A case for ranking heterodox journals and departments
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present, for the first time, a case for ranking heterodox journals and departments.Design methodology approach - The first section of the article briefly delineates the intellectual and social organization of heterodox economics as a social system of scienti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | On the horizon 2008-09, Vol.16 (4), p.241-251 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 251 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 241 |
| container_title | On the horizon |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Lee, Frederic S. |
| description | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present, for the first time, a case for ranking heterodox journals and departments.Design methodology approach - The first section of the article briefly delineates the intellectual and social organization of heterodox economics as a social system of scientific activity. This background is then used to argue the case for ranking heterodox journals (section two) and heterodox departments (section three). An example of ranking journals that promote the development of heterodox theory, is not a zero-sum game, and does not invite invidious comparisons is delineated in the fourth section. The final section summarizes the case for rankings.Findings - There are two central issues facing heterodox economics: one is the development of a coherent, integrated economic theory that explains the social provisioning process; and the second is the making of economic departments that contribute to the development of heterodox theory and policy, and the training of heterodox economists. A case can be made for ranking journals and departments that deal with the two issues.Originality value - An example of ranking journals that promote the development of heterodox theory, is not a zero-sum game, and does not invite invidious comparisons is delineated. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/10748120810912565 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_T6FFHB2Z_G</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35847136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-965d04f59776dc66436b65509f3fd91c25fdb3ccb0989751f8e6ae827f50964a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqD_C2ePDkaibfe6zFtkLBS0XwEtJNottud2uyhfrv3bIqUukpMHnemWEQugR8C4DVHWDJFBCsAGdAuOBHqEcwZylIrI5Rb_eftgBO0VmMC4xBUkV7iA-S3ESX-DokwVTLonpL3l3jQm3rbbKoN6EyZUxMZRPr1iY0K1c18Ryd-LbsLr7fPnoePcyGk3T6NH4cDqZpziBr0kxwi5nnmZTC5kIwKuaCc5x56m0GOeHezmmez3GmMsnBKyeMU0T61ghmaB9dd33Xof7YuNjoVRFzV5amcvUmasoVk0BFC6_24M_qmgATRDFCWwQdykMdY3Ber0OxMuFTA9a7K-p_V2wzaZcpYuO2vwETllpIKrlmL0TPxGg0uSevetz6m867lQumtH9G7LXWa-tbjg_xQxt9Abc1jN8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214628423</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A case for ranking heterodox journals and departments</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Lee, Frederic S.</creator><contributor>Lee, Frederic S. ; Elsner, Wolfram</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Frederic S. ; Lee, Frederic S. ; Elsner, Wolfram</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present, for the first time, a case for ranking heterodox journals and departments.Design methodology approach - The first section of the article briefly delineates the intellectual and social organization of heterodox economics as a social system of scientific activity. This background is then used to argue the case for ranking heterodox journals (section two) and heterodox departments (section three). An example of ranking journals that promote the development of heterodox theory, is not a zero-sum game, and does not invite invidious comparisons is delineated in the fourth section. The final section summarizes the case for rankings.Findings - There are two central issues facing heterodox economics: one is the development of a coherent, integrated economic theory that explains the social provisioning process; and the second is the making of economic departments that contribute to the development of heterodox theory and policy, and the training of heterodox economists. A case can be made for ranking journals and departments that deal with the two issues.Originality value - An example of ranking journals that promote the development of heterodox theory, is not a zero-sum game, and does not invite invidious comparisons is delineated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-8121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-1708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/10748120810912565</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Colleges & universities ; Community Relations ; Department Heads ; Departments ; Economic Research ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Exercise ; Hiring ; Periodicals ; Personnel Selection ; Research methodology ; Resource allocation ; Serials ; Social Networks ; Social Organizations ; Social Systems ; Teaching Load</subject><ispartof>On the horizon, 2008-09, Vol.16 (4), p.241-251</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-965d04f59776dc66436b65509f3fd91c25fdb3ccb0989751f8e6ae827f50964a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-965d04f59776dc66436b65509f3fd91c25fdb3ccb0989751f8e6ae827f50964a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/10748120810912565/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/10748120810912565/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,21674,27901,27902,52661,52664,53219,53347</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Lee, Frederic S.</contributor><contributor>Elsner, Wolfram</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Frederic S.</creatorcontrib><title>A case for ranking heterodox journals and departments</title><title>On the horizon</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present, for the first time, a case for ranking heterodox journals and departments.Design methodology approach - The first section of the article briefly delineates the intellectual and social organization of heterodox economics as a social system of scientific activity. This background is then used to argue the case for ranking heterodox journals (section two) and heterodox departments (section three). An example of ranking journals that promote the development of heterodox theory, is not a zero-sum game, and does not invite invidious comparisons is delineated in the fourth section. The final section summarizes the case for rankings.Findings - There are two central issues facing heterodox economics: one is the development of a coherent, integrated economic theory that explains the social provisioning process; and the second is the making of economic departments that contribute to the development of heterodox theory and policy, and the training of heterodox economists. A case can be made for ranking journals and departments that deal with the two issues.Originality value - An example of ranking journals that promote the development of heterodox theory, is not a zero-sum game, and does not invite invidious comparisons is delineated.</description><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Department Heads</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Economic Research</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Hiring</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Personnel Selection</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Serials</subject><subject>Social Networks</subject><subject>Social Organizations</subject><subject>Social Systems</subject><subject>Teaching Load</subject><issn>1074-8121</issn><issn>2054-1708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqD_C2ePDkaibfe6zFtkLBS0XwEtJNottud2uyhfrv3bIqUukpMHnemWEQugR8C4DVHWDJFBCsAGdAuOBHqEcwZylIrI5Rb_eftgBO0VmMC4xBUkV7iA-S3ESX-DokwVTLonpL3l3jQm3rbbKoN6EyZUxMZRPr1iY0K1c18Ryd-LbsLr7fPnoePcyGk3T6NH4cDqZpziBr0kxwi5nnmZTC5kIwKuaCc5x56m0GOeHezmmez3GmMsnBKyeMU0T61ghmaB9dd33Xof7YuNjoVRFzV5amcvUmasoVk0BFC6_24M_qmgATRDFCWwQdykMdY3Ber0OxMuFTA9a7K-p_V2wzaZcpYuO2vwETllpIKrlmL0TPxGg0uSevetz6m867lQumtH9G7LXWa-tbjg_xQxt9Abc1jN8</recordid><startdate>20080926</startdate><enddate>20080926</enddate><creator>Lee, Frederic S.</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080926</creationdate><title>A case for ranking heterodox journals and departments</title><author>Lee, Frederic S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-965d04f59776dc66436b65509f3fd91c25fdb3ccb0989751f8e6ae827f50964a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Department Heads</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Economic Research</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Hiring</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Personnel Selection</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Serials</topic><topic>Social Networks</topic><topic>Social Organizations</topic><topic>Social Systems</topic><topic>Teaching Load</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Frederic S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>On the horizon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Frederic S.</au><au>Lee, Frederic S.</au><au>Elsner, Wolfram</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A case for ranking heterodox journals and departments</atitle><jtitle>On the horizon</jtitle><date>2008-09-26</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>241-251</pages><issn>1074-8121</issn><eissn>2054-1708</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present, for the first time, a case for ranking heterodox journals and departments.Design methodology approach - The first section of the article briefly delineates the intellectual and social organization of heterodox economics as a social system of scientific activity. This background is then used to argue the case for ranking heterodox journals (section two) and heterodox departments (section three). An example of ranking journals that promote the development of heterodox theory, is not a zero-sum game, and does not invite invidious comparisons is delineated in the fourth section. The final section summarizes the case for rankings.Findings - There are two central issues facing heterodox economics: one is the development of a coherent, integrated economic theory that explains the social provisioning process; and the second is the making of economic departments that contribute to the development of heterodox theory and policy, and the training of heterodox economists. A case can be made for ranking journals and departments that deal with the two issues.Originality value - An example of ranking journals that promote the development of heterodox theory, is not a zero-sum game, and does not invite invidious comparisons is delineated.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/10748120810912565</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1074-8121 |
| ispartof | On the horizon, 2008-09, Vol.16 (4), p.241-251 |
| issn | 1074-8121 2054-1708 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_T6FFHB2Z_G |
| source | Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
| subjects | Colleges & universities Community Relations Department Heads Departments Economic Research Economic theory Economics Exercise Hiring Periodicals Personnel Selection Research methodology Resource allocation Serials Social Networks Social Organizations Social Systems Teaching Load |
| title | A case for ranking heterodox journals and departments |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A40%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20case%20for%20ranking%20heterodox%20journals%20and%20departments&rft.jtitle=On%20the%20horizon&rft.au=Lee,%20Frederic%20S.&rft.date=2008-09-26&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=241-251&rft.issn=1074-8121&rft.eissn=2054-1708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/10748120810912565&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E35847136%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214628423&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |