Afterword: Achilles and the tortoise: the tortoise’s view of late colonialism and decolonization

As the battle of Borodino draws to its wearied and bloody end, in volume three ofWar and peace, Leo Tolstoy reflects on a day that, while militarily inconclusive, ultimately led to the defeat of Napoleonic France, ‘a country on which, at Borodino, for the very first time, the hand of an opponent str...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Martin Shipway
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 177
container_title
container_volume
creator Martin Shipway
description As the battle of Borodino draws to its wearied and bloody end, in volume three ofWar and peace, Leo Tolstoy reflects on a day that, while militarily inconclusive, ultimately led to the defeat of Napoleonic France, ‘a country on which, at Borodino, for the very first time, the hand of an opponent stronger in spirit had been laid’. Turning the page, Tolstoy then turns his attention away from his narrative, to the problem of historical time and causation, drawing a parallel with Zeno of Elea’s best-known paradox, ‘whereby a tortoise that has a head start on Achilles will never
format Book Chapter
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_books_j_ctt1mtz521_14</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>j.ctt1mtz521.14</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>j.ctt1mtz521.14</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_books_j_ctt1mtz521_143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjZOAytDQ0NDYwNze2YGbgtTS3gPFNzDkYeIuLswwMDIwMzU1NjYw5GTgd00pSi8rzi1J4GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDkptriLOHblZxSX5RfFJ-fnZxfFZ8ckmJYW5JlamRYbyhiTFRigAc6Sgt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Afterword: Achilles and the tortoise: the tortoise’s view of late colonialism and decolonization</title><source>Project MUSE Open Access Books</source><source>JSTOR eBooks: Open Access</source><source>OAPEN</source><source>DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books</source><creator>Martin Shipway</creator><contributor>Chris Jeppesen ; Andrew W.M. Smith</contributor><creatorcontrib>Martin Shipway ; Chris Jeppesen ; Andrew W.M. Smith</creatorcontrib><description>As the battle of Borodino draws to its wearied and bloody end, in volume three ofWar and peace, Leo Tolstoy reflects on a day that, while militarily inconclusive, ultimately led to the defeat of Napoleonic France, ‘a country on which, at Borodino, for the very first time, the hand of an opponent stronger in spirit had been laid’. Turning the page, Tolstoy then turns his attention away from his narrative, to the problem of historical time and causation, drawing a parallel with Zeno of Elea’s best-known paradox, ‘whereby a tortoise that has a head start on Achilles will never</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781911307747</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1911307746</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1911307738</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781911307730</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UCL Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthropology ; Applied anthropology ; Archives ; Behavioral sciences ; Biological sciences ; Biology ; British history ; British imperialism ; Collective rights ; Colonialism ; Colonization ; Cultural anthropology ; Cultural institutions ; Decolonization ; Ethnography ; Ethnology ; European history ; European studies ; Government ; Hegemony ; Historians ; Historical methodology ; Historiography ; History ; Human geography ; Human rights ; Human settlements ; Jurisprudence ; Law ; Natural law ; Natural rights ; Optics ; Philosophy of law ; Physical sciences ; Physics ; Political science ; Political systems ; Reptiles ; Settlement geography ; Social sciences ; Sovereignty ; Tortoises ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Britain, France and the Decolonization of Africa, 2017, p.177</ispartof><rights>2017 Contributors</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>775,776,780,789,24341</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Chris Jeppesen</contributor><contributor>Andrew W.M. Smith</contributor><creatorcontrib>Martin Shipway</creatorcontrib><title>Afterword: Achilles and the tortoise: the tortoise’s view of late colonialism and decolonization</title><title>Britain, France and the Decolonization of Africa</title><description>As the battle of Borodino draws to its wearied and bloody end, in volume three ofWar and peace, Leo Tolstoy reflects on a day that, while militarily inconclusive, ultimately led to the defeat of Napoleonic France, ‘a country on which, at Borodino, for the very first time, the hand of an opponent stronger in spirit had been laid’. Turning the page, Tolstoy then turns his attention away from his narrative, to the problem of historical time and causation, drawing a parallel with Zeno of Elea’s best-known paradox, ‘whereby a tortoise that has a head start on Achilles will never</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Applied anthropology</subject><subject>Archives</subject><subject>Behavioral sciences</subject><subject>Biological sciences</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>British history</subject><subject>British imperialism</subject><subject>Collective rights</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Cultural institutions</subject><subject>Decolonization</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Ethnology</subject><subject>European history</subject><subject>European studies</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>Historical methodology</subject><subject>Historiography</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Human geography</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Human settlements</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Natural law</subject><subject>Natural rights</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Philosophy of law</subject><subject>Physical sciences</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Settlement geography</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Tortoises</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><isbn>9781911307747</isbn><isbn>1911307746</isbn><isbn>1911307738</isbn><isbn>9781911307730</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><sourceid>BAHZO</sourceid><recordid>eNpjZOAytDQ0NDYwNze2YGbgtTS3gPFNzDkYeIuLswwMDIwMzU1NjYw5GTgd00pSi8rzi1J4GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDkptriLOHblZxSX5RfFJ-fnZxfFZ8ckmJYW5JlamRYbyhiTFRigAc6Sgt</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Martin Shipway</creator><general>UCL Press</general><scope>BAHZO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Afterword</title><author>Martin Shipway</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_books_j_ctt1mtz521_143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Applied anthropology</topic><topic>Archives</topic><topic>Behavioral sciences</topic><topic>Biological sciences</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>British history</topic><topic>British imperialism</topic><topic>Collective rights</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Cultural institutions</topic><topic>Decolonization</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Ethnology</topic><topic>European history</topic><topic>European studies</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>Historical methodology</topic><topic>Historiography</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Human geography</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Human settlements</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Natural law</topic><topic>Natural rights</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Philosophy of law</topic><topic>Physical sciences</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Settlement geography</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Tortoises</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin Shipway</creatorcontrib><collection>JSTOR eBooks: Open Access</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin Shipway</au><au>Chris Jeppesen</au><au>Andrew W.M. Smith</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Afterword: Achilles and the tortoise: the tortoise’s view of late colonialism and decolonization</atitle><btitle>Britain, France and the Decolonization of Africa</btitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><spage>177</spage><pages>177-</pages><isbn>9781911307747</isbn><isbn>1911307746</isbn><eisbn>1911307738</eisbn><eisbn>9781911307730</eisbn><abstract>As the battle of Borodino draws to its wearied and bloody end, in volume three ofWar and peace, Leo Tolstoy reflects on a day that, while militarily inconclusive, ultimately led to the defeat of Napoleonic France, ‘a country on which, at Borodino, for the very first time, the hand of an opponent stronger in spirit had been laid’. Turning the page, Tolstoy then turns his attention away from his narrative, to the problem of historical time and causation, drawing a parallel with Zeno of Elea’s best-known paradox, ‘whereby a tortoise that has a head start on Achilles will never</abstract><pub>UCL Press</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISBN: 9781911307747
ispartof Britain, France and the Decolonization of Africa, 2017, p.177
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_books_j_ctt1mtz521_14
source Project MUSE Open Access Books; JSTOR eBooks: Open Access; OAPEN; DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books
subjects Animals
Anthropology
Applied anthropology
Archives
Behavioral sciences
Biological sciences
Biology
British history
British imperialism
Collective rights
Colonialism
Colonization
Cultural anthropology
Cultural institutions
Decolonization
Ethnography
Ethnology
European history
European studies
Government
Hegemony
Historians
Historical methodology
Historiography
History
Human geography
Human rights
Human settlements
Jurisprudence
Law
Natural law
Natural rights
Optics
Philosophy of law
Physical sciences
Physics
Political science
Political systems
Reptiles
Settlement geography
Social sciences
Sovereignty
Tortoises
Zoology
title Afterword: Achilles and the tortoise: the tortoise’s view of late colonialism and decolonization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A29%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Afterword:%20Achilles%20and%20the%20tortoise:%20the%20tortoise%E2%80%99s%20view%20of%20late%20colonialism%20and%20decolonization&rft.btitle=Britain,%20France%20and%20the%20Decolonization%20of%20Africa&rft.au=Martin%20Shipway&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.spage=177&rft.pages=177-&rft.isbn=9781911307747&rft.isbn_list=1911307746&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3Ej.ctt1mtz521.14%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1911307738&rft.eisbn_list=9781911307730&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=j.ctt1mtz521.14&rfr_iscdi=true