Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean
An understanding of environmental factors governing patchy weed distribution in fields could prove to be a valuable tool in weed management. The objectives of this research were to investigate the relationships between weed distribution patterns and environmental properties in two Mississippi soybea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weed science 2001-05, Vol.49 (3), p.367-374 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 374 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 367 |
container_title | Weed science |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Medlin, Case R. Shaw, David R. Cox, Michael S. Gerard, Patrick D. Abshire, Melinda J. Wardlaw III, Milton C. |
description | An understanding of environmental factors governing patchy weed distribution in fields could prove to be a valuable tool in weed management. The objectives of this research were to investigate the relationships between weed distribution patterns and environmental properties in two Mississippi soybean fields and to construct models based on those relationships to predict weed distribution. Two months before planting, fields were soil sampled on a 60- by 60-m coordinate grid, and samples were analyzed for calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, phosphorus, zinc, cation exchange capacity, percent organic matter, and soil pH. The relative elevation of each sample location was also recorded. Approximately 8 wk after planting, weed populations were estimated on a 30- by 30-m grid over the soil sample grid. Punctual kriging was used to estimate environmental values at each weed sample location. Discriminant analysis techniques were used to evaluate the associations between environmental characteristics on weed population densities of sample areas within each field. Generally, as sicklepod and pitted morningglory infestations increased, the prediction accuracy of the discriminant functions also increased; however, horsenettle infestations were not closely correlated to the environmental properties. Discriminant functions reasonably predicted presence or absence of sicklepod and pitted morningglory within the field. However, validation of the functions across years within the same field and with data collected from the other field resulted in poor classification of all species infestations. Prediction of weed infestations with environmental properties was specific for each field, year, and species. Nomenclature: Horsenettle, Solanum carolinense L. SOLCA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOB; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘DPL 3588’, ‘DPL 3519s’. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1614/0043-1745%282001%29049%5B0367%3AUSPTPW%5D2.0.CO%3B2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_4046319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4046319</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4046319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1199-c28b727c2a78be96d8d0062d1bf459cc8bc2e2b256bc312239fed6061cd304843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVfyCYS46ps7MfySIeavyEQitt8LjsJpuS0iYlG5D-e1OjPQ3DvLwwDyEPFCZUUn4PwFlEYy5CTBCAhqiAq1A8AZNxyKbZcrFafIXiGScwSeche8IzMqJCQISxUOdkdGq4JFfeb_oOiVSNyGPmq3od-KbaBnvTmp3rXOuDrgn2rSuqvAu-nSuCqi6d70xXNbXvlz5_sM7U1-SiNFvvbv7mmGSvL6v0PZrN3z7S6SyylCoV5ZjYGOMcTZxYp2SRFAASC2pLLlSeJzZHhxaFtDmjiEyVrpAgaV4w4AlnY3I79G5817R631Y70x40By4ZVf35bjiXptFm3VZeZ0sEKvo3FQch-sTnkLBV09Tu1EBBH4H1kUcfefQArH-B9QCs_4F1D6xBp3PdA7Mfhp1vqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Medlin, Case R. ; Shaw, David R. ; Cox, Michael S. ; Gerard, Patrick D. ; Abshire, Melinda J. ; Wardlaw III, Milton C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Medlin, Case R. ; Shaw, David R. ; Cox, Michael S. ; Gerard, Patrick D. ; Abshire, Melinda J. ; Wardlaw III, Milton C.</creatorcontrib><description>An understanding of environmental factors governing patchy weed distribution in fields could prove to be a valuable tool in weed management. The objectives of this research were to investigate the relationships between weed distribution patterns and environmental properties in two Mississippi soybean fields and to construct models based on those relationships to predict weed distribution. Two months before planting, fields were soil sampled on a 60- by 60-m coordinate grid, and samples were analyzed for calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, phosphorus, zinc, cation exchange capacity, percent organic matter, and soil pH. The relative elevation of each sample location was also recorded. Approximately 8 wk after planting, weed populations were estimated on a 30- by 30-m grid over the soil sample grid. Punctual kriging was used to estimate environmental values at each weed sample location. Discriminant analysis techniques were used to evaluate the associations between environmental characteristics on weed population densities of sample areas within each field. Generally, as sicklepod and pitted morningglory infestations increased, the prediction accuracy of the discriminant functions also increased; however, horsenettle infestations were not closely correlated to the environmental properties. Discriminant functions reasonably predicted presence or absence of sicklepod and pitted morningglory within the field. However, validation of the functions across years within the same field and with data collected from the other field resulted in poor classification of all species infestations. Prediction of weed infestations with environmental properties was specific for each field, year, and species. Nomenclature: Horsenettle, Solanum carolinense L. SOLCA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOB; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘DPL 3588’, ‘DPL 3519s’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745%282001%29049%5B0367%3AUSPTPW%5D2.0.CO%3B2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>calcium ; cation exchange capacity ; discriminant analysis ; Discriminants ; environmental factors ; Glycine max ; Infestation ; Ipomoea lacunosa ; kriging ; magnesium ; organic matter ; phosphorus ; planting ; Plants ; population density ; potassium ; prediction ; Senna obtusifolia ; Site-specific weed management ; sodium ; Soil fertility ; Soil pH ; Soil samples ; Soil science ; Solanum carolinense ; Soybeans ; spatial variability ; Weed control ; WEED MANAGEMENT ; Weeds ; zinc</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 2001-05, Vol.49 (3), p.367-374</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/0043-1745%282001%29049%5B0367%3AUSPTPW%5D2.0.CO%3B2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4046319$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,26978,27924,27925,52363,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Medlin, Case R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerard, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abshire, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardlaw III, Milton C.</creatorcontrib><title>Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean</title><title>Weed science</title><description>An understanding of environmental factors governing patchy weed distribution in fields could prove to be a valuable tool in weed management. The objectives of this research were to investigate the relationships between weed distribution patterns and environmental properties in two Mississippi soybean fields and to construct models based on those relationships to predict weed distribution. Two months before planting, fields were soil sampled on a 60- by 60-m coordinate grid, and samples were analyzed for calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, phosphorus, zinc, cation exchange capacity, percent organic matter, and soil pH. The relative elevation of each sample location was also recorded. Approximately 8 wk after planting, weed populations were estimated on a 30- by 30-m grid over the soil sample grid. Punctual kriging was used to estimate environmental values at each weed sample location. Discriminant analysis techniques were used to evaluate the associations between environmental characteristics on weed population densities of sample areas within each field. Generally, as sicklepod and pitted morningglory infestations increased, the prediction accuracy of the discriminant functions also increased; however, horsenettle infestations were not closely correlated to the environmental properties. Discriminant functions reasonably predicted presence or absence of sicklepod and pitted morningglory within the field. However, validation of the functions across years within the same field and with data collected from the other field resulted in poor classification of all species infestations. Prediction of weed infestations with environmental properties was specific for each field, year, and species. Nomenclature: Horsenettle, Solanum carolinense L. SOLCA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOB; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘DPL 3588’, ‘DPL 3519s’.</description><subject>calcium</subject><subject>cation exchange capacity</subject><subject>discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Discriminants</subject><subject>environmental factors</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Infestation</subject><subject>Ipomoea lacunosa</subject><subject>kriging</subject><subject>magnesium</subject><subject>organic matter</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>planting</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>population density</subject><subject>potassium</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Senna obtusifolia</subject><subject>Site-specific weed management</subject><subject>sodium</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil pH</subject><subject>Soil samples</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Solanum carolinense</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>spatial variability</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>WEED MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>zinc</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVfyCYS46ps7MfySIeavyEQitt8LjsJpuS0iYlG5D-e1OjPQ3DvLwwDyEPFCZUUn4PwFlEYy5CTBCAhqiAq1A8AZNxyKbZcrFafIXiGScwSeche8IzMqJCQISxUOdkdGq4JFfeb_oOiVSNyGPmq3od-KbaBnvTmp3rXOuDrgn2rSuqvAu-nSuCqi6d70xXNbXvlz5_sM7U1-SiNFvvbv7mmGSvL6v0PZrN3z7S6SyylCoV5ZjYGOMcTZxYp2SRFAASC2pLLlSeJzZHhxaFtDmjiEyVrpAgaV4w4AlnY3I79G5817R631Y70x40By4ZVf35bjiXptFm3VZeZ0sEKvo3FQch-sTnkLBV09Tu1EBBH4H1kUcfefQArH-B9QCs_4F1D6xBp3PdA7Mfhp1vqg</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>Medlin, Case R.</creator><creator>Shaw, David R.</creator><creator>Cox, Michael S.</creator><creator>Gerard, Patrick D.</creator><creator>Abshire, Melinda J.</creator><creator>Wardlaw III, Milton C.</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean</title><author>Medlin, Case R. ; Shaw, David R. ; Cox, Michael S. ; Gerard, Patrick D. ; Abshire, Melinda J. ; Wardlaw III, Milton C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1199-c28b727c2a78be96d8d0062d1bf459cc8bc2e2b256bc312239fed6061cd304843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>calcium</topic><topic>cation exchange capacity</topic><topic>discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Discriminants</topic><topic>environmental factors</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Infestation</topic><topic>Ipomoea lacunosa</topic><topic>kriging</topic><topic>magnesium</topic><topic>organic matter</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>planting</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>population density</topic><topic>potassium</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Senna obtusifolia</topic><topic>Site-specific weed management</topic><topic>sodium</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil pH</topic><topic>Soil samples</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Solanum carolinense</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>spatial variability</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>WEED MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Medlin, Case R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerard, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abshire, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardlaw III, Milton C.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Medlin, Case R.</au><au>Shaw, David R.</au><au>Cox, Michael S.</au><au>Gerard, Patrick D.</au><au>Abshire, Melinda J.</au><au>Wardlaw III, Milton C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>367-374</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>An understanding of environmental factors governing patchy weed distribution in fields could prove to be a valuable tool in weed management. The objectives of this research were to investigate the relationships between weed distribution patterns and environmental properties in two Mississippi soybean fields and to construct models based on those relationships to predict weed distribution. Two months before planting, fields were soil sampled on a 60- by 60-m coordinate grid, and samples were analyzed for calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, phosphorus, zinc, cation exchange capacity, percent organic matter, and soil pH. The relative elevation of each sample location was also recorded. Approximately 8 wk after planting, weed populations were estimated on a 30- by 30-m grid over the soil sample grid. Punctual kriging was used to estimate environmental values at each weed sample location. Discriminant analysis techniques were used to evaluate the associations between environmental characteristics on weed population densities of sample areas within each field. Generally, as sicklepod and pitted morningglory infestations increased, the prediction accuracy of the discriminant functions also increased; however, horsenettle infestations were not closely correlated to the environmental properties. Discriminant functions reasonably predicted presence or absence of sicklepod and pitted morningglory within the field. However, validation of the functions across years within the same field and with data collected from the other field resulted in poor classification of all species infestations. Prediction of weed infestations with environmental properties was specific for each field, year, and species. Nomenclature: Horsenettle, Solanum carolinense L. SOLCA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOB; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘DPL 3588’, ‘DPL 3519s’.</abstract><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/0043-1745%282001%29049%5B0367%3AUSPTPW%5D2.0.CO%3B2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1745 |
ispartof | Weed science, 2001-05, Vol.49 (3), p.367-374 |
issn | 0043-1745 1550-2759 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_4046319 |
source | BioOne Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | calcium cation exchange capacity discriminant analysis Discriminants environmental factors Glycine max Infestation Ipomoea lacunosa kriging magnesium organic matter phosphorus planting Plants population density potassium prediction Senna obtusifolia Site-specific weed management sodium Soil fertility Soil pH Soil samples Soil science Solanum carolinense Soybeans spatial variability Weed control WEED MANAGEMENT Weeds zinc |
title | Using soil parameters to predict weed infestations in soybean |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A05%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20soil%20parameters%20to%20predict%20weed%20infestations%20in%20soybean&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Medlin,%20Case%20R.&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=367-374&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/0043-1745%25282001%2529049%255B0367%253AUSPTPW%255D2.0.CO%253B2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_fao_a%3E4046319%3C/jstor_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4046319&rfr_iscdi=true |