Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon
Several authors find some points of resemblance between John Scottus Eriugena and German Idealism. But idealistic philosophers, like Hegel, did not read Eriugena's major work, Periphyseon, and, instead, they knew about his thought through the histories of philosophy that circulated during ninet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 2015-01, Vol.57, p.105-123 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 123 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Strok, Natalia |
description | Several authors find some points of resemblance between John Scottus Eriugena and German Idealism. But idealistic philosophers, like Hegel, did not read Eriugena's major work, Periphyseon, and, instead, they knew about his thought through the histories of philosophy that circulated during nineteenth century in Germany. In this sense, this article seeks to analyze how three German historians of philosophy of modern times, Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner, belonging to different philosophical trends, present Eriugena's thought in regard to the theme of pantheism, the most important topic pointed out in those historical philosophical works. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26353762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26353762</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26353762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_263537623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFyr0OgjAUQOEOmog_j2DSzUWShkoFRw3GwYEQdtLIBYpyS24hkbfXwd3pDN-ZMU8IIf0oPqgFWzrXCqFUHEYeuydkxhpQ7xxPNQ4NGNed-JnGxxNoz3NAhE4jco0lz8wbgb5rBro0WHNb8RTI9M3kwOKazSv9crD5dcW21yS_3PzWDZaKnkynaSoCJUN5VIH85x-s4DgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Strok, Natalia</creator><creatorcontrib>Strok, Natalia</creatorcontrib><description>Several authors find some points of resemblance between John Scottus Eriugena and German Idealism. But idealistic philosophers, like Hegel, did not read Eriugena's major work, Periphyseon, and, instead, they knew about his thought through the histories of philosophy that circulated during nineteenth century in Germany. In this sense, this article seeks to analyze how three German historians of philosophy of modern times, Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner, belonging to different philosophical trends, present Eriugena's thought in regard to the theme of pantheism, the most important topic pointed out in those historical philosophical works.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-8946</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>FELIX MEINER VERLAG</publisher><subject>ABHANDLUNGEN</subject><ispartof>Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 2015-01, Vol.57, p.105-123</ispartof><rights>Felix Meiner Verlag Hamburg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26353762$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26353762$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strok, Natalia</creatorcontrib><title>Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon</title><title>Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte</title><description>Several authors find some points of resemblance between John Scottus Eriugena and German Idealism. But idealistic philosophers, like Hegel, did not read Eriugena's major work, Periphyseon, and, instead, they knew about his thought through the histories of philosophy that circulated during nineteenth century in Germany. In this sense, this article seeks to analyze how three German historians of philosophy of modern times, Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner, belonging to different philosophical trends, present Eriugena's thought in regard to the theme of pantheism, the most important topic pointed out in those historical philosophical works.</description><subject>ABHANDLUNGEN</subject><issn>0003-8946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFyr0OgjAUQOEOmog_j2DSzUWShkoFRw3GwYEQdtLIBYpyS24hkbfXwd3pDN-ZMU8IIf0oPqgFWzrXCqFUHEYeuydkxhpQ7xxPNQ4NGNed-JnGxxNoz3NAhE4jco0lz8wbgb5rBro0WHNb8RTI9M3kwOKazSv9crD5dcW21yS_3PzWDZaKnkynaSoCJUN5VIH85x-s4DgA</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Strok, Natalia</creator><general>FELIX MEINER VERLAG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon</title><author>Strok, Natalia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_263537623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>ABHANDLUNGEN</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strok, Natalia</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strok, Natalia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon</atitle><jtitle>Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>57</volume><spage>105</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>105-123</pages><issn>0003-8946</issn><abstract>Several authors find some points of resemblance between John Scottus Eriugena and German Idealism. But idealistic philosophers, like Hegel, did not read Eriugena's major work, Periphyseon, and, instead, they knew about his thought through the histories of philosophy that circulated during nineteenth century in Germany. In this sense, this article seeks to analyze how three German historians of philosophy of modern times, Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner, belonging to different philosophical trends, present Eriugena's thought in regard to the theme of pantheism, the most important topic pointed out in those historical philosophical works.</abstract><pub>FELIX MEINER VERLAG</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-8946 |
ispartof | Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 2015-01, Vol.57, p.105-123 |
issn | 0003-8946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_26353762 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | ABHANDLUNGEN |
title | Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A43%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eriugena's%20Pantheism:%20Brucker,%20Tennemann%20and%20Rixner's%20Reading%20of%20Periphyseon&rft.jtitle=Archiv%20fu%CC%88r%20Begriffsgeschichte&rft.au=Strok,%20Natalia&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=105-123&rft.issn=0003-8946&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E26353762%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26353762&rfr_iscdi=true |