Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile

Recent research argues that pension systems influence the worker's decision to retire. The experience of Chile, which radically changed its pension system in 1981, offers an opportunity to test this hypothesis. Chile shifted from a defined-benefit plan to an actuarially fair defined-contributio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of human capital 2010-06, Vol.4 (2), p.130-172
Hauptverfasser: Edwards, Alejandra Cox, James, Estelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 172
container_issue 2
container_start_page 130
container_title Journal of human capital
container_volume 4
creator Edwards, Alejandra Cox
James, Estelle
description Recent research argues that pension systems influence the worker's decision to retire. The experience of Chile, which radically changed its pension system in 1981, offers an opportunity to test this hypothesis. Chile shifted from a defined-benefit plan to an actuarially fair defined-contribution plan, exempted pensioners from the pension payroll tax, and tightened early retirement restrictions. We estimate the impact of the 1981 reform on the probability of dropping out of the labor force. We find large effects: Labor force participation rose dramatically among older men who approached retirement age after 1981, in contrast to the decline observed before.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/657080
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_10_1086_657080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/657080</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/657080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a233457b708a6e3bd42930b454fdd960c01d963a50e26f0b345e36c83170584d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hoAi3lRPmzZtvZOx6WDo2PS6pPlwGWtTkkzcvzej0zvBq_fwnud8InQZw10MBb2nWQ4FHKFBXJIkKihNj3_iLM9O0ZlzawAKhMIAfU2bjnGPjcJLwzXb4KXkW6v9Di-kMrbBpsUzVhuLJ8ZyiefMes11x7wOmQXz0u2L57J1wZDWYdYK_GLa7td5wONPLWQbqpU1DR6t9EaeoxPFNk5eHHSI3ifjt9FzNHt9mo4eZxEnpPQRSwhJs7wOJzEqSS3SpCRQp1mqhCgpcIiDEJaBTKiCOsCSUF6QOIesSAUZopu-L7fGOStV1VndMLurYqj2_6r6fwXwtge3fKU5-zCdlc5Va7O1bVjwgFWdUAG9_gcasKseWztv7F9zvwEF3oMh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Edwards, Alejandra Cox ; James, Estelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Alejandra Cox ; James, Estelle</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research argues that pension systems influence the worker's decision to retire. The experience of Chile, which radically changed its pension system in 1981, offers an opportunity to test this hypothesis. Chile shifted from a defined-benefit plan to an actuarially fair defined-contribution plan, exempted pensioners from the pension payroll tax, and tightened early retirement restrictions. We estimate the impact of the 1981 reform on the probability of dropping out of the labor force. We find large effects: Labor force participation rose dramatically among older men who approached retirement age after 1981, in contrast to the decline observed before.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-8575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-8664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/657080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Age ; Age groups ; Employee pension plans ; Fairness ; Old age benefits ; Payroll taxes ; Pension contributions ; Pension plans ; Retirement ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Journal of human capital, 2010-06, Vol.4 (2), p.130-172</ispartof><rights>2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a233457b708a6e3bd42930b454fdd960c01d963a50e26f0b345e36c83170584d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Alejandra Cox</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Estelle</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile</title><title>Journal of human capital</title><description>Recent research argues that pension systems influence the worker's decision to retire. The experience of Chile, which radically changed its pension system in 1981, offers an opportunity to test this hypothesis. Chile shifted from a defined-benefit plan to an actuarially fair defined-contribution plan, exempted pensioners from the pension payroll tax, and tightened early retirement restrictions. We estimate the impact of the 1981 reform on the probability of dropping out of the labor force. We find large effects: Labor force participation rose dramatically among older men who approached retirement age after 1981, in contrast to the decline observed before.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Employee pension plans</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Old age benefits</subject><subject>Payroll taxes</subject><subject>Pension contributions</subject><subject>Pension plans</subject><subject>Retirement</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>1932-8575</issn><issn>1932-8664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hoAi3lRPmzZtvZOx6WDo2PS6pPlwGWtTkkzcvzej0zvBq_fwnud8InQZw10MBb2nWQ4FHKFBXJIkKihNj3_iLM9O0ZlzawAKhMIAfU2bjnGPjcJLwzXb4KXkW6v9Di-kMrbBpsUzVhuLJ8ZyiefMes11x7wOmQXz0u2L57J1wZDWYdYK_GLa7td5wONPLWQbqpU1DR6t9EaeoxPFNk5eHHSI3ifjt9FzNHt9mo4eZxEnpPQRSwhJs7wOJzEqSS3SpCRQp1mqhCgpcIiDEJaBTKiCOsCSUF6QOIesSAUZopu-L7fGOStV1VndMLurYqj2_6r6fwXwtge3fKU5-zCdlc5Va7O1bVjwgFWdUAG9_gcasKseWztv7F9zvwEF3oMh</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Edwards, Alejandra Cox</creator><creator>James, Estelle</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile</title><author>Edwards, Alejandra Cox ; James, Estelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a233457b708a6e3bd42930b454fdd960c01d963a50e26f0b345e36c83170584d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Employee pension plans</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Old age benefits</topic><topic>Payroll taxes</topic><topic>Pension contributions</topic><topic>Pension plans</topic><topic>Retirement</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Alejandra Cox</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Estelle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of human capital</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Alejandra Cox</au><au>James, Estelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile</atitle><jtitle>Journal of human capital</jtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>130-172</pages><issn>1932-8575</issn><eissn>1932-8664</eissn><abstract>Recent research argues that pension systems influence the worker's decision to retire. The experience of Chile, which radically changed its pension system in 1981, offers an opportunity to test this hypothesis. Chile shifted from a defined-benefit plan to an actuarially fair defined-contribution plan, exempted pensioners from the pension payroll tax, and tightened early retirement restrictions. We estimate the impact of the 1981 reform on the probability of dropping out of the labor force. We find large effects: Labor force participation rose dramatically among older men who approached retirement age after 1981, in contrast to the decline observed before.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/657080</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-8575
ispartof Journal of human capital, 2010-06, Vol.4 (2), p.130-172
issn 1932-8575
1932-8664
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_10_1086_657080
source Business Source Complete; JSTOR
subjects Age
Age groups
Employee pension plans
Fairness
Old age benefits
Payroll taxes
Pension contributions
Pension plans
Retirement
Workforce
title Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A05%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Social%20Security%20Reform%20on%20Labor%20Force%20Participation%20Rates%20of%20Pensioners%20and%20Nonpensioners:%20Evidence%20from%20Chile&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20human%20capital&rft.au=Edwards,%20Alejandra%20Cox&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=130-172&rft.issn=1932-8575&rft.eissn=1932-8664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/657080&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E10.1086/657080%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/657080&rfr_iscdi=true