What should copyright protect?
This project aims to imagine what copyright law might look like if it were designed anew, from scratch. In Chapter 1, the editors ask what it would look like if we could ‘design a law to encourage creativity, remunerate and support creators, and increase the size of cultural markets to ensure broad...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buchkapitel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 111 |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | R Anthony Reese |
| description | This project aims to imagine what copyright law might look like if it were designed anew, from scratch. In Chapter 1, the editors ask what it would look like if we could ‘design a law to encourage creativity, remunerate and support creators, and increase the size of cultural markets to ensure broad access to new knowledge and creativity’.¹ These goals seem to me to reflect the ‘preponderance of individual interests’ approach to the public interest that the editors have described.² After all, virtually every member of society is a creator – for example, in the age of cell phones, almost |
| format | Book Chapter |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_books_j_ctt1q1crjg_7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>j.ctt1q1crjg.7</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>j.ctt1q1crjg.7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j111t-aa6d65ea9d46c2a1b21291ea7b6c1c7f6a3460828d0d750b88f71e3bd6c8ce493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jsFqAjEUACOl0Fb3F8r6AQt52TUvORURrYLgRfG4JC9Zt1GI3aQH_15K62mYyzAj9gYoeSO5AvXECo3q4Vy9sCKlwDkXgIhavLL3Y29ymfr4c3Elxett-Dr1ubwOMXvKHxP23JlL8sU_x-ywWu4X62q7-9ws5tsqAECujJFOzrzRrpEkDFgBQoM3aCUBYSdN_TsglOMOZ9wq1SH42jpJinyj6zGb_nVDynFobYzn1IaWcoZvoCGcWqzvyLY8Mw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>What should copyright protect?</title><source>JSTOR eBooks: Open Access</source><creator>R Anthony Reese</creator><contributor>REBECCA GIBLIN ; KIMBERLEE WEATHERALL</contributor><creatorcontrib>R Anthony Reese ; REBECCA GIBLIN ; KIMBERLEE WEATHERALL</creatorcontrib><description>This project aims to imagine what copyright law might look like if it were designed anew, from scratch. In Chapter 1, the editors ask what it would look like if we could ‘design a law to encourage creativity, remunerate and support creators, and increase the size of cultural markets to ensure broad access to new knowledge and creativity’.¹ These goals seem to me to reflect the ‘preponderance of individual interests’ approach to the public interest that the editors have described.² After all, virtually every member of society is a creator – for example, in the age of cell phones, almost</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781760460808</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 176046080X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1760460818</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781760460815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ANU Press</publisher><subject>Applied arts ; Applied sciences ; Art genres and movements ; Art history ; Arts ; Blogs ; Civil law ; Commercial art ; Communications ; Communications media ; Copyright laws ; Copyrights ; Court orders ; Design ; Design elements ; Digital media ; Digital publications ; Emergency protective orders ; Engineering ; Fashion design ; Geometric designs ; Graphic design ; Industrial design ; Industrial engineering ; Industrial property ; Injunctions ; Intellectual property law ; Inventions ; Judicial rulings ; Judicial system ; Law ; Property law ; Social sciences ; Statutory law ; Stripes</subject><ispartof>What if we could reimagine copyright?, 2017, p.111</ispartof><rights>2017 ANU Press</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>775,776,780,789,24340</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>REBECCA GIBLIN</contributor><contributor>KIMBERLEE WEATHERALL</contributor><creatorcontrib>R Anthony Reese</creatorcontrib><title>What should copyright protect?</title><title>What if we could reimagine copyright?</title><description>This project aims to imagine what copyright law might look like if it were designed anew, from scratch. In Chapter 1, the editors ask what it would look like if we could ‘design a law to encourage creativity, remunerate and support creators, and increase the size of cultural markets to ensure broad access to new knowledge and creativity’.¹ These goals seem to me to reflect the ‘preponderance of individual interests’ approach to the public interest that the editors have described.² After all, virtually every member of society is a creator – for example, in the age of cell phones, almost</description><subject>Applied arts</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Art genres and movements</subject><subject>Art history</subject><subject>Arts</subject><subject>Blogs</subject><subject>Civil law</subject><subject>Commercial art</subject><subject>Communications</subject><subject>Communications media</subject><subject>Copyright laws</subject><subject>Copyrights</subject><subject>Court orders</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design elements</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Digital publications</subject><subject>Emergency protective orders</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Fashion design</subject><subject>Geometric designs</subject><subject>Graphic design</subject><subject>Industrial design</subject><subject>Industrial engineering</subject><subject>Industrial property</subject><subject>Injunctions</subject><subject>Intellectual property law</subject><subject>Inventions</subject><subject>Judicial rulings</subject><subject>Judicial system</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Property law</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>Stripes</subject><isbn>9781760460808</isbn><isbn>176046080X</isbn><isbn>1760460818</isbn><isbn>9781760460815</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><sourceid>BAHZO</sourceid><recordid>eNo1jsFqAjEUACOl0Fb3F8r6AQt52TUvORURrYLgRfG4JC9Zt1GI3aQH_15K62mYyzAj9gYoeSO5AvXECo3q4Vy9sCKlwDkXgIhavLL3Y29ymfr4c3Elxett-Dr1ubwOMXvKHxP23JlL8sU_x-ywWu4X62q7-9ws5tsqAECujJFOzrzRrpEkDFgBQoM3aCUBYSdN_TsglOMOZ9wq1SH42jpJinyj6zGb_nVDynFobYzn1IaWcoZvoCGcWqzvyLY8Mw</recordid><startdate>20170109</startdate><enddate>20170109</enddate><creator>R Anthony Reese</creator><general>ANU Press</general><scope>BAHZO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170109</creationdate><title>What should copyright protect?</title><author>R Anthony Reese</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j111t-aa6d65ea9d46c2a1b21291ea7b6c1c7f6a3460828d0d750b88f71e3bd6c8ce493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Applied arts</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Art genres and movements</topic><topic>Art history</topic><topic>Arts</topic><topic>Blogs</topic><topic>Civil law</topic><topic>Commercial art</topic><topic>Communications</topic><topic>Communications media</topic><topic>Copyright laws</topic><topic>Copyrights</topic><topic>Court orders</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design elements</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Digital publications</topic><topic>Emergency protective orders</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Fashion design</topic><topic>Geometric designs</topic><topic>Graphic design</topic><topic>Industrial design</topic><topic>Industrial engineering</topic><topic>Industrial property</topic><topic>Injunctions</topic><topic>Intellectual property law</topic><topic>Inventions</topic><topic>Judicial rulings</topic><topic>Judicial system</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Property law</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>Stripes</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>R Anthony Reese</creatorcontrib><collection>JSTOR eBooks: Open Access</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>R Anthony Reese</au><au>REBECCA GIBLIN</au><au>KIMBERLEE WEATHERALL</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>What should copyright protect?</atitle><btitle>What if we could reimagine copyright?</btitle><date>2017-01-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><spage>111</spage><pages>111-</pages><isbn>9781760460808</isbn><isbn>176046080X</isbn><eisbn>1760460818</eisbn><eisbn>9781760460815</eisbn><abstract>This project aims to imagine what copyright law might look like if it were designed anew, from scratch. In Chapter 1, the editors ask what it would look like if we could ‘design a law to encourage creativity, remunerate and support creators, and increase the size of cultural markets to ensure broad access to new knowledge and creativity’.¹ These goals seem to me to reflect the ‘preponderance of individual interests’ approach to the public interest that the editors have described.² After all, virtually every member of society is a creator – for example, in the age of cell phones, almost</abstract><pub>ANU Press</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISBN: 9781760460808 |
| ispartof | What if we could reimagine copyright?, 2017, p.111 |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_jstor_books_j_ctt1q1crjg_7 |
| source | JSTOR eBooks: Open Access |
| subjects | Applied arts Applied sciences Art genres and movements Art history Arts Blogs Civil law Commercial art Communications Communications media Copyright laws Copyrights Court orders Design Design elements Digital media Digital publications Emergency protective orders Engineering Fashion design Geometric designs Graphic design Industrial design Industrial engineering Industrial property Injunctions Intellectual property law Inventions Judicial rulings Judicial system Law Property law Social sciences Statutory law Stripes |
| title | What should copyright protect? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T14%3A46%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=What%20should%20copyright%20protect?&rft.btitle=What%20if%20we%20could%20reimagine%20copyright?&rft.au=R%20Anthony%20Reese&rft.date=2017-01-09&rft.spage=111&rft.pages=111-&rft.isbn=9781760460808&rft.isbn_list=176046080X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3Ej.ctt1q1crjg.7%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1760460818&rft.eisbn_list=9781760460815&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=j.ctt1q1crjg.7&rfr_iscdi=true |