Coping with Faculty Resistance to Teaching Critical Thinking

Reluctance of college faculty to teach critical thinking may be due to many factors. Proactive strategies for reducing resistance include creating a positive context for change, communicating expertness and credibility, creating a sense of safety and trust, countering sources of student resistance,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:College teaching 1998-04, Vol.46 (2), p.63-67
Hauptverfasser: Haas, Paul F., Keeley, Stuart M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 2
container_start_page 63
container_title College teaching
container_volume 46
creator Haas, Paul F.
Keeley, Stuart M.
description Reluctance of college faculty to teach critical thinking may be due to many factors. Proactive strategies for reducing resistance include creating a positive context for change, communicating expertness and credibility, creating a sense of safety and trust, countering sources of student resistance, and creating high hopes and expectations for change in students. (MSE)
doi_str_mv 10.1080/87567559809596238
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_27558883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ565314</ericid><jstor_id>27558883</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27558883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-472e2fc9667885ffaa9f35a209df745b00dbbe7477c52cb2591adcf704f6753c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QFAY3I_mMZkk0I0MrQ8EQep6SNPEpk4nNUmp_fdmGOmmiKtw851zHweASwRvEeTwjjNaMkoFh4KKEhN-BAZIEJhzLMQxGHQ8TwJ6Cs5CWEKIsOBsAEaVW9v2I9vauMgmUm2auMvedLAhylbpLLpsqqVadJrK22iVbLJpKj_Tzzk4MbIJ-uL3HYL3yXhaPeYvrw9P1f1LrggWMS8Y1tgoUZaMc2qMlMIQKjEUc8MKOoNwPptpVjCmKFYzTAWSc2UYLEy6iSgyBDd937V3XxsdYr10G9-mkTXubFhQlESoFynvQvDa1GtvV9LvagTrLqP6IKPkueo92lu114-faUkJKhK-7vEyROf3HKcmnHOSOOu5bY3zK7l1vpnXUe4a541P-dlwOLSO3zE5R_86yd97_wBPrZEE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>274772951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coping with Faculty Resistance to Teaching Critical Thinking</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Haas, Paul F. ; Keeley, Stuart M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haas, Paul F. ; Keeley, Stuart M.</creatorcontrib><description>Reluctance of college faculty to teach critical thinking may be due to many factors. Proactive strategies for reducing resistance include creating a positive context for change, communicating expertness and credibility, creating a sense of safety and trust, countering sources of student resistance, and creating high hopes and expectations for change in students. (MSE)</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-7555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-8299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/87567559809596238</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Active Learning ; Change Strategies ; College Environment ; College Faculty ; College Instruction ; Colleges ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Course Content ; Critical Thinking ; Economics education ; Education ; Educational Change ; Educational leadership ; Educational Strategies ; Faculty Development ; Group instruction ; Higher Education ; Hope ; Learning ; Organizational Climate ; Psychotherapy ; Resistance to Change ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Expectations of Students ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Textbooks ; Theory ; Thinking skills</subject><ispartof>College teaching, 1998-04, Vol.46 (2), p.63-67</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1998</rights><rights>Copyright 1998 Helen Dwight Reid Educational Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright Heldref Publications Spring 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-472e2fc9667885ffaa9f35a209df745b00dbbe7477c52cb2591adcf704f6753c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-472e2fc9667885ffaa9f35a209df745b00dbbe7477c52cb2591adcf704f6753c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27558883$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27558883$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ565314$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haas, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Stuart M.</creatorcontrib><title>Coping with Faculty Resistance to Teaching Critical Thinking</title><title>College teaching</title><description>Reluctance of college faculty to teach critical thinking may be due to many factors. Proactive strategies for reducing resistance include creating a positive context for change, communicating expertness and credibility, creating a sense of safety and trust, countering sources of student resistance, and creating high hopes and expectations for change in students. (MSE)</description><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>Change Strategies</subject><subject>College Environment</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Instruction</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Critical Thinking</subject><subject>Economics education</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational leadership</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Group instruction</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Hope</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Organizational Climate</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Resistance to Change</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Expectations of Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Thinking skills</subject><issn>8756-7555</issn><issn>1930-8299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QFAY3I_mMZkk0I0MrQ8EQep6SNPEpk4nNUmp_fdmGOmmiKtw851zHweASwRvEeTwjjNaMkoFh4KKEhN-BAZIEJhzLMQxGHQ8TwJ6Cs5CWEKIsOBsAEaVW9v2I9vauMgmUm2auMvedLAhylbpLLpsqqVadJrK22iVbLJpKj_Tzzk4MbIJ-uL3HYL3yXhaPeYvrw9P1f1LrggWMS8Y1tgoUZaMc2qMlMIQKjEUc8MKOoNwPptpVjCmKFYzTAWSc2UYLEy6iSgyBDd937V3XxsdYr10G9-mkTXubFhQlESoFynvQvDa1GtvV9LvagTrLqP6IKPkueo92lu114-faUkJKhK-7vEyROf3HKcmnHOSOOu5bY3zK7l1vpnXUe4a541P-dlwOLSO3zE5R_86yd97_wBPrZEE</recordid><startdate>19980401</startdate><enddate>19980401</enddate><creator>Haas, Paul F.</creator><creator>Keeley, Stuart M.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Heldref Publications</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980401</creationdate><title>Coping with Faculty Resistance to Teaching Critical Thinking</title><author>Haas, Paul F. ; Keeley, Stuart M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-472e2fc9667885ffaa9f35a209df745b00dbbe7477c52cb2591adcf704f6753c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>Change Strategies</topic><topic>College Environment</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Instruction</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Critical Thinking</topic><topic>Economics education</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational leadership</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Group instruction</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Hope</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Organizational Climate</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Resistance to Change</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Expectations of Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Thinking skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haas, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Stuart M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>College teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haas, Paul F.</au><au>Keeley, Stuart M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ565314</ericid><atitle>Coping with Faculty Resistance to Teaching Critical Thinking</atitle><jtitle>College teaching</jtitle><date>1998-04-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>63-67</pages><issn>8756-7555</issn><eissn>1930-8299</eissn><abstract>Reluctance of college faculty to teach critical thinking may be due to many factors. Proactive strategies for reducing resistance include creating a positive context for change, communicating expertness and credibility, creating a sense of safety and trust, countering sources of student resistance, and creating high hopes and expectations for change in students. (MSE)</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/87567559809596238</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8756-7555
ispartof College teaching, 1998-04, Vol.46 (2), p.63-67
issn 8756-7555
1930-8299
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_27558883
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Active Learning
Change Strategies
College Environment
College Faculty
College Instruction
Colleges
Colleges & universities
Course Content
Critical Thinking
Economics education
Education
Educational Change
Educational leadership
Educational Strategies
Faculty Development
Group instruction
Higher Education
Hope
Learning
Organizational Climate
Psychotherapy
Resistance to Change
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Expectations of Students
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Textbooks
Theory
Thinking skills
title Coping with Faculty Resistance to Teaching Critical Thinking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A52%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coping%20with%20Faculty%20Resistance%20to%20Teaching%20Critical%20Thinking&rft.jtitle=College%20teaching&rft.au=Haas,%20Paul%20F.&rft.date=1998-04-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=63-67&rft.issn=8756-7555&rft.eissn=1930-8299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/87567559809596238&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27558883%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=274772951&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ565314&rft_jstor_id=27558883&rfr_iscdi=true