Use and analysis of null flux coils
There are a number of ways to maintain stable levitation and guidance in Maglev through induction. If the secondary currents are unconstrained, the lift to drag ratio is much less than that realizable with constrained currents in a null flux configuration, regardless of whether the source field is s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Compel 2003-06, Vol.22 (2), p.304-313 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 313 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 304 |
| container_title | Compel |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Davey, Kent R. |
| description | There are a number of ways to maintain stable levitation and guidance in Maglev through induction. If the secondary currents are unconstrained, the lift to drag ratio is much less than that realizable with constrained currents in a null flux configuration, regardless of whether the source field is superconducting. This paper investigates 2D and 3D boundary element formulations capable of computing forces on such systems. Such systems pose a special challenge because they involve cross-connected coils having complete flux cancellation when the system is centered. Both 2D and 3D examples are compared to data on a circular test rig. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/03321640310459225 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_WKKZ9P52_7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>334975981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-97d2c53a166365071c4a372fb4299b2a13bf1d3c6fe2657e390d220ac0778fab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLAzEQB_AgCtbqB_C2KOjF1cl7c5Tiixb0YCl4CdndBLam3brpQvvtTVnpwfoIDDnM7z-EDEKnGK4xhuwGKCVYMKAYGFeE8D3UI8BZygWIfdTb9NMI1CE6CmEK8SgOPXQ-DjYx8zKW8etQhaR2ybz1PnG-XSVFXflwjA6c8cGefN19NL6_ex08pqPnh6fB7SgtWAbLVMmSFJwaLAQVHCQumKGSuJwRpXJiMM0dLmkhnCWCS0sVlISAKUDKzJmc9tFlN3fR1B-tDUs9q0JhvTdzW7dBS0YZ54rxKC_-lEQBFYqr_2EmgBOGIzz7Bqd128Q_iQaUIpwJGhHuUNHUITTW6UVTzUyz1hj0Zg16Zw0xk3aZKiztahswzbsWkkqu2YToyXD4pl440TL6q87bmW2ML7eJndF6UbrI4Wf--4s-AQ9JoFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>209925463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use and analysis of null flux coils</title><source>Emerald Insight</source><creator>Davey, Kent R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davey, Kent R.</creatorcontrib><description>There are a number of ways to maintain stable levitation and guidance in Maglev through induction. If the secondary currents are unconstrained, the lift to drag ratio is much less than that realizable with constrained currents in a null flux configuration, regardless of whether the source field is superconducting. This paper investigates 2D and 3D boundary element formulations capable of computing forces on such systems. Such systems pose a special challenge because they involve cross-connected coils having complete flux cancellation when the system is centered. Both 2D and 3D examples are compared to data on a circular test rig.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0332-1649</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/03321640310459225</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CODUDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Boundary element method ; Electron microscopes ; Magnetic forces ; Magnetic levitation systems ; Mathematical models ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Compel, 2003-06, Vol.22 (2), p.304-313</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>Copyright MCB UP Limited (MCB) 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-97d2c53a166365071c4a372fb4299b2a13bf1d3c6fe2657e390d220ac0778fab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-97d2c53a166365071c4a372fb4299b2a13bf1d3c6fe2657e390d220ac0778fab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03321640310459225/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03321640310459225/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27924,27925,52686,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davey, Kent R.</creatorcontrib><title>Use and analysis of null flux coils</title><title>Compel</title><description>There are a number of ways to maintain stable levitation and guidance in Maglev through induction. If the secondary currents are unconstrained, the lift to drag ratio is much less than that realizable with constrained currents in a null flux configuration, regardless of whether the source field is superconducting. This paper investigates 2D and 3D boundary element formulations capable of computing forces on such systems. Such systems pose a special challenge because they involve cross-connected coils having complete flux cancellation when the system is centered. Both 2D and 3D examples are compared to data on a circular test rig.</description><subject>Boundary element method</subject><subject>Electron microscopes</subject><subject>Magnetic forces</subject><subject>Magnetic levitation systems</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0332-1649</issn><issn>2054-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtLAzEQB_AgCtbqB_C2KOjF1cl7c5Tiixb0YCl4CdndBLam3brpQvvtTVnpwfoIDDnM7z-EDEKnGK4xhuwGKCVYMKAYGFeE8D3UI8BZygWIfdTb9NMI1CE6CmEK8SgOPXQ-DjYx8zKW8etQhaR2ybz1PnG-XSVFXflwjA6c8cGefN19NL6_ex08pqPnh6fB7SgtWAbLVMmSFJwaLAQVHCQumKGSuJwRpXJiMM0dLmkhnCWCS0sVlISAKUDKzJmc9tFlN3fR1B-tDUs9q0JhvTdzW7dBS0YZ54rxKC_-lEQBFYqr_2EmgBOGIzz7Bqd128Q_iQaUIpwJGhHuUNHUITTW6UVTzUyz1hj0Zg16Zw0xk3aZKiztahswzbsWkkqu2YToyXD4pl440TL6q87bmW2ML7eJndF6UbrI4Wf--4s-AQ9JoFw</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>Davey, Kent R.</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>Use and analysis of null flux coils</title><author>Davey, Kent R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-97d2c53a166365071c4a372fb4299b2a13bf1d3c6fe2657e390d220ac0778fab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Boundary element method</topic><topic>Electron microscopes</topic><topic>Magnetic forces</topic><topic>Magnetic levitation systems</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davey, Kent R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Compel</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davey, Kent R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use and analysis of null flux coils</atitle><jtitle>Compel</jtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>313</epage><pages>304-313</pages><issn>0332-1649</issn><eissn>2054-5606</eissn><coden>CODUDU</coden><abstract>There are a number of ways to maintain stable levitation and guidance in Maglev through induction. If the secondary currents are unconstrained, the lift to drag ratio is much less than that realizable with constrained currents in a null flux configuration, regardless of whether the source field is superconducting. This paper investigates 2D and 3D boundary element formulations capable of computing forces on such systems. Such systems pose a special challenge because they involve cross-connected coils having complete flux cancellation when the system is centered. Both 2D and 3D examples are compared to data on a circular test rig.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/03321640310459225</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0332-1649 |
| ispartof | Compel, 2003-06, Vol.22 (2), p.304-313 |
| issn | 0332-1649 2054-5606 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_WKKZ9P52_7 |
| source | Emerald Insight |
| subjects | Boundary element method Electron microscopes Magnetic forces Magnetic levitation systems Mathematical models Studies |
| title | Use and analysis of null flux coils |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A00%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20and%20analysis%20of%20null%20flux%20coils&rft.jtitle=Compel&rft.au=Davey,%20Kent%20R.&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=313&rft.pages=304-313&rft.issn=0332-1649&rft.eissn=2054-5606&rft.coden=CODUDU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/03321640310459225&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E334975981%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=209925463&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |