It Is Not My Place! Psychological Standing and Men’s Voice and Participation in Gender-Parity Initiatives
Attempts to improve gender parity at workplaces are more effective when organizations mobilize their entire workforce, including men, to participate (i.e., speak up with ideas, volunteer, or serve as champions) in gender-parity initiatives. Yet, frequently, men are hesitant to participate in such in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organization science (Providence, R.I.) R.I.), 2017-03, Vol.28 (2), p.193-210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 210 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | Organization science (Providence, R.I.) |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Sherf, Elad N. Tangirala, Subrahmaniam Weber, Katy Connealy |
description | Attempts to improve gender parity at workplaces are more effective when organizations mobilize their entire workforce, including men, to participate (i.e., speak up with ideas, volunteer, or serve as champions) in gender-parity initiatives. Yet, frequently, men are hesitant to participate in such initiatives. We explicate one reason for such hesitation on the part of men and suggest ways organizations can address this challenge. Using four studies (correlational as well as experimental), we demonstrate that men experience lower psychological standing (i.e., a subjective judgment of legitimacy to perform an action) with respect to gender-parity initiatives that leads them to participate less in such initiatives. We explain how psychological standing provides a complementary explanation to the current narrative in the literature suggesting that men’s poor participation results from sexist or discriminatory attitudes toward gender parity. We also establish that psychological standing influences participation over and above efficacy, instrumentality, and psychological safety and highlight how organizations can increase men’s participation by providing them with psychological standing when soliciting their participation in gender-parity initiatives. We discuss the implications of our findings for the literatures on gender parity, change management, and employee voice and participation.
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1118
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/orsc.2017.1118 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26179331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A492898894</galeid><jstor_id>26179331</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A492898894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-266257ae90121fd8ffbd0f3aa94b68cea328d489466fa50d72024f9f7921b5513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhhtRcF29ehMigid7zGd357gs7jqwqwN-XEMmnfRm7EnGVEZ2bv4N_56_xLQjrgMDEkgVleetSsJbVU8JnhHata9jAjOjmLQzQkh3rzohgja14ELcLznmbd1iJh9WjwBWGGPOhDypvswzmgN6FzO63qHFqI19jhawMzdxjIM3ekQfsg69DwMqAV3b8PP7D0Cfozf2d2WhU_bGb3T2MSAf0KUNvU11qfu8Q_Pgsy9n3yw8rh44PYJ98ieeVp8u3nw8f1tfvb-cn59d1UYInmvaNFS02kpMKHF959yyx45pLfmy6YzVjHY97yRvGqcF7luKKXfStZKSpRCEnVYv9n03KX7dWshqFbcplJGKSMmwoJw1d9SgR6t8cDEnbdYejDrjknayKyMKVR-hBhts0mMM1vlSPuBnR_iyerv25qjg5YGgMNne5kFvAdQh-OofcLkFHyyUDfxwk2HPH7uISREgWac2ya912imC1eQXNflFTX5Rk1-K4NlesIIc01-aNqSVjJG7n5geldbwv36_AIn0yWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993052436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>It Is Not My Place! Psychological Standing and Men’s Voice and Participation in Gender-Parity Initiatives</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Education Source</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Sherf, Elad N. ; Tangirala, Subrahmaniam ; Weber, Katy Connealy</creator><creatorcontrib>Sherf, Elad N. ; Tangirala, Subrahmaniam ; Weber, Katy Connealy</creatorcontrib><description>Attempts to improve gender parity at workplaces are more effective when organizations mobilize their entire workforce, including men, to participate (i.e., speak up with ideas, volunteer, or serve as champions) in gender-parity initiatives. Yet, frequently, men are hesitant to participate in such initiatives. We explicate one reason for such hesitation on the part of men and suggest ways organizations can address this challenge. Using four studies (correlational as well as experimental), we demonstrate that men experience lower psychological standing (i.e., a subjective judgment of legitimacy to perform an action) with respect to gender-parity initiatives that leads them to participate less in such initiatives. We explain how psychological standing provides a complementary explanation to the current narrative in the literature suggesting that men’s poor participation results from sexist or discriminatory attitudes toward gender parity. We also establish that psychological standing influences participation over and above efficacy, instrumentality, and psychological safety and highlight how organizations can increase men’s participation by providing them with psychological standing when soliciting their participation in gender-parity initiatives. We discuss the implications of our findings for the literatures on gender parity, change management, and employee voice and participation.
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1118
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-7039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2017.1118</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Discrimination ; Efficacy ; employee participation ; employee voice ; Gender ; gender parity ; Legitimacy ; Management ; Men ; Parity ; Participation ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological safety ; psychological standing ; Soliciting ; Work environment ; Workers ; Workforce ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Organization science (Providence, R.I.), 2017-03, Vol.28 (2), p.193-210</ispartof><rights>2017 INFORMS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Mar/Apr 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-266257ae90121fd8ffbd0f3aa94b68cea328d489466fa50d72024f9f7921b5513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-266257ae90121fd8ffbd0f3aa94b68cea328d489466fa50d72024f9f7921b5513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/epdf/10.1287/orsc.2017.1118$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/orsc.2017.1118$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,3696,27933,27934,58026,58259,62625,62627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sherf, Elad N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tangirala, Subrahmaniam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Katy Connealy</creatorcontrib><title>It Is Not My Place! Psychological Standing and Men’s Voice and Participation in Gender-Parity Initiatives</title><title>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</title><description>Attempts to improve gender parity at workplaces are more effective when organizations mobilize their entire workforce, including men, to participate (i.e., speak up with ideas, volunteer, or serve as champions) in gender-parity initiatives. Yet, frequently, men are hesitant to participate in such initiatives. We explicate one reason for such hesitation on the part of men and suggest ways organizations can address this challenge. Using four studies (correlational as well as experimental), we demonstrate that men experience lower psychological standing (i.e., a subjective judgment of legitimacy to perform an action) with respect to gender-parity initiatives that leads them to participate less in such initiatives. We explain how psychological standing provides a complementary explanation to the current narrative in the literature suggesting that men’s poor participation results from sexist or discriminatory attitudes toward gender parity. We also establish that psychological standing influences participation over and above efficacy, instrumentality, and psychological safety and highlight how organizations can increase men’s participation by providing them with psychological standing when soliciting their participation in gender-parity initiatives. We discuss the implications of our findings for the literatures on gender parity, change management, and employee voice and participation.
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1118
.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>employee participation</subject><subject>employee voice</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>gender parity</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological safety</subject><subject>psychological standing</subject><subject>Soliciting</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>1047-7039</issn><issn>1526-5455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhhtRcF29ehMigid7zGd357gs7jqwqwN-XEMmnfRm7EnGVEZ2bv4N_56_xLQjrgMDEkgVleetSsJbVU8JnhHata9jAjOjmLQzQkh3rzohgja14ELcLznmbd1iJh9WjwBWGGPOhDypvswzmgN6FzO63qHFqI19jhawMzdxjIM3ekQfsg69DwMqAV3b8PP7D0Cfozf2d2WhU_bGb3T2MSAf0KUNvU11qfu8Q_Pgsy9n3yw8rh44PYJ98ieeVp8u3nw8f1tfvb-cn59d1UYInmvaNFS02kpMKHF959yyx45pLfmy6YzVjHY97yRvGqcF7luKKXfStZKSpRCEnVYv9n03KX7dWshqFbcplJGKSMmwoJw1d9SgR6t8cDEnbdYejDrjknayKyMKVR-hBhts0mMM1vlSPuBnR_iyerv25qjg5YGgMNne5kFvAdQh-OofcLkFHyyUDfxwk2HPH7uISREgWac2ya912imC1eQXNflFTX5Rk1-K4NlesIIc01-aNqSVjJG7n5geldbwv36_AIn0yWw</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Sherf, Elad N.</creator><creator>Tangirala, Subrahmaniam</creator><creator>Weber, Katy Connealy</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>It Is Not My Place! Psychological Standing and Men’s Voice and Participation in Gender-Parity Initiatives</title><author>Sherf, Elad N. ; Tangirala, Subrahmaniam ; Weber, Katy Connealy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-266257ae90121fd8ffbd0f3aa94b68cea328d489466fa50d72024f9f7921b5513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>employee participation</topic><topic>employee voice</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>gender parity</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological safety</topic><topic>psychological standing</topic><topic>Soliciting</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sherf, Elad N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tangirala, Subrahmaniam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Katy Connealy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sherf, Elad N.</au><au>Tangirala, Subrahmaniam</au><au>Weber, Katy Connealy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>It Is Not My Place! Psychological Standing and Men’s Voice and Participation in Gender-Parity Initiatives</atitle><jtitle>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>193-210</pages><issn>1047-7039</issn><eissn>1526-5455</eissn><abstract>Attempts to improve gender parity at workplaces are more effective when organizations mobilize their entire workforce, including men, to participate (i.e., speak up with ideas, volunteer, or serve as champions) in gender-parity initiatives. Yet, frequently, men are hesitant to participate in such initiatives. We explicate one reason for such hesitation on the part of men and suggest ways organizations can address this challenge. Using four studies (correlational as well as experimental), we demonstrate that men experience lower psychological standing (i.e., a subjective judgment of legitimacy to perform an action) with respect to gender-parity initiatives that leads them to participate less in such initiatives. We explain how psychological standing provides a complementary explanation to the current narrative in the literature suggesting that men’s poor participation results from sexist or discriminatory attitudes toward gender parity. We also establish that psychological standing influences participation over and above efficacy, instrumentality, and psychological safety and highlight how organizations can increase men’s participation by providing them with psychological standing when soliciting their participation in gender-parity initiatives. We discuss the implications of our findings for the literatures on gender parity, change management, and employee voice and participation.
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1118
.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/orsc.2017.1118</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1047-7039 |
ispartof | Organization science (Providence, R.I.), 2017-03, Vol.28 (2), p.193-210 |
issn | 1047-7039 1526-5455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_26179331 |
source | INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete; Education Source; JSTOR |
subjects | Attitudes Discrimination Efficacy employee participation employee voice Gender gender parity Legitimacy Management Men Parity Participation Psychological aspects Psychological safety psychological standing Soliciting Work environment Workers Workforce Workplaces |
title | It Is Not My Place! Psychological Standing and Men’s Voice and Participation in Gender-Parity Initiatives |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T01%3A32%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=It%20Is%20Not%20My%20Place!%20Psychological%20Standing%20and%20Men%E2%80%99s%20Voice%20and%20Participation%20in%20Gender-Parity%20Initiatives&rft.jtitle=Organization%20science%20(Providence,%20R.I.)&rft.au=Sherf,%20Elad%20N.&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=193-210&rft.issn=1047-7039&rft.eissn=1526-5455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/orsc.2017.1118&rft_dat=%3Cgale_jstor%3EA492898894%3C/gale_jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993052436&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A492898894&rft_jstor_id=26179331&rfr_iscdi=true |