Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon

Several authors find some points of resemblance between John Scottus Eriugena and German Idealism. But idealistic philosophers, like Hegel, did not read Eriugena's major work, Periphyseon, and, instead, they knew about his thought through the histories of philosophy that circulated during ninet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 2015-01, Vol.57, p.105-123
1. Verfasser: Strok, Natalia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 123
container_issue
container_start_page 105
container_title Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte
container_volume 57
creator Strok, Natalia
description Several authors find some points of resemblance between John Scottus Eriugena and German Idealism. But idealistic philosophers, like Hegel, did not read Eriugena's major work, Periphyseon, and, instead, they knew about his thought through the histories of philosophy that circulated during nineteenth century in Germany. In this sense, this article seeks to analyze how three German historians of philosophy of modern times, Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner, belonging to different philosophical trends, present Eriugena's thought in regard to the theme of pantheism, the most important topic pointed out in those historical philosophical works.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26353762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26353762</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26353762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_263537623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFyr0OgjAUQOEOmog_j2DSzUWShkoFRw3GwYEQdtLIBYpyS24hkbfXwd3pDN-ZMU8IIf0oPqgFWzrXCqFUHEYeuydkxhpQ7xxPNQ4NGNed-JnGxxNoz3NAhE4jco0lz8wbgb5rBro0WHNb8RTI9M3kwOKazSv9crD5dcW21yS_3PzWDZaKnkynaSoCJUN5VIH85x-s4DgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Strok, Natalia</creator><creatorcontrib>Strok, Natalia</creatorcontrib><description>Several authors find some points of resemblance between John Scottus Eriugena and German Idealism. But idealistic philosophers, like Hegel, did not read Eriugena's major work, Periphyseon, and, instead, they knew about his thought through the histories of philosophy that circulated during nineteenth century in Germany. In this sense, this article seeks to analyze how three German historians of philosophy of modern times, Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner, belonging to different philosophical trends, present Eriugena's thought in regard to the theme of pantheism, the most important topic pointed out in those historical philosophical works.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-8946</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>FELIX MEINER VERLAG</publisher><subject>ABHANDLUNGEN</subject><ispartof>Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 2015-01, Vol.57, p.105-123</ispartof><rights>Felix Meiner Verlag Hamburg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26353762$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26353762$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strok, Natalia</creatorcontrib><title>Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon</title><title>Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte</title><description>Several authors find some points of resemblance between John Scottus Eriugena and German Idealism. But idealistic philosophers, like Hegel, did not read Eriugena's major work, Periphyseon, and, instead, they knew about his thought through the histories of philosophy that circulated during nineteenth century in Germany. In this sense, this article seeks to analyze how three German historians of philosophy of modern times, Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner, belonging to different philosophical trends, present Eriugena's thought in regard to the theme of pantheism, the most important topic pointed out in those historical philosophical works.</description><subject>ABHANDLUNGEN</subject><issn>0003-8946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFyr0OgjAUQOEOmog_j2DSzUWShkoFRw3GwYEQdtLIBYpyS24hkbfXwd3pDN-ZMU8IIf0oPqgFWzrXCqFUHEYeuydkxhpQ7xxPNQ4NGNed-JnGxxNoz3NAhE4jco0lz8wbgb5rBro0WHNb8RTI9M3kwOKazSv9crD5dcW21yS_3PzWDZaKnkynaSoCJUN5VIH85x-s4DgA</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Strok, Natalia</creator><general>FELIX MEINER VERLAG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon</title><author>Strok, Natalia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_263537623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>ABHANDLUNGEN</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strok, Natalia</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strok, Natalia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon</atitle><jtitle>Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>57</volume><spage>105</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>105-123</pages><issn>0003-8946</issn><abstract>Several authors find some points of resemblance between John Scottus Eriugena and German Idealism. But idealistic philosophers, like Hegel, did not read Eriugena's major work, Periphyseon, and, instead, they knew about his thought through the histories of philosophy that circulated during nineteenth century in Germany. In this sense, this article seeks to analyze how three German historians of philosophy of modern times, Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner, belonging to different philosophical trends, present Eriugena's thought in regard to the theme of pantheism, the most important topic pointed out in those historical philosophical works.</abstract><pub>FELIX MEINER VERLAG</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-8946
ispartof Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 2015-01, Vol.57, p.105-123
issn 0003-8946
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_26353762
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects ABHANDLUNGEN
title Eriugena's Pantheism: Brucker, Tennemann and Rixner's Reading of Periphyseon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A43%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eriugena's%20Pantheism:%20Brucker,%20Tennemann%20and%20Rixner's%20Reading%20of%20Periphyseon&rft.jtitle=Archiv%20fu%CC%88r%20Begriffsgeschichte&rft.au=Strok,%20Natalia&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=105-123&rft.issn=0003-8946&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E26353762%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26353762&rfr_iscdi=true