Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean

An understanding of environmental factors governing patchy weed distribution in fields could prove to be a valuable tool in weed management. The objectives of this research were to investigate the relationships between weed distribution patterns and environmental properties in two Mississippi soybea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed science 2001-05, Vol.49 (3), p.367-374
Hauptverfasser: Medlin, Case R., Shaw, David R., Cox, Michael S., Gerard, Patrick D., Abshire, Melinda J., Wardlaw III, Milton C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue 3
container_start_page 367
container_title Weed science
container_volume 49
creator Medlin, Case R.
Shaw, David R.
Cox, Michael S.
Gerard, Patrick D.
Abshire, Melinda J.
Wardlaw III, Milton C.
description An understanding of environmental factors governing patchy weed distribution in fields could prove to be a valuable tool in weed management. The objectives of this research were to investigate the relationships between weed distribution patterns and environmental properties in two Mississippi soybean fields and to construct models based on those relationships to predict weed distribution. Two months before planting, fields were soil sampled on a 60- by 60-m coordinate grid, and samples were analyzed for calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, phosphorus, zinc, cation exchange capacity, percent organic matter, and soil pH. The relative elevation of each sample location was also recorded. Approximately 8 wk after planting, weed populations were estimated on a 30- by 30-m grid over the soil sample grid. Punctual kriging was used to estimate environmental values at each weed sample location. Discriminant analysis techniques were used to evaluate the associations between environmental characteristics on weed population densities of sample areas within each field. Generally, as sicklepod and pitted morningglory infestations increased, the prediction accuracy of the discriminant functions also increased; however, horsenettle infestations were not closely correlated to the environmental properties. Discriminant functions reasonably predicted presence or absence of sicklepod and pitted morningglory within the field. However, validation of the functions across years within the same field and with data collected from the other field resulted in poor classification of all species infestations. Prediction of weed infestations with environmental properties was specific for each field, year, and species. Nomenclature: Horsenettle, Solanum carolinense L. SOLCA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOB; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘DPL 3588’, ‘DPL 3519s’.
doi_str_mv 10.1614/0043-1745%282001%29049%5B0367%3AUSPTPW%5D2.0.CO%3B2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_4046319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4046319</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4046319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1199-c28b727c2a78be96d8d0062d1bf459cc8bc2e2b256bc312239fed6061cd304843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVfyCYS46ps7MfySIeavyEQitt8LjsJpuS0iYlG5D-e1OjPQ3DvLwwDyEPFCZUUn4PwFlEYy5CTBCAhqiAq1A8AZNxyKbZcrFafIXiGScwSeche8IzMqJCQISxUOdkdGq4JFfeb_oOiVSNyGPmq3od-KbaBnvTmp3rXOuDrgn2rSuqvAu-nSuCqi6d70xXNbXvlz5_sM7U1-SiNFvvbv7mmGSvL6v0PZrN3z7S6SyylCoV5ZjYGOMcTZxYp2SRFAASC2pLLlSeJzZHhxaFtDmjiEyVrpAgaV4w4AlnY3I79G5817R631Y70x40By4ZVf35bjiXptFm3VZeZ0sEKvo3FQch-sTnkLBV09Tu1EBBH4H1kUcfefQArH-B9QCs_4F1D6xBp3PdA7Mfhp1vqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Medlin, Case R. ; Shaw, David R. ; Cox, Michael S. ; Gerard, Patrick D. ; Abshire, Melinda J. ; Wardlaw III, Milton C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Medlin, Case R. ; Shaw, David R. ; Cox, Michael S. ; Gerard, Patrick D. ; Abshire, Melinda J. ; Wardlaw III, Milton C.</creatorcontrib><description>An understanding of environmental factors governing patchy weed distribution in fields could prove to be a valuable tool in weed management. The objectives of this research were to investigate the relationships between weed distribution patterns and environmental properties in two Mississippi soybean fields and to construct models based on those relationships to predict weed distribution. Two months before planting, fields were soil sampled on a 60- by 60-m coordinate grid, and samples were analyzed for calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, phosphorus, zinc, cation exchange capacity, percent organic matter, and soil pH. The relative elevation of each sample location was also recorded. Approximately 8 wk after planting, weed populations were estimated on a 30- by 30-m grid over the soil sample grid. Punctual kriging was used to estimate environmental values at each weed sample location. Discriminant analysis techniques were used to evaluate the associations between environmental characteristics on weed population densities of sample areas within each field. Generally, as sicklepod and pitted morningglory infestations increased, the prediction accuracy of the discriminant functions also increased; however, horsenettle infestations were not closely correlated to the environmental properties. Discriminant functions reasonably predicted presence or absence of sicklepod and pitted morningglory within the field. However, validation of the functions across years within the same field and with data collected from the other field resulted in poor classification of all species infestations. Prediction of weed infestations with environmental properties was specific for each field, year, and species. Nomenclature: Horsenettle, Solanum carolinense L. SOLCA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOB; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘DPL 3588’, ‘DPL 3519s’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745%282001%29049%5B0367%3AUSPTPW%5D2.0.CO%3B2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>calcium ; cation exchange capacity ; discriminant analysis ; Discriminants ; environmental factors ; Glycine max ; Infestation ; Ipomoea lacunosa ; kriging ; magnesium ; organic matter ; phosphorus ; planting ; Plants ; population density ; potassium ; prediction ; Senna obtusifolia ; Site-specific weed management ; sodium ; Soil fertility ; Soil pH ; Soil samples ; Soil science ; Solanum carolinense ; Soybeans ; spatial variability ; Weed control ; WEED MANAGEMENT ; Weeds ; zinc</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 2001-05, Vol.49 (3), p.367-374</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/0043-1745%282001%29049%5B0367%3AUSPTPW%5D2.0.CO%3B2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4046319$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,26978,27924,27925,52363,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Medlin, Case R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerard, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abshire, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardlaw III, Milton C.</creatorcontrib><title>Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean</title><title>Weed science</title><description>An understanding of environmental factors governing patchy weed distribution in fields could prove to be a valuable tool in weed management. The objectives of this research were to investigate the relationships between weed distribution patterns and environmental properties in two Mississippi soybean fields and to construct models based on those relationships to predict weed distribution. Two months before planting, fields were soil sampled on a 60- by 60-m coordinate grid, and samples were analyzed for calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, phosphorus, zinc, cation exchange capacity, percent organic matter, and soil pH. The relative elevation of each sample location was also recorded. Approximately 8 wk after planting, weed populations were estimated on a 30- by 30-m grid over the soil sample grid. Punctual kriging was used to estimate environmental values at each weed sample location. Discriminant analysis techniques were used to evaluate the associations between environmental characteristics on weed population densities of sample areas within each field. Generally, as sicklepod and pitted morningglory infestations increased, the prediction accuracy of the discriminant functions also increased; however, horsenettle infestations were not closely correlated to the environmental properties. Discriminant functions reasonably predicted presence or absence of sicklepod and pitted morningglory within the field. However, validation of the functions across years within the same field and with data collected from the other field resulted in poor classification of all species infestations. Prediction of weed infestations with environmental properties was specific for each field, year, and species. Nomenclature: Horsenettle, Solanum carolinense L. SOLCA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOB; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘DPL 3588’, ‘DPL 3519s’.</description><subject>calcium</subject><subject>cation exchange capacity</subject><subject>discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Discriminants</subject><subject>environmental factors</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Infestation</subject><subject>Ipomoea lacunosa</subject><subject>kriging</subject><subject>magnesium</subject><subject>organic matter</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>planting</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>population density</subject><subject>potassium</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Senna obtusifolia</subject><subject>Site-specific weed management</subject><subject>sodium</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil pH</subject><subject>Soil samples</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Solanum carolinense</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>spatial variability</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>WEED MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>zinc</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVfyCYS46ps7MfySIeavyEQitt8LjsJpuS0iYlG5D-e1OjPQ3DvLwwDyEPFCZUUn4PwFlEYy5CTBCAhqiAq1A8AZNxyKbZcrFafIXiGScwSeche8IzMqJCQISxUOdkdGq4JFfeb_oOiVSNyGPmq3od-KbaBnvTmp3rXOuDrgn2rSuqvAu-nSuCqi6d70xXNbXvlz5_sM7U1-SiNFvvbv7mmGSvL6v0PZrN3z7S6SyylCoV5ZjYGOMcTZxYp2SRFAASC2pLLlSeJzZHhxaFtDmjiEyVrpAgaV4w4AlnY3I79G5817R631Y70x40By4ZVf35bjiXptFm3VZeZ0sEKvo3FQch-sTnkLBV09Tu1EBBH4H1kUcfefQArH-B9QCs_4F1D6xBp3PdA7Mfhp1vqg</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>Medlin, Case R.</creator><creator>Shaw, David R.</creator><creator>Cox, Michael S.</creator><creator>Gerard, Patrick D.</creator><creator>Abshire, Melinda J.</creator><creator>Wardlaw III, Milton C.</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean</title><author>Medlin, Case R. ; Shaw, David R. ; Cox, Michael S. ; Gerard, Patrick D. ; Abshire, Melinda J. ; Wardlaw III, Milton C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1199-c28b727c2a78be96d8d0062d1bf459cc8bc2e2b256bc312239fed6061cd304843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>calcium</topic><topic>cation exchange capacity</topic><topic>discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Discriminants</topic><topic>environmental factors</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Infestation</topic><topic>Ipomoea lacunosa</topic><topic>kriging</topic><topic>magnesium</topic><topic>organic matter</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>planting</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>population density</topic><topic>potassium</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Senna obtusifolia</topic><topic>Site-specific weed management</topic><topic>sodium</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil pH</topic><topic>Soil samples</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Solanum carolinense</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>spatial variability</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>WEED MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Medlin, Case R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerard, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abshire, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardlaw III, Milton C.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Medlin, Case R.</au><au>Shaw, David R.</au><au>Cox, Michael S.</au><au>Gerard, Patrick D.</au><au>Abshire, Melinda J.</au><au>Wardlaw III, Milton C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>367-374</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>An understanding of environmental factors governing patchy weed distribution in fields could prove to be a valuable tool in weed management. The objectives of this research were to investigate the relationships between weed distribution patterns and environmental properties in two Mississippi soybean fields and to construct models based on those relationships to predict weed distribution. Two months before planting, fields were soil sampled on a 60- by 60-m coordinate grid, and samples were analyzed for calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, phosphorus, zinc, cation exchange capacity, percent organic matter, and soil pH. The relative elevation of each sample location was also recorded. Approximately 8 wk after planting, weed populations were estimated on a 30- by 30-m grid over the soil sample grid. Punctual kriging was used to estimate environmental values at each weed sample location. Discriminant analysis techniques were used to evaluate the associations between environmental characteristics on weed population densities of sample areas within each field. Generally, as sicklepod and pitted morningglory infestations increased, the prediction accuracy of the discriminant functions also increased; however, horsenettle infestations were not closely correlated to the environmental properties. Discriminant functions reasonably predicted presence or absence of sicklepod and pitted morningglory within the field. However, validation of the functions across years within the same field and with data collected from the other field resulted in poor classification of all species infestations. Prediction of weed infestations with environmental properties was specific for each field, year, and species. Nomenclature: Horsenettle, Solanum carolinense L. SOLCA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOB; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘DPL 3588’, ‘DPL 3519s’.</abstract><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/0043-1745%282001%29049%5B0367%3AUSPTPW%5D2.0.CO%3B2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1745
ispartof Weed science, 2001-05, Vol.49 (3), p.367-374
issn 0043-1745
1550-2759
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_4046319
source BioOne Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects calcium
cation exchange capacity
discriminant analysis
Discriminants
environmental factors
Glycine max
Infestation
Ipomoea lacunosa
kriging
magnesium
organic matter
phosphorus
planting
Plants
population density
potassium
prediction
Senna obtusifolia
Site-specific weed management
sodium
Soil fertility
Soil pH
Soil samples
Soil science
Solanum carolinense
Soybeans
spatial variability
Weed control
WEED MANAGEMENT
Weeds
zinc
title Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A05%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20soil%20parameters%20to%20predict%20weed%20infestations%20in%20soybean&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Medlin,%20Case%20R.&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=367-374&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/0043-1745%25282001%2529049%255B0367%253AUSPTPW%255D2.0.CO%253B2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_fao_a%3E4046319%3C/jstor_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4046319&rfr_iscdi=true