Recognition Errors and Probability of Parasitism Determine Whether Reed Warblers Should Accept or Reject Mimetic Cuckoo Eggs
Reed warblers sometimes make recognition errors when faced with a mimetic cuckoo egg in their nest and reject one or more of their own eggs rather than the foreign egg. Using the framework of signal detection theory, we analyse responses to model eggs to quantify the costs and benefits of acceptance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 1996-07, Vol.263 (1372), p.925-931 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 931 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1372 |
container_start_page | 925 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
container_volume | 263 |
creator | Davies, Nicholas Barry Brooke, M. De L. Kacelnik, Alejandro |
description | Reed warblers sometimes make recognition errors when faced with a mimetic cuckoo egg in their nest and reject one or more of their own eggs rather than the foreign egg. Using the framework of signal detection theory, we analyse responses to model eggs to quantify the costs and benefits of acceptance versus rejection in parasitized and unparasitized nests. We show that below a threshold of 19-41% parasitism, the warblers should accept mimetic cuckoo eggs because the costs of rejection outweigh the benefits, whereas above this threshold they should reject. The warblers behaved as predicted; when they saw a cuckoo at their nest they usually showed rejection, but without the sight of the cuckoo they behaved appropriately for the average parasitism rate in Britain (6%) and tended to accept. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rspb.1996.0137 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_V84_WFXN9N54_F</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>50576</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>50576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-6e025fdb0a3fb296335120f2f73edb557dcfd508b90d3f62de6ae6bdf82915273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM2O0zAUhSMEEmVgy4KVXyAd_9ROskJDaQFpGKoOUHZWYl-37qRxZLtAEQ-P06KRKsSsLOt-55x7T5a9JHhMcFVe-tA3Y1JVYowJKx5lIzIpSE4rPnmcjXAlaF5OOH2aPQthizGueMlH2e8lKLfubLSuQzPvnQ-o7jRaeNfUjW1tPCBn0KL2dUhQ2KG3EMHvbAdotYG4AY-WABqtat-0kNS3G7dvNbpSCvqI3DDegoroo91BtApN9-rOOTRbr8Pz7Imp2wAv_r4X2Zf57PP0fX796d2H6dV1rgTBMReAKTe6wTUzDa0EY5xQbKgpGOiG80IrozkumwprZgTVIGoQjTYlrQinBbvIxidf5V0IHozsvd3V_iAJlkN3cuhODt3JobskCCeBd4e0mFMW4kFu3d536SuXt4s3CcbfqWA28VTikhEsSJH8ftn-aDcAMgHShrAHecTOY_5NZQ-l_nfXVyfVNkTn7y_jmBciDfPT0IYIP--Htb-TomAFl1_LiVzNv91UN3wi54l_feI3dr35YT3Is12O0cp1Ebp4vO14VUW5NPu2lb02yYE86OAOvQ_NmZj9Aatw25k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recognition Errors and Probability of Parasitism Determine Whether Reed Warblers Should Accept or Reject Mimetic Cuckoo Eggs</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Davies, Nicholas Barry ; Brooke, M. De L. ; Kacelnik, Alejandro</creator><creatorcontrib>Davies, Nicholas Barry ; Brooke, M. De L. ; Kacelnik, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><description>Reed warblers sometimes make recognition errors when faced with a mimetic cuckoo egg in their nest and reject one or more of their own eggs rather than the foreign egg. Using the framework of signal detection theory, we analyse responses to model eggs to quantify the costs and benefits of acceptance versus rejection in parasitized and unparasitized nests. We show that below a threshold of 19-41% parasitism, the warblers should accept mimetic cuckoo eggs because the costs of rejection outweigh the benefits, whereas above this threshold they should reject. The warblers behaved as predicted; when they saw a cuckoo at their nest they usually showed rejection, but without the sight of the cuckoo they behaved appropriately for the average parasitism rate in Britain (6%) and tended to accept.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0137</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animal nesting ; Arms races ; Bird nesting ; Brood parasitism ; Eggs ; Evolution ; Mimicry ; Population dynamics ; Signal detection theory ; Warblers</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 1996-07, Vol.263 (1372), p.925-931</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 The Royal Society</rights><rights>Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-6e025fdb0a3fb296335120f2f73edb557dcfd508b90d3f62de6ae6bdf82915273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-6e025fdb0a3fb296335120f2f73edb557dcfd508b90d3f62de6ae6bdf82915273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/50576$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/50576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davies, Nicholas Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooke, M. De L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kacelnik, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><title>Recognition Errors and Probability of Parasitism Determine Whether Reed Warblers Should Accept or Reject Mimetic Cuckoo Eggs</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B</addtitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B</addtitle><description>Reed warblers sometimes make recognition errors when faced with a mimetic cuckoo egg in their nest and reject one or more of their own eggs rather than the foreign egg. Using the framework of signal detection theory, we analyse responses to model eggs to quantify the costs and benefits of acceptance versus rejection in parasitized and unparasitized nests. We show that below a threshold of 19-41% parasitism, the warblers should accept mimetic cuckoo eggs because the costs of rejection outweigh the benefits, whereas above this threshold they should reject. The warblers behaved as predicted; when they saw a cuckoo at their nest they usually showed rejection, but without the sight of the cuckoo they behaved appropriately for the average parasitism rate in Britain (6%) and tended to accept.</description><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Arms races</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Brood parasitism</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Mimicry</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Signal detection theory</subject><subject>Warblers</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM2O0zAUhSMEEmVgy4KVXyAd_9ROskJDaQFpGKoOUHZWYl-37qRxZLtAEQ-P06KRKsSsLOt-55x7T5a9JHhMcFVe-tA3Y1JVYowJKx5lIzIpSE4rPnmcjXAlaF5OOH2aPQthizGueMlH2e8lKLfubLSuQzPvnQ-o7jRaeNfUjW1tPCBn0KL2dUhQ2KG3EMHvbAdotYG4AY-WABqtat-0kNS3G7dvNbpSCvqI3DDegoroo91BtApN9-rOOTRbr8Pz7Imp2wAv_r4X2Zf57PP0fX796d2H6dV1rgTBMReAKTe6wTUzDa0EY5xQbKgpGOiG80IrozkumwprZgTVIGoQjTYlrQinBbvIxidf5V0IHozsvd3V_iAJlkN3cuhODt3JobskCCeBd4e0mFMW4kFu3d536SuXt4s3CcbfqWA28VTikhEsSJH8ftn-aDcAMgHShrAHecTOY_5NZQ-l_nfXVyfVNkTn7y_jmBciDfPT0IYIP--Htb-TomAFl1_LiVzNv91UN3wi54l_feI3dr35YT3Is12O0cp1Ebp4vO14VUW5NPu2lb02yYE86OAOvQ_NmZj9Aatw25k</recordid><startdate>19960722</startdate><enddate>19960722</enddate><creator>Davies, Nicholas Barry</creator><creator>Brooke, M. De L.</creator><creator>Kacelnik, Alejandro</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960722</creationdate><title>Recognition Errors and Probability of Parasitism Determine Whether Reed Warblers Should Accept or Reject Mimetic Cuckoo Eggs</title><author>Davies, Nicholas Barry ; Brooke, M. De L. ; Kacelnik, Alejandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-6e025fdb0a3fb296335120f2f73edb557dcfd508b90d3f62de6ae6bdf82915273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Arms races</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Brood parasitism</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Mimicry</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Signal detection theory</topic><topic>Warblers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davies, Nicholas Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooke, M. De L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kacelnik, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davies, Nicholas Barry</au><au>Brooke, M. De L.</au><au>Kacelnik, Alejandro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recognition Errors and Probability of Parasitism Determine Whether Reed Warblers Should Accept or Reject Mimetic Cuckoo Eggs</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B</stitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B</addtitle><date>1996-07-22</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>263</volume><issue>1372</issue><spage>925</spage><epage>931</epage><pages>925-931</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>Reed warblers sometimes make recognition errors when faced with a mimetic cuckoo egg in their nest and reject one or more of their own eggs rather than the foreign egg. Using the framework of signal detection theory, we analyse responses to model eggs to quantify the costs and benefits of acceptance versus rejection in parasitized and unparasitized nests. We show that below a threshold of 19-41% parasitism, the warblers should accept mimetic cuckoo eggs because the costs of rejection outweigh the benefits, whereas above this threshold they should reject. The warblers behaved as predicted; when they saw a cuckoo at their nest they usually showed rejection, but without the sight of the cuckoo they behaved appropriately for the average parasitism rate in Britain (6%) and tended to accept.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><doi>10.1098/rspb.1996.0137</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8452 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 1996-07, Vol.263 (1372), p.925-931 |
issn | 0962-8452 1471-2954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_V84_WFXN9N54_F |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Animal nesting Arms races Bird nesting Brood parasitism Eggs Evolution Mimicry Population dynamics Signal detection theory Warblers |
title | Recognition Errors and Probability of Parasitism Determine Whether Reed Warblers Should Accept or Reject Mimetic Cuckoo Eggs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A25%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recognition%20Errors%20and%20Probability%20of%20Parasitism%20Determine%20Whether%20Reed%20Warblers%20Should%20Accept%20or%20Reject%20Mimetic%20Cuckoo%20Eggs&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Davies,%20Nicholas%20Barry&rft.date=1996-07-22&rft.volume=263&rft.issue=1372&rft.spage=925&rft.epage=931&rft.pages=925-931&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.1996.0137&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_istex%3E50576%3C/jstor_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=50576&rfr_iscdi=true |