Il tardoantico sottoposto a censura: le rappresentazioni dell'arco di Costantino tra Quattro e Cinquecento

I propose a re-reading of several representations of the arch of Constantine in 15th and 16th century paintings, drawings, and engravings. All of them portray exactly the sculptural spolia embedded in the arch, yet they 'correct' or remove the sculptures dating from the Constantinian era....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annali della Scuola normale superiore di Pisa, Classe di lettere e filosofia Classe di lettere e filosofia, 2010-01, Vol.2 (1), p.45-374
1. Verfasser: Morresi, Manuela M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ita
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue 1
container_start_page 45
container_title Annali della Scuola normale superiore di Pisa, Classe di lettere e filosofia
container_volume 2
creator Morresi, Manuela M.
description I propose a re-reading of several representations of the arch of Constantine in 15th and 16th century paintings, drawings, and engravings. All of them portray exactly the sculptural spolia embedded in the arch, yet they 'correct' or remove the sculptures dating from the Constantinian era. I argue that the criticism on this arch that Raphael expresses in his letter to Pope Leo X is not something new, but depends on verbally unexpressed opinions by preceding artists – such as Mantegna, Botticelli, Perugino, Pinturicchio, Francesco di Giorgio, and others – who have reproduced the arch in their works. From Raphael's judgement on Constantine arch, later quoted by Vasari in his Foreword to the Vite, takes origin a negative bias that will influence following artists and critics: from Palladio to Piranesi they will continue to 'correct' its Constantinian sculptures; finally the prejudice extends to all artistic expressions from the late antiquity, which culminates in the modern interpretation of the arch by Berenson.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_24308617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24308617</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24308617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_243086173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjbEKwkAQBa9QMGg-QdjOKnBJjDG2QdFSsLALiznhwnkb9zaFfr0R7K1eMcy8iYp0XmWJrorrTMUhdFrrtFiXWaUj1Z0cCHJL6MXeCAKJUE9BCBBuxoeBcQfOAGPfswnGC74teQutcW6FPDqthXo0vgVPIIxwHlCECQzU1j8HM4aEFmp6RxdM_Nu5Wh72l_qYdOMbNz3bB_Kryda53m7SMv_HPwSSRRI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Il tardoantico sottoposto a censura: le rappresentazioni dell'arco di Costantino tra Quattro e Cinquecento</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Morresi, Manuela M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morresi, Manuela M.</creatorcontrib><description>I propose a re-reading of several representations of the arch of Constantine in 15th and 16th century paintings, drawings, and engravings. All of them portray exactly the sculptural spolia embedded in the arch, yet they 'correct' or remove the sculptures dating from the Constantinian era. I argue that the criticism on this arch that Raphael expresses in his letter to Pope Leo X is not something new, but depends on verbally unexpressed opinions by preceding artists – such as Mantegna, Botticelli, Perugino, Pinturicchio, Francesco di Giorgio, and others – who have reproduced the arch in their works. From Raphael's judgement on Constantine arch, later quoted by Vasari in his Foreword to the Vite, takes origin a negative bias that will influence following artists and critics: from Palladio to Piranesi they will continue to 'correct' its Constantinian sculptures; finally the prejudice extends to all artistic expressions from the late antiquity, which culminates in the modern interpretation of the arch by Berenson.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0392-095X</identifier><language>ita</language><publisher>EDIZIONI DELLA NORMALE</publisher><subject>CENSURA, RISCRITTURA, RESTAURO</subject><ispartof>Annali della Scuola normale superiore di Pisa, Classe di lettere e filosofia, 2010-01, Vol.2 (1), p.45-374</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24308617$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24308617$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morresi, Manuela M.</creatorcontrib><title>Il tardoantico sottoposto a censura: le rappresentazioni dell'arco di Costantino tra Quattro e Cinquecento</title><title>Annali della Scuola normale superiore di Pisa, Classe di lettere e filosofia</title><description>I propose a re-reading of several representations of the arch of Constantine in 15th and 16th century paintings, drawings, and engravings. All of them portray exactly the sculptural spolia embedded in the arch, yet they 'correct' or remove the sculptures dating from the Constantinian era. I argue that the criticism on this arch that Raphael expresses in his letter to Pope Leo X is not something new, but depends on verbally unexpressed opinions by preceding artists – such as Mantegna, Botticelli, Perugino, Pinturicchio, Francesco di Giorgio, and others – who have reproduced the arch in their works. From Raphael's judgement on Constantine arch, later quoted by Vasari in his Foreword to the Vite, takes origin a negative bias that will influence following artists and critics: from Palladio to Piranesi they will continue to 'correct' its Constantinian sculptures; finally the prejudice extends to all artistic expressions from the late antiquity, which culminates in the modern interpretation of the arch by Berenson.</description><subject>CENSURA, RISCRITTURA, RESTAURO</subject><issn>0392-095X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFjbEKwkAQBa9QMGg-QdjOKnBJjDG2QdFSsLALiznhwnkb9zaFfr0R7K1eMcy8iYp0XmWJrorrTMUhdFrrtFiXWaUj1Z0cCHJL6MXeCAKJUE9BCBBuxoeBcQfOAGPfswnGC74teQutcW6FPDqthXo0vgVPIIxwHlCECQzU1j8HM4aEFmp6RxdM_Nu5Wh72l_qYdOMbNz3bB_Kryda53m7SMv_HPwSSRRI</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Morresi, Manuela M.</creator><general>EDIZIONI DELLA NORMALE</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Il tardoantico sottoposto a censura: le rappresentazioni dell'arco di Costantino tra Quattro e Cinquecento</title><author>Morresi, Manuela M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_243086173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ita</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>CENSURA, RISCRITTURA, RESTAURO</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morresi, Manuela M.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Annali della Scuola normale superiore di Pisa, Classe di lettere e filosofia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morresi, Manuela M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Il tardoantico sottoposto a censura: le rappresentazioni dell'arco di Costantino tra Quattro e Cinquecento</atitle><jtitle>Annali della Scuola normale superiore di Pisa, Classe di lettere e filosofia</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>45-374</pages><issn>0392-095X</issn><abstract>I propose a re-reading of several representations of the arch of Constantine in 15th and 16th century paintings, drawings, and engravings. All of them portray exactly the sculptural spolia embedded in the arch, yet they 'correct' or remove the sculptures dating from the Constantinian era. I argue that the criticism on this arch that Raphael expresses in his letter to Pope Leo X is not something new, but depends on verbally unexpressed opinions by preceding artists – such as Mantegna, Botticelli, Perugino, Pinturicchio, Francesco di Giorgio, and others – who have reproduced the arch in their works. From Raphael's judgement on Constantine arch, later quoted by Vasari in his Foreword to the Vite, takes origin a negative bias that will influence following artists and critics: from Palladio to Piranesi they will continue to 'correct' its Constantinian sculptures; finally the prejudice extends to all artistic expressions from the late antiquity, which culminates in the modern interpretation of the arch by Berenson.</abstract><pub>EDIZIONI DELLA NORMALE</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0392-095X
ispartof Annali della Scuola normale superiore di Pisa, Classe di lettere e filosofia, 2010-01, Vol.2 (1), p.45-374
issn 0392-095X
language ita
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_24308617
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects CENSURA, RISCRITTURA, RESTAURO
title Il tardoantico sottoposto a censura: le rappresentazioni dell'arco di Costantino tra Quattro e Cinquecento
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A08%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Il%20tardoantico%20sottoposto%20a%20censura:%20le%20rappresentazioni%20dell'arco%20di%20Costantino%20tra%20Quattro%20e%20Cinquecento&rft.jtitle=Annali%20della%20Scuola%20normale%20superiore%20di%20Pisa,%20Classe%20di%20lettere%20e%20filosofia&rft.au=Morresi,%20Manuela%20M.&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=45-374&rft.issn=0392-095X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E24308617%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24308617&rfr_iscdi=true