"Riding Two Horses": The British Aviation Industry's Position vis-à-vis Boeing and Airbus Industrie

Boeing began to focus on Britain in 1977, and wanted to attract it away from the European consortium Airbus Industrie. Boeing's grand design was that British aviation companies (British Aerospace [BAe], Rolls-Royce, and British Airways) would participate in the Boeing 757 project. However, BAe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Kyoto economic review 2015-06, Vol.84 (1/2 (176/177)), p.29-45
1. Verfasser: Sakade, Takeshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue 1/2 (176/177)
container_start_page 29
container_title The Kyoto economic review
container_volume 84
creator Sakade, Takeshi
description Boeing began to focus on Britain in 1977, and wanted to attract it away from the European consortium Airbus Industrie. Boeing's grand design was that British aviation companies (British Aerospace [BAe], Rolls-Royce, and British Airways) would participate in the Boeing 757 project. However, BAe rejected the Boeing offer and preferred to join the European Airbus Industrie. Following negotiations, BAe rejoined the European consortium Airbus Industrie, British Airways purchased the 757, and Rolls-Royce became the launch supplier for the 757, which featured its RB211–535 engine. This engine became the best-selling engine Trent. The British aircraft industry was thus finally able to "ride two horses" – namely, the United States and continental Europe.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_24898518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24898518</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24898518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j991-13a733e6933d6463519eb53e0accee56ea3280a8d6117ef361ebc921388d9ed33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jM1KAzEURoMoWKuPIIRuXAUmcyeZxN20aFsoKDL7kpnc2gw6kdxppW_ju_hi_rs6Hx-cc8RGEgordFma4_9t9Ck7I-qyrJBK5iPmJw_Bh_6R16-RL2IipMk1r7fIpykMgba82gc3hNjzZe93NKTDFfH7SOH72wcS72_iE3wa8avjes-rkJod_QkBz9nJxj0RXvxyzOrbm3q2EKu7-XJWrURnrRQSXAmA2gJ4XWhQ0mKjADPXtohKo4PcZM54LWWJG9ASm9bmEozxFj3AmF3-ZDsaYlq_pPDs0mGdF8YaJQ18AJS6UDc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Riding Two Horses": The British Aviation Industry's Position vis-à-vis Boeing and Airbus Industrie</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Open Access Titles of Japan</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Sakade, Takeshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakade, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><description>Boeing began to focus on Britain in 1977, and wanted to attract it away from the European consortium Airbus Industrie. Boeing's grand design was that British aviation companies (British Aerospace [BAe], Rolls-Royce, and British Airways) would participate in the Boeing 757 project. However, BAe rejected the Boeing offer and preferred to join the European Airbus Industrie. Following negotiations, BAe rejoined the European consortium Airbus Industrie, British Airways purchased the 757, and Rolls-Royce became the launch supplier for the 757, which featured its RB211–535 engine. This engine became the best-selling engine Trent. The British aircraft industry was thus finally able to "ride two horses" – namely, the United States and continental Europe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1349-6786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-6778</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Graduate School of Economics, Kyoto University</publisher><subject>Aircraft ; Aircraft engines ; Aircraft industry ; Airframes ; Airlines ; Aviation ; Civil aviation ; Industrial market ; Industry ; REFEREED ARTICLES ; Service industries</subject><ispartof>The Kyoto economic review, 2015-06, Vol.84 (1/2 (176/177)), p.29-45</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24898518$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24898518$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakade, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><title>"Riding Two Horses": The British Aviation Industry's Position vis-à-vis Boeing and Airbus Industrie</title><title>The Kyoto economic review</title><description>Boeing began to focus on Britain in 1977, and wanted to attract it away from the European consortium Airbus Industrie. Boeing's grand design was that British aviation companies (British Aerospace [BAe], Rolls-Royce, and British Airways) would participate in the Boeing 757 project. However, BAe rejected the Boeing offer and preferred to join the European Airbus Industrie. Following negotiations, BAe rejoined the European consortium Airbus Industrie, British Airways purchased the 757, and Rolls-Royce became the launch supplier for the 757, which featured its RB211–535 engine. This engine became the best-selling engine Trent. The British aircraft industry was thus finally able to "ride two horses" – namely, the United States and continental Europe.</description><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Aircraft engines</subject><subject>Aircraft industry</subject><subject>Airframes</subject><subject>Airlines</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Civil aviation</subject><subject>Industrial market</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>REFEREED ARTICLES</subject><subject>Service industries</subject><issn>1349-6786</issn><issn>1349-6778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNo9jM1KAzEURoMoWKuPIIRuXAUmcyeZxN20aFsoKDL7kpnc2gw6kdxppW_ju_hi_rs6Hx-cc8RGEgordFma4_9t9Ck7I-qyrJBK5iPmJw_Bh_6R16-RL2IipMk1r7fIpykMgba82gc3hNjzZe93NKTDFfH7SOH72wcS72_iE3wa8avjes-rkJod_QkBz9nJxj0RXvxyzOrbm3q2EKu7-XJWrURnrRQSXAmA2gJ4XWhQ0mKjADPXtohKo4PcZM54LWWJG9ASm9bmEozxFj3AmF3-ZDsaYlq_pPDs0mGdF8YaJQ18AJS6UDc</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Sakade, Takeshi</creator><general>Graduate School of Economics, Kyoto University</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>"Riding Two Horses": The British Aviation Industry's Position vis-à-vis Boeing and Airbus Industrie</title><author>Sakade, Takeshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j991-13a733e6933d6463519eb53e0accee56ea3280a8d6117ef361ebc921388d9ed33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Aircraft engines</topic><topic>Aircraft industry</topic><topic>Airframes</topic><topic>Airlines</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Civil aviation</topic><topic>Industrial market</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>REFEREED ARTICLES</topic><topic>Service industries</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakade, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Kyoto economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakade, Takeshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Riding Two Horses": The British Aviation Industry's Position vis-à-vis Boeing and Airbus Industrie</atitle><jtitle>The Kyoto economic review</jtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1/2 (176/177)</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>29-45</pages><issn>1349-6786</issn><eissn>1349-6778</eissn><abstract>Boeing began to focus on Britain in 1977, and wanted to attract it away from the European consortium Airbus Industrie. Boeing's grand design was that British aviation companies (British Aerospace [BAe], Rolls-Royce, and British Airways) would participate in the Boeing 757 project. However, BAe rejected the Boeing offer and preferred to join the European Airbus Industrie. Following negotiations, BAe rejoined the European consortium Airbus Industrie, British Airways purchased the 757, and Rolls-Royce became the launch supplier for the 757, which featured its RB211–535 engine. This engine became the best-selling engine Trent. The British aircraft industry was thus finally able to "ride two horses" – namely, the United States and continental Europe.</abstract><pub>Graduate School of Economics, Kyoto University</pub><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1349-6786
ispartof The Kyoto economic review, 2015-06, Vol.84 (1/2 (176/177)), p.29-45
issn 1349-6786
1349-6778
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_24898518
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Open Access Titles of Japan; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Aircraft
Aircraft engines
Aircraft industry
Airframes
Airlines
Aviation
Civil aviation
Industrial market
Industry
REFEREED ARTICLES
Service industries
title "Riding Two Horses": The British Aviation Industry's Position vis-à-vis Boeing and Airbus Industrie
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A35%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Riding%20Two%20Horses%22:%20The%20British%20Aviation%20Industry's%20Position%20vis-%C3%A0-vis%20Boeing%20and%20Airbus%20Industrie&rft.jtitle=The%20Kyoto%20economic%20review&rft.au=Sakade,%20Takeshi&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1/2%20(176/177)&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=29-45&rft.issn=1349-6786&rft.eissn=1349-6778&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E24898518%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24898518&rfr_iscdi=true