Possible Selves in Late Antiquity: Ideal Selfhood and Embodied Selves in Evagrian Anthropology
In social psychology an ideal self is understood as a psychological component of the self that serves as the core mechanism for self-regulation and motivation. According to the theory of Possible Selves put forward by psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius, the self is a collection of schemas o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of religion 2018-01, Vol.98 (1), p.59-89 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 89 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | The Journal of religion |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Graiver, Inbar |
description | In social psychology an ideal self is understood as a psychological component of the self that serves as the core mechanism for self-regulation and motivation. According to the theory of Possible Selves put forward by psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius, the self is a collection of schemas or possible selves, which represent individuals' ideas of what they might become, what they would like to become, and what they are afraid of becoming. According to this prominent model, people evaluate their current selves with reference to possible selves. The latter function as incentives for behavior by providing a conceptual link between cognition and motivation. This article considers the intellectual background that gave rise to this double view of selfhood and examines the ideal self model prescribed by the Alexandrian theologians and their followers. The identification of the self is tied to value judgments, namely, to what one believes to express oneself best, be that cognition, desire, moral choices or personality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/694589 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26544119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26544119</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26544119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc517adddf65c555bb945c6fe4baa7116e26fb92ab76cf4014e6997ff5aed0553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz0tLxDAUBeAgCtZR_4FQUdxV703zaJbD4AsKCuq6pGmiHWrbSdqB-fdWKuPqbj7OPYeQc4RbhEzcCcV4pg5IhJypRPA0OyQRAKUJw0wdk5MQ1gCIGciIXL52IdRlY-M322xtiOs2zvVg42U71JuxHnan5MjpJtizv7sgHw_376unJH95fF4t88SkQIekMhylrqrKCW4452U51TDCWVZqLRGFpcKViupSCuMYILNCKekc17YCztMFuZpze99tRhuGYt2Nvp1eFhQoY1IisEndzMr4qbi3ruh9_a39rkAofucX8_wJXs9wNF-10Z9d720I_5l7djGzdRg6vw-jgjOGqNIf8qZg6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2024477104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Possible Selves in Late Antiquity: Ideal Selfhood and Embodied Selves in Evagrian Anthropology</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Graiver, Inbar</creator><creatorcontrib>Graiver, Inbar</creatorcontrib><description>In social psychology an ideal self is understood as a psychological component of the self that serves as the core mechanism for self-regulation and motivation. According to the theory of Possible Selves put forward by psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius, the self is a collection of schemas or possible selves, which represent individuals' ideas of what they might become, what they would like to become, and what they are afraid of becoming. According to this prominent model, people evaluate their current selves with reference to possible selves. The latter function as incentives for behavior by providing a conceptual link between cognition and motivation. This article considers the intellectual background that gave rise to this double view of selfhood and examines the ideal self model prescribed by the Alexandrian theologians and their followers. The identification of the self is tied to value judgments, namely, to what one believes to express oneself best, be that cognition, desire, moral choices or personality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-6538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/694589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Early Middle Ages ; Identity formation ; Morality ; Motivation ; Self image ; Social history ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of religion, 2018-01, Vol.98 (1), p.59-89</ispartof><rights>2018 by The University of Chicago</rights><rights>2018 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc517adddf65c555bb945c6fe4baa7116e26fb92ab76cf4014e6997ff5aed0553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc517adddf65c555bb945c6fe4baa7116e26fb92ab76cf4014e6997ff5aed0553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26544119$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26544119$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graiver, Inbar</creatorcontrib><title>Possible Selves in Late Antiquity: Ideal Selfhood and Embodied Selves in Evagrian Anthropology</title><title>The Journal of religion</title><description>In social psychology an ideal self is understood as a psychological component of the self that serves as the core mechanism for self-regulation and motivation. According to the theory of Possible Selves put forward by psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius, the self is a collection of schemas or possible selves, which represent individuals' ideas of what they might become, what they would like to become, and what they are afraid of becoming. According to this prominent model, people evaluate their current selves with reference to possible selves. The latter function as incentives for behavior by providing a conceptual link between cognition and motivation. This article considers the intellectual background that gave rise to this double view of selfhood and examines the ideal self model prescribed by the Alexandrian theologians and their followers. The identification of the self is tied to value judgments, namely, to what one believes to express oneself best, be that cognition, desire, moral choices or personality.</description><subject>Early Middle Ages</subject><subject>Identity formation</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Self image</subject><subject>Social history</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0022-4189</issn><issn>1549-6538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz0tLxDAUBeAgCtZR_4FQUdxV703zaJbD4AsKCuq6pGmiHWrbSdqB-fdWKuPqbj7OPYeQc4RbhEzcCcV4pg5IhJypRPA0OyQRAKUJw0wdk5MQ1gCIGciIXL52IdRlY-M322xtiOs2zvVg42U71JuxHnan5MjpJtizv7sgHw_376unJH95fF4t88SkQIekMhylrqrKCW4452U51TDCWVZqLRGFpcKViupSCuMYILNCKekc17YCztMFuZpze99tRhuGYt2Nvp1eFhQoY1IisEndzMr4qbi3ruh9_a39rkAofucX8_wJXs9wNF-10Z9d720I_5l7djGzdRg6vw-jgjOGqNIf8qZg6A</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Graiver, Inbar</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Possible Selves in Late Antiquity</title><author>Graiver, Inbar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc517adddf65c555bb945c6fe4baa7116e26fb92ab76cf4014e6997ff5aed0553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Early Middle Ages</topic><topic>Identity formation</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Self image</topic><topic>Social history</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graiver, Inbar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graiver, Inbar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Possible Selves in Late Antiquity: Ideal Selfhood and Embodied Selves in Evagrian Anthropology</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of religion</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>59-89</pages><issn>0022-4189</issn><eissn>1549-6538</eissn><abstract>In social psychology an ideal self is understood as a psychological component of the self that serves as the core mechanism for self-regulation and motivation. According to the theory of Possible Selves put forward by psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius, the self is a collection of schemas or possible selves, which represent individuals' ideas of what they might become, what they would like to become, and what they are afraid of becoming. According to this prominent model, people evaluate their current selves with reference to possible selves. The latter function as incentives for behavior by providing a conceptual link between cognition and motivation. This article considers the intellectual background that gave rise to this double view of selfhood and examines the ideal self model prescribed by the Alexandrian theologians and their followers. The identification of the self is tied to value judgments, namely, to what one believes to express oneself best, be that cognition, desire, moral choices or personality.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/694589</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4189 |
ispartof | The Journal of religion, 2018-01, Vol.98 (1), p.59-89 |
issn | 0022-4189 1549-6538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_26544119 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Early Middle Ages Identity formation Morality Motivation Self image Social history Social psychology |
title | Possible Selves in Late Antiquity: Ideal Selfhood and Embodied Selves in Evagrian Anthropology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T23%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Possible%20Selves%20in%20Late%20Antiquity:%20Ideal%20Selfhood%20and%20Embodied%20Selves%20in%20Evagrian%20Anthropology&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20religion&rft.au=Graiver,%20Inbar&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=59-89&rft.issn=0022-4189&rft.eissn=1549-6538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/694589&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26544119%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2024477104&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26544119&rfr_iscdi=true |