Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome

Intelligent design (ID)--the latest incarnation of religious creationism--posits that complex biological features did not accrue gradually via natural evolutionary forces but, instead, were crafted ex nihilo by a cognitive agent. Yet, many complex biological traits are gratuitously complicated, func...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2010-05, Vol.107 (Supplement 2), p.8969-8976
1. Verfasser: Avise, John C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8976
container_issue Supplement 2
container_start_page 8969
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 107
creator Avise, John C
description Intelligent design (ID)--the latest incarnation of religious creationism--posits that complex biological features did not accrue gradually via natural evolutionary forces but, instead, were crafted ex nihilo by a cognitive agent. Yet, many complex biological traits are gratuitously complicated, function poorly, and debilitate their bearers. Furthermore, such dysfunctional traits abound not only in the phenotypes but inside the genomes of eukaryotic species. Here, I highlight several outlandish features of the human genome that defy notions of ID by a caring cognitive agent. These range from de novo mutational glitches that collectively kill or maim countless individuals (including embryos and fetuses) to pervasive architectural flaws (including pseudogenes, parasitic mobile elements, and needlessly baroque regulatory pathways) that are endogenous in every human genome. Gross imperfection at the molecular level presents a conundrum for the traditional paradigms of natural theology as well as for recent assertions of ID, but it is consistent with the notion of nonsentient contrivance by evolutionary forces. In this important philosophical sense, the science of evolutionary genetics should rightly be viewed as an ally (not an adversary) of mainstream religions because it helps the latter to escape the profound theological enigmas posed by notions of ID.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.0914609107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_25681527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25681527</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25681527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-3f9160a2a776709956206b249d7d56f62a2dc029cddb88ffed79da3cdc29960c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM9r2zAUx0VZabO2553GzG47uH16lvXjMihh2QqFHtKchWLJiUMseZI92H8_mYSWHfQk-H7eV1--hHyicE9BVA-DN-keFGU8DxAXZEHzo-RMwQeyAEBRSobsmnxM6QAAqpZwRa4RGKsp0AWRqxDGIXZ-TEVoCx98cn7s8imsS93OF51PnXXFuHfFfuqNL3bOh97dksvWHJO7O983ZLP68br8VT6__HxaPj6XhnExllWrKAeDRgguQKmaI_AtMmWFrXnL0aBtAFVj7VbKtnVWKGuqxjaoFIemuiHfT77DtO2dbXKyaI46R-5N_KuD6fT_iu_2ehf-6AqQAdJs8PVsEMPvyaVRH8IUfc6sEWjFgNM6Qw8nqIkhpejatw8o6LlpPTet35vOG9_OtrPwTgu9nobh6PocR6OWiqvMfj6xhzSG-AZjzSWtcfb6ctJbE7TZxS7pzXoOB1QyikpW_wBkWpHk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201340615</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Avise, John C</creator><creatorcontrib>Avise, John C</creatorcontrib><description>Intelligent design (ID)--the latest incarnation of religious creationism--posits that complex biological features did not accrue gradually via natural evolutionary forces but, instead, were crafted ex nihilo by a cognitive agent. Yet, many complex biological traits are gratuitously complicated, function poorly, and debilitate their bearers. Furthermore, such dysfunctional traits abound not only in the phenotypes but inside the genomes of eukaryotic species. Here, I highlight several outlandish features of the human genome that defy notions of ID by a caring cognitive agent. These range from de novo mutational glitches that collectively kill or maim countless individuals (including embryos and fetuses) to pervasive architectural flaws (including pseudogenes, parasitic mobile elements, and needlessly baroque regulatory pathways) that are endogenous in every human genome. Gross imperfection at the molecular level presents a conundrum for the traditional paradigms of natural theology as well as for recent assertions of ID, but it is consistent with the notion of nonsentient contrivance by evolutionary forces. In this important philosophical sense, the science of evolutionary genetics should rightly be viewed as an ally (not an adversary) of mainstream religions because it helps the latter to escape the profound theological enigmas posed by notions of ID.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0914609107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20445101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning ; COLLOQUIUM PAPERS ; DNA ; Eukaryotes ; Evolution ; Evolutionary genetics ; Genes ; Genetic mutation ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Human genetics ; Human genome ; Intelligent design ; Mutation ; Natural selection</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2010-05, Vol.107 (Supplement 2), p.8969-8976</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences May 11, 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-3f9160a2a776709956206b249d7d56f62a2dc029cddb88ffed79da3cdc29960c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-3f9160a2a776709956206b249d7d56f62a2dc029cddb88ffed79da3cdc29960c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.pnas.org/content/107/Supplement%202.cover.gif</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25681527$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25681527$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Avise, John C</creatorcontrib><title>Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><description>Intelligent design (ID)--the latest incarnation of religious creationism--posits that complex biological features did not accrue gradually via natural evolutionary forces but, instead, were crafted ex nihilo by a cognitive agent. Yet, many complex biological traits are gratuitously complicated, function poorly, and debilitate their bearers. Furthermore, such dysfunctional traits abound not only in the phenotypes but inside the genomes of eukaryotic species. Here, I highlight several outlandish features of the human genome that defy notions of ID by a caring cognitive agent. These range from de novo mutational glitches that collectively kill or maim countless individuals (including embryos and fetuses) to pervasive architectural flaws (including pseudogenes, parasitic mobile elements, and needlessly baroque regulatory pathways) that are endogenous in every human genome. Gross imperfection at the molecular level presents a conundrum for the traditional paradigms of natural theology as well as for recent assertions of ID, but it is consistent with the notion of nonsentient contrivance by evolutionary forces. In this important philosophical sense, the science of evolutionary genetics should rightly be viewed as an ally (not an adversary) of mainstream religions because it helps the latter to escape the profound theological enigmas posed by notions of ID.</description><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>COLLOQUIUM PAPERS</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Eukaryotes</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic mutation</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Human genetics</subject><subject>Human genome</subject><subject>Intelligent design</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Natural selection</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM9r2zAUx0VZabO2553GzG47uH16lvXjMihh2QqFHtKchWLJiUMseZI92H8_mYSWHfQk-H7eV1--hHyicE9BVA-DN-keFGU8DxAXZEHzo-RMwQeyAEBRSobsmnxM6QAAqpZwRa4RGKsp0AWRqxDGIXZ-TEVoCx98cn7s8imsS93OF51PnXXFuHfFfuqNL3bOh97dksvWHJO7O983ZLP68br8VT6__HxaPj6XhnExllWrKAeDRgguQKmaI_AtMmWFrXnL0aBtAFVj7VbKtnVWKGuqxjaoFIemuiHfT77DtO2dbXKyaI46R-5N_KuD6fT_iu_2ehf-6AqQAdJs8PVsEMPvyaVRH8IUfc6sEWjFgNM6Qw8nqIkhpejatw8o6LlpPTet35vOG9_OtrPwTgu9nobh6PocR6OWiqvMfj6xhzSG-AZjzSWtcfb6ctJbE7TZxS7pzXoOB1QyikpW_wBkWpHk</recordid><startdate>20100511</startdate><enddate>20100511</enddate><creator>Avise, John C</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><general>National Acad Sciences</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100511</creationdate><title>Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome</title><author>Avise, John C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-3f9160a2a776709956206b249d7d56f62a2dc029cddb88ffed79da3cdc29960c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>COLLOQUIUM PAPERS</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Eukaryotes</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic mutation</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Human genetics</topic><topic>Human genome</topic><topic>Intelligent design</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Natural selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Avise, John C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Avise, John C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><date>2010-05-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>Supplement 2</issue><spage>8969</spage><epage>8976</epage><pages>8969-8976</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Intelligent design (ID)--the latest incarnation of religious creationism--posits that complex biological features did not accrue gradually via natural evolutionary forces but, instead, were crafted ex nihilo by a cognitive agent. Yet, many complex biological traits are gratuitously complicated, function poorly, and debilitate their bearers. Furthermore, such dysfunctional traits abound not only in the phenotypes but inside the genomes of eukaryotic species. Here, I highlight several outlandish features of the human genome that defy notions of ID by a caring cognitive agent. These range from de novo mutational glitches that collectively kill or maim countless individuals (including embryos and fetuses) to pervasive architectural flaws (including pseudogenes, parasitic mobile elements, and needlessly baroque regulatory pathways) that are endogenous in every human genome. Gross imperfection at the molecular level presents a conundrum for the traditional paradigms of natural theology as well as for recent assertions of ID, but it is consistent with the notion of nonsentient contrivance by evolutionary forces. In this important philosophical sense, the science of evolutionary genetics should rightly be viewed as an ally (not an adversary) of mainstream religions because it helps the latter to escape the profound theological enigmas posed by notions of ID.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>20445101</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.0914609107</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2010-05, Vol.107 (Supplement 2), p.8969-8976
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_25681527
source Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Cognition & reasoning
COLLOQUIUM PAPERS
DNA
Eukaryotes
Evolution
Evolutionary genetics
Genes
Genetic mutation
Genomes
Genomics
Genotype & phenotype
Human genetics
Human genome
Intelligent design
Mutation
Natural selection
title Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A23%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Footprints%20of%20nonsentient%20design%20inside%20the%20human%20genome&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Avise,%20John%20C&rft.date=2010-05-11&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=Supplement%202&rft.spage=8969&rft.epage=8976&rft.pages=8969-8976&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.0914609107&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_fao_a%3E25681527%3C/jstor_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201340615&rft_id=info:pmid/20445101&rft_jstor_id=25681527&rfr_iscdi=true