EVALUATING INDIA’S CLIMATE TARGETS: THE IMPLICATIONS OF ECONOMY-WIDE AND SECTOR-SPECIFIC POLICIES

We employ a numerical economy-wide model of India with energy sector detail to evaluate the impact of achieving India’s commitments to the Paris Climate Agreement. We simulate targets for reducing CO2 emissions intensity of GDP via an economy-wide CO2 price and for increasing non-fossil electricity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Climate change economics 2019-01, Vol.10 (3), p.1-29
Hauptverfasser: SINGH, ARUN, WINCHESTER, NIVEN, KARPLUS, VALERIE J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1
container_title Climate change economics
container_volume 10
creator SINGH, ARUN
WINCHESTER, NIVEN
KARPLUS, VALERIE J.
description We employ a numerical economy-wide model of India with energy sector detail to evaluate the impact of achieving India’s commitments to the Paris Climate Agreement. We simulate targets for reducing CO2 emissions intensity of GDP via an economy-wide CO2 price and for increasing non-fossil electricity capacity via a Renewable Portfolio Standard. We find that compared with the no policy scenario in 2030, the average cost per unit of emissions reduced is lowest under a CO2 pricing regime. A pure RPS costs more than 10 times the cost of a CO2 pricing regime. Projected electricity demand in 2030 decreases by 8% under the CO2 price, while introducing an RPS further suppresses electricity demand. Importantly, a reduction in the costs of wind and solar power induced by favorable policies may result in cost convergence across instruments, paving the way for more aggressive decarbonization policies in the future.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26748529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26748529</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26748529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g878-6a11952629f046c79c3229554f2ee5abf11504abdcd5b0439e31bf2248c709ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jM1qAjEYAIO0ULE-QmEPvS58-fJ_DNt1DawWatqrZGMilZbKrhdvfY2-nk9iQXEuM6cZkTEChRJAy7tbK_1ApsOwg3-U0srQMXmuP2z7br1bNoVbvjh7-v1bFVXrFtbXhbdvTe1Xj-Q-h68hTa-eED-rfTUv29fGVbYtt1rpUgZKjUCJJgOXUZnIEI0QPGNKInSZUgE8dJu4ER1wZhKjXUbkOiowKbIJebpsd8Php1_v-8_v0B_XKBXXAg07A0-eNrs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>EVALUATING INDIA’S CLIMATE TARGETS: THE IMPLICATIONS OF ECONOMY-WIDE AND SECTOR-SPECIFIC POLICIES</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>SINGH, ARUN ; WINCHESTER, NIVEN ; KARPLUS, VALERIE J.</creator><creatorcontrib>SINGH, ARUN ; WINCHESTER, NIVEN ; KARPLUS, VALERIE J.</creatorcontrib><description>We employ a numerical economy-wide model of India with energy sector detail to evaluate the impact of achieving India’s commitments to the Paris Climate Agreement. We simulate targets for reducing CO2 emissions intensity of GDP via an economy-wide CO2 price and for increasing non-fossil electricity capacity via a Renewable Portfolio Standard. We find that compared with the no policy scenario in 2030, the average cost per unit of emissions reduced is lowest under a CO2 pricing regime. A pure RPS costs more than 10 times the cost of a CO2 pricing regime. Projected electricity demand in 2030 decreases by 8% under the CO2 price, while introducing an RPS further suppresses electricity demand. Importantly, a reduction in the costs of wind and solar power induced by favorable policies may result in cost convergence across instruments, paving the way for more aggressive decarbonization policies in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2010-0078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2010-0086</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc</publisher><ispartof>Climate change economics, 2019-01, Vol.10 (3), p.1-29</ispartof><rights>The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26748529$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26748529$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SINGH, ARUN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINCHESTER, NIVEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARPLUS, VALERIE J.</creatorcontrib><title>EVALUATING INDIA’S CLIMATE TARGETS: THE IMPLICATIONS OF ECONOMY-WIDE AND SECTOR-SPECIFIC POLICIES</title><title>Climate change economics</title><description>We employ a numerical economy-wide model of India with energy sector detail to evaluate the impact of achieving India’s commitments to the Paris Climate Agreement. We simulate targets for reducing CO2 emissions intensity of GDP via an economy-wide CO2 price and for increasing non-fossil electricity capacity via a Renewable Portfolio Standard. We find that compared with the no policy scenario in 2030, the average cost per unit of emissions reduced is lowest under a CO2 pricing regime. A pure RPS costs more than 10 times the cost of a CO2 pricing regime. Projected electricity demand in 2030 decreases by 8% under the CO2 price, while introducing an RPS further suppresses electricity demand. Importantly, a reduction in the costs of wind and solar power induced by favorable policies may result in cost convergence across instruments, paving the way for more aggressive decarbonization policies in the future.</description><issn>2010-0078</issn><issn>2010-0086</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNo9jM1qAjEYAIO0ULE-QmEPvS58-fJ_DNt1DawWatqrZGMilZbKrhdvfY2-nk9iQXEuM6cZkTEChRJAy7tbK_1ApsOwg3-U0srQMXmuP2z7br1bNoVbvjh7-v1bFVXrFtbXhbdvTe1Xj-Q-h68hTa-eED-rfTUv29fGVbYtt1rpUgZKjUCJJgOXUZnIEI0QPGNKInSZUgE8dJu4ER1wZhKjXUbkOiowKbIJebpsd8Php1_v-8_v0B_XKBXXAg07A0-eNrs</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>SINGH, ARUN</creator><creator>WINCHESTER, NIVEN</creator><creator>KARPLUS, VALERIE J.</creator><general>World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>EVALUATING INDIA’S CLIMATE TARGETS</title><author>SINGH, ARUN ; WINCHESTER, NIVEN ; KARPLUS, VALERIE J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g878-6a11952629f046c79c3229554f2ee5abf11504abdcd5b0439e31bf2248c709ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SINGH, ARUN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINCHESTER, NIVEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARPLUS, VALERIE J.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Climate change economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SINGH, ARUN</au><au>WINCHESTER, NIVEN</au><au>KARPLUS, VALERIE J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EVALUATING INDIA’S CLIMATE TARGETS: THE IMPLICATIONS OF ECONOMY-WIDE AND SECTOR-SPECIFIC POLICIES</atitle><jtitle>Climate change economics</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>1-29</pages><issn>2010-0078</issn><eissn>2010-0086</eissn><abstract>We employ a numerical economy-wide model of India with energy sector detail to evaluate the impact of achieving India’s commitments to the Paris Climate Agreement. We simulate targets for reducing CO2 emissions intensity of GDP via an economy-wide CO2 price and for increasing non-fossil electricity capacity via a Renewable Portfolio Standard. We find that compared with the no policy scenario in 2030, the average cost per unit of emissions reduced is lowest under a CO2 pricing regime. A pure RPS costs more than 10 times the cost of a CO2 pricing regime. Projected electricity demand in 2030 decreases by 8% under the CO2 price, while introducing an RPS further suppresses electricity demand. Importantly, a reduction in the costs of wind and solar power induced by favorable policies may result in cost convergence across instruments, paving the way for more aggressive decarbonization policies in the future.</abstract><pub>World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc</pub><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2010-0078
ispartof Climate change economics, 2019-01, Vol.10 (3), p.1-29
issn 2010-0078
2010-0086
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_26748529
source Jstor Complete Legacy
title EVALUATING INDIA’S CLIMATE TARGETS: THE IMPLICATIONS OF ECONOMY-WIDE AND SECTOR-SPECIFIC POLICIES
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A44%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EVALUATING%20INDIA%E2%80%99S%20CLIMATE%20TARGETS:%20THE%20IMPLICATIONS%20OF%20ECONOMY-WIDE%20AND%20SECTOR-SPECIFIC%20POLICIES&rft.jtitle=Climate%20change%20economics&rft.au=SINGH,%20ARUN&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=1-29&rft.issn=2010-0078&rft.eissn=2010-0086&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E26748529%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26748529&rfr_iscdi=true