The World Social Forum and global democratisation: Learning from Porto Alegre

Being anti-something can be politically useful, but only up to a point. The search for alternative globalisation projects has been central to the World Social Forum process. The first two forums, held in the Brazilian city of Porto Alegre in 2001 and 2002, provided a wide variety of approaches towar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Third world quarterly 2002-08, Vol.23 (4), p.621-632
1. Verfasser: Teivainen, Teivo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 632
container_issue 4
container_start_page 621
container_title Third world quarterly
container_volume 23
creator Teivainen, Teivo
description Being anti-something can be politically useful, but only up to a point. The search for alternative globalisation projects has been central to the World Social Forum process. The first two forums, held in the Brazilian city of Porto Alegre in 2001 and 2002, provided a wide variety of approaches towards global democratisation. This article analyses the contradictions and prospects of various approaches towards global democratisation that could be found in the meetings, including the organisational aspects of the World Social Forum itself. It simultaneously argues for the political importance of learning from the innovative experiences in the so-called developing countries, such as the participatory budget planning of the Porto Alegre municipality. Without such learning that transgresses the idea of developed/adult/teacher vs developing/child/pupil, global democratisation cannot advance very far.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0143659022000005300
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_3993479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3993479</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3993479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-710f1e746fd9cb1694edced744667bb186bee21d9db928436aba48f48c9d71393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9LHDEUxYNU6Lr6CepD8MG3sfk3yaQPgki1hRUFt_QxZJLMdpaZyXozS_Xbm2HFhyLaC-FC8jvn5nIQ-kLJGSUV-Uqo4LLUhDEyVckJ2UMzyiUpGBP0E5pNRJER9RkdpLTOkBRVNUM3yz8B_47QeXwfXWs7fBVh22M7eLzqYp0vfOijAzu2KZ84fMOLYGFohxVuIPb4LsIY8UUXVhAO0X5juxSOXvoc_br6vrz8USxur39eXiwKJyQbC0VJQ4MSsvHa1VRqEbwLXgkhpaprWsk6BEa99rVmVV7N1lZUjaic9opyzefodOe7gfiwDWk0fZtc6Do7hLhNRhLJaMXK_wBFqcvsOUcn_4DruIUhL2EY1UpRSqaxfAc5iClBaMwG2t7Ck6HETEGYN4LIquOdap3GCK8SrjUXajLVu-d2aCL09u8UhhntUxehATu4Nr1la8bHMWvPP9Ty9_72DHeeqL0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219771109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The World Social Forum and global democratisation: Learning from Porto Alegre</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Teivainen, Teivo</creator><creatorcontrib>Teivainen, Teivo</creatorcontrib><description>Being anti-something can be politically useful, but only up to a point. The search for alternative globalisation projects has been central to the World Social Forum process. The first two forums, held in the Brazilian city of Porto Alegre in 2001 and 2002, provided a wide variety of approaches towards global democratisation. This article analyses the contradictions and prospects of various approaches towards global democratisation that could be found in the meetings, including the organisational aspects of the World Social Forum itself. It simultaneously argues for the political importance of learning from the innovative experiences in the so-called developing countries, such as the participatory budget planning of the Porto Alegre municipality. Without such learning that transgresses the idea of developed/adult/teacher vs developing/child/pupil, global democratisation cannot advance very far.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-6597</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-2241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0143659022000005300</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TWQUDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Alternative Approaches ; Alternatives ; Antiglobalization ; Civil society ; Democracy ; Developing Countries ; Development Strategies ; Globalization ; Government budgets ; Government initiatives ; Political debate ; Political protests ; Porto Alegre, Brazil ; Social Policy ; State government ; Third World</subject><ispartof>Third world quarterly, 2002-08, Vol.23 (4), p.621-632</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Third World Quarterly</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Aug 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-710f1e746fd9cb1694edced744667bb186bee21d9db928436aba48f48c9d71393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-710f1e746fd9cb1694edced744667bb186bee21d9db928436aba48f48c9d71393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3993479$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3993479$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,33751,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teivainen, Teivo</creatorcontrib><title>The World Social Forum and global democratisation: Learning from Porto Alegre</title><title>Third world quarterly</title><description>Being anti-something can be politically useful, but only up to a point. The search for alternative globalisation projects has been central to the World Social Forum process. The first two forums, held in the Brazilian city of Porto Alegre in 2001 and 2002, provided a wide variety of approaches towards global democratisation. This article analyses the contradictions and prospects of various approaches towards global democratisation that could be found in the meetings, including the organisational aspects of the World Social Forum itself. It simultaneously argues for the political importance of learning from the innovative experiences in the so-called developing countries, such as the participatory budget planning of the Porto Alegre municipality. Without such learning that transgresses the idea of developed/adult/teacher vs developing/child/pupil, global democratisation cannot advance very far.</description><subject>Alternative Approaches</subject><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Antiglobalization</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Development Strategies</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Government budgets</subject><subject>Government initiatives</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Porto Alegre, Brazil</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>Third World</subject><issn>0143-6597</issn><issn>1360-2241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9LHDEUxYNU6Lr6CepD8MG3sfk3yaQPgki1hRUFt_QxZJLMdpaZyXozS_Xbm2HFhyLaC-FC8jvn5nIQ-kLJGSUV-Uqo4LLUhDEyVckJ2UMzyiUpGBP0E5pNRJER9RkdpLTOkBRVNUM3yz8B_47QeXwfXWs7fBVh22M7eLzqYp0vfOijAzu2KZ84fMOLYGFohxVuIPb4LsIY8UUXVhAO0X5juxSOXvoc_br6vrz8USxur39eXiwKJyQbC0VJQ4MSsvHa1VRqEbwLXgkhpaprWsk6BEa99rVmVV7N1lZUjaic9opyzefodOe7gfiwDWk0fZtc6Do7hLhNRhLJaMXK_wBFqcvsOUcn_4DruIUhL2EY1UpRSqaxfAc5iClBaMwG2t7Ck6HETEGYN4LIquOdap3GCK8SrjUXajLVu-d2aCL09u8UhhntUxehATu4Nr1la8bHMWvPP9Ty9_72DHeeqL0</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Teivainen, Teivo</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Carfax Publishing</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>The World Social Forum and global democratisation: Learning from Porto Alegre</title><author>Teivainen, Teivo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-710f1e746fd9cb1694edced744667bb186bee21d9db928436aba48f48c9d71393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Alternative Approaches</topic><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Antiglobalization</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Development Strategies</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Government budgets</topic><topic>Government initiatives</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Porto Alegre, Brazil</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>Third World</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teivainen, Teivo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Third world quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teivainen, Teivo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The World Social Forum and global democratisation: Learning from Porto Alegre</atitle><jtitle>Third world quarterly</jtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>632</epage><pages>621-632</pages><issn>0143-6597</issn><eissn>1360-2241</eissn><coden>TWQUDW</coden><abstract>Being anti-something can be politically useful, but only up to a point. The search for alternative globalisation projects has been central to the World Social Forum process. The first two forums, held in the Brazilian city of Porto Alegre in 2001 and 2002, provided a wide variety of approaches towards global democratisation. This article analyses the contradictions and prospects of various approaches towards global democratisation that could be found in the meetings, including the organisational aspects of the World Social Forum itself. It simultaneously argues for the political importance of learning from the innovative experiences in the so-called developing countries, such as the participatory budget planning of the Porto Alegre municipality. Without such learning that transgresses the idea of developed/adult/teacher vs developing/child/pupil, global democratisation cannot advance very far.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/0143659022000005300</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-6597
ispartof Third world quarterly, 2002-08, Vol.23 (4), p.621-632
issn 0143-6597
1360-2241
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_3993479
source Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Alternative Approaches
Alternatives
Antiglobalization
Civil society
Democracy
Developing Countries
Development Strategies
Globalization
Government budgets
Government initiatives
Political debate
Political protests
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Social Policy
State government
Third World
title The World Social Forum and global democratisation: Learning from Porto Alegre
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T13%3A30%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20World%20Social%20Forum%20and%20global%20democratisation:%20Learning%20from%20Porto%20Alegre&rft.jtitle=Third%20world%20quarterly&rft.au=Teivainen,%20Teivo&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=632&rft.pages=621-632&rft.issn=0143-6597&rft.eissn=1360-2241&rft.coden=TWQUDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0143659022000005300&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3993479%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219771109&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3993479&rfr_iscdi=true