Energetics of C−F, C−Cl, C−Br, and C−I Bonds in 2-Haloethanols. Enthalpies of Formation of XCH2CH2OH (X = F, Cl, Br, I) Compounds and of the 2-Hydroxyethyl Radical
The energetics of the C−F, C−Cl, C−Br, and C−I bonds in 2-haloethanols was investigated by using a combination of experimental and theoretical methods. The standard molar enthalpies of formation of 2-chloro-, 2-bromo-, and 2-iodoethanol, at 298.15 K, were determined as Δf (ClCH2CH2OH, l) = −315.5 ±...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of physical chemistry. A, Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory, 2007-03, Vol.111 (9), p.1713-1720 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The energetics of the C−F, C−Cl, C−Br, and C−I bonds in 2-haloethanols was investigated by using a combination of experimental and theoretical methods. The standard molar enthalpies of formation of 2-chloro-, 2-bromo-, and 2-iodoethanol, at 298.15 K, were determined as Δf (ClCH2CH2OH, l) = −315.5 ± 0.7 kJ·mol-1, Δf (BrCH2CH2OH, l) = −275.8 ± 0.6 kJ·mol-1, Δf (ICH2CH2OH, l) = −207.3 ± 0.7 kJ·mol-1, by rotating-bomb combustion calorimetry. The corresponding standard molar enthalpies of vaporization, Δvap (ClCH2CH2OH) = 48.32 ± 0.37 kJ·mol-1, Δvap (BrCH2CH2OH) = 54.08 ± 0.40 kJ·mol-1, and Δvap (ICH2CH2OH) = 57.03 ± 0.20 kJ·mol-1 were also obtained by Calvet-drop microcalorimetry. The condensed phase and vaporization enthalpy data lead to Δf (ClCH2CH2OH, g) = −267.2 ± 0.8 kJ·mol-1, Δf (BrCH2CH2OH, g) = −221.7 ± 0.7 kJ·mol-1, and Δf (ICH2CH2OH, g) = −150.3 ± 0.7 kJ·mol-1. These values, together with the enthalpy of selected isodesmic and isogyric gas-phase reactions predicted by density functional theory (B3LYP/cc-pVTZ) and CBS-QB3 calculations were used to derive the enthalpies of formation of gaseous 2-fluoroethanol, Δf (FCH2CH2OH, g) = −423.6 ± 5.0 kJ·mol-1, and of the 2-hydroxyethyl radical, Δf (CH2CH2OH, g) = −28.7 ± 8.0 kJ·mol-1. The obtained thermochemical data led to the following carbon−halogen bond dissociation enthalpies: DH o(X−CH2CH2OH) = 474.4 ± 9.4 kJ·mol-1 (X = F), 359.9 ± 8.0 kJ·mol-1 (X = Cl), 305.0 ± 8.0 kJ·mol-1 (X = Br), 228.7 ± 8.1 kJ·mol-1 (X = I). These values were compared with the corresponding C−X bond dissociation enthalpies in XCH2COOH, XCH3, XC2H5, XCHCH2, and XC6H5. In view of this comparison the computational methods mentioned above were also used to obtain Δf (FCH2COOH, g) = −594.0 ± 5.0 kJ·mol-1 from which DH o(F−CH2COOH) = 435.4 ± 5.4 kJ·mol-1. The order DH o(C−F) > DH o(C−Cl) > DH o(C−Br) > DH o(C−I) is observed for the haloalcohols and all other RX compounds. It is finally concluded that the major qualitative trends exhibited by the C−X bond dissociation enthalpies for the series of compounds studied in this work can be predicted by Pauling's electrostatic-covalent model. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1089-5639 1520-5215 |
DOI: | 10.1021/jp0675678 |