“Without Regard to Race”: Critical Ideational Development in Modern American Politics
Many scholars note that racial policy issues now focus on color-blind versus race-conscious approaches to racial inequalities, but they have not adequately explained how this development occurred or its consequences. Using work theorizing the role of ideas in politics, this article argues that these...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of politics 2014-10, Vol.76 (4), p.958-971 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 971 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 958 |
| container_title | The Journal of politics |
| container_volume | 76 |
| creator | King, Desmond S. Smith, Rogers M. |
| description | Many scholars note that racial policy issues now focus on color-blind versus race-conscious approaches to racial inequalities, but they have not adequately explained how this development occurred or its consequences. Using work theorizing the role of ideas in politics, this article argues that these changes represent a “critical ideational development.” Diverse strains in earlier racial policy positions were reformulated to advance not just old racial goals but new ones. This critical ideational development produced advantages for conservative coalition building and Republican electoral campaigns, thereby contributing to the Reagan Revolution and later polarization and gridlock, and it helped drive racial issues out of campaigns and into other venues, especially legislative, administrative, and judicial hearings. It has not been associated with great progress in reducing racial inequalities or promoting racial harmony |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022381614000541 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_10_1017_S0022381614000541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022381614000541</cupid><jstor_id>10.1017/s0022381614000541</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1017/s0022381614000541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-a444fcbbf07fb7881b03643372e74fdfebc2a946d5acc6bf2512db643d9c5cd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQgC1EJZaWB-BmiQuXdP0Xx-G2WqCttIhqASFOkWNPtlkl8WI7SNz2QdqX2yfB0VYCURCcZqT5vpmxB6HnlJxTQov5B0IY44pKKgghuaCP0IwKqTKWE_UYzaZyNtWfoKchbBNDZClm6Mthf_u5jTdujHgNG-0tjg6vtYHD_u4VXvo2tkZ3-MqCjq0bUvoavkHndj0MEbcDfucs-AEvevCJHPC16yYnnKGTRncBnt3HU_Tp7ZuPy8ts9f7iarlYZSZXMmZaCNGYum5I0dSFUrQmXArOCwaFaGwDtWG6FNLm2hhZNyynzNaJsKXJjS35KXp57Lvz7usIIVZ9Gwx0nR7AjaGihaRSKsr5v1FJSalKXoiEvvgN3brRp-cnKpdM5EzRaTY9Usa7EDw01c63vfbfK0qq6S7Vg7skZ350RnOTPmzjdh5C-Nn-T8b50diG6Px_jeD3a-m-9q3dwC_b_9X6AdN-rFo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1562452819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Without Regard to Race”: Critical Ideational Development in Modern American Politics</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>King, Desmond S. ; Smith, Rogers M.</creator><creatorcontrib>King, Desmond S. ; Smith, Rogers M.</creatorcontrib><description>Many scholars note that racial policy issues now focus on color-blind versus race-conscious approaches to racial inequalities, but they have not adequately explained how this development occurred or its consequences. Using work theorizing the role of ideas in politics, this article argues that these changes represent a “critical ideational development.” Diverse strains in earlier racial policy positions were reformulated to advance not just old racial goals but new ones. This critical ideational development produced advantages for conservative coalition building and Republican electoral campaigns, thereby contributing to the Reagan Revolution and later polarization and gridlock, and it helped drive racial issues out of campaigns and into other venues, especially legislative, administrative, and judicial hearings. It has not been associated with great progress in reducing racial inequalities or promoting racial harmony</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3816</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022381614000541</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPOLA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Affirmative action ; Alliances ; Civil rights ; Civil rights movements ; Coalitions ; Color vision defects ; Conservatism ; Conservatives ; Electoral College ; Ethnicity ; Gridlock (Politics) ; Ideology ; Inequality ; Intellectuals ; Interethnic relations ; Liberalism ; Polarization ; Policy Analysis ; Political Campaigns ; Political parties ; Politics ; Racial differences ; Racial inequality ; Racial integration ; Racial policies ; Racial segregation ; Republican parties ; Revolutions ; Social policy ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>The Journal of politics, 2014-10, Vol.76 (4), p.958-971</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Southern Political Science Association 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-a444fcbbf07fb7881b03643372e74fdfebc2a946d5acc6bf2512db643d9c5cd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-a444fcbbf07fb7881b03643372e74fdfebc2a946d5acc6bf2512db643d9c5cd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, Desmond S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Rogers M.</creatorcontrib><title>“Without Regard to Race”: Critical Ideational Development in Modern American Politics</title><title>The Journal of politics</title><addtitle>J of Pol</addtitle><description>Many scholars note that racial policy issues now focus on color-blind versus race-conscious approaches to racial inequalities, but they have not adequately explained how this development occurred or its consequences. Using work theorizing the role of ideas in politics, this article argues that these changes represent a “critical ideational development.” Diverse strains in earlier racial policy positions were reformulated to advance not just old racial goals but new ones. This critical ideational development produced advantages for conservative coalition building and Republican electoral campaigns, thereby contributing to the Reagan Revolution and later polarization and gridlock, and it helped drive racial issues out of campaigns and into other venues, especially legislative, administrative, and judicial hearings. It has not been associated with great progress in reducing racial inequalities or promoting racial harmony</description><subject>Affirmative action</subject><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Civil rights movements</subject><subject>Coalitions</subject><subject>Color vision defects</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Conservatives</subject><subject>Electoral College</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Gridlock (Politics)</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Interethnic relations</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Policy Analysis</subject><subject>Political Campaigns</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Racial differences</subject><subject>Racial inequality</subject><subject>Racial integration</subject><subject>Racial policies</subject><subject>Racial segregation</subject><subject>Republican parties</subject><subject>Revolutions</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0022-3816</issn><issn>1468-2508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQgC1EJZaWB-BmiQuXdP0Xx-G2WqCttIhqASFOkWNPtlkl8WI7SNz2QdqX2yfB0VYCURCcZqT5vpmxB6HnlJxTQov5B0IY44pKKgghuaCP0IwKqTKWE_UYzaZyNtWfoKchbBNDZClm6Mthf_u5jTdujHgNG-0tjg6vtYHD_u4VXvo2tkZ3-MqCjq0bUvoavkHndj0MEbcDfucs-AEvevCJHPC16yYnnKGTRncBnt3HU_Tp7ZuPy8ts9f7iarlYZSZXMmZaCNGYum5I0dSFUrQmXArOCwaFaGwDtWG6FNLm2hhZNyynzNaJsKXJjS35KXp57Lvz7usIIVZ9Gwx0nR7AjaGihaRSKsr5v1FJSalKXoiEvvgN3brRp-cnKpdM5EzRaTY9Usa7EDw01c63vfbfK0qq6S7Vg7skZ350RnOTPmzjdh5C-Nn-T8b50diG6Px_jeD3a-m-9q3dwC_b_9X6AdN-rFo</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>King, Desmond S.</creator><creator>Smith, Rogers M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>“Without Regard to Race”: Critical Ideational Development in Modern American Politics</title><author>King, Desmond S. ; Smith, Rogers M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-a444fcbbf07fb7881b03643372e74fdfebc2a946d5acc6bf2512db643d9c5cd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Affirmative action</topic><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Civil rights movements</topic><topic>Coalitions</topic><topic>Color vision defects</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Conservatives</topic><topic>Electoral College</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Gridlock (Politics)</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Interethnic relations</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Policy Analysis</topic><topic>Political Campaigns</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Racial differences</topic><topic>Racial inequality</topic><topic>Racial integration</topic><topic>Racial policies</topic><topic>Racial segregation</topic><topic>Republican parties</topic><topic>Revolutions</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, Desmond S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Rogers M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, Desmond S.</au><au>Smith, Rogers M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Without Regard to Race”: Critical Ideational Development in Modern American Politics</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle><addtitle>J of Pol</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>958</spage><epage>971</epage><pages>958-971</pages><issn>0022-3816</issn><eissn>1468-2508</eissn><coden>JPOLA3</coden><abstract>Many scholars note that racial policy issues now focus on color-blind versus race-conscious approaches to racial inequalities, but they have not adequately explained how this development occurred or its consequences. Using work theorizing the role of ideas in politics, this article argues that these changes represent a “critical ideational development.” Diverse strains in earlier racial policy positions were reformulated to advance not just old racial goals but new ones. This critical ideational development produced advantages for conservative coalition building and Republican electoral campaigns, thereby contributing to the Reagan Revolution and later polarization and gridlock, and it helped drive racial issues out of campaigns and into other venues, especially legislative, administrative, and judicial hearings. It has not been associated with great progress in reducing racial inequalities or promoting racial harmony</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022381614000541</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3816 |
| ispartof | The Journal of politics, 2014-10, Vol.76 (4), p.958-971 |
| issn | 0022-3816 1468-2508 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_10_1017_S0022381614000541 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete |
| subjects | Affirmative action Alliances Civil rights Civil rights movements Coalitions Color vision defects Conservatism Conservatives Electoral College Ethnicity Gridlock (Politics) Ideology Inequality Intellectuals Interethnic relations Liberalism Polarization Policy Analysis Political Campaigns Political parties Politics Racial differences Racial inequality Racial integration Racial policies Racial segregation Republican parties Revolutions Social policy U.S.A |
| title | “Without Regard to Race”: Critical Ideational Development in Modern American Politics |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A00%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CWithout%20Regard%20to%20Race%E2%80%9D:%20Critical%20Ideational%20Development%20in%20Modern%20American%20Politics&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20politics&rft.au=King,%20Desmond%20S.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=958&rft.epage=971&rft.pages=958-971&rft.issn=0022-3816&rft.eissn=1468-2508&rft.coden=JPOLA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022381614000541&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1017/s0022381614000541%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1562452819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022381614000541&rft_jstor_id=10.1017/s0022381614000541&rfr_iscdi=true |