Head to head: the case for fighting behaviour in Megaloceros giganteus using finite-element analysis
The largest antlers of any known deer species belonged to the extinct giant deer Megaloceros giganteus. It has been argued that their antlers were too large for use in fighting, instead being used only in ritualized displays to attract mates. Here, we used finite-element analysis to test whether the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2019-10, Vol.286 (1912), p.1-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1912 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
container_volume | 286 |
creator | Klinkhamer, Ada J. Woodley, Nicholas Neenan, James M. Parr, William C. H. Clausen, Philip Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R. Sansalone, Gabriele Lister, Adrian M. Wroe, Stephen |
description | The largest antlers of any known deer species belonged to the extinct giant deer Megaloceros giganteus. It has been argued that their antlers were too large for use in fighting, instead being used only in ritualized displays to attract mates. Here, we used finite-element analysis to test whether the antlers of M. giganteus could have withstood forces generated during fighting. We compared the mechanical performance of antlers in M. giganteus with three extant deer species: red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama) and elk (Alces alces). Von Mises stress results suggest that M. giganteus was capable of withstanding some fighting loads, provided that their antlers interlocked proximally, and that their antlers were best adapted for withstanding loads from twisting rather than pushing actions, as are other deer with palmate antlers. We conclude that fighting in M. giganteus was probably more constrained and predictable than in extant deer. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26838030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26838030</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26838030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_268380303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDE31DWyNDVhYeA0sDQz0rUwMTXiYOAqLs4yMDCwNLUw5WTg8UhNTFEoyVfIANI8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptB1s01xNlDN6u4JL8ovqAoMzexqDLeyMzC2MLA2MCYkDwA2IciAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Head to head: the case for fighting behaviour in Megaloceros giganteus using finite-element analysis</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Klinkhamer, Ada J. ; Woodley, Nicholas ; Neenan, James M. ; Parr, William C. H. ; Clausen, Philip ; Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R. ; Sansalone, Gabriele ; Lister, Adrian M. ; Wroe, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Klinkhamer, Ada J. ; Woodley, Nicholas ; Neenan, James M. ; Parr, William C. H. ; Clausen, Philip ; Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R. ; Sansalone, Gabriele ; Lister, Adrian M. ; Wroe, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>The largest antlers of any known deer species belonged to the extinct giant deer Megaloceros giganteus. It has been argued that their antlers were too large for use in fighting, instead being used only in ritualized displays to attract mates. Here, we used finite-element analysis to test whether the antlers of M. giganteus could have withstood forces generated during fighting. We compared the mechanical performance of antlers in M. giganteus with three extant deer species: red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama) and elk (Alces alces). Von Mises stress results suggest that M. giganteus was capable of withstanding some fighting loads, provided that their antlers interlocked proximally, and that their antlers were best adapted for withstanding loads from twisting rather than pushing actions, as are other deer with palmate antlers. We conclude that fighting in M. giganteus was probably more constrained and predictable than in extant deer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Royal Society</publisher><subject>Palaeobiology</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2019-10, Vol.286 (1912), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26838030$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26838030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klinkhamer, Ada J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodley, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neenan, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, William C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sansalone, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lister, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wroe, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Head to head: the case for fighting behaviour in Megaloceros giganteus using finite-element analysis</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><description>The largest antlers of any known deer species belonged to the extinct giant deer Megaloceros giganteus. It has been argued that their antlers were too large for use in fighting, instead being used only in ritualized displays to attract mates. Here, we used finite-element analysis to test whether the antlers of M. giganteus could have withstood forces generated during fighting. We compared the mechanical performance of antlers in M. giganteus with three extant deer species: red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama) and elk (Alces alces). Von Mises stress results suggest that M. giganteus was capable of withstanding some fighting loads, provided that their antlers interlocked proximally, and that their antlers were best adapted for withstanding loads from twisting rather than pushing actions, as are other deer with palmate antlers. We conclude that fighting in M. giganteus was probably more constrained and predictable than in extant deer.</description><subject>Palaeobiology</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDE31DWyNDVhYeA0sDQz0rUwMTXiYOAqLs4yMDCwNLUw5WTg8UhNTFEoyVfIANI8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptB1s01xNlDN6u4JL8ovqAoMzexqDLeyMzC2MLA2MCYkDwA2IciAg</recordid><startdate>20191009</startdate><enddate>20191009</enddate><creator>Klinkhamer, Ada J.</creator><creator>Woodley, Nicholas</creator><creator>Neenan, James M.</creator><creator>Parr, William C. H.</creator><creator>Clausen, Philip</creator><creator>Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.</creator><creator>Sansalone, Gabriele</creator><creator>Lister, Adrian M.</creator><creator>Wroe, Stephen</creator><general>Royal Society</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20191009</creationdate><title>Head to head</title><author>Klinkhamer, Ada J. ; Woodley, Nicholas ; Neenan, James M. ; Parr, William C. H. ; Clausen, Philip ; Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R. ; Sansalone, Gabriele ; Lister, Adrian M. ; Wroe, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_268380303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Palaeobiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klinkhamer, Ada J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodley, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neenan, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, William C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sansalone, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lister, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wroe, Stephen</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klinkhamer, Ada J.</au><au>Woodley, Nicholas</au><au>Neenan, James M.</au><au>Parr, William C. H.</au><au>Clausen, Philip</au><au>Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.</au><au>Sansalone, Gabriele</au><au>Lister, Adrian M.</au><au>Wroe, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Head to head: the case for fighting behaviour in Megaloceros giganteus using finite-element analysis</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><date>2019-10-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>286</volume><issue>1912</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>The largest antlers of any known deer species belonged to the extinct giant deer Megaloceros giganteus. It has been argued that their antlers were too large for use in fighting, instead being used only in ritualized displays to attract mates. Here, we used finite-element analysis to test whether the antlers of M. giganteus could have withstood forces generated during fighting. We compared the mechanical performance of antlers in M. giganteus with three extant deer species: red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama) and elk (Alces alces). Von Mises stress results suggest that M. giganteus was capable of withstanding some fighting loads, provided that their antlers interlocked proximally, and that their antlers were best adapted for withstanding loads from twisting rather than pushing actions, as are other deer with palmate antlers. We conclude that fighting in M. giganteus was probably more constrained and predictable than in extant deer.</abstract><pub>Royal Society</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8452 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2019-10, Vol.286 (1912), p.1-10 |
issn | 0962-8452 1471-2954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_26838030 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central |
subjects | Palaeobiology |
title | Head to head: the case for fighting behaviour in Megaloceros giganteus using finite-element analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T19%3A58%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Head%20to%20head:%20the%20case%20for%20fighting%20behaviour%20in%20Megaloceros%20giganteus%20using%20finite-element%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Klinkhamer,%20Ada%20J.&rft.date=2019-10-09&rft.volume=286&rft.issue=1912&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E26838030%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26838030&rfr_iscdi=true |