Can females benefit from selfing avoidance? Genetic associations and the evolution of plant gender
Evolutionary stability of dioecy and nuclear gynodioecy in higher plants requires that females produce over twice as many successful seeds as hermaphrodites. This fitness differential is widely thought to derive primarily from the advantages of outcrossing caused by high selfing rates and inbreeding...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 1999-10, Vol.266 (1432), p.1967-1973 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1973 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1432 |
container_start_page | 1967 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
container_volume | 266 |
creator | Schultz, S. T. |
description | Evolutionary stability of dioecy and nuclear gynodioecy in higher plants requires that females produce over twice as many successful seeds as hermaphrodites. This fitness differential is widely thought to derive primarily from the advantages of outcrossing caused by high selfing rates and inbreeding depression in the hermaphrodite. This study hypothesized that (i) extraordinarily high deleterious mutation rates are necessary to double female seed success due to outcrossing, and (ii) the large difference in outcrossing rates between sex morphs causes differential purging of these mutations, resulting in additional genetic selection on male sterility. Using genetically explicit models, I showed that the phenotypic outcrossing advantage requires at least one new highly recessive deleterious mutation per genome per generation, regardless of selection coefficient. However, under this mutational regime, differential purging created strong genetic selection against recessive male sterility that overwhelmed the phenotypic selection in favour of outcrossing. In very small populations and for dominant male sterility, this genetic selection was weaker or absent. This first genetically explicit study of the outcrossing advantage of unisexual females may shed new light on both the genetic and selective conditions for the evolution of gynodioecy and dioecy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rspb.1999.0874 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_V84_R1FCMLF6_L</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>51588</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>51588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-569826c7b7656558919b0681f47c2ca1770bdffb27ca9505be49ff3d9b863f973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUuP0zAYjBBIlIUrB04-cUuxk_h14aFqu6xUhISAq2U7duuS2sV2Cv33OMqqUg_syfo8M99jpqpeI7hEkLN3MR3VEnHOl5DR7km1QB1FdcNx97RaQE6amnW4eV69SGkPIeSY4UWlVtIDaw5yMAko4411GdgYDiCZwTq_BfIUXC-9Nh_AXcGz00CmFLST2QWfgPQ9yDsDzCkM4_QFggXHQfoMtsb3Jr6snlk5JPPq4b2pfqxvv68-15uvd_erT5taY9LlGhPOGqKpogQTjBlHXEHCkO2obrRElELVW6saqiXHECvTcWvbnitGWstpe1O9n_seR3UwvTY-RzmIY3QHGc8iSCeuEe92YhtOAhEOW4RKg7cPDWL4PZqUxcElbYZyiwljEogW_yCDhbiciTqGlKKxlyEIiikLMWUhpizElEURtLMghnOxoJhn8lnswxh9Kf-vejOr9imHeJmBEWasgPUMupTN3wso4y9BaEux-Mk68Q2tV182ayI2hd_M_J3b7v64aMTVLqU4xqREQ4hAXduUNchk6cdHRdO-OvhcDL1WCjsOxfretv8AUTPSWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17452080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can females benefit from selfing avoidance? Genetic associations and the evolution of plant gender</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schultz, S. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schultz, S. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Evolutionary stability of dioecy and nuclear gynodioecy in higher plants requires that females produce over twice as many successful seeds as hermaphrodites. This fitness differential is widely thought to derive primarily from the advantages of outcrossing caused by high selfing rates and inbreeding depression in the hermaphrodite. This study hypothesized that (i) extraordinarily high deleterious mutation rates are necessary to double female seed success due to outcrossing, and (ii) the large difference in outcrossing rates between sex morphs causes differential purging of these mutations, resulting in additional genetic selection on male sterility. Using genetically explicit models, I showed that the phenotypic outcrossing advantage requires at least one new highly recessive deleterious mutation per genome per generation, regardless of selection coefficient. However, under this mutational regime, differential purging created strong genetic selection against recessive male sterility that overwhelmed the phenotypic selection in favour of outcrossing. In very small populations and for dominant male sterility, this genetic selection was weaker or absent. This first genetically explicit study of the outcrossing advantage of unisexual females may shed new light on both the genetic and selective conditions for the evolution of gynodioecy and dioecy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Dioecy ; Evolution ; Evolutionary genetics ; Genetic mutation ; Gynodioecy ; Inbreeding Depression ; Male infertility ; Mutation ; Outcrossing ; Plants ; Selfing ; Viability ; Zygotes</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 1999-10, Vol.266 (1432), p.1967-1973</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-569826c7b7656558919b0681f47c2ca1770bdffb27ca9505be49ff3d9b863f973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-569826c7b7656558919b0681f47c2ca1770bdffb27ca9505be49ff3d9b863f973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/51588$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/51588$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27923,27924,53790,53792,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schultz, S. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Can females benefit from selfing avoidance? Genetic associations and the evolution of plant gender</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><description>Evolutionary stability of dioecy and nuclear gynodioecy in higher plants requires that females produce over twice as many successful seeds as hermaphrodites. This fitness differential is widely thought to derive primarily from the advantages of outcrossing caused by high selfing rates and inbreeding depression in the hermaphrodite. This study hypothesized that (i) extraordinarily high deleterious mutation rates are necessary to double female seed success due to outcrossing, and (ii) the large difference in outcrossing rates between sex morphs causes differential purging of these mutations, resulting in additional genetic selection on male sterility. Using genetically explicit models, I showed that the phenotypic outcrossing advantage requires at least one new highly recessive deleterious mutation per genome per generation, regardless of selection coefficient. However, under this mutational regime, differential purging created strong genetic selection against recessive male sterility that overwhelmed the phenotypic selection in favour of outcrossing. In very small populations and for dominant male sterility, this genetic selection was weaker or absent. This first genetically explicit study of the outcrossing advantage of unisexual females may shed new light on both the genetic and selective conditions for the evolution of gynodioecy and dioecy.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Dioecy</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Genetic mutation</subject><subject>Gynodioecy</subject><subject>Inbreeding Depression</subject><subject>Male infertility</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Outcrossing</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Selfing</subject><subject>Viability</subject><subject>Zygotes</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UUuP0zAYjBBIlIUrB04-cUuxk_h14aFqu6xUhISAq2U7duuS2sV2Cv33OMqqUg_syfo8M99jpqpeI7hEkLN3MR3VEnHOl5DR7km1QB1FdcNx97RaQE6amnW4eV69SGkPIeSY4UWlVtIDaw5yMAko4411GdgYDiCZwTq_BfIUXC-9Nh_AXcGz00CmFLST2QWfgPQ9yDsDzCkM4_QFggXHQfoMtsb3Jr6snlk5JPPq4b2pfqxvv68-15uvd_erT5taY9LlGhPOGqKpogQTjBlHXEHCkO2obrRElELVW6saqiXHECvTcWvbnitGWstpe1O9n_seR3UwvTY-RzmIY3QHGc8iSCeuEe92YhtOAhEOW4RKg7cPDWL4PZqUxcElbYZyiwljEogW_yCDhbiciTqGlKKxlyEIiikLMWUhpizElEURtLMghnOxoJhn8lnswxh9Kf-vejOr9imHeJmBEWasgPUMupTN3wso4y9BaEux-Mk68Q2tV182ayI2hd_M_J3b7v64aMTVLqU4xqREQ4hAXduUNchk6cdHRdO-OvhcDL1WCjsOxfretv8AUTPSWw</recordid><startdate>19991007</startdate><enddate>19991007</enddate><creator>Schultz, S. T.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991007</creationdate><title>Can females benefit from selfing avoidance? Genetic associations and the evolution of plant gender</title><author>Schultz, S. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-569826c7b7656558919b0681f47c2ca1770bdffb27ca9505be49ff3d9b863f973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Dioecy</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Genetic mutation</topic><topic>Gynodioecy</topic><topic>Inbreeding Depression</topic><topic>Male infertility</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Outcrossing</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Selfing</topic><topic>Viability</topic><topic>Zygotes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schultz, S. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schultz, S. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can females benefit from selfing avoidance? Genetic associations and the evolution of plant gender</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><date>1999-10-07</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>266</volume><issue>1432</issue><spage>1967</spage><epage>1973</epage><pages>1967-1973</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>Evolutionary stability of dioecy and nuclear gynodioecy in higher plants requires that females produce over twice as many successful seeds as hermaphrodites. This fitness differential is widely thought to derive primarily from the advantages of outcrossing caused by high selfing rates and inbreeding depression in the hermaphrodite. This study hypothesized that (i) extraordinarily high deleterious mutation rates are necessary to double female seed success due to outcrossing, and (ii) the large difference in outcrossing rates between sex morphs causes differential purging of these mutations, resulting in additional genetic selection on male sterility. Using genetically explicit models, I showed that the phenotypic outcrossing advantage requires at least one new highly recessive deleterious mutation per genome per generation, regardless of selection coefficient. However, under this mutational regime, differential purging created strong genetic selection against recessive male sterility that overwhelmed the phenotypic selection in favour of outcrossing. In very small populations and for dominant male sterility, this genetic selection was weaker or absent. This first genetically explicit study of the outcrossing advantage of unisexual females may shed new light on both the genetic and selective conditions for the evolution of gynodioecy and dioecy.</abstract><pub>The Royal Society</pub><doi>10.1098/rspb.1999.0874</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8452 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 1999-10, Vol.266 (1432), p.1967-1973 |
issn | 0962-8452 1471-2954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_V84_R1FCMLF6_L |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central |
subjects | Alleles Dioecy Evolution Evolutionary genetics Genetic mutation Gynodioecy Inbreeding Depression Male infertility Mutation Outcrossing Plants Selfing Viability Zygotes |
title | Can females benefit from selfing avoidance? Genetic associations and the evolution of plant gender |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A41%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20females%20benefit%20from%20selfing%20avoidance?%20Genetic%20associations%20and%20the%20evolution%20of%20plant%20gender&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Schultz,%20S.%20T.&rft.date=1999-10-07&rft.volume=266&rft.issue=1432&rft.spage=1967&rft.epage=1973&rft.pages=1967-1973&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.1999.0874&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_istex%3E51588%3C/jstor_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17452080&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=51588&rfr_iscdi=true |