MINORITY PARADOXES: ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REPORTED OFFENDING AND OFFICIAL CRIME STATISTICS

Immigrants and their native-born children tend to be overrepresented among crime suspects in Europe. Using a representative Dutch survey, we examine whether inhabitants of Turkish and Moroccan origin also self-report more crimes than the native Dutch. In addition, we test various explanations for et...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of criminology 2019-01, Vol.59 (1), p.166-187
Hauptverfasser: Leerkes, Arjen, Martinez, Ramiro, Groeneveld, Pim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 187
container_issue 1
container_start_page 166
container_title British journal of criminology
container_volume 59
creator Leerkes, Arjen
Martinez, Ramiro
Groeneveld, Pim
description Immigrants and their native-born children tend to be overrepresented among crime suspects in Europe. Using a representative Dutch survey, we examine whether inhabitants of Turkish and Moroccan origin also self-report more crimes than the native Dutch. In addition, we test various explanations for ethnic differences in crime, partly using variables that are unavailable in administrative data (socio-economic status [SES], perceived discrimination, neighbourhood disadvantage and control, family bonds, religiousness). We discover two ‘minority paradoxes’. Firstly, contrary to analyses using administrative data, both minorities have similar to lower self-reported crime rates compared to the majority group when age, sex, urbanization, SES and social desirability are controlled. Secondly, first-generation immigrants report fewer crimes than expected given their social disadvantage, thus indicating a notable ‘righteous migrant effect’.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bjc/azy021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26780653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20190211006561</informt_id><jstor_id>26780653</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/bjc/azy021</oup_id><sourcerecordid>26780653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-22f51fffa0d2ae4019ccabd2ca2c8d2a28daf4e5f85b074939a98553a755734d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj89LwzAUgIMoWKeX3QUvXoS6_Gyb45jTDaaTOUFP4TVttg5nSxIP8683tepFEDw98vjy8T6E-gRfEizZIN_oAbzvMCV7KCI84TETVO6jCGOcxlgKcYiOnNuEZyI5iVD_dno3X0yXz2f3w8Xwav40fjhGBwZeXHnyNXvo8Xq8HE3i2fxmOhrOYi0I8TGlRhBjDOCCQskxkVpDXlANVGdhRbMCDC-FyUSOUy6ZBJkJwSAVImW8YD100Xm1rZ2zpVGNrbZgd4pg1daoUKO6mgBPOthuK69gVbnGK1eC1WtVvZr6c13blSrqqv3PGEm-MRpuCw4SmkXSqma_VWvvG6cK8PB_3Xmnq9-avwtOO27jfG1_SJqkWRAx9gHWooRM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>MINORITY PARADOXES: ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REPORTED OFFENDING AND OFFICIAL CRIME STATISTICS</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Leerkes, Arjen ; Martinez, Ramiro ; Groeneveld, Pim</creator><creatorcontrib>Leerkes, Arjen ; Martinez, Ramiro ; Groeneveld, Pim</creatorcontrib><description>Immigrants and their native-born children tend to be overrepresented among crime suspects in Europe. Using a representative Dutch survey, we examine whether inhabitants of Turkish and Moroccan origin also self-report more crimes than the native Dutch. In addition, we test various explanations for ethnic differences in crime, partly using variables that are unavailable in administrative data (socio-economic status [SES], perceived discrimination, neighbourhood disadvantage and control, family bonds, religiousness). We discover two ‘minority paradoxes’. Firstly, contrary to analyses using administrative data, both minorities have similar to lower self-reported crime rates compared to the majority group when age, sex, urbanization, SES and social desirability are controlled. Secondly, first-generation immigrants report fewer crimes than expected given their social disadvantage, thus indicating a notable ‘righteous migrant effect’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0955</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azy021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Corrupt practices ; Criminals ; ETHNIC GROUPS ; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ; Logistic regression analysis ; Minorities ; Multivariate analysis ; Prevention ; PRISONERS ; PRISONS ; Proportional hazards models ; Public administration ; Rehabilitation ; SOCIOLOGY</subject><ispartof>British journal of criminology, 2019-01, Vol.59 (1), p.166-187</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-22f51fffa0d2ae4019ccabd2ca2c8d2a28daf4e5f85b074939a98553a755734d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-22f51fffa0d2ae4019ccabd2ca2c8d2a28daf4e5f85b074939a98553a755734d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leerkes, Arjen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Ramiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeneveld, Pim</creatorcontrib><title>MINORITY PARADOXES: ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REPORTED OFFENDING AND OFFICIAL CRIME STATISTICS</title><title>British journal of criminology</title><description>Immigrants and their native-born children tend to be overrepresented among crime suspects in Europe. Using a representative Dutch survey, we examine whether inhabitants of Turkish and Moroccan origin also self-report more crimes than the native Dutch. In addition, we test various explanations for ethnic differences in crime, partly using variables that are unavailable in administrative data (socio-economic status [SES], perceived discrimination, neighbourhood disadvantage and control, family bonds, religiousness). We discover two ‘minority paradoxes’. Firstly, contrary to analyses using administrative data, both minorities have similar to lower self-reported crime rates compared to the majority group when age, sex, urbanization, SES and social desirability are controlled. Secondly, first-generation immigrants report fewer crimes than expected given their social disadvantage, thus indicating a notable ‘righteous migrant effect’.</description><subject>Corrupt practices</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>ETHNIC GROUPS</subject><subject>INDIGENOUS PEOPLE</subject><subject>Logistic regression analysis</subject><subject>Minorities</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>PRISONERS</subject><subject>PRISONS</subject><subject>Proportional hazards models</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>SOCIOLOGY</subject><issn>0007-0955</issn><issn>1464-3529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj89LwzAUgIMoWKeX3QUvXoS6_Gyb45jTDaaTOUFP4TVttg5nSxIP8683tepFEDw98vjy8T6E-gRfEizZIN_oAbzvMCV7KCI84TETVO6jCGOcxlgKcYiOnNuEZyI5iVD_dno3X0yXz2f3w8Xwav40fjhGBwZeXHnyNXvo8Xq8HE3i2fxmOhrOYi0I8TGlRhBjDOCCQskxkVpDXlANVGdhRbMCDC-FyUSOUy6ZBJkJwSAVImW8YD100Xm1rZ2zpVGNrbZgd4pg1daoUKO6mgBPOthuK69gVbnGK1eC1WtVvZr6c13blSrqqv3PGEm-MRpuCw4SmkXSqma_VWvvG6cK8PB_3Xmnq9-avwtOO27jfG1_SJqkWRAx9gHWooRM</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Leerkes, Arjen</creator><creator>Martinez, Ramiro</creator><creator>Groeneveld, Pim</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Uniiversity Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>MINORITY PARADOXES</title><author>Leerkes, Arjen ; Martinez, Ramiro ; Groeneveld, Pim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-22f51fffa0d2ae4019ccabd2ca2c8d2a28daf4e5f85b074939a98553a755734d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Corrupt practices</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>ETHNIC GROUPS</topic><topic>INDIGENOUS PEOPLE</topic><topic>Logistic regression analysis</topic><topic>Minorities</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>PRISONERS</topic><topic>PRISONS</topic><topic>Proportional hazards models</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>SOCIOLOGY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leerkes, Arjen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Ramiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeneveld, Pim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>British journal of criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leerkes, Arjen</au><au>Martinez, Ramiro</au><au>Groeneveld, Pim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MINORITY PARADOXES: ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REPORTED OFFENDING AND OFFICIAL CRIME STATISTICS</atitle><jtitle>British journal of criminology</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>166-187</pages><issn>0007-0955</issn><eissn>1464-3529</eissn><abstract>Immigrants and their native-born children tend to be overrepresented among crime suspects in Europe. Using a representative Dutch survey, we examine whether inhabitants of Turkish and Moroccan origin also self-report more crimes than the native Dutch. In addition, we test various explanations for ethnic differences in crime, partly using variables that are unavailable in administrative data (socio-economic status [SES], perceived discrimination, neighbourhood disadvantage and control, family bonds, religiousness). We discover two ‘minority paradoxes’. Firstly, contrary to analyses using administrative data, both minorities have similar to lower self-reported crime rates compared to the majority group when age, sex, urbanization, SES and social desirability are controlled. Secondly, first-generation immigrants report fewer crimes than expected given their social disadvantage, thus indicating a notable ‘righteous migrant effect’.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/bjc/azy021</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0955
ispartof British journal of criminology, 2019-01, Vol.59 (1), p.166-187
issn 0007-0955
1464-3529
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_26780653
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Corrupt practices
Criminals
ETHNIC GROUPS
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
Logistic regression analysis
Minorities
Multivariate analysis
Prevention
PRISONERS
PRISONS
Proportional hazards models
Public administration
Rehabilitation
SOCIOLOGY
title MINORITY PARADOXES: ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REPORTED OFFENDING AND OFFICIAL CRIME STATISTICS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A34%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MINORITY%20PARADOXES:%20ETHNIC%20DIFFERENCES%20IN%20SELF-REPORTED%20OFFENDING%20AND%20OFFICIAL%20CRIME%20STATISTICS&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20criminology&rft.au=Leerkes,%20Arjen&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=166-187&rft.issn=0007-0955&rft.eissn=1464-3529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjc/azy021&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_rmit_%3E26780653%3C/jstor_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20190211006561&rft_jstor_id=26780653&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bjc/azy021&rfr_iscdi=true