1xvXedQOqfLxqOm9U2KuWNmpvwjk5saoJ5uJ7T8nb48Pr4ilZvSyfF_NVsuZp1idMRyfQvNLCIqZM88JWIs1twQUKUVbKos0NpKCEAJ1hgTZlWIAWmeDC8im5GXO1dyF4Y2Xn64-oLRHkUICEOCyTGNHbET3oaK02rvMmBLlzB99GRTk2JVF21ZB7_S84glcjuAu98z_fU8hLlgn4DVrXzrXmb70vE4B-8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benthic secondary production in eight oligotrophic arctic Alaskan lakes</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Northington, Robert M ; Keyse, Matthew D ; Beaty, Steven R ; Whalen, Stephen C ; Sokol, Eric R ; Hershey, Anne E</creator><creatorcontrib>Northington, Robert M ; Keyse, Matthew D ; Beaty, Steven R ; Whalen, Stephen C ; Sokol, Eric R ; Hershey, Anne E</creatorcontrib><description>Across aquatic ecosystems, benthic secondary production generally is thought to be limited by autochthonous primary production. We estimated secondary production in 8 oligotrophic arctic lakes of varying morphometric characteristics for which we also had estimates of pelagic and benthic primary production during the summer of 2001. Four of the lakes supported similar communities of fish, and 4 were fishless. The size–frequency method was used to calculate cohort production interval (CPI)-corrected lake benthic secondary production and production to biomass (P:B) ratios for all taxa in all lakes. Taxa examined from sediment samples included Baetis spp., Grensia praeterita, and larval chironomids. Larval chironomids had the greatest secondary production overall. Whole-lake benthic secondary production ranged from 1.02 to 20.52 g dry mass m−2 y−1. No significant relationship or trend was found between benthic secondary production and primary production (whole-lake, benthic, or pelagic). A stronger trend (p  =  0.2) suggested higher benthic secondary production in fishless lakes than in lakes with fish, but within fishless lakes, no pattern was found that suggested autochthonous control of benthic secondary production. Our study is unique in that we examined multiple oligotrophic lakes and demonstrated that the secondary production of benthic fauna was, at most, weakly related to autochthonous primary production. This result is in contrast to the commonly accepted paradigm that autochthonous production limits secondary production. We suggest that allochthonous organic matter sources were very important for supporting secondary production in these oligotrophic arctic lakes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-3593</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-237X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1899/09-026.1</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>arctic lake ; benthos ; Biomass production ; Freshwater fishes ; Glacial lakes ; lake productivity model ; Lentic systems ; Marine fishes ; Primary productivity ; Production estimates ; s ; secondary production ; Secondary productivity ; size–frequency method ; Taxa ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2010-06, Vol.29 (2), p.465-479</ispartof><rights>North American Benthological Society</rights><rights>2010 by The North American Benthological Society</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b346t-2c9370c3dc5f1142c38fd547f8351559daf1f7e040a550c6181f42180c56535f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b346t-2c9370c3dc5f1142c38fd547f8351559daf1f7e040a550c6181f42180c56535f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1899/09-026.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,26978,27924,27925,52363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Northington, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyse, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaty, Steven R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whalen, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokol, Eric R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hershey, Anne E</creatorcontrib><title>Benthic secondary production in eight oligotrophic arctic Alaskan lakes</title><title>Journal of the North American Benthological Society</title><description>Across aquatic ecosystems, benthic secondary production generally is thought to be limited by autochthonous primary production. We estimated secondary production in 8 oligotrophic arctic lakes of varying morphometric characteristics for which we also had estimates of pelagic and benthic primary production during the summer of 2001. Four of the lakes supported similar communities of fish, and 4 were fishless. The size–frequency method was used to calculate cohort production interval (CPI)-corrected lake benthic secondary production and production to biomass (P:B) ratios for all taxa in all lakes. Taxa examined from sediment samples included Baetis spp., Grensia praeterita, and larval chironomids. Larval chironomids had the greatest secondary production overall. Whole-lake benthic secondary production ranged from 1.02 to 20.52 g dry mass m−2 y−1. No significant relationship or trend was found between benthic secondary production and primary production (whole-lake, benthic, or pelagic). A stronger trend (p  =  0.2) suggested higher benthic secondary production in fishless lakes than in lakes with fish, but within fishless lakes, no pattern was found that suggested autochthonous control of benthic secondary production. Our study is unique in that we examined multiple oligotrophic lakes and demonstrated that the secondary production of benthic fauna was, at most, weakly related to autochthonous primary production. This result is in contrast to the commonly accepted paradigm that autochthonous production limits secondary production. We suggest that allochthonous organic matter sources were very important for supporting secondary production in these oligotrophic arctic lakes.</description><subject>arctic lake</subject><subject>benthos</subject><subject>Biomass production</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Glacial lakes</subject><subject>lake productivity model</subject><subject>Lentic systems</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Primary productivity</subject><subject>Production estimates</subject><subject>s</subject><subject>secondary production</subject><subject>Secondary productivity</subject><subject>size–frequency method</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0887-3593</issn><issn>1937-237X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKvgHxByEhG2ziSb_TjWolUoeFHwFtJs0m67bpZke_Dfm2VFT4IwMId5eOfhJeQSYYZFWd5BmQDLZnhEJljyPGE8fz8mEyiKPOGi5KfkLIQdAMM04xOyvDdtv601DUa7tlL-k3beVQfd166ldUtNvdn21DX1xvXedQOqfLxqOm9U2KuWNmpvwjk5saoJ5uJ7T8nb48Pr4ilZvSyfF_NVsuZp1idMRyfQvNLCIqZM88JWIs1twQUKUVbKos0NpKCEAJ1hgTZlWIAWmeDC8im5GXO1dyF4Y2Xn64-oLRHkUICEOCyTGNHbET3oaK02rvMmBLlzB99GRTk2JVF21ZB7_S84glcjuAu98z_fU8hLlgn4DVrXzrXmb70vE4B-8g</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Northington, Robert M</creator><creator>Keyse, Matthew D</creator><creator>Beaty, Steven R</creator><creator>Whalen, Stephen C</creator><creator>Sokol, Eric R</creator><creator>Hershey, Anne E</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Benthic secondary production in eight oligotrophic arctic Alaskan lakes</title><author>Northington, Robert M ; Keyse, Matthew D ; Beaty, Steven R ; Whalen, Stephen C ; Sokol, Eric R ; Hershey, Anne E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b346t-2c9370c3dc5f1142c38fd547f8351559daf1f7e040a550c6181f42180c56535f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>arctic lake</topic><topic>benthos</topic><topic>Biomass production</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Glacial lakes</topic><topic>lake productivity model</topic><topic>Lentic systems</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Primary productivity</topic><topic>Production estimates</topic><topic>s</topic><topic>secondary production</topic><topic>Secondary productivity</topic><topic>size–frequency method</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Northington, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyse, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaty, Steven R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whalen, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokol, Eric R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hershey, Anne E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the North American Benthological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Northington, Robert M</au><au>Keyse, Matthew D</au><au>Beaty, Steven R</au><au>Whalen, Stephen C</au><au>Sokol, Eric R</au><au>Hershey, Anne E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benthic secondary production in eight oligotrophic arctic Alaskan lakes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the North American Benthological Society</jtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>465</spage><epage>479</epage><pages>465-479</pages><issn>0887-3593</issn><eissn>1937-237X</eissn><abstract>Across aquatic ecosystems, benthic secondary production generally is thought to be limited by autochthonous primary production. We estimated secondary production in 8 oligotrophic arctic lakes of varying morphometric characteristics for which we also had estimates of pelagic and benthic primary production during the summer of 2001. Four of the lakes supported similar communities of fish, and 4 were fishless. The size–frequency method was used to calculate cohort production interval (CPI)-corrected lake benthic secondary production and production to biomass (P:B) ratios for all taxa in all lakes. Taxa examined from sediment samples included Baetis spp., Grensia praeterita, and larval chironomids. Larval chironomids had the greatest secondary production overall. Whole-lake benthic secondary production ranged from 1.02 to 20.52 g dry mass m−2 y−1. No significant relationship or trend was found between benthic secondary production and primary production (whole-lake, benthic, or pelagic). A stronger trend (p  =  0.2) suggested higher benthic secondary production in fishless lakes than in lakes with fish, but within fishless lakes, no pattern was found that suggested autochthonous control of benthic secondary production. Our study is unique in that we examined multiple oligotrophic lakes and demonstrated that the secondary production of benthic fauna was, at most, weakly related to autochthonous primary production. This result is in contrast to the commonly accepted paradigm that autochthonous production limits secondary production. We suggest that allochthonous organic matter sources were very important for supporting secondary production in these oligotrophic arctic lakes.</abstract><doi>10.1899/09-026.1</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-3593
ispartof Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2010-06, Vol.29 (2), p.465-479
issn 0887-3593
1937-237X
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_40792650
source BioOne Complete
subjects arctic lake
benthos
Biomass production
Freshwater fishes
Glacial lakes
lake productivity model
Lentic systems
Marine fishes
Primary productivity
Production estimates
s
secondary production
Secondary productivity
size–frequency method
Taxa
Watersheds
title Benthic secondary production in eight oligotrophic arctic Alaskan lakes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A03%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_bioon&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benthic%20secondary%20production%20in%20eight%20oligotrophic%20arctic%20Alaskan%20lakes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20North%20American%20Benthological%20Society&rft.au=Northington,%20Robert%20M&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=465&rft.epage=479&rft.pages=465-479&rft.issn=0887-3593&rft.eissn=1937-237X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1899/09-026.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_bioon%3E10.1899/09-026.1%3C/jstor_bioon%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1899/09-026.1&rfr_iscdi=true