The Reliability of Differences Scores in Populations and Samples

This study was an investigation of the relation between the reliability of difference scores, considered as a parameter characterizing a population of examinees, and the reliability estimates obtained from random samples from the population. The parameters in familiar equations for the reliability o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of educational measurement 2009-04, Vol.46 (1), p.19-42
1. Verfasser: Zimmerman, Donald W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Journal of educational measurement
container_volume 46
creator Zimmerman, Donald W.
description This study was an investigation of the relation between the reliability of difference scores, considered as a parameter characterizing a population of examinees, and the reliability estimates obtained from random samples from the population. The parameters in familiar equations for the reliability of difference scores were redefined in such a way that determinants of reliability in both populations and samples become more transparent. Computer simulation was used to find sample values and to plot frequency distributions of various correlations and variance ratios relevant to the reliability of differences. The shape of frequency distributions resulting from the simulations and the means and standard deviations of these distributions reveal the extent to which reliability estimates based on sample data can be expected to meaningfully represent population reliability.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_20461912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20461912</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20461912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_204619123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFybsKwjAUANAgCtbHJwj3BwpJ2rR2E3zgKLZ7iTXBlDQJuXXo3-vg7nSGMyMJK3ORZtU-n5OEUs5TWgixJCvEnlImSsEScmheCu7KGvkw1owTeA0no7WKynUKoe58_GIc3Hx4Wzka7xCke0Ith2AVbshCS4tq-3NNdpdzc7ymPY4-tiGaQcap5TQvWMV49u8_QbY1rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Reliability of Differences Scores in Populations and Samples</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Zimmerman, Donald W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Donald W.</creatorcontrib><description>This study was an investigation of the relation between the reliability of difference scores, considered as a parameter characterizing a population of examinees, and the reliability estimates obtained from random samples from the population. The parameters in familiar equations for the reliability of difference scores were redefined in such a way that determinants of reliability in both populations and samples become more transparent. Computer simulation was used to find sample values and to plot frequency distributions of various correlations and variance ratios relevant to the reliability of differences. The shape of frequency distributions resulting from the simulations and the means and standard deviations of these distributions reveal the extent to which reliability estimates based on sample data can be expected to meaningfully represent population reliability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services</publisher><subject>Correlations ; Error rates ; Estimate reliability ; Frequency distribution ; Population estimates ; Population parameters ; Ratios ; Sampling distributions ; Standard deviation ; Test theory</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational measurement, 2009-04, Vol.46 (1), p.19-42</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 National Council on Measurement in Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20461912$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20461912$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Donald W.</creatorcontrib><title>The Reliability of Differences Scores in Populations and Samples</title><title>Journal of educational measurement</title><description>This study was an investigation of the relation between the reliability of difference scores, considered as a parameter characterizing a population of examinees, and the reliability estimates obtained from random samples from the population. The parameters in familiar equations for the reliability of difference scores were redefined in such a way that determinants of reliability in both populations and samples become more transparent. Computer simulation was used to find sample values and to plot frequency distributions of various correlations and variance ratios relevant to the reliability of differences. The shape of frequency distributions resulting from the simulations and the means and standard deviations of these distributions reveal the extent to which reliability estimates based on sample data can be expected to meaningfully represent population reliability.</description><subject>Correlations</subject><subject>Error rates</subject><subject>Estimate reliability</subject><subject>Frequency distribution</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Population parameters</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Sampling distributions</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Test theory</subject><issn>0022-0655</issn><issn>1745-3984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFybsKwjAUANAgCtbHJwj3BwpJ2rR2E3zgKLZ7iTXBlDQJuXXo3-vg7nSGMyMJK3ORZtU-n5OEUs5TWgixJCvEnlImSsEScmheCu7KGvkw1owTeA0no7WKynUKoe58_GIc3Hx4Wzka7xCke0Ith2AVbshCS4tq-3NNdpdzc7ymPY4-tiGaQcap5TQvWMV49u8_QbY1rw</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Zimmerman, Donald W.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>The Reliability of Differences Scores in Populations and Samples</title><author>Zimmerman, Donald W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_204619123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Correlations</topic><topic>Error rates</topic><topic>Estimate reliability</topic><topic>Frequency distribution</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Population parameters</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Sampling distributions</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Test theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Donald W.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of educational measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimmerman, Donald W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Reliability of Differences Scores in Populations and Samples</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational measurement</jtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>19-42</pages><issn>0022-0655</issn><eissn>1745-3984</eissn><abstract>This study was an investigation of the relation between the reliability of difference scores, considered as a parameter characterizing a population of examinees, and the reliability estimates obtained from random samples from the population. The parameters in familiar equations for the reliability of difference scores were redefined in such a way that determinants of reliability in both populations and samples become more transparent. Computer simulation was used to find sample values and to plot frequency distributions of various correlations and variance ratios relevant to the reliability of differences. The shape of frequency distributions resulting from the simulations and the means and standard deviations of these distributions reveal the extent to which reliability estimates based on sample data can be expected to meaningfully represent population reliability.</abstract><pub>Wiley Subscription Services</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0655
ispartof Journal of educational measurement, 2009-04, Vol.46 (1), p.19-42
issn 0022-0655
1745-3984
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_20461912
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Correlations
Error rates
Estimate reliability
Frequency distribution
Population estimates
Population parameters
Ratios
Sampling distributions
Standard deviation
Test theory
title The Reliability of Differences Scores in Populations and Samples
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Reliability%20of%20Differences%20Scores%20in%20Populations%20and%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20measurement&rft.au=Zimmerman,%20Donald%20W.&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=19-42&rft.issn=0022-0655&rft.eissn=1745-3984&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E20461912%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20461912&rfr_iscdi=true