The problem of proof identity, and why computer scientists should care about Hilbert’s 24th problem

In this short overview article, I will discuss the problem of proof identity and explain how it is related to Hilbert’s 24th problem. I will also argue that not knowing when two proofs are ‘the same’ has embarrassing consequences not only for proof theory but also for certain areas of computer scien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences physical, and engineering sciences, 2019-03, Vol.377 (2140), p.1-14
1. Verfasser: Straßburger, Lutz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 2140
container_start_page 1
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences
container_volume 377
creator Straßburger, Lutz
description In this short overview article, I will discuss the problem of proof identity and explain how it is related to Hilbert’s 24th problem. I will also argue that not knowing when two proofs are ‘the same’ has embarrassing consequences not only for proof theory but also for certain areas of computer science where formal proofs play a fundamental role, in particular, the formal verification of software. Then I will formulate a set of four objectives that a satisfactory notion of proof identity should obey. And finally, I discuss Hughes’ combinatorial proofs and argue that they can be seen as a first step towards a possible solution to the problem of proof identity. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The notion of ‘simple proof’ - Hilbert’s 24th problem’.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26644635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26644635</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26644635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_266446353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjE0KgkAYhocoyH6OEHwHSHDGcaJ1FB7ARTsZdcQRdWS-kXDXNbpeJ0mh1m3e54EH3gXxKD9Rn50FW04eCu5HQXhfkw1iHQSUioh5RCWVgt6arFEtmHLWaXWhOqfdeATZFfCoRshN2w9OWcBczw0dAlZmaArIpVUgMzM4iHWTKevezxcC4676Pe_IqpQNqv2XW3K4XZNL7NfojE17q1tpx5QJwbkIo_Bf_wCJlUSj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The problem of proof identity, and why computer scientists should care about Hilbert’s 24th problem</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics &amp; Statistics</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Straßburger, Lutz</creator><creatorcontrib>Straßburger, Lutz</creatorcontrib><description>In this short overview article, I will discuss the problem of proof identity and explain how it is related to Hilbert’s 24th problem. I will also argue that not knowing when two proofs are ‘the same’ has embarrassing consequences not only for proof theory but also for certain areas of computer science where formal proofs play a fundamental role, in particular, the formal verification of software. Then I will formulate a set of four objectives that a satisfactory notion of proof identity should obey. And finally, I discuss Hughes’ combinatorial proofs and argue that they can be seen as a first step towards a possible solution to the problem of proof identity. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The notion of ‘simple proof’ - Hilbert’s 24th problem’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-503X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2962</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Royal Society</publisher><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2019-03, Vol.377 (2140), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26644635$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26644635$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,828,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Straßburger, Lutz</creatorcontrib><title>The problem of proof identity, and why computer scientists should care about Hilbert’s 24th problem</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</title><description>In this short overview article, I will discuss the problem of proof identity and explain how it is related to Hilbert’s 24th problem. I will also argue that not knowing when two proofs are ‘the same’ has embarrassing consequences not only for proof theory but also for certain areas of computer science where formal proofs play a fundamental role, in particular, the formal verification of software. Then I will formulate a set of four objectives that a satisfactory notion of proof identity should obey. And finally, I discuss Hughes’ combinatorial proofs and argue that they can be seen as a first step towards a possible solution to the problem of proof identity. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The notion of ‘simple proof’ - Hilbert’s 24th problem’.</description><issn>1364-503X</issn><issn>1471-2962</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFjE0KgkAYhocoyH6OEHwHSHDGcaJ1FB7ARTsZdcQRdWS-kXDXNbpeJ0mh1m3e54EH3gXxKD9Rn50FW04eCu5HQXhfkw1iHQSUioh5RCWVgt6arFEtmHLWaXWhOqfdeATZFfCoRshN2w9OWcBczw0dAlZmaArIpVUgMzM4iHWTKevezxcC4676Pe_IqpQNqv2XW3K4XZNL7NfojE17q1tpx5QJwbkIo_Bf_wCJlUSj</recordid><startdate>20190311</startdate><enddate>20190311</enddate><creator>Straßburger, Lutz</creator><general>Royal Society</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20190311</creationdate><title>The problem of proof identity, and why computer scientists should care about Hilbert’s 24th problem</title><author>Straßburger, Lutz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_266446353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Straßburger, Lutz</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Straßburger, Lutz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The problem of proof identity, and why computer scientists should care about Hilbert’s 24th problem</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</jtitle><date>2019-03-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>377</volume><issue>2140</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>1364-503X</issn><eissn>1471-2962</eissn><abstract>In this short overview article, I will discuss the problem of proof identity and explain how it is related to Hilbert’s 24th problem. I will also argue that not knowing when two proofs are ‘the same’ has embarrassing consequences not only for proof theory but also for certain areas of computer science where formal proofs play a fundamental role, in particular, the formal verification of software. Then I will formulate a set of four objectives that a satisfactory notion of proof identity should obey. And finally, I discuss Hughes’ combinatorial proofs and argue that they can be seen as a first step towards a possible solution to the problem of proof identity. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The notion of ‘simple proof’ - Hilbert’s 24th problem’.</abstract><pub>Royal Society</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-503X
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2019-03, Vol.377 (2140), p.1-14
issn 1364-503X
1471-2962
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_26644635
source JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
title The problem of proof identity, and why computer scientists should care about Hilbert’s 24th problem
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A38%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20problem%20of%20proof%20identity,%20and%20why%20computer%20scientists%20should%20care%20about%20Hilbert%E2%80%99s%2024th%20problem&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20A:%20Mathematical,%20physical,%20and%20engineering%20sciences&rft.au=Stra%C3%9Fburger,%20Lutz&rft.date=2019-03-11&rft.volume=377&rft.issue=2140&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=1364-503X&rft.eissn=1471-2962&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E26644635%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26644635&rfr_iscdi=true