Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie

The opinion of Mr. Justice Francis of the English High Court which denied the parents of Charlie Gard, who had been born with an extremely rare mutation of a genetic disease, the right to take their child to the United States for a proposed experimental treatment occasioned world wide attention incl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical ethics 2018-07, Vol.44 (7), p.443-447
Hauptverfasser: Paris, John J, Cummings, Brian M, Moreland, Michael P, Batten, Jason N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 447
container_issue 7
container_start_page 443
container_title Journal of medical ethics
container_volume 44
creator Paris, John J
Cummings, Brian M
Moreland, Michael P
Batten, Jason N
description The opinion of Mr. Justice Francis of the English High Court which denied the parents of Charlie Gard, who had been born with an extremely rare mutation of a genetic disease, the right to take their child to the United States for a proposed experimental treatment occasioned world wide attention including that of the Pope, President Trump, and the US Congress. The case raise anew a debate as old as the foundation of Western medicine on who should decide and on what standard when there is a conflict between a family and the treating physicians over a possible treatment. This paper will explore the different approaches of the British and American courts on the issue and the various proposals from that of John Rawls in his A Theory of Justice to a processed-based approach for resolving such disputes.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26879760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26879760</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26879760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_268797603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFiksOgjAUABujifg5gkkv0KQCtrA0ROMB3JMHfQQI_aSvG28vC_fOZhYzG5ZdS12IMr_pLctkIZVQlZR7diCa5Upe1Rlr7iFED_2IxJPnASK6BAs3aMEZPvjInXcCKUG3TDSi4RbN1K9LigjJrvuJ7QZYCM8_H9nl-Xg3LzFT8rENcbIQP22uKl1rJYt__QtABTeO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Paris, John J ; Cummings, Brian M ; Moreland, Michael P ; Batten, Jason N</creator><creatorcontrib>Paris, John J ; Cummings, Brian M ; Moreland, Michael P ; Batten, Jason N</creatorcontrib><description>The opinion of Mr. Justice Francis of the English High Court which denied the parents of Charlie Gard, who had been born with an extremely rare mutation of a genetic disease, the right to take their child to the United States for a proposed experimental treatment occasioned world wide attention including that of the Pope, President Trump, and the US Congress. The case raise anew a debate as old as the foundation of Western medicine on who should decide and on what standard when there is a conflict between a family and the treating physicians over a possible treatment. This paper will explore the different approaches of the British and American courts on the issue and the various proposals from that of John Rawls in his A Theory of Justice to a processed-based approach for resolving such disputes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-6800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMJ</publisher><ispartof>Journal of medical ethics, 2018-07, Vol.44 (7), p.443-447</ispartof><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26879760$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26879760$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paris, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Brian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreland, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batten, Jason N</creatorcontrib><title>Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie</title><title>Journal of medical ethics</title><description>The opinion of Mr. Justice Francis of the English High Court which denied the parents of Charlie Gard, who had been born with an extremely rare mutation of a genetic disease, the right to take their child to the United States for a proposed experimental treatment occasioned world wide attention including that of the Pope, President Trump, and the US Congress. The case raise anew a debate as old as the foundation of Western medicine on who should decide and on what standard when there is a conflict between a family and the treating physicians over a possible treatment. This paper will explore the different approaches of the British and American courts on the issue and the various proposals from that of John Rawls in his A Theory of Justice to a processed-based approach for resolving such disputes.</description><issn>0306-6800</issn><issn>1473-4257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFiksOgjAUABujifg5gkkv0KQCtrA0ROMB3JMHfQQI_aSvG28vC_fOZhYzG5ZdS12IMr_pLctkIZVQlZR7diCa5Upe1Rlr7iFED_2IxJPnASK6BAs3aMEZPvjInXcCKUG3TDSi4RbN1K9LigjJrvuJ7QZYCM8_H9nl-Xg3LzFT8rENcbIQP22uKl1rJYt__QtABTeO</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Paris, John J</creator><creator>Cummings, Brian M</creator><creator>Moreland, Michael P</creator><creator>Batten, Jason N</creator><general>BMJ</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment</title><author>Paris, John J ; Cummings, Brian M ; Moreland, Michael P ; Batten, Jason N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_268797603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paris, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Brian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreland, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batten, Jason N</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paris, John J</au><au>Cummings, Brian M</au><au>Moreland, Michael P</au><au>Batten, Jason N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>443-447</pages><issn>0306-6800</issn><eissn>1473-4257</eissn><abstract>The opinion of Mr. Justice Francis of the English High Court which denied the parents of Charlie Gard, who had been born with an extremely rare mutation of a genetic disease, the right to take their child to the United States for a proposed experimental treatment occasioned world wide attention including that of the Pope, President Trump, and the US Congress. The case raise anew a debate as old as the foundation of Western medicine on who should decide and on what standard when there is a conflict between a family and the treating physicians over a possible treatment. This paper will explore the different approaches of the British and American courts on the issue and the various proposals from that of John Rawls in his A Theory of Justice to a processed-based approach for resolving such disputes.</abstract><pub>BMJ</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-6800
ispartof Journal of medical ethics, 2018-07, Vol.44 (7), p.443-447
issn 0306-6800
1473-4257
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_26879760
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
title Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A17%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Approaches%20to%20parental%20demand%20for%20non-established%20medical%20treatment:%20reflections%20on%20the%20Charlie&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20ethics&rft.au=Paris,%20John%20J&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=443-447&rft.issn=0306-6800&rft.eissn=1473-4257&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E26879760%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26879760&rfr_iscdi=true