Discussion
The extent to which exposures to the asbestos-containing products of bankrupt firms are identified during a tort case has important implications for plaintiffs and remaining solvent defendants. The failure of plaintiffs and defendants to identify all such exposures can mean that a remaining solvent...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buchkapitel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 37 |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Lloyd Dixon Geoffrey McGovern |
| description | The extent to which exposures to the asbestos-containing products of bankrupt firms are identified during a tort case has important implications for plaintiffs and remaining solvent defendants. The failure of plaintiffs and defendants to identify all such exposures can mean that a remaining solvent defendant will pay more than it would if all exposure were identified. Failure to identify exposure to the products of bankrupt parties might also result in greater plaintiff compensation than otherwise from bankruptcy trusts and the tort case combined. As discussed in Chapter One, plaintiffs thus have disincentives to identify exposure to bankrupt firms’ products, while |
| format | Book Chapter |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_books_j_ctt15sk8bb_11</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.7249/j.ctt15sk8bb.11</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.7249/j.ctt15sk8bb.11</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_books_j_ctt15sk8bb_113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjZOAysDA2NrA0NLY0ZYZxDAwtzDgYeIuLswwMDAxNjSzNDQw4GbhcMouTS4uLM_PzeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5Kba4izh25WcUl-UXxSfn52cXxWfHJJiaFpcbZFUlK8oaExUYoA9x8oKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Discussion</title><source>JSTOR eBooks: Open Access</source><source>DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books</source><creator>Lloyd Dixon ; Geoffrey McGovern</creator><creatorcontrib>Lloyd Dixon ; Geoffrey McGovern</creatorcontrib><description>The extent to which exposures to the asbestos-containing products of bankrupt firms are identified during a tort case has important implications for plaintiffs and remaining solvent defendants. The failure of plaintiffs and defendants to identify all such exposures can mean that a remaining solvent defendant will pay more than it would if all exposure were identified. Failure to identify exposure to the products of bankrupt parties might also result in greater plaintiff compensation than otherwise from bankruptcy trusts and the tort case combined. As discussed in Chapter One, plaintiffs thus have disincentives to identify exposure to bankrupt firms’ products, while</description><identifier>ISBN: 0833090186</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780833090188</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 0833091395</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9780833091390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>RAND Corporation</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Asbestos ; Attorneys ; Bankruptcy ; Bankruptcy claims ; Bankruptcy Code ; Bankruptcy trusteeship ; Criminal defense attorneys ; Defendants ; Defense counsel ; Economic disciplines ; Economics ; Employment ; Finance ; Financial economics ; Financial status ; Hazardous substances ; Interrogatories ; Judicial system ; Labor economics ; Law ; Legal proceedings ; Legal professionals ; Litigants ; Litigation ; Litigation parties ; Materials ; Materials science ; Occupations ; Plaintiffs ; Plaintiffs attorneys ; Trial court proceedings ; Witness examination</subject><ispartof>Bankruptcy’s Effect on Product Identification in Asbestos Personal Injury Cases, 2015, p.37</ispartof><rights>2015 RAND Corporation</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>779,780,784,793,24361</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lloyd Dixon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geoffrey McGovern</creatorcontrib><title>Discussion</title><title>Bankruptcy’s Effect on Product Identification in Asbestos Personal Injury Cases</title><description>The extent to which exposures to the asbestos-containing products of bankrupt firms are identified during a tort case has important implications for plaintiffs and remaining solvent defendants. The failure of plaintiffs and defendants to identify all such exposures can mean that a remaining solvent defendant will pay more than it would if all exposure were identified. Failure to identify exposure to the products of bankrupt parties might also result in greater plaintiff compensation than otherwise from bankruptcy trusts and the tort case combined. As discussed in Chapter One, plaintiffs thus have disincentives to identify exposure to bankrupt firms’ products, while</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Asbestos</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Bankruptcy claims</subject><subject>Bankruptcy Code</subject><subject>Bankruptcy trusteeship</subject><subject>Criminal defense attorneys</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Defense counsel</subject><subject>Economic disciplines</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Financial economics</subject><subject>Financial status</subject><subject>Hazardous substances</subject><subject>Interrogatories</subject><subject>Judicial system</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legal proceedings</subject><subject>Legal professionals</subject><subject>Litigants</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Litigation parties</subject><subject>Materials</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>Plaintiffs attorneys</subject><subject>Trial court proceedings</subject><subject>Witness examination</subject><isbn>0833090186</isbn><isbn>9780833090188</isbn><isbn>0833091395</isbn><isbn>9780833091390</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><sourceid>BAHZO</sourceid><recordid>eNpjZOAysDA2NrA0NLY0ZYZxDAwtzDgYeIuLswwMDAxNjSzNDQw4GbhcMouTS4uLM_PzeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5Kba4izh25WcUl-UXxSfn52cXxWfHJJiaFpcbZFUlK8oaExUYoA9x8oKQ</recordid><startdate>20150521</startdate><enddate>20150521</enddate><creator>Lloyd Dixon</creator><creator>Geoffrey McGovern</creator><general>RAND Corporation</general><scope>BAHZO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150521</creationdate><title>Discussion</title><author>Lloyd Dixon ; Geoffrey McGovern</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_books_j_ctt15sk8bb_113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Asbestos</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Bankruptcy claims</topic><topic>Bankruptcy Code</topic><topic>Bankruptcy trusteeship</topic><topic>Criminal defense attorneys</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Defense counsel</topic><topic>Economic disciplines</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Financial economics</topic><topic>Financial status</topic><topic>Hazardous substances</topic><topic>Interrogatories</topic><topic>Judicial system</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legal proceedings</topic><topic>Legal professionals</topic><topic>Litigants</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Litigation parties</topic><topic>Materials</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>Plaintiffs attorneys</topic><topic>Trial court proceedings</topic><topic>Witness examination</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lloyd Dixon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geoffrey McGovern</creatorcontrib><collection>JSTOR eBooks: Open Access</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lloyd Dixon</au><au>Geoffrey McGovern</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Discussion</atitle><btitle>Bankruptcy’s Effect on Product Identification in Asbestos Personal Injury Cases</btitle><date>2015-05-21</date><risdate>2015</risdate><spage>37</spage><pages>37-</pages><isbn>0833090186</isbn><isbn>9780833090188</isbn><eisbn>0833091395</eisbn><eisbn>9780833091390</eisbn><abstract>The extent to which exposures to the asbestos-containing products of bankrupt firms are identified during a tort case has important implications for plaintiffs and remaining solvent defendants. The failure of plaintiffs and defendants to identify all such exposures can mean that a remaining solvent defendant will pay more than it would if all exposure were identified. Failure to identify exposure to the products of bankrupt parties might also result in greater plaintiff compensation than otherwise from bankruptcy trusts and the tort case combined. As discussed in Chapter One, plaintiffs thus have disincentives to identify exposure to bankrupt firms’ products, while</abstract><pub>RAND Corporation</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISBN: 0833090186 |
| ispartof | Bankruptcy’s Effect on Product Identification in Asbestos Personal Injury Cases, 2015, p.37 |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_jstor_books_j_ctt15sk8bb_11 |
| source | JSTOR eBooks: Open Access; DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books |
| subjects | Applied sciences Asbestos Attorneys Bankruptcy Bankruptcy claims Bankruptcy Code Bankruptcy trusteeship Criminal defense attorneys Defendants Defense counsel Economic disciplines Economics Employment Finance Financial economics Financial status Hazardous substances Interrogatories Judicial system Labor economics Law Legal proceedings Legal professionals Litigants Litigation Litigation parties Materials Materials science Occupations Plaintiffs Plaintiffs attorneys Trial court proceedings Witness examination |
| title | Discussion |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A03%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Discussion&rft.btitle=Bankruptcy%E2%80%99s%20Effect%20on%20Product%20Identification%20in%20Asbestos%20Personal%20Injury%20Cases&rft.au=Lloyd%20Dixon&rft.date=2015-05-21&rft.spage=37&rft.pages=37-&rft.isbn=0833090186&rft.isbn_list=9780833090188&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E10.7249/j.ctt15sk8bb.11%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=0833091395&rft.eisbn_list=9780833091390&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.7249/j.ctt15sk8bb.11&rfr_iscdi=true |