Comparing modern and presettlement forest dynamics of a subboreal wilderness: Does spruce budworm enhance fire risk?

Insect disturbance is often thought to increase fire risk through enhanced fuel loadings, particularly in coniferous forest ecosystems. Yet insect disturbances also affect successional pathways and landscape structure that interact with fire disturbances (and vice-versa) over longer time scales. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2012-06, Vol.22 (4), p.1278-1296
Hauptverfasser: Sturtevant, Brian R, Miranda, Brian R, Shinneman, Douglas J, Gustafson, Eric J, Wolter, Peter T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1296
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1278
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 22
creator Sturtevant, Brian R
Miranda, Brian R
Shinneman, Douglas J
Gustafson, Eric J
Wolter, Peter T
description Insect disturbance is often thought to increase fire risk through enhanced fuel loadings, particularly in coniferous forest ecosystems. Yet insect disturbances also affect successional pathways and landscape structure that interact with fire disturbances (and vice-versa) over longer time scales. We applied a landscape succession and disturbance model (LANDIS-II) to evaluate the relative strength of interactions between spruce budworm ( Choristoneura fumiferana ) outbreaks and fire disturbances in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area (BWCA) in northern Minnesota (USA). Disturbance interactions were evaluated for two different scenarios: presettlement forests and fire regimes vs. contemporary forests and fire regimes. Forest composition under the contemporary scenario trended toward mixtures of deciduous species (primarily Betula papyrifera and Populus spp.) and shade-tolerant conifers ( Picea mariana , Abies balsamea , Thuja occidentalis ), with disturbances dominated by a combination of budworm defoliation and high-severity fires. The presettlement scenario retained comparatively more "big pines" (i.e., Pinus strobus , P. resinosa ) and tamarack ( L. laricina ), and experienced less budworm disturbance and a comparatively less-severe fire regime. Spruce budworm disturbance decreased area burned and fire severity under both scenarios when averaged across the entire 300-year simulations. Contrary to past research, area burned and fire severity during outbreak decades were each similar to that observed in non-outbreak decades. Our analyses suggest budworm disturbances within forests of the BWCA have a comparatively weak effect on long-term forest composition due to a combination of characteristics. These include strict host specificity, fine-scaled patchiness created by defoliation damage, and advance regeneration of its primary host, balsam fir ( A. balsamea ) that allows its host to persist despite repeated disturbances. Understanding the nature of the three-way interaction between budworm, fire, and composition has important ramifications for both fire mitigation strategies and ecosystem restoration initiatives. We conclude that budworm disturbance can partially mitigate long-term future fire risk by periodically reducing live ladder fuel within the mixed forest types of the BWCA but will do little to reverse the compositional trends caused in part by reduced fire rotations.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/11-0590.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_23213961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23213961</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23213961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4778-40a3856849b5bcc6c1e32a815d5564e3ae14d48a36b8e5d1367c8d21b5c4b75a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1TAQhiMEohdY8AAgS2xgEfD4EjtsUHVaLlIlWMDasuMJpCR2sBOV8_b4KKVsioQ39ni--ceev6qeAH0FuqWvAWoq2xLcq46h5W0tpWb3y5nKklENHFUnOV_RshhjD6sjxjRTwOVxteziNNs0hG9kih5TIDZ4MifMuCwjThgW0scSLsTvg52GLpPYE0vy6ly5tyO5HsZDIeb8hpxHzCTPae2QuNVfxzQRDN9tKHE_JCRpyD_ePqoe9HbM-PhmP62-vrv4svtQX356_3F3dllboZSuBbVcy0aL1knXdU0HyJnVIL2UjUBuEYQX2vLGaZQeeKM67Rk42QmnpOWn1YtNd07x51r-YKYhdziONmBcswHKmW6ZUuI_UKYpqDLRgr7c0C7FnBP2Zk7DZNO-QObghwEwBz8MFPbZjezqJvS35B8DCiA3oEwR9_9WMhdnnxmFYp8ApnSpe7rVXeUlpr-6nAFvm0Pj51veLvs5BoPZ3vm8O6jblrPvzfJr4b8Bzo600w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1028017105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing modern and presettlement forest dynamics of a subboreal wilderness: Does spruce budworm enhance fire risk?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sturtevant, Brian R ; Miranda, Brian R ; Shinneman, Douglas J ; Gustafson, Eric J ; Wolter, Peter T</creator><contributor>Ayres, MP</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sturtevant, Brian R ; Miranda, Brian R ; Shinneman, Douglas J ; Gustafson, Eric J ; Wolter, Peter T ; Ayres, MP</creatorcontrib><description>Insect disturbance is often thought to increase fire risk through enhanced fuel loadings, particularly in coniferous forest ecosystems. Yet insect disturbances also affect successional pathways and landscape structure that interact with fire disturbances (and vice-versa) over longer time scales. We applied a landscape succession and disturbance model (LANDIS-II) to evaluate the relative strength of interactions between spruce budworm ( Choristoneura fumiferana ) outbreaks and fire disturbances in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area (BWCA) in northern Minnesota (USA). Disturbance interactions were evaluated for two different scenarios: presettlement forests and fire regimes vs. contemporary forests and fire regimes. Forest composition under the contemporary scenario trended toward mixtures of deciduous species (primarily Betula papyrifera and Populus spp.) and shade-tolerant conifers ( Picea mariana , Abies balsamea , Thuja occidentalis ), with disturbances dominated by a combination of budworm defoliation and high-severity fires. The presettlement scenario retained comparatively more "big pines" (i.e., Pinus strobus , P. resinosa ) and tamarack ( L. laricina ), and experienced less budworm disturbance and a comparatively less-severe fire regime. Spruce budworm disturbance decreased area burned and fire severity under both scenarios when averaged across the entire 300-year simulations. Contrary to past research, area burned and fire severity during outbreak decades were each similar to that observed in non-outbreak decades. Our analyses suggest budworm disturbances within forests of the BWCA have a comparatively weak effect on long-term forest composition due to a combination of characteristics. These include strict host specificity, fine-scaled patchiness created by defoliation damage, and advance regeneration of its primary host, balsam fir ( A. balsamea ) that allows its host to persist despite repeated disturbances. Understanding the nature of the three-way interaction between budworm, fire, and composition has important ramifications for both fire mitigation strategies and ecosystem restoration initiatives. We conclude that budworm disturbance can partially mitigate long-term future fire risk by periodically reducing live ladder fuel within the mixed forest types of the BWCA but will do little to reverse the compositional trends caused in part by reduced fire rotations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/11-0590.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22827135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Abies balsamea ; Animals ; Betula papyrifera ; Boreal forests ; Choristoneura fumiferana ; Computer Simulation ; Coniferous forests ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Deciduous forests ; disturbance ecology ; Ecosystem ; Environmental Monitoring ; Feeding Behavior ; Fire ecology ; Fire regimes ; Fires ; Forest ecology ; Forest fires ; Forest regeneration ; insect-fire interactions ; LANDIS-II ; Landscapes ; Larva - physiology ; Laurentian mixed forest ; Minnesota ; Mixed forests ; Models, Biological ; Moths - physiology ; Picea mariana ; Pinus strobus ; Population Dynamics ; Populus ; spruce budworm ; succession ; Thuja occidentalis ; Time Factors ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2012-06, Vol.22 (4), p.1278-1296</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2012 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4778-40a3856849b5bcc6c1e32a815d5564e3ae14d48a36b8e5d1367c8d21b5c4b75a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4778-40a3856849b5bcc6c1e32a815d5564e3ae14d48a36b8e5d1367c8d21b5c4b75a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23213961$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23213961$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22827135$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ayres, MP</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sturtevant, Brian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Brian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinneman, Douglas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolter, Peter T</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing modern and presettlement forest dynamics of a subboreal wilderness: Does spruce budworm enhance fire risk?</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Insect disturbance is often thought to increase fire risk through enhanced fuel loadings, particularly in coniferous forest ecosystems. Yet insect disturbances also affect successional pathways and landscape structure that interact with fire disturbances (and vice-versa) over longer time scales. We applied a landscape succession and disturbance model (LANDIS-II) to evaluate the relative strength of interactions between spruce budworm ( Choristoneura fumiferana ) outbreaks and fire disturbances in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area (BWCA) in northern Minnesota (USA). Disturbance interactions were evaluated for two different scenarios: presettlement forests and fire regimes vs. contemporary forests and fire regimes. Forest composition under the contemporary scenario trended toward mixtures of deciduous species (primarily Betula papyrifera and Populus spp.) and shade-tolerant conifers ( Picea mariana , Abies balsamea , Thuja occidentalis ), with disturbances dominated by a combination of budworm defoliation and high-severity fires. The presettlement scenario retained comparatively more "big pines" (i.e., Pinus strobus , P. resinosa ) and tamarack ( L. laricina ), and experienced less budworm disturbance and a comparatively less-severe fire regime. Spruce budworm disturbance decreased area burned and fire severity under both scenarios when averaged across the entire 300-year simulations. Contrary to past research, area burned and fire severity during outbreak decades were each similar to that observed in non-outbreak decades. Our analyses suggest budworm disturbances within forests of the BWCA have a comparatively weak effect on long-term forest composition due to a combination of characteristics. These include strict host specificity, fine-scaled patchiness created by defoliation damage, and advance regeneration of its primary host, balsam fir ( A. balsamea ) that allows its host to persist despite repeated disturbances. Understanding the nature of the three-way interaction between budworm, fire, and composition has important ramifications for both fire mitigation strategies and ecosystem restoration initiatives. We conclude that budworm disturbance can partially mitigate long-term future fire risk by periodically reducing live ladder fuel within the mixed forest types of the BWCA but will do little to reverse the compositional trends caused in part by reduced fire rotations.</description><subject>Abies balsamea</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Betula papyrifera</subject><subject>Boreal forests</subject><subject>Choristoneura fumiferana</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Deciduous forests</subject><subject>disturbance ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Fire ecology</subject><subject>Fire regimes</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest fires</subject><subject>Forest regeneration</subject><subject>insect-fire interactions</subject><subject>LANDIS-II</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Larva - physiology</subject><subject>Laurentian mixed forest</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Mixed forests</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Moths - physiology</subject><subject>Picea mariana</subject><subject>Pinus strobus</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Populus</subject><subject>spruce budworm</subject><subject>succession</subject><subject>Thuja occidentalis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1TAQhiMEohdY8AAgS2xgEfD4EjtsUHVaLlIlWMDasuMJpCR2sBOV8_b4KKVsioQ39ni--ceev6qeAH0FuqWvAWoq2xLcq46h5W0tpWb3y5nKklENHFUnOV_RshhjD6sjxjRTwOVxteziNNs0hG9kih5TIDZ4MifMuCwjThgW0scSLsTvg52GLpPYE0vy6ly5tyO5HsZDIeb8hpxHzCTPae2QuNVfxzQRDN9tKHE_JCRpyD_ePqoe9HbM-PhmP62-vrv4svtQX356_3F3dllboZSuBbVcy0aL1knXdU0HyJnVIL2UjUBuEYQX2vLGaZQeeKM67Rk42QmnpOWn1YtNd07x51r-YKYhdziONmBcswHKmW6ZUuI_UKYpqDLRgr7c0C7FnBP2Zk7DZNO-QObghwEwBz8MFPbZjezqJvS35B8DCiA3oEwR9_9WMhdnnxmFYp8ApnSpe7rVXeUlpr-6nAFvm0Pj51veLvs5BoPZ3vm8O6jblrPvzfJr4b8Bzo600w</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Sturtevant, Brian R</creator><creator>Miranda, Brian R</creator><creator>Shinneman, Douglas J</creator><creator>Gustafson, Eric J</creator><creator>Wolter, Peter T</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Comparing modern and presettlement forest dynamics of a subboreal wilderness: Does spruce budworm enhance fire risk?</title><author>Sturtevant, Brian R ; Miranda, Brian R ; Shinneman, Douglas J ; Gustafson, Eric J ; Wolter, Peter T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4778-40a3856849b5bcc6c1e32a815d5564e3ae14d48a36b8e5d1367c8d21b5c4b75a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abies balsamea</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Betula papyrifera</topic><topic>Boreal forests</topic><topic>Choristoneura fumiferana</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Deciduous forests</topic><topic>disturbance ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Fire ecology</topic><topic>Fire regimes</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest fires</topic><topic>Forest regeneration</topic><topic>insect-fire interactions</topic><topic>LANDIS-II</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Larva - physiology</topic><topic>Laurentian mixed forest</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Mixed forests</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Moths - physiology</topic><topic>Picea mariana</topic><topic>Pinus strobus</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Populus</topic><topic>spruce budworm</topic><topic>succession</topic><topic>Thuja occidentalis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sturtevant, Brian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Brian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinneman, Douglas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolter, Peter T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sturtevant, Brian R</au><au>Miranda, Brian R</au><au>Shinneman, Douglas J</au><au>Gustafson, Eric J</au><au>Wolter, Peter T</au><au>Ayres, MP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing modern and presettlement forest dynamics of a subboreal wilderness: Does spruce budworm enhance fire risk?</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1278</spage><epage>1296</epage><pages>1278-1296</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Insect disturbance is often thought to increase fire risk through enhanced fuel loadings, particularly in coniferous forest ecosystems. Yet insect disturbances also affect successional pathways and landscape structure that interact with fire disturbances (and vice-versa) over longer time scales. We applied a landscape succession and disturbance model (LANDIS-II) to evaluate the relative strength of interactions between spruce budworm ( Choristoneura fumiferana ) outbreaks and fire disturbances in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area (BWCA) in northern Minnesota (USA). Disturbance interactions were evaluated for two different scenarios: presettlement forests and fire regimes vs. contemporary forests and fire regimes. Forest composition under the contemporary scenario trended toward mixtures of deciduous species (primarily Betula papyrifera and Populus spp.) and shade-tolerant conifers ( Picea mariana , Abies balsamea , Thuja occidentalis ), with disturbances dominated by a combination of budworm defoliation and high-severity fires. The presettlement scenario retained comparatively more "big pines" (i.e., Pinus strobus , P. resinosa ) and tamarack ( L. laricina ), and experienced less budworm disturbance and a comparatively less-severe fire regime. Spruce budworm disturbance decreased area burned and fire severity under both scenarios when averaged across the entire 300-year simulations. Contrary to past research, area burned and fire severity during outbreak decades were each similar to that observed in non-outbreak decades. Our analyses suggest budworm disturbances within forests of the BWCA have a comparatively weak effect on long-term forest composition due to a combination of characteristics. These include strict host specificity, fine-scaled patchiness created by defoliation damage, and advance regeneration of its primary host, balsam fir ( A. balsamea ) that allows its host to persist despite repeated disturbances. Understanding the nature of the three-way interaction between budworm, fire, and composition has important ramifications for both fire mitigation strategies and ecosystem restoration initiatives. We conclude that budworm disturbance can partially mitigate long-term future fire risk by periodically reducing live ladder fuel within the mixed forest types of the BWCA but will do little to reverse the compositional trends caused in part by reduced fire rotations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>22827135</pmid><doi>10.1890/11-0590.1</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2012-06, Vol.22 (4), p.1278-1296
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_23213961
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Abies balsamea
Animals
Betula papyrifera
Boreal forests
Choristoneura fumiferana
Computer Simulation
Coniferous forests
Conservation of Natural Resources
Deciduous forests
disturbance ecology
Ecosystem
Environmental Monitoring
Feeding Behavior
Fire ecology
Fire regimes
Fires
Forest ecology
Forest fires
Forest regeneration
insect-fire interactions
LANDIS-II
Landscapes
Larva - physiology
Laurentian mixed forest
Minnesota
Mixed forests
Models, Biological
Moths - physiology
Picea mariana
Pinus strobus
Population Dynamics
Populus
spruce budworm
succession
Thuja occidentalis
Time Factors
Trees
title Comparing modern and presettlement forest dynamics of a subboreal wilderness: Does spruce budworm enhance fire risk?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A23%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20modern%20and%20presettlement%20forest%20dynamics%20of%20a%20subboreal%20wilderness:%20Does%20spruce%20budworm%20enhance%20fire%20risk?&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Sturtevant,%20Brian%20R&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1278&rft.epage=1296&rft.pages=1278-1296&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/11-0590.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23213961%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1028017105&rft_id=info:pmid/22827135&rft_jstor_id=23213961&rfr_iscdi=true