Economics of everyday cycling and cycling facilities
IntroductionEconomics is the study of choice. In narrow terms, economics is concerned with choices in the production or consumption of goods and services traded in the market. In broader terms, economics matters whenever people need to make a choice amongst various options.People make a choice in tr...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buchkapitel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 130 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 107 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Suh, Jungho |
description | IntroductionEconomics is the study of choice. In narrow terms, economics is concerned with choices in the production or consumption of goods and services traded in the market. In broader terms, economics matters whenever people need to make a choice amongst various options.People make a choice in travelling amongst various transport modes. The use of bikes as a transport mode varies greatly depending on regional economic and social factors. For example, fossil-fuel-burning transport modes inclusive of motorised bikes and tricycles (also known as rickshaws or tuktuks) are widely used for relatively long-distance travelling in developing countries. Riding pushbikes may not be a desirable option for long-distance travelling in developing countries where the cycling infrastructure is not well established. In contrast, in some developed countries, cycling can be a transport mode even for long-distance travelling for recreation and physical fitness (Börjesson & Eliasson, 2012a; Pattinson & Thomson, 2014).This chapter discusses the economics of cycling as a choice of transport, based on the neoclassical approach to the economic way of thinking. In the neoclassical economics paradigm, it is assumed that human beings are economic beings (Homo economicus) and are responsive to economic (dis)incentives. When some activity is found to become more costly and less beneficial to undertake, a ‘rational’ economic being is expected to do it less. Conversely, when doing something becomes less costly and more beneficial, the ‘rational’ person tends to do it more. When decisions are made with respect to transportation, the benefits and costs of each of the available transportation options are weighed up. In doing so, non-market benefits and costs are also taken into account.The economics of cycling is not just about cycling as a choice of transport mode, but also about cycling facilities as a public choice of road use. In fact, no clear dividing line can be drawn between the benefits of cycling and the benefits of cycling facilities because the two are inextricably linked. |
format | Book Chapter |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cambr</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_books_j_ctt1sq5x1g_11</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>9781925261172_xml_CBO9781925261172A015</cupid><jstor_id>10.20851/j.ctt1sq5x1g.11</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.20851/j.ctt1sq5x1g.11</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791-e229ec1af9c1cbb6410e7c87b38cf2b69fbfd4dd3bea741e87d9c2e96a161bc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLxDAUhSMiKGP_Q3Ff6E3apMHVWMYHDMxm9iG5SUpq22BTZPrvFUaErs6Dj7M4NySTogFJa8oBBL3dZF7fkyylvixL4FxWjD2Q6oBximPAlEefu283r1avOa44hKnL9WT_vdcYhrAElx7JnddDctmf7sj59XBu34vj6e2j3R8LFBIKR6l0CNpLBDSGV1A6gY0wrEFPDZfeeFtZy4zTogLXCCuROsk1cDBYsx15us72aYmzMjF-JtUrXBZIX_UFOgXwCz1fIdSjmYPtnEIT1eYGdRkH1b6cNuW-hJr9ADM8VlY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Economics of everyday cycling and cycling facilities</title><source>OAPEN</source><source>DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books</source><source>University of Adelaide Press (Open Access)</source><source>JSTOR eBooks: Open Access</source><creator>Suh, Jungho</creator><contributor>Jennifer Bonham ; Marilyn Johnson</contributor><creatorcontrib>Suh, Jungho ; Jennifer Bonham ; Marilyn Johnson</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionEconomics is the study of choice. In narrow terms, economics is concerned with choices in the production or consumption of goods and services traded in the market. In broader terms, economics matters whenever people need to make a choice amongst various options.People make a choice in travelling amongst various transport modes. The use of bikes as a transport mode varies greatly depending on regional economic and social factors. For example, fossil-fuel-burning transport modes inclusive of motorised bikes and tricycles (also known as rickshaws or tuktuks) are widely used for relatively long-distance travelling in developing countries. Riding pushbikes may not be a desirable option for long-distance travelling in developing countries where the cycling infrastructure is not well established. In contrast, in some developed countries, cycling can be a transport mode even for long-distance travelling for recreation and physical fitness (Börjesson & Eliasson, 2012a; Pattinson & Thomson, 2014).This chapter discusses the economics of cycling as a choice of transport, based on the neoclassical approach to the economic way of thinking. In the neoclassical economics paradigm, it is assumed that human beings are economic beings (Homo economicus) and are responsive to economic (dis)incentives. When some activity is found to become more costly and less beneficial to undertake, a ‘rational’ economic being is expected to do it less. Conversely, when doing something becomes less costly and more beneficial, the ‘rational’ person tends to do it more. When decisions are made with respect to transportation, the benefits and costs of each of the available transportation options are weighed up. In doing so, non-market benefits and costs are also taken into account.The economics of cycling is not just about cycling as a choice of transport mode, but also about cycling facilities as a public choice of road use. In fact, no clear dividing line can be drawn between the benefits of cycling and the benefits of cycling facilities because the two are inextricably linked.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781925261165</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1925261166</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781925261172</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1925261174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Adelaide Press</publisher><subject>Applied mathematics ; Applied sciences ; Applied statistics ; Behavioral sciences ; Bicycle paths ; Bicycling ; Civil engineering ; Economic analysis ; Economic benefits ; Economic costs and benefits ; Economic research ; Economic value ; Economics ; Engineering ; Estimation methods ; Inferential statistics ; Infrastructure ; Leisure studies ; Mathematics ; Microeconomics ; Outdoor recreation ; Recreation ; Roads ; Statistical estimation ; Statistics ; Traffic engineering ; Traffic estimation ; Trails ; Transportation ; Transportation engineering ; Transportation infrastructure ; Transportation modes ; Travel ; Travel expenses ; Travel time</subject><ispartof>Cycling Futures, 2015, p.107-130</ispartof><rights>The authors 2015</rights><rights>2015 The authors</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>775,776,780,789,24340,24760</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Jennifer Bonham</contributor><contributor>Marilyn Johnson</contributor><creatorcontrib>Suh, Jungho</creatorcontrib><title>Economics of everyday cycling and cycling facilities</title><title>Cycling Futures</title><description>IntroductionEconomics is the study of choice. In narrow terms, economics is concerned with choices in the production or consumption of goods and services traded in the market. In broader terms, economics matters whenever people need to make a choice amongst various options.People make a choice in travelling amongst various transport modes. The use of bikes as a transport mode varies greatly depending on regional economic and social factors. For example, fossil-fuel-burning transport modes inclusive of motorised bikes and tricycles (also known as rickshaws or tuktuks) are widely used for relatively long-distance travelling in developing countries. Riding pushbikes may not be a desirable option for long-distance travelling in developing countries where the cycling infrastructure is not well established. In contrast, in some developed countries, cycling can be a transport mode even for long-distance travelling for recreation and physical fitness (Börjesson & Eliasson, 2012a; Pattinson & Thomson, 2014).This chapter discusses the economics of cycling as a choice of transport, based on the neoclassical approach to the economic way of thinking. In the neoclassical economics paradigm, it is assumed that human beings are economic beings (Homo economicus) and are responsive to economic (dis)incentives. When some activity is found to become more costly and less beneficial to undertake, a ‘rational’ economic being is expected to do it less. Conversely, when doing something becomes less costly and more beneficial, the ‘rational’ person tends to do it more. When decisions are made with respect to transportation, the benefits and costs of each of the available transportation options are weighed up. In doing so, non-market benefits and costs are also taken into account.The economics of cycling is not just about cycling as a choice of transport mode, but also about cycling facilities as a public choice of road use. In fact, no clear dividing line can be drawn between the benefits of cycling and the benefits of cycling facilities because the two are inextricably linked.</description><subject>Applied mathematics</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Applied statistics</subject><subject>Behavioral sciences</subject><subject>Bicycle paths</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic benefits</subject><subject>Economic costs and benefits</subject><subject>Economic research</subject><subject>Economic value</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Inferential statistics</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Leisure studies</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Outdoor recreation</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Statistical estimation</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Traffic engineering</subject><subject>Traffic estimation</subject><subject>Trails</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Transportation engineering</subject><subject>Transportation infrastructure</subject><subject>Transportation modes</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Travel expenses</subject><subject>Travel time</subject><isbn>9781925261165</isbn><isbn>1925261166</isbn><isbn>9781925261172</isbn><isbn>1925261174</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><sourceid>BAHZO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkEtLxDAUhSMiKGP_Q3Ff6E3apMHVWMYHDMxm9iG5SUpq22BTZPrvFUaErs6Dj7M4NySTogFJa8oBBL3dZF7fkyylvixL4FxWjD2Q6oBximPAlEefu283r1avOa44hKnL9WT_vdcYhrAElx7JnddDctmf7sj59XBu34vj6e2j3R8LFBIKR6l0CNpLBDSGV1A6gY0wrEFPDZfeeFtZy4zTogLXCCuROsk1cDBYsx15us72aYmzMjF-JtUrXBZIX_UFOgXwCz1fIdSjmYPtnEIT1eYGdRkH1b6cNuW-hJr9ADM8VlY</recordid><startdate>20151231</startdate><enddate>20151231</enddate><creator>Suh, Jungho</creator><general>University of Adelaide Press</general><scope>BAHZO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151231</creationdate><title>Economics of everyday cycling and cycling facilities</title><author>Suh, Jungho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c791-e229ec1af9c1cbb6410e7c87b38cf2b69fbfd4dd3bea741e87d9c2e96a161bc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Applied mathematics</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Applied statistics</topic><topic>Behavioral sciences</topic><topic>Bicycle paths</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic benefits</topic><topic>Economic costs and benefits</topic><topic>Economic research</topic><topic>Economic value</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Inferential statistics</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Leisure studies</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Outdoor recreation</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Statistical estimation</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Traffic engineering</topic><topic>Traffic estimation</topic><topic>Trails</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Transportation engineering</topic><topic>Transportation infrastructure</topic><topic>Transportation modes</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Travel expenses</topic><topic>Travel time</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suh, Jungho</creatorcontrib><collection>JSTOR eBooks: Open Access</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suh, Jungho</au><au>Jennifer Bonham</au><au>Marilyn Johnson</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Economics of everyday cycling and cycling facilities</atitle><btitle>Cycling Futures</btitle><date>2015-12-31</date><risdate>2015</risdate><spage>107</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>107-130</pages><isbn>9781925261165</isbn><isbn>1925261166</isbn><eisbn>9781925261172</eisbn><eisbn>1925261174</eisbn><abstract>IntroductionEconomics is the study of choice. In narrow terms, economics is concerned with choices in the production or consumption of goods and services traded in the market. In broader terms, economics matters whenever people need to make a choice amongst various options.People make a choice in travelling amongst various transport modes. The use of bikes as a transport mode varies greatly depending on regional economic and social factors. For example, fossil-fuel-burning transport modes inclusive of motorised bikes and tricycles (also known as rickshaws or tuktuks) are widely used for relatively long-distance travelling in developing countries. Riding pushbikes may not be a desirable option for long-distance travelling in developing countries where the cycling infrastructure is not well established. In contrast, in some developed countries, cycling can be a transport mode even for long-distance travelling for recreation and physical fitness (Börjesson & Eliasson, 2012a; Pattinson & Thomson, 2014).This chapter discusses the economics of cycling as a choice of transport, based on the neoclassical approach to the economic way of thinking. In the neoclassical economics paradigm, it is assumed that human beings are economic beings (Homo economicus) and are responsive to economic (dis)incentives. When some activity is found to become more costly and less beneficial to undertake, a ‘rational’ economic being is expected to do it less. Conversely, when doing something becomes less costly and more beneficial, the ‘rational’ person tends to do it more. When decisions are made with respect to transportation, the benefits and costs of each of the available transportation options are weighed up. In doing so, non-market benefits and costs are also taken into account.The economics of cycling is not just about cycling as a choice of transport mode, but also about cycling facilities as a public choice of road use. In fact, no clear dividing line can be drawn between the benefits of cycling and the benefits of cycling facilities because the two are inextricably linked.</abstract><pub>University of Adelaide Press</pub><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISBN: 9781925261165 |
ispartof | Cycling Futures, 2015, p.107-130 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_books_j_ctt1sq5x1g_11 |
source | OAPEN; DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books; University of Adelaide Press (Open Access); JSTOR eBooks: Open Access |
subjects | Applied mathematics Applied sciences Applied statistics Behavioral sciences Bicycle paths Bicycling Civil engineering Economic analysis Economic benefits Economic costs and benefits Economic research Economic value Economics Engineering Estimation methods Inferential statistics Infrastructure Leisure studies Mathematics Microeconomics Outdoor recreation Recreation Roads Statistical estimation Statistics Traffic engineering Traffic estimation Trails Transportation Transportation engineering Transportation infrastructure Transportation modes Travel Travel expenses Travel time |
title | Economics of everyday cycling and cycling facilities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T18%3A52%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cambr&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Economics%20of%20everyday%20cycling%20and%20cycling%20facilities&rft.btitle=Cycling%20Futures&rft.au=Suh,%20Jungho&rft.date=2015-12-31&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=107-130&rft.isbn=9781925261165&rft.isbn_list=1925261166&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cambr%3E10.20851/j.ctt1sq5x1g.11%3C/jstor_cambr%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781925261172&rft.eisbn_list=1925261174&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=9781925261172_xml_CBO9781925261172A015&rft_jstor_id=10.20851/j.ctt1sq5x1g.11&rfr_iscdi=true |