A Contingency Approach to Work Week Structuring
Recent experiments with changes in work week structure from 'rigid' to 'flexible' have alerted employers and employees to the possibility of varying existing hours arrangements. The decision to change (or not to change) is often based on inadequate consideration of the consequenc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personnel review 1977-02, Vol.6 (2), p.45-55 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 55 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Personnel review |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Lee, Robert A. McEwan Young, W. |
description | Recent experiments with changes in work week structure from 'rigid' to 'flexible' have alerted employers and employees to the possibility of varying existing hours arrangements. The decision to change (or not to change) is often based on inadequate consideration of the consequences and an incomplete identification and analysis of all the available alternatives. Different degrees and forms of 'flexibility' may be appropriate for different work situations. The decision-maker must appraise the work situations under his control and determine from the alternatives available which particular structure(s) are most suitable. To this end it is necessary, firstly, to conceptualize about the major variables in work week structures and then to develop a model which will allow the work situation characteristics to be 'matched' with a suitable work week structure. Research carried out in the Department of Management Studies at Loughborough University indicates that a 'contingency' model seems most appropriate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/eb055334 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_W25ZW3RN_T</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>33119241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4713d9c2778f23b92729e2b13ffc403a1a3796a71be801d26074952e53509a6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0N9LwzAQB_A8KDin4J9QENSXuiSXNO3jGP6CoaCTgi8hTa9at7U1acH993bU7UWfjoPPfe84Qs4YvWaMxhPMqJQA4oCMKBVxCCKOjsix95902wMfkck0mNVVW1bvWNlNMG0aVxv7EbR1kNZuGaSIy-CldZ1tO9erE3JYmJXH0986Jq-3N4vZfTh_unuYTeehBRm1oVAM8sRypeKCQ5ZwxRPkGYOisIKCYQZUEhnFMowpy3lElUgkRwmSJibKYUwuhtz-nq8OfavXpbe4WpkK685rAMYSLlgPrwZoXe29w0I3rlwbt9GM6u0X9O4LPQ0HWvoWv_fOuKWOFCipRcp1yuVbCs-PetH788HjGp1Z5fuJXaJu8qJXl_-rP_t_APOcdmk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>33119241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Contingency Approach to Work Week Structuring</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Lee, Robert A. ; McEwan Young, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Robert A. ; McEwan Young, W.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent experiments with changes in work week structure from 'rigid' to 'flexible' have alerted employers and employees to the possibility of varying existing hours arrangements. The decision to change (or not to change) is often based on inadequate consideration of the consequences and an incomplete identification and analysis of all the available alternatives. Different degrees and forms of 'flexibility' may be appropriate for different work situations. The decision-maker must appraise the work situations under his control and determine from the alternatives available which particular structure(s) are most suitable. To this end it is necessary, firstly, to conceptualize about the major variables in work week structures and then to develop a model which will allow the work situation characteristics to be 'matched' with a suitable work week structure. Research carried out in the Department of Management Studies at Loughborough University indicates that a 'contingency' model seems most appropriate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-3486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/eb055334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Personnel review, 1977-02, Vol.6 (2), p.45-55</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4713d9c2778f23b92729e2b13ffc403a1a3796a71be801d26074952e53509a6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4713d9c2778f23b92729e2b13ffc403a1a3796a71be801d26074952e53509a6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb055334/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb055334/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,27901,27902,52661,52664</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwan Young, W.</creatorcontrib><title>A Contingency Approach to Work Week Structuring</title><title>Personnel review</title><description>Recent experiments with changes in work week structure from 'rigid' to 'flexible' have alerted employers and employees to the possibility of varying existing hours arrangements. The decision to change (or not to change) is often based on inadequate consideration of the consequences and an incomplete identification and analysis of all the available alternatives. Different degrees and forms of 'flexibility' may be appropriate for different work situations. The decision-maker must appraise the work situations under his control and determine from the alternatives available which particular structure(s) are most suitable. To this end it is necessary, firstly, to conceptualize about the major variables in work week structures and then to develop a model which will allow the work situation characteristics to be 'matched' with a suitable work week structure. Research carried out in the Department of Management Studies at Loughborough University indicates that a 'contingency' model seems most appropriate.</description><issn>0048-3486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0N9LwzAQB_A8KDin4J9QENSXuiSXNO3jGP6CoaCTgi8hTa9at7U1acH993bU7UWfjoPPfe84Qs4YvWaMxhPMqJQA4oCMKBVxCCKOjsix95902wMfkck0mNVVW1bvWNlNMG0aVxv7EbR1kNZuGaSIy-CldZ1tO9erE3JYmJXH0986Jq-3N4vZfTh_unuYTeehBRm1oVAM8sRypeKCQ5ZwxRPkGYOisIKCYQZUEhnFMowpy3lElUgkRwmSJibKYUwuhtz-nq8OfavXpbe4WpkK685rAMYSLlgPrwZoXe29w0I3rlwbt9GM6u0X9O4LPQ0HWvoWv_fOuKWOFCipRcp1yuVbCs-PetH788HjGp1Z5fuJXaJu8qJXl_-rP_t_APOcdmk</recordid><startdate>19770201</startdate><enddate>19770201</enddate><creator>Lee, Robert A.</creator><creator>McEwan Young, W.</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19770201</creationdate><title>A Contingency Approach to Work Week Structuring</title><author>Lee, Robert A. ; McEwan Young, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4713d9c2778f23b92729e2b13ffc403a1a3796a71be801d26074952e53509a6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwan Young, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Personnel review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Robert A.</au><au>McEwan Young, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Contingency Approach to Work Week Structuring</atitle><jtitle>Personnel review</jtitle><date>1977-02-01</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>45-55</pages><issn>0048-3486</issn><abstract>Recent experiments with changes in work week structure from 'rigid' to 'flexible' have alerted employers and employees to the possibility of varying existing hours arrangements. The decision to change (or not to change) is often based on inadequate consideration of the consequences and an incomplete identification and analysis of all the available alternatives. Different degrees and forms of 'flexibility' may be appropriate for different work situations. The decision-maker must appraise the work situations under his control and determine from the alternatives available which particular structure(s) are most suitable. To this end it is necessary, firstly, to conceptualize about the major variables in work week structures and then to develop a model which will allow the work situation characteristics to be 'matched' with a suitable work week structure. Research carried out in the Department of Management Studies at Loughborough University indicates that a 'contingency' model seems most appropriate.</abstract><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/eb055334</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-3486 |
ispartof | Personnel review, 1977-02, Vol.6 (2), p.45-55 |
issn | 0048-3486 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_W25ZW3RN_T |
source | Emerald Journals |
title | A Contingency Approach to Work Week Structuring |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A44%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Contingency%20Approach%20to%20Work%20Week%20Structuring&rft.jtitle=Personnel%20review&rft.au=Lee,%20Robert%20A.&rft.date=1977-02-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=45-55&rft.issn=0048-3486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/eb055334&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E33119241%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=33119241&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |