Head to head: the case for fighting behaviour in Megaloceros giganteus using finite-element analysis

The largest antlers of any known deer species belonged to the extinct giant deer Megaloceros giganteus. It has been argued that their antlers were too large for use in fighting, instead being used only in ritualized displays to attract mates. Here, we used finite-element analysis to test whether the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2019-10, Vol.286 (1912), p.1-10
Hauptverfasser: Klinkhamer, Ada J., Woodley, Nicholas, Neenan, James M., Parr, William C. H., Clausen, Philip, Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R., Sansalone, Gabriele, Lister, Adrian M., Wroe, Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue 1912
container_start_page 1
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences
container_volume 286
creator Klinkhamer, Ada J.
Woodley, Nicholas
Neenan, James M.
Parr, William C. H.
Clausen, Philip
Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.
Sansalone, Gabriele
Lister, Adrian M.
Wroe, Stephen
description The largest antlers of any known deer species belonged to the extinct giant deer Megaloceros giganteus. It has been argued that their antlers were too large for use in fighting, instead being used only in ritualized displays to attract mates. Here, we used finite-element analysis to test whether the antlers of M. giganteus could have withstood forces generated during fighting. We compared the mechanical performance of antlers in M. giganteus with three extant deer species: red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama) and elk (Alces alces). Von Mises stress results suggest that M. giganteus was capable of withstanding some fighting loads, provided that their antlers interlocked proximally, and that their antlers were best adapted for withstanding loads from twisting rather than pushing actions, as are other deer with palmate antlers. We conclude that fighting in M. giganteus was probably more constrained and predictable than in extant deer.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26838030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26838030</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26838030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_268380303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDE31DWyNDVhYeA0sDQz0rUwMTXiYOAqLs4yMDCwNLUw5WTg8UhNTFEoyVfIANI8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptB1s01xNlDN6u4JL8ovqAoMzexqDLeyMzC2MLA2MCYkDwA2IciAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Head to head: the case for fighting behaviour in Megaloceros giganteus using finite-element analysis</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Klinkhamer, Ada J. ; Woodley, Nicholas ; Neenan, James M. ; Parr, William C. H. ; Clausen, Philip ; Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R. ; Sansalone, Gabriele ; Lister, Adrian M. ; Wroe, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Klinkhamer, Ada J. ; Woodley, Nicholas ; Neenan, James M. ; Parr, William C. H. ; Clausen, Philip ; Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R. ; Sansalone, Gabriele ; Lister, Adrian M. ; Wroe, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>The largest antlers of any known deer species belonged to the extinct giant deer Megaloceros giganteus. It has been argued that their antlers were too large for use in fighting, instead being used only in ritualized displays to attract mates. Here, we used finite-element analysis to test whether the antlers of M. giganteus could have withstood forces generated during fighting. We compared the mechanical performance of antlers in M. giganteus with three extant deer species: red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama) and elk (Alces alces). Von Mises stress results suggest that M. giganteus was capable of withstanding some fighting loads, provided that their antlers interlocked proximally, and that their antlers were best adapted for withstanding loads from twisting rather than pushing actions, as are other deer with palmate antlers. We conclude that fighting in M. giganteus was probably more constrained and predictable than in extant deer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Royal Society</publisher><subject>Palaeobiology</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2019-10, Vol.286 (1912), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26838030$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26838030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klinkhamer, Ada J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodley, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neenan, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, William C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sansalone, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lister, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wroe, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Head to head: the case for fighting behaviour in Megaloceros giganteus using finite-element analysis</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><description>The largest antlers of any known deer species belonged to the extinct giant deer Megaloceros giganteus. It has been argued that their antlers were too large for use in fighting, instead being used only in ritualized displays to attract mates. Here, we used finite-element analysis to test whether the antlers of M. giganteus could have withstood forces generated during fighting. We compared the mechanical performance of antlers in M. giganteus with three extant deer species: red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama) and elk (Alces alces). Von Mises stress results suggest that M. giganteus was capable of withstanding some fighting loads, provided that their antlers interlocked proximally, and that their antlers were best adapted for withstanding loads from twisting rather than pushing actions, as are other deer with palmate antlers. We conclude that fighting in M. giganteus was probably more constrained and predictable than in extant deer.</description><subject>Palaeobiology</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDE31DWyNDVhYeA0sDQz0rUwMTXiYOAqLs4yMDCwNLUw5WTg8UhNTFEoyVfIANI8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptB1s01xNlDN6u4JL8ovqAoMzexqDLeyMzC2MLA2MCYkDwA2IciAg</recordid><startdate>20191009</startdate><enddate>20191009</enddate><creator>Klinkhamer, Ada J.</creator><creator>Woodley, Nicholas</creator><creator>Neenan, James M.</creator><creator>Parr, William C. H.</creator><creator>Clausen, Philip</creator><creator>Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.</creator><creator>Sansalone, Gabriele</creator><creator>Lister, Adrian M.</creator><creator>Wroe, Stephen</creator><general>Royal Society</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20191009</creationdate><title>Head to head</title><author>Klinkhamer, Ada J. ; Woodley, Nicholas ; Neenan, James M. ; Parr, William C. H. ; Clausen, Philip ; Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R. ; Sansalone, Gabriele ; Lister, Adrian M. ; Wroe, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_268380303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Palaeobiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klinkhamer, Ada J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodley, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neenan, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, William C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sansalone, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lister, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wroe, Stephen</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klinkhamer, Ada J.</au><au>Woodley, Nicholas</au><au>Neenan, James M.</au><au>Parr, William C. H.</au><au>Clausen, Philip</au><au>Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.</au><au>Sansalone, Gabriele</au><au>Lister, Adrian M.</au><au>Wroe, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Head to head: the case for fighting behaviour in Megaloceros giganteus using finite-element analysis</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><date>2019-10-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>286</volume><issue>1912</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>The largest antlers of any known deer species belonged to the extinct giant deer Megaloceros giganteus. It has been argued that their antlers were too large for use in fighting, instead being used only in ritualized displays to attract mates. Here, we used finite-element analysis to test whether the antlers of M. giganteus could have withstood forces generated during fighting. We compared the mechanical performance of antlers in M. giganteus with three extant deer species: red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama) and elk (Alces alces). Von Mises stress results suggest that M. giganteus was capable of withstanding some fighting loads, provided that their antlers interlocked proximally, and that their antlers were best adapted for withstanding loads from twisting rather than pushing actions, as are other deer with palmate antlers. We conclude that fighting in M. giganteus was probably more constrained and predictable than in extant deer.</abstract><pub>Royal Society</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8452
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2019-10, Vol.286 (1912), p.1-10
issn 0962-8452
1471-2954
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_26838030
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central
subjects Palaeobiology
title Head to head: the case for fighting behaviour in Megaloceros giganteus using finite-element analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T19%3A58%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Head%20to%20head:%20the%20case%20for%20fighting%20behaviour%20in%20Megaloceros%20giganteus%20using%20finite-element%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Klinkhamer,%20Ada%20J.&rft.date=2019-10-09&rft.volume=286&rft.issue=1912&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E26838030%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26838030&rfr_iscdi=true