Fungal Epiphytes and Endophytes of Coffee Leaves (Coffea arabica)

Plants harbor diverse communities of fungi and other microorganisms. Fungi are known to occur both on plant surfaces (epiphytes) and inside plant tissues (endophytes), but the two communities have rarely been compared. We compared epiphytic and endophytic fungal communities associated with leaves of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microbial ecology 2005-07, Vol.50 (1), p.1-8
Hauptverfasser: Santamaría, Johanna, Bayman, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Microbial ecology
container_volume 50
creator Santamaría, Johanna
Bayman, Paul
description Plants harbor diverse communities of fungi and other microorganisms. Fungi are known to occur both on plant surfaces (epiphytes) and inside plant tissues (endophytes), but the two communities have rarely been compared. We compared epiphytic and endophytic fungal communities associated with leaves of coffee (Coffea arabica) in Puerto Rico. We asked whether the dominant fungi are the same in both communities, whether endophyte and epiphyte communities are equally diverse, and whether epiphytes and endophytes exhibit similar patterns of spatial heterogeneity among sites. Leaves of naturalized coffee plants were collected from six sites in Puerto Rico. Epiphytic and endophytic fungi were isolated by placing leaf pieces on potato dextrose agar without and with surface sterilization, respectively. A total of 821 colonies were isolated and grouped into 131 morphospecies. The taxonomic affinities of the four most common nonsporulating fungi were determined by sequencing the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region: two grouped with Xylaria and one each with Botryosphaeria and Guignardia. Of the most common genera, Pestalotia and Botryosphaeria were significantly more common as epiphytes; Colletotrichum, Xylaria, and Guignardia were significantly more common as endophytes. Suprisingly, more morphospecies occurred as endophytes than as epiphytes. Differences among sites in number of fungi per plant were significant. Thus epiphytic and endophytic communities differed greatly on a single leaf, despite living only millimeters apart, and both communities differed from site to site. Significant correlations between occurrence of fungal morphospecies suggested that fungi may have positive or negative effects on their neighbors. This is the first quantitative comparison of epiphytic and endophytic fungal floras in any plant, and the first to examine endophytic fungi or epiphytic fungi in leaves of coffee, one of the world's most valuable crops.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00248-004-002-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_25153220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25153220</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25153220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_251532203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFibsOgkAURDdGE_HR25hsqcXq3QcPS0MgFpYWduQquwpBICya8PcSQ28xOXNmCFlx2HEAf28BhAoYgOojGB8RhyvZl0Bdx8QBOLhMeiKYkpm1OQD3PSEdcozf5QMLGtVZ_exabSmWKY3KtBq0MjSsjNGanjV--mHzU6TY4C2743ZBJgYLq5cD52QdR5fwxHLbVk1SN9kLmy4RLnelECD__V8d0Do_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fungal Epiphytes and Endophytes of Coffee Leaves (Coffea arabica)</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Santamaría, Johanna ; Bayman, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Santamaría, Johanna ; Bayman, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Plants harbor diverse communities of fungi and other microorganisms. Fungi are known to occur both on plant surfaces (epiphytes) and inside plant tissues (endophytes), but the two communities have rarely been compared. We compared epiphytic and endophytic fungal communities associated with leaves of coffee (Coffea arabica) in Puerto Rico. We asked whether the dominant fungi are the same in both communities, whether endophyte and epiphyte communities are equally diverse, and whether epiphytes and endophytes exhibit similar patterns of spatial heterogeneity among sites. Leaves of naturalized coffee plants were collected from six sites in Puerto Rico. Epiphytic and endophytic fungi were isolated by placing leaf pieces on potato dextrose agar without and with surface sterilization, respectively. A total of 821 colonies were isolated and grouped into 131 morphospecies. The taxonomic affinities of the four most common nonsporulating fungi were determined by sequencing the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region: two grouped with Xylaria and one each with Botryosphaeria and Guignardia. Of the most common genera, Pestalotia and Botryosphaeria were significantly more common as epiphytes; Colletotrichum, Xylaria, and Guignardia were significantly more common as endophytes. Suprisingly, more morphospecies occurred as endophytes than as epiphytes. Differences among sites in number of fungi per plant were significant. Thus epiphytic and endophytic communities differed greatly on a single leaf, despite living only millimeters apart, and both communities differed from site to site. Significant correlations between occurrence of fungal morphospecies suggested that fungi may have positive or negative effects on their neighbors. This is the first quantitative comparison of epiphytic and endophytic fungal floras in any plant, and the first to examine endophytic fungi or epiphytic fungi in leaves of coffee, one of the world's most valuable crops.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-3628</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-184X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00248-004-002-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</publisher><subject>Colletotrichum ; Communities ; Endosymbionts ; Epiphytes ; Flora ; Fungi ; Genera ; Leaves ; Pathogens ; Plants</subject><ispartof>Microbial ecology, 2005-07, Vol.50 (1), p.1-8</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25153220$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25153220$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santamaría, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayman, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Fungal Epiphytes and Endophytes of Coffee Leaves (Coffea arabica)</title><title>Microbial ecology</title><description>Plants harbor diverse communities of fungi and other microorganisms. Fungi are known to occur both on plant surfaces (epiphytes) and inside plant tissues (endophytes), but the two communities have rarely been compared. We compared epiphytic and endophytic fungal communities associated with leaves of coffee (Coffea arabica) in Puerto Rico. We asked whether the dominant fungi are the same in both communities, whether endophyte and epiphyte communities are equally diverse, and whether epiphytes and endophytes exhibit similar patterns of spatial heterogeneity among sites. Leaves of naturalized coffee plants were collected from six sites in Puerto Rico. Epiphytic and endophytic fungi were isolated by placing leaf pieces on potato dextrose agar without and with surface sterilization, respectively. A total of 821 colonies were isolated and grouped into 131 morphospecies. The taxonomic affinities of the four most common nonsporulating fungi were determined by sequencing the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region: two grouped with Xylaria and one each with Botryosphaeria and Guignardia. Of the most common genera, Pestalotia and Botryosphaeria were significantly more common as epiphytes; Colletotrichum, Xylaria, and Guignardia were significantly more common as endophytes. Suprisingly, more morphospecies occurred as endophytes than as epiphytes. Differences among sites in number of fungi per plant were significant. Thus epiphytic and endophytic communities differed greatly on a single leaf, despite living only millimeters apart, and both communities differed from site to site. Significant correlations between occurrence of fungal morphospecies suggested that fungi may have positive or negative effects on their neighbors. This is the first quantitative comparison of epiphytic and endophytic fungal floras in any plant, and the first to examine endophytic fungi or epiphytic fungi in leaves of coffee, one of the world's most valuable crops.</description><subject>Colletotrichum</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Endosymbionts</subject><subject>Epiphytes</subject><subject>Flora</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Plants</subject><issn>0095-3628</issn><issn>1432-184X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFibsOgkAURDdGE_HR25hsqcXq3QcPS0MgFpYWduQquwpBICya8PcSQ28xOXNmCFlx2HEAf28BhAoYgOojGB8RhyvZl0Bdx8QBOLhMeiKYkpm1OQD3PSEdcozf5QMLGtVZ_exabSmWKY3KtBq0MjSsjNGanjV--mHzU6TY4C2743ZBJgYLq5cD52QdR5fwxHLbVk1SN9kLmy4RLnelECD__V8d0Do_</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Santamaría, Johanna</creator><creator>Bayman, Paul</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Fungal Epiphytes and Endophytes of Coffee Leaves (Coffea arabica)</title><author>Santamaría, Johanna ; Bayman, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_251532203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Colletotrichum</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Endosymbionts</topic><topic>Epiphytes</topic><topic>Flora</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santamaría, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayman, Paul</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Microbial ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santamaría, Johanna</au><au>Bayman, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fungal Epiphytes and Endophytes of Coffee Leaves (Coffea arabica)</atitle><jtitle>Microbial ecology</jtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>0095-3628</issn><eissn>1432-184X</eissn><abstract>Plants harbor diverse communities of fungi and other microorganisms. Fungi are known to occur both on plant surfaces (epiphytes) and inside plant tissues (endophytes), but the two communities have rarely been compared. We compared epiphytic and endophytic fungal communities associated with leaves of coffee (Coffea arabica) in Puerto Rico. We asked whether the dominant fungi are the same in both communities, whether endophyte and epiphyte communities are equally diverse, and whether epiphytes and endophytes exhibit similar patterns of spatial heterogeneity among sites. Leaves of naturalized coffee plants were collected from six sites in Puerto Rico. Epiphytic and endophytic fungi were isolated by placing leaf pieces on potato dextrose agar without and with surface sterilization, respectively. A total of 821 colonies were isolated and grouped into 131 morphospecies. The taxonomic affinities of the four most common nonsporulating fungi were determined by sequencing the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region: two grouped with Xylaria and one each with Botryosphaeria and Guignardia. Of the most common genera, Pestalotia and Botryosphaeria were significantly more common as epiphytes; Colletotrichum, Xylaria, and Guignardia were significantly more common as endophytes. Suprisingly, more morphospecies occurred as endophytes than as epiphytes. Differences among sites in number of fungi per plant were significant. Thus epiphytic and endophytic communities differed greatly on a single leaf, despite living only millimeters apart, and both communities differed from site to site. Significant correlations between occurrence of fungal morphospecies suggested that fungi may have positive or negative effects on their neighbors. This is the first quantitative comparison of epiphytic and endophytic fungal floras in any plant, and the first to examine endophytic fungi or epiphytic fungi in leaves of coffee, one of the world's most valuable crops.</abstract><pub>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</pub><doi>10.1007/s00248-004-002-1</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-3628
ispartof Microbial ecology, 2005-07, Vol.50 (1), p.1-8
issn 0095-3628
1432-184X
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_25153220
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Colletotrichum
Communities
Endosymbionts
Epiphytes
Flora
Fungi
Genera
Leaves
Pathogens
Plants
title Fungal Epiphytes and Endophytes of Coffee Leaves (Coffea arabica)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T09%3A23%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fungal%20Epiphytes%20and%20Endophytes%20of%20Coffee%20Leaves%20(Coffea%20arabica)&rft.jtitle=Microbial%20ecology&rft.au=Santamar%C3%ADa,%20Johanna&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=0095-3628&rft.eissn=1432-184X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00248-004-002-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E25153220%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25153220&rfr_iscdi=true