Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile
Recent research argues that pension systems influence the worker's decision to retire. The experience of Chile, which radically changed its pension system in 1981, offers an opportunity to test this hypothesis. Chile shifted from a defined-benefit plan to an actuarially fair defined-contributio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of human capital 2010-06, Vol.4 (2), p.130-172 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 172 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 130 |
container_title | Journal of human capital |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Edwards, Alejandra Cox James, Estelle |
description | Recent research argues that pension systems influence the worker's decision to retire. The experience of Chile, which radically changed its pension system in 1981, offers an opportunity to test this hypothesis. Chile shifted from a defined-benefit plan to an actuarially fair defined-contribution plan, exempted pensioners from the pension payroll tax, and tightened early retirement restrictions. We estimate the impact of the 1981 reform on the probability of dropping out of the labor force. We find large effects: Labor force participation rose dramatically among older men who approached retirement age after 1981, in contrast to the decline observed before. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/657080 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_10_1086_657080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/657080</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/657080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a233457b708a6e3bd42930b454fdd960c01d963a50e26f0b345e36c83170584d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hoAi3lRPmzZtvZOx6WDo2PS6pPlwGWtTkkzcvzej0zvBq_fwnud8InQZw10MBb2nWQ4FHKFBXJIkKihNj3_iLM9O0ZlzawAKhMIAfU2bjnGPjcJLwzXb4KXkW6v9Di-kMrbBpsUzVhuLJ8ZyiefMes11x7wOmQXz0u2L57J1wZDWYdYK_GLa7td5wONPLWQbqpU1DR6t9EaeoxPFNk5eHHSI3ifjt9FzNHt9mo4eZxEnpPQRSwhJs7wOJzEqSS3SpCRQp1mqhCgpcIiDEJaBTKiCOsCSUF6QOIesSAUZopu-L7fGOStV1VndMLurYqj2_6r6fwXwtge3fKU5-zCdlc5Va7O1bVjwgFWdUAG9_gcasKseWztv7F9zvwEF3oMh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Edwards, Alejandra Cox ; James, Estelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Alejandra Cox ; James, Estelle</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research argues that pension systems influence the worker's decision to retire. The experience of Chile, which radically changed its pension system in 1981, offers an opportunity to test this hypothesis. Chile shifted from a defined-benefit plan to an actuarially fair defined-contribution plan, exempted pensioners from the pension payroll tax, and tightened early retirement restrictions. We estimate the impact of the 1981 reform on the probability of dropping out of the labor force. We find large effects: Labor force participation rose dramatically among older men who approached retirement age after 1981, in contrast to the decline observed before.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-8575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-8664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/657080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Age ; Age groups ; Employee pension plans ; Fairness ; Old age benefits ; Payroll taxes ; Pension contributions ; Pension plans ; Retirement ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Journal of human capital, 2010-06, Vol.4 (2), p.130-172</ispartof><rights>2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a233457b708a6e3bd42930b454fdd960c01d963a50e26f0b345e36c83170584d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Alejandra Cox</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Estelle</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile</title><title>Journal of human capital</title><description>Recent research argues that pension systems influence the worker's decision to retire. The experience of Chile, which radically changed its pension system in 1981, offers an opportunity to test this hypothesis. Chile shifted from a defined-benefit plan to an actuarially fair defined-contribution plan, exempted pensioners from the pension payroll tax, and tightened early retirement restrictions. We estimate the impact of the 1981 reform on the probability of dropping out of the labor force. We find large effects: Labor force participation rose dramatically among older men who approached retirement age after 1981, in contrast to the decline observed before.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Employee pension plans</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Old age benefits</subject><subject>Payroll taxes</subject><subject>Pension contributions</subject><subject>Pension plans</subject><subject>Retirement</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>1932-8575</issn><issn>1932-8664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hoAi3lRPmzZtvZOx6WDo2PS6pPlwGWtTkkzcvzej0zvBq_fwnud8InQZw10MBb2nWQ4FHKFBXJIkKihNj3_iLM9O0ZlzawAKhMIAfU2bjnGPjcJLwzXb4KXkW6v9Di-kMrbBpsUzVhuLJ8ZyiefMes11x7wOmQXz0u2L57J1wZDWYdYK_GLa7td5wONPLWQbqpU1DR6t9EaeoxPFNk5eHHSI3ifjt9FzNHt9mo4eZxEnpPQRSwhJs7wOJzEqSS3SpCRQp1mqhCgpcIiDEJaBTKiCOsCSUF6QOIesSAUZopu-L7fGOStV1VndMLurYqj2_6r6fwXwtge3fKU5-zCdlc5Va7O1bVjwgFWdUAG9_gcasKseWztv7F9zvwEF3oMh</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Edwards, Alejandra Cox</creator><creator>James, Estelle</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile</title><author>Edwards, Alejandra Cox ; James, Estelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a233457b708a6e3bd42930b454fdd960c01d963a50e26f0b345e36c83170584d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Employee pension plans</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Old age benefits</topic><topic>Payroll taxes</topic><topic>Pension contributions</topic><topic>Pension plans</topic><topic>Retirement</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Alejandra Cox</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Estelle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of human capital</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Alejandra Cox</au><au>James, Estelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile</atitle><jtitle>Journal of human capital</jtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>130-172</pages><issn>1932-8575</issn><eissn>1932-8664</eissn><abstract>Recent research argues that pension systems influence the worker's decision to retire. The experience of Chile, which radically changed its pension system in 1981, offers an opportunity to test this hypothesis. Chile shifted from a defined-benefit plan to an actuarially fair defined-contribution plan, exempted pensioners from the pension payroll tax, and tightened early retirement restrictions. We estimate the impact of the 1981 reform on the probability of dropping out of the labor force. We find large effects: Labor force participation rose dramatically among older men who approached retirement age after 1981, in contrast to the decline observed before.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/657080</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-8575 |
ispartof | Journal of human capital, 2010-06, Vol.4 (2), p.130-172 |
issn | 1932-8575 1932-8664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_10_1086_657080 |
source | Business Source Complete; JSTOR |
subjects | Age Age groups Employee pension plans Fairness Old age benefits Payroll taxes Pension contributions Pension plans Retirement Workforce |
title | Impact of Social Security Reform on Labor Force Participation Rates of Pensioners and Nonpensioners: Evidence from Chile |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A05%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Social%20Security%20Reform%20on%20Labor%20Force%20Participation%20Rates%20of%20Pensioners%20and%20Nonpensioners:%20Evidence%20from%20Chile&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20human%20capital&rft.au=Edwards,%20Alejandra%20Cox&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=130-172&rft.issn=1932-8575&rft.eissn=1932-8664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/657080&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E10.1086/657080%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/657080&rfr_iscdi=true |