MINORITY PARADOXES: ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REPORTED OFFENDING AND OFFICIAL CRIME STATISTICS
Immigrants and their native-born children tend to be overrepresented among crime suspects in Europe. Using a representative Dutch survey, we examine whether inhabitants of Turkish and Moroccan origin also self-report more crimes than the native Dutch. In addition, we test various explanations for et...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of criminology 2019-01, Vol.59 (1), p.166-187 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 187 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 166 |
container_title | British journal of criminology |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Leerkes, Arjen Martinez, Ramiro Groeneveld, Pim |
description | Immigrants and their native-born children tend to be overrepresented among crime suspects in Europe. Using a representative Dutch survey, we examine whether inhabitants of Turkish and Moroccan origin also self-report more crimes than the native Dutch. In addition, we test various explanations for ethnic differences in crime, partly using variables that are unavailable in administrative data (socio-economic status [SES], perceived discrimination, neighbourhood disadvantage and control, family bonds, religiousness). We discover two ‘minority paradoxes’. Firstly, contrary to analyses using administrative data, both minorities have similar to lower self-reported crime rates compared to the majority group when age, sex, urbanization, SES and social desirability are controlled. Secondly, first-generation immigrants report fewer crimes than expected given their social disadvantage, thus indicating a notable ‘righteous migrant effect’. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bjc/azy021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26780653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20190211006561</informt_id><jstor_id>26780653</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/bjc/azy021</oup_id><sourcerecordid>26780653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-22f51fffa0d2ae4019ccabd2ca2c8d2a28daf4e5f85b074939a98553a755734d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj89LwzAUgIMoWKeX3QUvXoS6_Gyb45jTDaaTOUFP4TVttg5nSxIP8683tepFEDw98vjy8T6E-gRfEizZIN_oAbzvMCV7KCI84TETVO6jCGOcxlgKcYiOnNuEZyI5iVD_dno3X0yXz2f3w8Xwav40fjhGBwZeXHnyNXvo8Xq8HE3i2fxmOhrOYi0I8TGlRhBjDOCCQskxkVpDXlANVGdhRbMCDC-FyUSOUy6ZBJkJwSAVImW8YD100Xm1rZ2zpVGNrbZgd4pg1daoUKO6mgBPOthuK69gVbnGK1eC1WtVvZr6c13blSrqqv3PGEm-MRpuCw4SmkXSqma_VWvvG6cK8PB_3Xmnq9-avwtOO27jfG1_SJqkWRAx9gHWooRM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>MINORITY PARADOXES: ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REPORTED OFFENDING AND OFFICIAL CRIME STATISTICS</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Leerkes, Arjen ; Martinez, Ramiro ; Groeneveld, Pim</creator><creatorcontrib>Leerkes, Arjen ; Martinez, Ramiro ; Groeneveld, Pim</creatorcontrib><description>Immigrants and their native-born children tend to be overrepresented among crime suspects in Europe. Using a representative Dutch survey, we examine whether inhabitants of Turkish and Moroccan origin also self-report more crimes than the native Dutch. In addition, we test various explanations for ethnic differences in crime, partly using variables that are unavailable in administrative data (socio-economic status [SES], perceived discrimination, neighbourhood disadvantage and control, family bonds, religiousness). We discover two ‘minority paradoxes’. Firstly, contrary to analyses using administrative data, both minorities have similar to lower self-reported crime rates compared to the majority group when age, sex, urbanization, SES and social desirability are controlled. Secondly, first-generation immigrants report fewer crimes than expected given their social disadvantage, thus indicating a notable ‘righteous migrant effect’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0955</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azy021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Corrupt practices ; Criminals ; ETHNIC GROUPS ; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ; Logistic regression analysis ; Minorities ; Multivariate analysis ; Prevention ; PRISONERS ; PRISONS ; Proportional hazards models ; Public administration ; Rehabilitation ; SOCIOLOGY</subject><ispartof>British journal of criminology, 2019-01, Vol.59 (1), p.166-187</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-22f51fffa0d2ae4019ccabd2ca2c8d2a28daf4e5f85b074939a98553a755734d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-22f51fffa0d2ae4019ccabd2ca2c8d2a28daf4e5f85b074939a98553a755734d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leerkes, Arjen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Ramiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeneveld, Pim</creatorcontrib><title>MINORITY PARADOXES: ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REPORTED OFFENDING AND OFFICIAL CRIME STATISTICS</title><title>British journal of criminology</title><description>Immigrants and their native-born children tend to be overrepresented among crime suspects in Europe. Using a representative Dutch survey, we examine whether inhabitants of Turkish and Moroccan origin also self-report more crimes than the native Dutch. In addition, we test various explanations for ethnic differences in crime, partly using variables that are unavailable in administrative data (socio-economic status [SES], perceived discrimination, neighbourhood disadvantage and control, family bonds, religiousness). We discover two ‘minority paradoxes’. Firstly, contrary to analyses using administrative data, both minorities have similar to lower self-reported crime rates compared to the majority group when age, sex, urbanization, SES and social desirability are controlled. Secondly, first-generation immigrants report fewer crimes than expected given their social disadvantage, thus indicating a notable ‘righteous migrant effect’.</description><subject>Corrupt practices</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>ETHNIC GROUPS</subject><subject>INDIGENOUS PEOPLE</subject><subject>Logistic regression analysis</subject><subject>Minorities</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>PRISONERS</subject><subject>PRISONS</subject><subject>Proportional hazards models</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>SOCIOLOGY</subject><issn>0007-0955</issn><issn>1464-3529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj89LwzAUgIMoWKeX3QUvXoS6_Gyb45jTDaaTOUFP4TVttg5nSxIP8683tepFEDw98vjy8T6E-gRfEizZIN_oAbzvMCV7KCI84TETVO6jCGOcxlgKcYiOnNuEZyI5iVD_dno3X0yXz2f3w8Xwav40fjhGBwZeXHnyNXvo8Xq8HE3i2fxmOhrOYi0I8TGlRhBjDOCCQskxkVpDXlANVGdhRbMCDC-FyUSOUy6ZBJkJwSAVImW8YD100Xm1rZ2zpVGNrbZgd4pg1daoUKO6mgBPOthuK69gVbnGK1eC1WtVvZr6c13blSrqqv3PGEm-MRpuCw4SmkXSqma_VWvvG6cK8PB_3Xmnq9-avwtOO27jfG1_SJqkWRAx9gHWooRM</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Leerkes, Arjen</creator><creator>Martinez, Ramiro</creator><creator>Groeneveld, Pim</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Uniiversity Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>MINORITY PARADOXES</title><author>Leerkes, Arjen ; Martinez, Ramiro ; Groeneveld, Pim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-22f51fffa0d2ae4019ccabd2ca2c8d2a28daf4e5f85b074939a98553a755734d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Corrupt practices</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>ETHNIC GROUPS</topic><topic>INDIGENOUS PEOPLE</topic><topic>Logistic regression analysis</topic><topic>Minorities</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>PRISONERS</topic><topic>PRISONS</topic><topic>Proportional hazards models</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>SOCIOLOGY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leerkes, Arjen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Ramiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeneveld, Pim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>British journal of criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leerkes, Arjen</au><au>Martinez, Ramiro</au><au>Groeneveld, Pim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MINORITY PARADOXES: ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REPORTED OFFENDING AND OFFICIAL CRIME STATISTICS</atitle><jtitle>British journal of criminology</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>166-187</pages><issn>0007-0955</issn><eissn>1464-3529</eissn><abstract>Immigrants and their native-born children tend to be overrepresented among crime suspects in Europe. Using a representative Dutch survey, we examine whether inhabitants of Turkish and Moroccan origin also self-report more crimes than the native Dutch. In addition, we test various explanations for ethnic differences in crime, partly using variables that are unavailable in administrative data (socio-economic status [SES], perceived discrimination, neighbourhood disadvantage and control, family bonds, religiousness). We discover two ‘minority paradoxes’. Firstly, contrary to analyses using administrative data, both minorities have similar to lower self-reported crime rates compared to the majority group when age, sex, urbanization, SES and social desirability are controlled. Secondly, first-generation immigrants report fewer crimes than expected given their social disadvantage, thus indicating a notable ‘righteous migrant effect’.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/bjc/azy021</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0955 |
ispartof | British journal of criminology, 2019-01, Vol.59 (1), p.166-187 |
issn | 0007-0955 1464-3529 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_26780653 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Corrupt practices Criminals ETHNIC GROUPS INDIGENOUS PEOPLE Logistic regression analysis Minorities Multivariate analysis Prevention PRISONERS PRISONS Proportional hazards models Public administration Rehabilitation SOCIOLOGY |
title | MINORITY PARADOXES: ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REPORTED OFFENDING AND OFFICIAL CRIME STATISTICS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A34%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MINORITY%20PARADOXES:%20ETHNIC%20DIFFERENCES%20IN%20SELF-REPORTED%20OFFENDING%20AND%20OFFICIAL%20CRIME%20STATISTICS&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20criminology&rft.au=Leerkes,%20Arjen&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=166-187&rft.issn=0007-0955&rft.eissn=1464-3529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjc/azy021&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_rmit_%3E26780653%3C/jstor_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20190211006561&rft_jstor_id=26780653&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bjc/azy021&rfr_iscdi=true |