INQUIRY INTO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BUSH'S EXECUTIVE ORDER 13211 AND THE IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATION
Executive Order 13211, promulgated in 2001, requires the federal government to consider the impact of federal action on energy independence as part of the George W. Bush's National Energy Policy. This law review examines whether EO 13211 was used to curtail environmental protection and natural...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fordham environmental law review 2016-01, Vol.27 (2), p.225-276 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 276 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 225 |
container_title | Fordham environmental law review |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Geltman, Elizabeth Glass Gill, Gunwant Jovanovic, Miriam |
description | Executive Order 13211, promulgated in 2001, requires the federal government to consider the impact of federal action on energy independence as part of the George W. Bush's National Energy Policy. This law review examines whether EO 13211 was used to curtail environmental protection and natural resource conservation. The article begins with a review of the procedure required of federal agencies under EO 13211 and its associated documents. The paper then examines case law and published federal rulemaking proceedings and examines how federal agencies apply tests to evaluate the potential energy effect. The study concludes that EO 13211 strikes a reasonable effective balance between environmental conservation and energy development. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26195897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26195897</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26195897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_261958973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjL0KwjAYADMoWH8eQfg2J6FpG23HWj9NIE1qmohO4qCgKErrIvjwStHZ6YbjrkU8ylgyjqYx65BuXZ99PwoTn3nkJdTKCbMFoawGyxFEXkjMUdnUCq1AL2DmSj4qATeYOSvWCNrM0QANA0ohVfNflmYWPgWqtTBaNQvZ-MLNpMiAYyotB4NLJ5t5n7SP-0t9GHzZI8MF2oyPz_XjVu3u1em6r567YEITFifT8J9_A3xrPcI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>INQUIRY INTO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BUSH'S EXECUTIVE ORDER 13211 AND THE IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATION</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Geltman, Elizabeth Glass ; Gill, Gunwant ; Jovanovic, Miriam</creator><creatorcontrib>Geltman, Elizabeth Glass ; Gill, Gunwant ; Jovanovic, Miriam</creatorcontrib><description>Executive Order 13211, promulgated in 2001, requires the federal government to consider the impact of federal action on energy independence as part of the George W. Bush's National Energy Policy. This law review examines whether EO 13211 was used to curtail environmental protection and natural resource conservation. The article begins with a review of the procedure required of federal agencies under EO 13211 and its associated documents. The paper then examines case law and published federal rulemaking proceedings and examines how federal agencies apply tests to evaluate the potential energy effect. The study concludes that EO 13211 strikes a reasonable effective balance between environmental conservation and energy development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-4785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fordham University School of Law</publisher><subject>Capital costs ; Environmental agencies ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental regulation ; Fossil fuels ; Habitat conservation ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Production costs ; Riverine habitats ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Fordham environmental law review, 2016-01, Vol.27 (2), p.225-276</ispartof><rights>2016 Fordham Environmental Law Review</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26195897$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26195897$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geltman, Elizabeth Glass</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Gunwant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jovanovic, Miriam</creatorcontrib><title>INQUIRY INTO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BUSH'S EXECUTIVE ORDER 13211 AND THE IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATION</title><title>Fordham environmental law review</title><description>Executive Order 13211, promulgated in 2001, requires the federal government to consider the impact of federal action on energy independence as part of the George W. Bush's National Energy Policy. This law review examines whether EO 13211 was used to curtail environmental protection and natural resource conservation. The article begins with a review of the procedure required of federal agencies under EO 13211 and its associated documents. The paper then examines case law and published federal rulemaking proceedings and examines how federal agencies apply tests to evaluate the potential energy effect. The study concludes that EO 13211 strikes a reasonable effective balance between environmental conservation and energy development.</description><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental regulation</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Riverine habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>1559-4785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFjL0KwjAYADMoWH8eQfg2J6FpG23HWj9NIE1qmohO4qCgKErrIvjwStHZ6YbjrkU8ylgyjqYx65BuXZ99PwoTn3nkJdTKCbMFoawGyxFEXkjMUdnUCq1AL2DmSj4qATeYOSvWCNrM0QANA0ohVfNflmYWPgWqtTBaNQvZ-MLNpMiAYyotB4NLJ5t5n7SP-0t9GHzZI8MF2oyPz_XjVu3u1em6r567YEITFifT8J9_A3xrPcI</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Geltman, Elizabeth Glass</creator><creator>Gill, Gunwant</creator><creator>Jovanovic, Miriam</creator><general>Fordham University School of Law</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>INQUIRY INTO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BUSH'S EXECUTIVE ORDER 13211 AND THE IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATION</title><author>Geltman, Elizabeth Glass ; Gill, Gunwant ; Jovanovic, Miriam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_261958973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental regulation</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Riverine habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geltman, Elizabeth Glass</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Gunwant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jovanovic, Miriam</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Fordham environmental law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geltman, Elizabeth Glass</au><au>Gill, Gunwant</au><au>Jovanovic, Miriam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INQUIRY INTO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BUSH'S EXECUTIVE ORDER 13211 AND THE IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATION</atitle><jtitle>Fordham environmental law review</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>276</epage><pages>225-276</pages><issn>1559-4785</issn><abstract>Executive Order 13211, promulgated in 2001, requires the federal government to consider the impact of federal action on energy independence as part of the George W. Bush's National Energy Policy. This law review examines whether EO 13211 was used to curtail environmental protection and natural resource conservation. The article begins with a review of the procedure required of federal agencies under EO 13211 and its associated documents. The paper then examines case law and published federal rulemaking proceedings and examines how federal agencies apply tests to evaluate the potential energy effect. The study concludes that EO 13211 strikes a reasonable effective balance between environmental conservation and energy development.</abstract><pub>Fordham University School of Law</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1559-4785 |
ispartof | Fordham environmental law review, 2016-01, Vol.27 (2), p.225-276 |
issn | 1559-4785 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_26195897 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Capital costs Environmental agencies Environmental conservation Environmental regulation Fossil fuels Habitat conservation Hydraulic fracturing Production costs Riverine habitats Wildlife habitats |
title | INQUIRY INTO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BUSH'S EXECUTIVE ORDER 13211 AND THE IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATION |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A51%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INQUIRY%20INTO%20THE%20IMPLEMENTATION%20OF%20BUSH'S%20EXECUTIVE%20ORDER%2013211%20AND%20THE%20IMPACT%20ON%20ENVIRONMENTAL%20AND%20PUBLIC%20HEALTH%20REGULATION&rft.jtitle=Fordham%20environmental%20law%20review&rft.au=Geltman,%20Elizabeth%20Glass&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=276&rft.pages=225-276&rft.issn=1559-4785&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E26195897%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26195897&rfr_iscdi=true |