Seasonality in Offspring Value and Trade-Offs with Growth Explain Capital Breeding
The degree to which reproduction is based on reserves (capital breeding) and/or current acquisition (income breeding) drives extensive variation in organism life histories. In nature, pure income and capital breeding are endpoints of a continuum of diversity whose ultimate drivers are poorly underst...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American naturalist 2015-11, Vol.186 (5), p.E111-E125 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E125 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | E111 |
container_title | The American naturalist |
container_volume | 186 |
creator | Ejsmond, Maciej Jan Varpe, Øystein Czarnoleski, Marcin Kozłowski, Jan |
description | The degree to which reproduction is based on reserves (capital breeding) and/or current acquisition (income breeding) drives extensive variation in organism life histories. In nature, pure income and capital breeding are endpoints of a continuum of diversity whose ultimate drivers are poorly understood. To study the adaptive value of capital and income breeding, we present an annual routine model of the life history of a perennial organism where reproductive value at birth varies seasonally. The model organisms allocate time and resources to growth, reproduction, and storage. Our model predicts that capital breeding is adaptive when timing of birth affects offspring reproductive value. The stronger the seasonality, the more time is dedicated to capital breeding and growth after maturation (indeterminate growth) instead of income breeding. This is because storage and growth are investments in future (residual) reproduction taken at times when offspring value is low. Storage is a short-term investment in offspring through capital breeding; growth is a long-term investment in reproductive potential. Because the modeled production rate increases less than linearly with body size, growth brings diminishing returns for larger organisms, favoring capital breeding. Building storage requires time, which limits growth opportunities, and we show for the first time that in seasonal environments, the degree of capital breeding is tightly linked to body size of indeterminate growers through allocation trade-offs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/683119 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_10_1086_683119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/683119</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/683119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-1092635b8c834ae3da29ac892332628f715023000e258c7357b154e9bc3ed6453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNFLwzAQxoMoOKf-DQFF9lJNck2bPOqYUxgMdPpasjTdOrqmJi1z_70ZEweC4NNx3O-7--5D6JKSW0pEcpcIoFQeoR7lkEYcGByjHiEEIkLj9BSdeb8KrYwl76GXV6O8rVVVtltc1nhaFL5xZb3A76rqDFZ1jmdO5SbaTfCmbJd47OwmlNFnU6kgGaqmbFWFH5wxeVCeo5NCVd5cfNc-ensczYZP0WQ6fh7eTyINadxGlEiWAJ8LLSBWBnLFpNJCMgCWMFGklBMGwahhXOgUeDqnPDZyrsHkScyhjwb7vY2zH53xbbYuvTZVpWpjO5_RoJGUpzIO6NUvdGU7F77eUUyCYEwmgbrZU9pZ750pspDEWrltRkm2izbbRxvA6z3Y6WWp1cI2znh_2PmDDf6BZU1eHAyufGvdX3e_ACMKjio</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1729382296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonality in Offspring Value and Trade-Offs with Growth Explain Capital Breeding</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ejsmond, Maciej Jan ; Varpe, Øystein ; Czarnoleski, Marcin ; Kozłowski, Jan</creator><contributor>C. Jessica E. Metcalf ; Susan Kalisz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ejsmond, Maciej Jan ; Varpe, Øystein ; Czarnoleski, Marcin ; Kozłowski, Jan ; C. Jessica E. Metcalf ; Susan Kalisz</creatorcontrib><description>The degree to which reproduction is based on reserves (capital breeding) and/or current acquisition (income breeding) drives extensive variation in organism life histories. In nature, pure income and capital breeding are endpoints of a continuum of diversity whose ultimate drivers are poorly understood. To study the adaptive value of capital and income breeding, we present an annual routine model of the life history of a perennial organism where reproductive value at birth varies seasonally. The model organisms allocate time and resources to growth, reproduction, and storage. Our model predicts that capital breeding is adaptive when timing of birth affects offspring reproductive value. The stronger the seasonality, the more time is dedicated to capital breeding and growth after maturation (indeterminate growth) instead of income breeding. This is because storage and growth are investments in future (residual) reproduction taken at times when offspring value is low. Storage is a short-term investment in offspring through capital breeding; growth is a long-term investment in reproductive potential. Because the modeled production rate increases less than linearly with body size, growth brings diminishing returns for larger organisms, favoring capital breeding. Building storage requires time, which limits growth opportunities, and we show for the first time that in seasonal environments, the degree of capital breeding is tightly linked to body size of indeterminate growers through allocation trade-offs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/683119</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Body size ; Breeding ; Breeding of animals ; Breeding seasons ; E-Article ; Ecological competition ; Ecological life histories ; Growing seasons ; Growth models ; Indeterminate growth ; Maturation ; Mortality ; Winter</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2015-11, Vol.186 (5), p.E111-E125</ispartof><rights>2015 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Nov 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-1092635b8c834ae3da29ac892332628f715023000e258c7357b154e9bc3ed6453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-1092635b8c834ae3da29ac892332628f715023000e258c7357b154e9bc3ed6453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>C. Jessica E. Metcalf</contributor><contributor>Susan Kalisz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ejsmond, Maciej Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varpe, Øystein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czarnoleski, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozłowski, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonality in Offspring Value and Trade-Offs with Growth Explain Capital Breeding</title><title>The American naturalist</title><description>The degree to which reproduction is based on reserves (capital breeding) and/or current acquisition (income breeding) drives extensive variation in organism life histories. In nature, pure income and capital breeding are endpoints of a continuum of diversity whose ultimate drivers are poorly understood. To study the adaptive value of capital and income breeding, we present an annual routine model of the life history of a perennial organism where reproductive value at birth varies seasonally. The model organisms allocate time and resources to growth, reproduction, and storage. Our model predicts that capital breeding is adaptive when timing of birth affects offspring reproductive value. The stronger the seasonality, the more time is dedicated to capital breeding and growth after maturation (indeterminate growth) instead of income breeding. This is because storage and growth are investments in future (residual) reproduction taken at times when offspring value is low. Storage is a short-term investment in offspring through capital breeding; growth is a long-term investment in reproductive potential. Because the modeled production rate increases less than linearly with body size, growth brings diminishing returns for larger organisms, favoring capital breeding. Building storage requires time, which limits growth opportunities, and we show for the first time that in seasonal environments, the degree of capital breeding is tightly linked to body size of indeterminate growers through allocation trade-offs.</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding of animals</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>E-Article</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Ecological life histories</subject><subject>Growing seasons</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Indeterminate growth</subject><subject>Maturation</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkNFLwzAQxoMoOKf-DQFF9lJNck2bPOqYUxgMdPpasjTdOrqmJi1z_70ZEweC4NNx3O-7--5D6JKSW0pEcpcIoFQeoR7lkEYcGByjHiEEIkLj9BSdeb8KrYwl76GXV6O8rVVVtltc1nhaFL5xZb3A76rqDFZ1jmdO5SbaTfCmbJd47OwmlNFnU6kgGaqmbFWFH5wxeVCeo5NCVd5cfNc-ensczYZP0WQ6fh7eTyINadxGlEiWAJ8LLSBWBnLFpNJCMgCWMFGklBMGwahhXOgUeDqnPDZyrsHkScyhjwb7vY2zH53xbbYuvTZVpWpjO5_RoJGUpzIO6NUvdGU7F77eUUyCYEwmgbrZU9pZ750pspDEWrltRkm2izbbRxvA6z3Y6WWp1cI2znh_2PmDDf6BZU1eHAyufGvdX3e_ACMKjio</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Ejsmond, Maciej Jan</creator><creator>Varpe, Øystein</creator><creator>Czarnoleski, Marcin</creator><creator>Kozłowski, Jan</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Seasonality in Offspring Value and Trade-Offs with Growth Explain Capital Breeding</title><author>Ejsmond, Maciej Jan ; Varpe, Øystein ; Czarnoleski, Marcin ; Kozłowski, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-1092635b8c834ae3da29ac892332628f715023000e258c7357b154e9bc3ed6453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding of animals</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>E-Article</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Ecological life histories</topic><topic>Growing seasons</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Indeterminate growth</topic><topic>Maturation</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ejsmond, Maciej Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varpe, Øystein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czarnoleski, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozłowski, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ejsmond, Maciej Jan</au><au>Varpe, Øystein</au><au>Czarnoleski, Marcin</au><au>Kozłowski, Jan</au><au>C. Jessica E. Metcalf</au><au>Susan Kalisz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonality in Offspring Value and Trade-Offs with Growth Explain Capital Breeding</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>186</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>E111</spage><epage>E125</epage><pages>E111-E125</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>The degree to which reproduction is based on reserves (capital breeding) and/or current acquisition (income breeding) drives extensive variation in organism life histories. In nature, pure income and capital breeding are endpoints of a continuum of diversity whose ultimate drivers are poorly understood. To study the adaptive value of capital and income breeding, we present an annual routine model of the life history of a perennial organism where reproductive value at birth varies seasonally. The model organisms allocate time and resources to growth, reproduction, and storage. Our model predicts that capital breeding is adaptive when timing of birth affects offspring reproductive value. The stronger the seasonality, the more time is dedicated to capital breeding and growth after maturation (indeterminate growth) instead of income breeding. This is because storage and growth are investments in future (residual) reproduction taken at times when offspring value is low. Storage is a short-term investment in offspring through capital breeding; growth is a long-term investment in reproductive potential. Because the modeled production rate increases less than linearly with body size, growth brings diminishing returns for larger organisms, favoring capital breeding. Building storage requires time, which limits growth opportunities, and we show for the first time that in seasonal environments, the degree of capital breeding is tightly linked to body size of indeterminate growers through allocation trade-offs.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/683119</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0147 |
ispartof | The American naturalist, 2015-11, Vol.186 (5), p.E111-E125 |
issn | 0003-0147 1537-5323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_10_1086_683119 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animal reproduction Body size Breeding Breeding of animals Breeding seasons E-Article Ecological competition Ecological life histories Growing seasons Growth models Indeterminate growth Maturation Mortality Winter |
title | Seasonality in Offspring Value and Trade-Offs with Growth Explain Capital Breeding |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T15%3A59%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonality%20in%20Offspring%20Value%20and%20Trade-Offs%20with%20Growth%20Explain%20Capital%20Breeding&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Ejsmond,%20Maciej%20Jan&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=186&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=E111&rft.epage=E125&rft.pages=E111-E125&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/683119&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E10.1086/683119%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1729382296&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/683119&rfr_iscdi=true |