Bare Life: The Refugee in Contemporary Israeli Art and Critical Discourse

It has been over a decade since the publication of Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer, yet the notion of "bare life," evolved from the scathing biopolitical political analyses of Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault, has gained theoretical momentum in art and critical discourse only recently....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Art journal (New York. 1960) 2009-12, Vol.68 (4), p.24-43
1. Verfasser: Gal, Nissim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 43
container_issue 4
container_start_page 24
container_title Art journal (New York. 1960)
container_volume 68
creator Gal, Nissim
description It has been over a decade since the publication of Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer, yet the notion of "bare life," evolved from the scathing biopolitical political analyses of Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault, has gained theoretical momentum in art and critical discourse only recently. 1 At the same time, its increasing deployment in these arenas has, for better or worse, risked diluting the concept into a synonym for a quasi-existentialist subjectivity; the resulting pluralism has tended to neutralize the concept. 2 In the following argument, by contrast, I will try to locate a critical position in both the visual and the theoretical fields in order to resituate the biopolitical force of bare life.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00043249.2009.10791359
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_25676502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25676502</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25676502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a61aa0397b8ec4673b2984fff768538211de9da5927f3e9e448f29f54871e87a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIngHzkkuJH4ge3Ul6VKiGhcrbcZA2ukrjYqVD_nkQBrpxWuzszOzsIXVEyo0SRG0JIzlmuZ4wQ3Y-kprzQR2jCOCuyghN5jCYDKBtQp-gspW3fSkbpBC3vbAS88g5u8foD8Cu4_TsA9i1ehLaDZheijQe8TNFC7fE8dti2FV5E3_nS1vjepzLsY4JzdOJsneDip07R2-PDevGcrV6elov5Kiu5UF1mBbWWcC03CspcSL5hWuXOOSlUwVVvqgJd2UIz6ThoyHPlmHZFriQFJS2foutRdxfD5x5SZ5reAtS1bSHsk6GcEZ4LKlgPFSO0jCGlCM7som_6dwwlZsjO_GZnhuzMb3Y98XIkblMX4h-LFUKKggzC83HvWxdiY79CrCvT2UMdoou2LX0y_J8b3wsNfZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1320346162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bare Life: The Refugee in Contemporary Israeli Art and Critical Discourse</title><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Gal, Nissim</creator><creatorcontrib>Gal, Nissim</creatorcontrib><description>It has been over a decade since the publication of Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer, yet the notion of "bare life," evolved from the scathing biopolitical political analyses of Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault, has gained theoretical momentum in art and critical discourse only recently. 1 At the same time, its increasing deployment in these arenas has, for better or worse, risked diluting the concept into a synonym for a quasi-existentialist subjectivity; the resulting pluralism has tended to neutralize the concept. 2 In the following argument, by contrast, I will try to locate a critical position in both the visual and the theoretical fields in order to resituate the biopolitical force of bare life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-3249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-5307</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00043249.2009.10791359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Art photography ; Concentration camps ; Jewish refugees ; Nation states ; Refugees ; Sovereign states ; Sovereignty ; Woody vines ; Zionism</subject><ispartof>Art journal (New York. 1960), 2009-12, Vol.68 (4), p.24-43</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 College Art Association, Inc. 2009</rights><rights>copyright © 2009 College Art Association, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a61aa0397b8ec4673b2984fff768538211de9da5927f3e9e448f29f54871e87a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25676502$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25676502$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27915,27916,30985,58008,58241</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gal, Nissim</creatorcontrib><title>Bare Life: The Refugee in Contemporary Israeli Art and Critical Discourse</title><title>Art journal (New York. 1960)</title><description>It has been over a decade since the publication of Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer, yet the notion of "bare life," evolved from the scathing biopolitical political analyses of Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault, has gained theoretical momentum in art and critical discourse only recently. 1 At the same time, its increasing deployment in these arenas has, for better or worse, risked diluting the concept into a synonym for a quasi-existentialist subjectivity; the resulting pluralism has tended to neutralize the concept. 2 In the following argument, by contrast, I will try to locate a critical position in both the visual and the theoretical fields in order to resituate the biopolitical force of bare life.</description><subject>Art photography</subject><subject>Concentration camps</subject><subject>Jewish refugees</subject><subject>Nation states</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Sovereign states</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Woody vines</subject><subject>Zionism</subject><issn>0004-3249</issn><issn>2325-5307</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIngHzkkuJH4ge3Ul6VKiGhcrbcZA2ukrjYqVD_nkQBrpxWuzszOzsIXVEyo0SRG0JIzlmuZ4wQ3Y-kprzQR2jCOCuyghN5jCYDKBtQp-gspW3fSkbpBC3vbAS88g5u8foD8Cu4_TsA9i1ehLaDZheijQe8TNFC7fE8dti2FV5E3_nS1vjepzLsY4JzdOJsneDip07R2-PDevGcrV6elov5Kiu5UF1mBbWWcC03CspcSL5hWuXOOSlUwVVvqgJd2UIz6ThoyHPlmHZFriQFJS2foutRdxfD5x5SZ5reAtS1bSHsk6GcEZ4LKlgPFSO0jCGlCM7som_6dwwlZsjO_GZnhuzMb3Y98XIkblMX4h-LFUKKggzC83HvWxdiY79CrCvT2UMdoou2LX0y_J8b3wsNfZg</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Gal, Nissim</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>College Art Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QI</scope><scope>~I4</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Bare Life: The Refugee in Contemporary Israeli Art and Critical Discourse</title><author>Gal, Nissim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a61aa0397b8ec4673b2984fff768538211de9da5927f3e9e448f29f54871e87a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Art photography</topic><topic>Concentration camps</topic><topic>Jewish refugees</topic><topic>Nation states</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Sovereign states</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Woody vines</topic><topic>Zionism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gal, Nissim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><jtitle>Art journal (New York. 1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gal, Nissim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bare Life: The Refugee in Contemporary Israeli Art and Critical Discourse</atitle><jtitle>Art journal (New York. 1960)</jtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>24-43</pages><issn>0004-3249</issn><eissn>2325-5307</eissn><abstract>It has been over a decade since the publication of Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer, yet the notion of "bare life," evolved from the scathing biopolitical political analyses of Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault, has gained theoretical momentum in art and critical discourse only recently. 1 At the same time, its increasing deployment in these arenas has, for better or worse, risked diluting the concept into a synonym for a quasi-existentialist subjectivity; the resulting pluralism has tended to neutralize the concept. 2 In the following argument, by contrast, I will try to locate a critical position in both the visual and the theoretical fields in order to resituate the biopolitical force of bare life.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00043249.2009.10791359</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-3249
ispartof Art journal (New York. 1960), 2009-12, Vol.68 (4), p.24-43
issn 0004-3249
2325-5307
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_25676502
source ARTbibliographies Modern; JSTOR
subjects Art photography
Concentration camps
Jewish refugees
Nation states
Refugees
Sovereign states
Sovereignty
Woody vines
Zionism
title Bare Life: The Refugee in Contemporary Israeli Art and Critical Discourse
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A09%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bare%20Life:%20The%20Refugee%20in%20Contemporary%20Israeli%20Art%20and%20Critical%20Discourse&rft.jtitle=Art%20journal%20(New%20York.%201960)&rft.au=Gal,%20Nissim&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=24-43&rft.issn=0004-3249&rft.eissn=2325-5307&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00043249.2009.10791359&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25676502%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1320346162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25676502&rfr_iscdi=true