Source Analysis of Central Plains Tradition Pottery Using Neutron Activation Analysis: Feasibility and First Results

We report the results of a study applying instrumental neutron activation analysis (NAA) to pottery from eight sites assigned to the western part of the Central Plains tradition (Upper Republican and Smoky Hill phases) and six components identified as High Plains Upper Republican. Our purpose is to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plains anthropologist 2007-08, Vol.52 (203), p.325-335
Hauptverfasser: Roper, Donna C., Hoard, Robert J., Speakman, Robert J., Glascock, Michael D., DiCosola, Anne Cobry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 335
container_issue 203
container_start_page 325
container_title Plains anthropologist
container_volume 52
creator Roper, Donna C.
Hoard, Robert J.
Speakman, Robert J.
Glascock, Michael D.
DiCosola, Anne Cobry
description We report the results of a study applying instrumental neutron activation analysis (NAA) to pottery from eight sites assigned to the western part of the Central Plains tradition (Upper Republican and Smoky Hill phases) and six components identified as High Plains Upper Republican. Our purpose is to test the feasibility of using NAA to trace interactions among people of the Central Plains tradition and between the Central Plains tradition people and their counterparts on the High Plains. Results of the statistical analysis, which was performed using the chemical data for both newly sampled sites and previously studied sites (as reported by Cobry), suggest that NAA is a usable method for evaluating the movement of pottery for at least parts of the Central Plains tradition. Samples from four sites on Medicine Creek as well as the Albert Bell and LeBeau sites formed a single homogeneous group referred to as the Central Plains Reference Group. Samples from the other sites, however, formed distinct groups for each site and also reflected some interaction with their contemporaries. We discuss the implications of these results, some of the questions that remain, and the need for continued sampling.
doi_str_mv 10.1179/pan.2007.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_25670959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25670959</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25670959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-773f439009a001e517db007c7c1b193039262343f7c4b7fcb5996a965011031c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE2LFDEQhoMoOI7evApB8GbPVpJOh3gbBkeFxV32A7yFdCYtGbLJmMoo_e_NOrt68RTI-9RL1UPIawYrxpQ-O9i04gBqBZw_IQsOkneyH749JQsAwTvoe_WcvEDcA3Ch-LAg9Tofi_N0nWycMSDNE934VIuN9DLakJDeFLsLNeREL3Otvsz0FkP6Tr_6Yy3td-1q-Gn_AI8tH-jWWwxjiKHO1KYd3YaClV55PMaKL8mzyUb0rx7eJbndfrzZfO7OLz592azPOycGXjulxNQLDaAtAPOSqd3YrnPKsZFpAULzgYteTMr1o5rcKLUerB4kMAaCObEkb0-9h5J_HD1Ws2_Xth3RcNYrrZhgDXp_glzJiMVP5lDCnS2zYWDutZqm1dxrNU1rw989dFp0Nk7FJhfw7wwHISU020vy5sTtsebyL5eDAi11y9UpD2nK5c7-yiXuTLVzzOWxVPx3g9_qW5QE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214797131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Source Analysis of Central Plains Tradition Pottery Using Neutron Activation Analysis: Feasibility and First Results</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Roper, Donna C. ; Hoard, Robert J. ; Speakman, Robert J. ; Glascock, Michael D. ; DiCosola, Anne Cobry</creator><creatorcontrib>Roper, Donna C. ; Hoard, Robert J. ; Speakman, Robert J. ; Glascock, Michael D. ; DiCosola, Anne Cobry</creatorcontrib><description>We report the results of a study applying instrumental neutron activation analysis (NAA) to pottery from eight sites assigned to the western part of the Central Plains tradition (Upper Republican and Smoky Hill phases) and six components identified as High Plains Upper Republican. Our purpose is to test the feasibility of using NAA to trace interactions among people of the Central Plains tradition and between the Central Plains tradition people and their counterparts on the High Plains. Results of the statistical analysis, which was performed using the chemical data for both newly sampled sites and previously studied sites (as reported by Cobry), suggest that NAA is a usable method for evaluating the movement of pottery for at least parts of the Central Plains tradition. Samples from four sites on Medicine Creek as well as the Albert Bell and LeBeau sites formed a single homogeneous group referred to as the Central Plains Reference Group. Samples from the other sites, however, formed distinct groups for each site and also reflected some interaction with their contemporaries. We discuss the implications of these results, some of the questions that remain, and the need for continued sampling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-546X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1179/pan.2007.022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lincoln, NE: Routledge</publisher><subject>Canyons ; Central Plains tradition ; Ceramics ; Chemicals ; Clay ; Coal ; Creeks ; Excavation and methods ; interaction ; Irradiation ; Laboratory methods ; Medicine ; Methodology and general studies ; Neutron activation analysis ; Physical and chemical analysis ; Plains ; Pottery ; Prehistoric pottery ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Raw materials ; Specimens ; Statistical analysis ; Valleys</subject><ispartof>Plains anthropologist, 2007-08, Vol.52 (203), p.325-335</ispartof><rights>2007 Plains Anthropologist 2007</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 Board of Directors, Plains Anthropological Society</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Plains Anthropologist Aug 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-773f439009a001e517db007c7c1b193039262343f7c4b7fcb5996a965011031c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-773f439009a001e517db007c7c1b193039262343f7c4b7fcb5996a965011031c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25670959$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25670959$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20355000$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roper, Donna C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoard, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speakman, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glascock, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiCosola, Anne Cobry</creatorcontrib><title>Source Analysis of Central Plains Tradition Pottery Using Neutron Activation Analysis: Feasibility and First Results</title><title>Plains anthropologist</title><description>We report the results of a study applying instrumental neutron activation analysis (NAA) to pottery from eight sites assigned to the western part of the Central Plains tradition (Upper Republican and Smoky Hill phases) and six components identified as High Plains Upper Republican. Our purpose is to test the feasibility of using NAA to trace interactions among people of the Central Plains tradition and between the Central Plains tradition people and their counterparts on the High Plains. Results of the statistical analysis, which was performed using the chemical data for both newly sampled sites and previously studied sites (as reported by Cobry), suggest that NAA is a usable method for evaluating the movement of pottery for at least parts of the Central Plains tradition. Samples from four sites on Medicine Creek as well as the Albert Bell and LeBeau sites formed a single homogeneous group referred to as the Central Plains Reference Group. Samples from the other sites, however, formed distinct groups for each site and also reflected some interaction with their contemporaries. We discuss the implications of these results, some of the questions that remain, and the need for continued sampling.</description><subject>Canyons</subject><subject>Central Plains tradition</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Creeks</subject><subject>Excavation and methods</subject><subject>interaction</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Laboratory methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Neutron activation analysis</subject><subject>Physical and chemical analysis</subject><subject>Plains</subject><subject>Pottery</subject><subject>Prehistoric pottery</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Specimens</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><issn>0032-0447</issn><issn>2052-546X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE2LFDEQhoMoOI7evApB8GbPVpJOh3gbBkeFxV32A7yFdCYtGbLJmMoo_e_NOrt68RTI-9RL1UPIawYrxpQ-O9i04gBqBZw_IQsOkneyH749JQsAwTvoe_WcvEDcA3Ch-LAg9Tofi_N0nWycMSDNE934VIuN9DLakJDeFLsLNeREL3Otvsz0FkP6Tr_6Yy3td-1q-Gn_AI8tH-jWWwxjiKHO1KYd3YaClV55PMaKL8mzyUb0rx7eJbndfrzZfO7OLz592azPOycGXjulxNQLDaAtAPOSqd3YrnPKsZFpAULzgYteTMr1o5rcKLUerB4kMAaCObEkb0-9h5J_HD1Ws2_Xth3RcNYrrZhgDXp_glzJiMVP5lDCnS2zYWDutZqm1dxrNU1rw989dFp0Nk7FJhfw7wwHISU020vy5sTtsebyL5eDAi11y9UpD2nK5c7-yiXuTLVzzOWxVPx3g9_qW5QE</recordid><startdate>20070801</startdate><enddate>20070801</enddate><creator>Roper, Donna C.</creator><creator>Hoard, Robert J.</creator><creator>Speakman, Robert J.</creator><creator>Glascock, Michael D.</creator><creator>DiCosola, Anne Cobry</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Plains Anthropological Society</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070801</creationdate><title>Source Analysis of Central Plains Tradition Pottery Using Neutron Activation Analysis: Feasibility and First Results</title><author>Roper, Donna C. ; Hoard, Robert J. ; Speakman, Robert J. ; Glascock, Michael D. ; DiCosola, Anne Cobry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-773f439009a001e517db007c7c1b193039262343f7c4b7fcb5996a965011031c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Canyons</topic><topic>Central Plains tradition</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Creeks</topic><topic>Excavation and methods</topic><topic>interaction</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Laboratory methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Neutron activation analysis</topic><topic>Physical and chemical analysis</topic><topic>Plains</topic><topic>Pottery</topic><topic>Prehistoric pottery</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Specimens</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roper, Donna C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoard, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speakman, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glascock, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiCosola, Anne Cobry</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Plains anthropologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roper, Donna C.</au><au>Hoard, Robert J.</au><au>Speakman, Robert J.</au><au>Glascock, Michael D.</au><au>DiCosola, Anne Cobry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Source Analysis of Central Plains Tradition Pottery Using Neutron Activation Analysis: Feasibility and First Results</atitle><jtitle>Plains anthropologist</jtitle><date>2007-08-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>203</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>325-335</pages><issn>0032-0447</issn><eissn>2052-546X</eissn><abstract>We report the results of a study applying instrumental neutron activation analysis (NAA) to pottery from eight sites assigned to the western part of the Central Plains tradition (Upper Republican and Smoky Hill phases) and six components identified as High Plains Upper Republican. Our purpose is to test the feasibility of using NAA to trace interactions among people of the Central Plains tradition and between the Central Plains tradition people and their counterparts on the High Plains. Results of the statistical analysis, which was performed using the chemical data for both newly sampled sites and previously studied sites (as reported by Cobry), suggest that NAA is a usable method for evaluating the movement of pottery for at least parts of the Central Plains tradition. Samples from four sites on Medicine Creek as well as the Albert Bell and LeBeau sites formed a single homogeneous group referred to as the Central Plains Reference Group. Samples from the other sites, however, formed distinct groups for each site and also reflected some interaction with their contemporaries. We discuss the implications of these results, some of the questions that remain, and the need for continued sampling.</abstract><cop>Lincoln, NE</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1179/pan.2007.022</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0447
ispartof Plains anthropologist, 2007-08, Vol.52 (203), p.325-335
issn 0032-0447
2052-546X
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_25670959
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Canyons
Central Plains tradition
Ceramics
Chemicals
Clay
Coal
Creeks
Excavation and methods
interaction
Irradiation
Laboratory methods
Medicine
Methodology and general studies
Neutron activation analysis
Physical and chemical analysis
Plains
Pottery
Prehistoric pottery
Prehistory and protohistory
Raw materials
Specimens
Statistical analysis
Valleys
title Source Analysis of Central Plains Tradition Pottery Using Neutron Activation Analysis: Feasibility and First Results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A05%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Source%20Analysis%20of%20Central%20Plains%20Tradition%20Pottery%20Using%20Neutron%20Activation%20Analysis:%20Feasibility%20and%20First%20Results&rft.jtitle=Plains%20anthropologist&rft.au=Roper,%20Donna%20C.&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=203&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=325-335&rft.issn=0032-0447&rft.eissn=2052-546X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1179/pan.2007.022&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E25670959%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214797131&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25670959&rfr_iscdi=true