Worst-Case Analysis for Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problems

In the vehicle routing problem (VRP) the objective is to construct a minimum cost set of routes serving all customers where the demand of each customer is less than or equal to the vehicle capacity and where each customer is visited once. In the split delivery vehicle routing problem (SDVRP) the res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation science 2006-05, Vol.40 (2), p.226-234
Hauptverfasser: Archetti, Claudia, Savelsbergh, Martin W. P, Speranza, M. Grazia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 234
container_issue 2
container_start_page 226
container_title Transportation science
container_volume 40
creator Archetti, Claudia
Savelsbergh, Martin W. P
Speranza, M. Grazia
description In the vehicle routing problem (VRP) the objective is to construct a minimum cost set of routes serving all customers where the demand of each customer is less than or equal to the vehicle capacity and where each customer is visited once. In the split delivery vehicle routing problem (SDVRP) the restriction that each customer is visited once is removed. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing split deliveries is at most 50%. We also study the variant of the VRP in which the demand of a customer may be larger than the vehicle capacity, but where each customer has to be visited a minimum number of times. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing more than the minimum number of required visits is again at most 50%. Furthermore, we analyze the performance of simple heuristics that handle customers with demands larger than the vehicle capacity by employing full load out-and-back trips to these customers until the demands become less than or equal to the vehicle capacity. Finally, we investigate situations in which demands are discrete and vehicle capacities are small.
doi_str_mv 10.1287/trsc.1050.0117
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_25769298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A146679377</galeid><jstor_id>25769298</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A146679377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-e151554e90cf8000d1695a9c1b8e46d6b8514414a500365ed49a857288001bcf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuLFDEQxhtRcFy9ehMaQfHSY6o7laRPMoxPWFB8HkMmUz2TId2ZTXqU-e9N04sLIi51CKR-X72-ongMbAm1ki_HmOwSGLIlA5B3igVgLSrkXN4tFoxxqEAg3i8epHRgDFACLopXP0JMY7U2icrVYPw5uVR2IZZfjt6N5Wvy7ifFc_md9s56Kj-H0-iGXfkpho2nPj0s7nXGJ3p0_V4U396--bp-X11-fPdhvbqsLNZqrAgQEDm1zHaKMbYF0aJpLWwUcbEVG4XAOXCDjDUCactbo1DWKsOwsV1zUTyf6x5juDpRGnXvkiXvzUDhlHQjuJBty24F6zZHjW0Gn_4FHsIp5hNkhjXIBKqpWjVDO-NJu6ELYzR2RwNF48NAncvfK-AiN2-kzPzyH3yOLfXO_k9gY0gpUqeP0fUmnjUwPdmqJ1v1ZKuebM2CZ9djm2SN76IZrEs3Kqm4ahEy92TmDmkM8U--RinyBdTNZtOQsU-3930x83u32_9ycd5uEuYNh2Sd5kzXuq5F8xuCW8Ye</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203506580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Worst-Case Analysis for Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problems</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Archetti, Claudia ; Savelsbergh, Martin W. P ; Speranza, M. Grazia</creator><creatorcontrib>Archetti, Claudia ; Savelsbergh, Martin W. P ; Speranza, M. Grazia</creatorcontrib><description>In the vehicle routing problem (VRP) the objective is to construct a minimum cost set of routes serving all customers where the demand of each customer is less than or equal to the vehicle capacity and where each customer is visited once. In the split delivery vehicle routing problem (SDVRP) the restriction that each customer is visited once is removed. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing split deliveries is at most 50%. We also study the variant of the VRP in which the demand of a customer may be larger than the vehicle capacity, but where each customer has to be visited a minimum number of times. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing more than the minimum number of required visits is again at most 50%. Furthermore, we analyze the performance of simple heuristics that handle customers with demands larger than the vehicle capacity by employing full load out-and-back trips to these customers until the demands become less than or equal to the vehicle capacity. Finally, we investigate situations in which demands are discrete and vehicle capacities are small.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1050.0117</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRSCBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum, MD: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Bridge/routers ; Cost control ; Cost efficiency ; Cost-effectiveness ; Customers ; Deliveries ; Delivery costs ; Delivery vehicles ; Demand ; Distribution ; Evaluation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction ; Heuristic ; Heuristics ; Inequality ; Integer programming ; Investigations ; Management ; Minimization of cost ; Motor vehicle fleets ; Optimal solutions ; Programming ; Route optimization ; Scheduling algorithms ; split deliveries ; Studies ; Transport ; Transportation ; Transportation planning, management and economics ; Travel expenses ; Triangle inequalities ; Vehicle capacity ; vehicle routing ; Vehicles ; worst-case analysis</subject><ispartof>Transportation science, 2006-05, Vol.40 (2), p.226-234</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2006 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences May 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-e151554e90cf8000d1695a9c1b8e46d6b8514414a500365ed49a857288001bcf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-e151554e90cf8000d1695a9c1b8e46d6b8514414a500365ed49a857288001bcf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25769298$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/trsc.1050.0117$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3692,27924,27925,58017,58250,62616</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17848951$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Archetti, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savelsbergh, Martin W. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speranza, M. Grazia</creatorcontrib><title>Worst-Case Analysis for Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problems</title><title>Transportation science</title><description>In the vehicle routing problem (VRP) the objective is to construct a minimum cost set of routes serving all customers where the demand of each customer is less than or equal to the vehicle capacity and where each customer is visited once. In the split delivery vehicle routing problem (SDVRP) the restriction that each customer is visited once is removed. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing split deliveries is at most 50%. We also study the variant of the VRP in which the demand of a customer may be larger than the vehicle capacity, but where each customer has to be visited a minimum number of times. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing more than the minimum number of required visits is again at most 50%. Furthermore, we analyze the performance of simple heuristics that handle customers with demands larger than the vehicle capacity by employing full load out-and-back trips to these customers until the demands become less than or equal to the vehicle capacity. Finally, we investigate situations in which demands are discrete and vehicle capacities are small.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bridge/routers</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost efficiency</subject><subject>Cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Deliveries</subject><subject>Delivery costs</subject><subject>Delivery vehicles</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Integer programming</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Minimization of cost</subject><subject>Motor vehicle fleets</subject><subject>Optimal solutions</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>Route optimization</subject><subject>Scheduling algorithms</subject><subject>split deliveries</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Transportation planning, management and economics</subject><subject>Travel expenses</subject><subject>Triangle inequalities</subject><subject>Vehicle capacity</subject><subject>vehicle routing</subject><subject>Vehicles</subject><subject>worst-case analysis</subject><issn>0041-1655</issn><issn>1526-5447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuLFDEQxhtRcFy9ehMaQfHSY6o7laRPMoxPWFB8HkMmUz2TId2ZTXqU-e9N04sLIi51CKR-X72-ongMbAm1ki_HmOwSGLIlA5B3igVgLSrkXN4tFoxxqEAg3i8epHRgDFACLopXP0JMY7U2icrVYPw5uVR2IZZfjt6N5Wvy7ifFc_md9s56Kj-H0-iGXfkpho2nPj0s7nXGJ3p0_V4U396--bp-X11-fPdhvbqsLNZqrAgQEDm1zHaKMbYF0aJpLWwUcbEVG4XAOXCDjDUCactbo1DWKsOwsV1zUTyf6x5juDpRGnXvkiXvzUDhlHQjuJBty24F6zZHjW0Gn_4FHsIp5hNkhjXIBKqpWjVDO-NJu6ELYzR2RwNF48NAncvfK-AiN2-kzPzyH3yOLfXO_k9gY0gpUqeP0fUmnjUwPdmqJ1v1ZKuebM2CZ9djm2SN76IZrEs3Kqm4ahEy92TmDmkM8U--RinyBdTNZtOQsU-3930x83u32_9ycd5uEuYNh2Sd5kzXuq5F8xuCW8Ye</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Archetti, Claudia</creator><creator>Savelsbergh, Martin W. P</creator><creator>Speranza, M. Grazia</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Transportation Science &amp; Logistic Society of the Institute for Operations Research and Management Sciences</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Worst-Case Analysis for Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problems</title><author>Archetti, Claudia ; Savelsbergh, Martin W. P ; Speranza, M. Grazia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-e151554e90cf8000d1695a9c1b8e46d6b8514414a500365ed49a857288001bcf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bridge/routers</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost efficiency</topic><topic>Cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Deliveries</topic><topic>Delivery costs</topic><topic>Delivery vehicles</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Integer programming</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Minimization of cost</topic><topic>Motor vehicle fleets</topic><topic>Optimal solutions</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>Route optimization</topic><topic>Scheduling algorithms</topic><topic>split deliveries</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Transportation planning, management and economics</topic><topic>Travel expenses</topic><topic>Triangle inequalities</topic><topic>Vehicle capacity</topic><topic>vehicle routing</topic><topic>Vehicles</topic><topic>worst-case analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Archetti, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savelsbergh, Martin W. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speranza, M. Grazia</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Archetti, Claudia</au><au>Savelsbergh, Martin W. P</au><au>Speranza, M. Grazia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Worst-Case Analysis for Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problems</atitle><jtitle>Transportation science</jtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>226-234</pages><issn>0041-1655</issn><eissn>1526-5447</eissn><coden>TRSCBJ</coden><abstract>In the vehicle routing problem (VRP) the objective is to construct a minimum cost set of routes serving all customers where the demand of each customer is less than or equal to the vehicle capacity and where each customer is visited once. In the split delivery vehicle routing problem (SDVRP) the restriction that each customer is visited once is removed. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing split deliveries is at most 50%. We also study the variant of the VRP in which the demand of a customer may be larger than the vehicle capacity, but where each customer has to be visited a minimum number of times. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing more than the minimum number of required visits is again at most 50%. Furthermore, we analyze the performance of simple heuristics that handle customers with demands larger than the vehicle capacity by employing full load out-and-back trips to these customers until the demands become less than or equal to the vehicle capacity. Finally, we investigate situations in which demands are discrete and vehicle capacities are small.</abstract><cop>Linthicum, MD</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/trsc.1050.0117</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1655
ispartof Transportation science, 2006-05, Vol.40 (2), p.226-234
issn 0041-1655
1526-5447
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_25769298
source INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Applied sciences
Bridge/routers
Cost control
Cost efficiency
Cost-effectiveness
Customers
Deliveries
Delivery costs
Delivery vehicles
Demand
Distribution
Evaluation
Exact sciences and technology
Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction
Heuristic
Heuristics
Inequality
Integer programming
Investigations
Management
Minimization of cost
Motor vehicle fleets
Optimal solutions
Programming
Route optimization
Scheduling algorithms
split deliveries
Studies
Transport
Transportation
Transportation planning, management and economics
Travel expenses
Triangle inequalities
Vehicle capacity
vehicle routing
Vehicles
worst-case analysis
title Worst-Case Analysis for Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T16%3A37%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Worst-Case%20Analysis%20for%20Split%20Delivery%20Vehicle%20Routing%20Problems&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20science&rft.au=Archetti,%20Claudia&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=226-234&rft.issn=0041-1655&rft.eissn=1526-5447&rft.coden=TRSCBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/trsc.1050.0117&rft_dat=%3Cgale_jstor%3EA146679377%3C/gale_jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203506580&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A146679377&rft_jstor_id=25769298&rfr_iscdi=true