Possible Selves in Late Antiquity: Ideal Selfhood and Embodied Selves in Evagrian Anthropology

In social psychology an ideal self is understood as a psychological component of the self that serves as the core mechanism for self-regulation and motivation. According to the theory of Possible Selves put forward by psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius, the self is a collection of schemas o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of religion 2018-01, Vol.98 (1), p.59-89
1. Verfasser: Graiver, Inbar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 89
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title The Journal of religion
container_volume 98
creator Graiver, Inbar
description In social psychology an ideal self is understood as a psychological component of the self that serves as the core mechanism for self-regulation and motivation. According to the theory of Possible Selves put forward by psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius, the self is a collection of schemas or possible selves, which represent individuals' ideas of what they might become, what they would like to become, and what they are afraid of becoming. According to this prominent model, people evaluate their current selves with reference to possible selves. The latter function as incentives for behavior by providing a conceptual link between cognition and motivation. This article considers the intellectual background that gave rise to this double view of selfhood and examines the ideal self model prescribed by the Alexandrian theologians and their followers. The identification of the self is tied to value judgments, namely, to what one believes to express oneself best, be that cognition, desire, moral choices or personality.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/694589
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26544119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26544119</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26544119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc517adddf65c555bb945c6fe4baa7116e26fb92ab76cf4014e6997ff5aed0553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz0tLxDAUBeAgCtZR_4FQUdxV703zaJbD4AsKCuq6pGmiHWrbSdqB-fdWKuPqbj7OPYeQc4RbhEzcCcV4pg5IhJypRPA0OyQRAKUJw0wdk5MQ1gCIGciIXL52IdRlY-M322xtiOs2zvVg42U71JuxHnan5MjpJtizv7sgHw_376unJH95fF4t88SkQIekMhylrqrKCW4452U51TDCWVZqLRGFpcKViupSCuMYILNCKekc17YCztMFuZpze99tRhuGYt2Nvp1eFhQoY1IisEndzMr4qbi3ruh9_a39rkAofucX8_wJXs9wNF-10Z9d720I_5l7djGzdRg6vw-jgjOGqNIf8qZg6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2024477104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Possible Selves in Late Antiquity: Ideal Selfhood and Embodied Selves in Evagrian Anthropology</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Graiver, Inbar</creator><creatorcontrib>Graiver, Inbar</creatorcontrib><description>In social psychology an ideal self is understood as a psychological component of the self that serves as the core mechanism for self-regulation and motivation. According to the theory of Possible Selves put forward by psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius, the self is a collection of schemas or possible selves, which represent individuals' ideas of what they might become, what they would like to become, and what they are afraid of becoming. According to this prominent model, people evaluate their current selves with reference to possible selves. The latter function as incentives for behavior by providing a conceptual link between cognition and motivation. This article considers the intellectual background that gave rise to this double view of selfhood and examines the ideal self model prescribed by the Alexandrian theologians and their followers. The identification of the self is tied to value judgments, namely, to what one believes to express oneself best, be that cognition, desire, moral choices or personality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-6538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/694589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Early Middle Ages ; Identity formation ; Morality ; Motivation ; Self image ; Social history ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of religion, 2018-01, Vol.98 (1), p.59-89</ispartof><rights>2018 by The University of Chicago</rights><rights>2018 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc517adddf65c555bb945c6fe4baa7116e26fb92ab76cf4014e6997ff5aed0553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc517adddf65c555bb945c6fe4baa7116e26fb92ab76cf4014e6997ff5aed0553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26544119$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26544119$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graiver, Inbar</creatorcontrib><title>Possible Selves in Late Antiquity: Ideal Selfhood and Embodied Selves in Evagrian Anthropology</title><title>The Journal of religion</title><description>In social psychology an ideal self is understood as a psychological component of the self that serves as the core mechanism for self-regulation and motivation. According to the theory of Possible Selves put forward by psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius, the self is a collection of schemas or possible selves, which represent individuals' ideas of what they might become, what they would like to become, and what they are afraid of becoming. According to this prominent model, people evaluate their current selves with reference to possible selves. The latter function as incentives for behavior by providing a conceptual link between cognition and motivation. This article considers the intellectual background that gave rise to this double view of selfhood and examines the ideal self model prescribed by the Alexandrian theologians and their followers. The identification of the self is tied to value judgments, namely, to what one believes to express oneself best, be that cognition, desire, moral choices or personality.</description><subject>Early Middle Ages</subject><subject>Identity formation</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Self image</subject><subject>Social history</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0022-4189</issn><issn>1549-6538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz0tLxDAUBeAgCtZR_4FQUdxV703zaJbD4AsKCuq6pGmiHWrbSdqB-fdWKuPqbj7OPYeQc4RbhEzcCcV4pg5IhJypRPA0OyQRAKUJw0wdk5MQ1gCIGciIXL52IdRlY-M322xtiOs2zvVg42U71JuxHnan5MjpJtizv7sgHw_376unJH95fF4t88SkQIekMhylrqrKCW4452U51TDCWVZqLRGFpcKViupSCuMYILNCKekc17YCztMFuZpze99tRhuGYt2Nvp1eFhQoY1IisEndzMr4qbi3ruh9_a39rkAofucX8_wJXs9wNF-10Z9d720I_5l7djGzdRg6vw-jgjOGqNIf8qZg6A</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Graiver, Inbar</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Possible Selves in Late Antiquity</title><author>Graiver, Inbar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc517adddf65c555bb945c6fe4baa7116e26fb92ab76cf4014e6997ff5aed0553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Early Middle Ages</topic><topic>Identity formation</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Self image</topic><topic>Social history</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graiver, Inbar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graiver, Inbar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Possible Selves in Late Antiquity: Ideal Selfhood and Embodied Selves in Evagrian Anthropology</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of religion</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>59-89</pages><issn>0022-4189</issn><eissn>1549-6538</eissn><abstract>In social psychology an ideal self is understood as a psychological component of the self that serves as the core mechanism for self-regulation and motivation. According to the theory of Possible Selves put forward by psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius, the self is a collection of schemas or possible selves, which represent individuals' ideas of what they might become, what they would like to become, and what they are afraid of becoming. According to this prominent model, people evaluate their current selves with reference to possible selves. The latter function as incentives for behavior by providing a conceptual link between cognition and motivation. This article considers the intellectual background that gave rise to this double view of selfhood and examines the ideal self model prescribed by the Alexandrian theologians and their followers. The identification of the self is tied to value judgments, namely, to what one believes to express oneself best, be that cognition, desire, moral choices or personality.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/694589</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4189
ispartof The Journal of religion, 2018-01, Vol.98 (1), p.59-89
issn 0022-4189
1549-6538
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_26544119
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Early Middle Ages
Identity formation
Morality
Motivation
Self image
Social history
Social psychology
title Possible Selves in Late Antiquity: Ideal Selfhood and Embodied Selves in Evagrian Anthropology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T23%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Possible%20Selves%20in%20Late%20Antiquity:%20Ideal%20Selfhood%20and%20Embodied%20Selves%20in%20Evagrian%20Anthropology&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20religion&rft.au=Graiver,%20Inbar&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=59-89&rft.issn=0022-4189&rft.eissn=1549-6538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/694589&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26544119%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2024477104&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26544119&rfr_iscdi=true