Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome
Intelligent design (ID)--the latest incarnation of religious creationism--posits that complex biological features did not accrue gradually via natural evolutionary forces but, instead, were crafted ex nihilo by a cognitive agent. Yet, many complex biological traits are gratuitously complicated, func...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2010-05, Vol.107 (Supplement 2), p.8969-8976 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8976 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement 2 |
container_start_page | 8969 |
container_title | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Avise, John C |
description | Intelligent design (ID)--the latest incarnation of religious creationism--posits that complex biological features did not accrue gradually via natural evolutionary forces but, instead, were crafted ex nihilo by a cognitive agent. Yet, many complex biological traits are gratuitously complicated, function poorly, and debilitate their bearers. Furthermore, such dysfunctional traits abound not only in the phenotypes but inside the genomes of eukaryotic species. Here, I highlight several outlandish features of the human genome that defy notions of ID by a caring cognitive agent. These range from de novo mutational glitches that collectively kill or maim countless individuals (including embryos and fetuses) to pervasive architectural flaws (including pseudogenes, parasitic mobile elements, and needlessly baroque regulatory pathways) that are endogenous in every human genome. Gross imperfection at the molecular level presents a conundrum for the traditional paradigms of natural theology as well as for recent assertions of ID, but it is consistent with the notion of nonsentient contrivance by evolutionary forces. In this important philosophical sense, the science of evolutionary genetics should rightly be viewed as an ally (not an adversary) of mainstream religions because it helps the latter to escape the profound theological enigmas posed by notions of ID. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1073/pnas.0914609107 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_25681527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25681527</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25681527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-3f9160a2a776709956206b249d7d56f62a2dc029cddb88ffed79da3cdc29960c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM9r2zAUx0VZabO2553GzG47uH16lvXjMihh2QqFHtKchWLJiUMseZI92H8_mYSWHfQk-H7eV1--hHyicE9BVA-DN-keFGU8DxAXZEHzo-RMwQeyAEBRSobsmnxM6QAAqpZwRa4RGKsp0AWRqxDGIXZ-TEVoCx98cn7s8imsS93OF51PnXXFuHfFfuqNL3bOh97dksvWHJO7O983ZLP68br8VT6__HxaPj6XhnExllWrKAeDRgguQKmaI_AtMmWFrXnL0aBtAFVj7VbKtnVWKGuqxjaoFIemuiHfT77DtO2dbXKyaI46R-5N_KuD6fT_iu_2ehf-6AqQAdJs8PVsEMPvyaVRH8IUfc6sEWjFgNM6Qw8nqIkhpejatw8o6LlpPTet35vOG9_OtrPwTgu9nobh6PocR6OWiqvMfj6xhzSG-AZjzSWtcfb6ctJbE7TZxS7pzXoOB1QyikpW_wBkWpHk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201340615</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Avise, John C</creator><creatorcontrib>Avise, John C</creatorcontrib><description>Intelligent design (ID)--the latest incarnation of religious creationism--posits that complex biological features did not accrue gradually via natural evolutionary forces but, instead, were crafted ex nihilo by a cognitive agent. Yet, many complex biological traits are gratuitously complicated, function poorly, and debilitate their bearers. Furthermore, such dysfunctional traits abound not only in the phenotypes but inside the genomes of eukaryotic species. Here, I highlight several outlandish features of the human genome that defy notions of ID by a caring cognitive agent. These range from de novo mutational glitches that collectively kill or maim countless individuals (including embryos and fetuses) to pervasive architectural flaws (including pseudogenes, parasitic mobile elements, and needlessly baroque regulatory pathways) that are endogenous in every human genome. Gross imperfection at the molecular level presents a conundrum for the traditional paradigms of natural theology as well as for recent assertions of ID, but it is consistent with the notion of nonsentient contrivance by evolutionary forces. In this important philosophical sense, the science of evolutionary genetics should rightly be viewed as an ally (not an adversary) of mainstream religions because it helps the latter to escape the profound theological enigmas posed by notions of ID.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0914609107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20445101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Cognition & reasoning ; COLLOQUIUM PAPERS ; DNA ; Eukaryotes ; Evolution ; Evolutionary genetics ; Genes ; Genetic mutation ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Genotype & phenotype ; Human genetics ; Human genome ; Intelligent design ; Mutation ; Natural selection</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2010-05, Vol.107 (Supplement 2), p.8969-8976</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences May 11, 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-3f9160a2a776709956206b249d7d56f62a2dc029cddb88ffed79da3cdc29960c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-3f9160a2a776709956206b249d7d56f62a2dc029cddb88ffed79da3cdc29960c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.pnas.org/content/107/Supplement%202.cover.gif</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25681527$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25681527$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Avise, John C</creatorcontrib><title>Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><description>Intelligent design (ID)--the latest incarnation of religious creationism--posits that complex biological features did not accrue gradually via natural evolutionary forces but, instead, were crafted ex nihilo by a cognitive agent. Yet, many complex biological traits are gratuitously complicated, function poorly, and debilitate their bearers. Furthermore, such dysfunctional traits abound not only in the phenotypes but inside the genomes of eukaryotic species. Here, I highlight several outlandish features of the human genome that defy notions of ID by a caring cognitive agent. These range from de novo mutational glitches that collectively kill or maim countless individuals (including embryos and fetuses) to pervasive architectural flaws (including pseudogenes, parasitic mobile elements, and needlessly baroque regulatory pathways) that are endogenous in every human genome. Gross imperfection at the molecular level presents a conundrum for the traditional paradigms of natural theology as well as for recent assertions of ID, but it is consistent with the notion of nonsentient contrivance by evolutionary forces. In this important philosophical sense, the science of evolutionary genetics should rightly be viewed as an ally (not an adversary) of mainstream religions because it helps the latter to escape the profound theological enigmas posed by notions of ID.</description><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>COLLOQUIUM PAPERS</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Eukaryotes</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic mutation</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Human genetics</subject><subject>Human genome</subject><subject>Intelligent design</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Natural selection</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM9r2zAUx0VZabO2553GzG47uH16lvXjMihh2QqFHtKchWLJiUMseZI92H8_mYSWHfQk-H7eV1--hHyicE9BVA-DN-keFGU8DxAXZEHzo-RMwQeyAEBRSobsmnxM6QAAqpZwRa4RGKsp0AWRqxDGIXZ-TEVoCx98cn7s8imsS93OF51PnXXFuHfFfuqNL3bOh97dksvWHJO7O983ZLP68br8VT6__HxaPj6XhnExllWrKAeDRgguQKmaI_AtMmWFrXnL0aBtAFVj7VbKtnVWKGuqxjaoFIemuiHfT77DtO2dbXKyaI46R-5N_KuD6fT_iu_2ehf-6AqQAdJs8PVsEMPvyaVRH8IUfc6sEWjFgNM6Qw8nqIkhpejatw8o6LlpPTet35vOG9_OtrPwTgu9nobh6PocR6OWiqvMfj6xhzSG-AZjzSWtcfb6ctJbE7TZxS7pzXoOB1QyikpW_wBkWpHk</recordid><startdate>20100511</startdate><enddate>20100511</enddate><creator>Avise, John C</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><general>National Acad Sciences</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100511</creationdate><title>Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome</title><author>Avise, John C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-3f9160a2a776709956206b249d7d56f62a2dc029cddb88ffed79da3cdc29960c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>COLLOQUIUM PAPERS</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Eukaryotes</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic mutation</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Human genetics</topic><topic>Human genome</topic><topic>Intelligent design</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Natural selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Avise, John C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Avise, John C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><date>2010-05-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>Supplement 2</issue><spage>8969</spage><epage>8976</epage><pages>8969-8976</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Intelligent design (ID)--the latest incarnation of religious creationism--posits that complex biological features did not accrue gradually via natural evolutionary forces but, instead, were crafted ex nihilo by a cognitive agent. Yet, many complex biological traits are gratuitously complicated, function poorly, and debilitate their bearers. Furthermore, such dysfunctional traits abound not only in the phenotypes but inside the genomes of eukaryotic species. Here, I highlight several outlandish features of the human genome that defy notions of ID by a caring cognitive agent. These range from de novo mutational glitches that collectively kill or maim countless individuals (including embryos and fetuses) to pervasive architectural flaws (including pseudogenes, parasitic mobile elements, and needlessly baroque regulatory pathways) that are endogenous in every human genome. Gross imperfection at the molecular level presents a conundrum for the traditional paradigms of natural theology as well as for recent assertions of ID, but it is consistent with the notion of nonsentient contrivance by evolutionary forces. In this important philosophical sense, the science of evolutionary genetics should rightly be viewed as an ally (not an adversary) of mainstream religions because it helps the latter to escape the profound theological enigmas posed by notions of ID.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>20445101</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.0914609107</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-8424 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2010-05, Vol.107 (Supplement 2), p.8969-8976 |
issn | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_25681527 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Cognition & reasoning COLLOQUIUM PAPERS DNA Eukaryotes Evolution Evolutionary genetics Genes Genetic mutation Genomes Genomics Genotype & phenotype Human genetics Human genome Intelligent design Mutation Natural selection |
title | Footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A23%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Footprints%20of%20nonsentient%20design%20inside%20the%20human%20genome&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Avise,%20John%20C&rft.date=2010-05-11&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=Supplement%202&rft.spage=8969&rft.epage=8976&rft.pages=8969-8976&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.0914609107&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_fao_a%3E25681527%3C/jstor_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201340615&rft_id=info:pmid/20445101&rft_jstor_id=25681527&rfr_iscdi=true |