Benchmarking road freight transport
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review of the first ten years of the UK Government's "transport key performance indicator (KPI)" programme which benchmarks the efficiency of road freight operations.Design methodology approach - Documentation on nine benchm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Benchmarking : an international journal 2009-08, Vol.16 (5), p.640-656 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 656 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 640 |
container_title | Benchmarking : an international journal |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | McKinnon, Alan C |
description | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review of the first ten years of the UK Government's "transport key performance indicator (KPI)" programme which benchmarks the efficiency of road freight operations.Design methodology approach - Documentation on nine benchmarking surveys is reviewed and combined with direct experience of programme's implementation to assess the general approach, the synchronised auditing procedure used, the choice of KPIs and resulting benefits to stakeholders.Findings - The programme illustrates how a benchmarking programme can become an instrument of government policy heightening awareness of best practice in freight transport and potential efficiency gains. It has been shown, across various industry supply chains, that similar distribution operations can have markedly different energy intensity. The programme has, nevertheless, been deficient in several respects. Too little attention has been given to the inter-relationship with other logistical activities, the causes of observed differences in efficiency and subsequent changes in company behaviour.Research limitations implications - Most of the benchmarking exercises have lacked follow-up surveys to enquire about the costs and benefits of company participation. Such surveys should become an integral part of future transport KPI projects.Practical implications - The UK Government has pioneered this form of transport benchmarking. Other governments and organisations can learn from its experience, particularly in dealing with the practical problems of recruiting companies, balancing government and industry requirements and ensuring consistency.Originality value - The government-sponsored programme of freight transport benchmarking reviewed in this paper is unique. This is the first attempt to summarise its achievements and findings since its launch in 1997. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/14635770910987850 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>istex_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_5PHMMMR5_7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_4W2_5PHMMMR5_7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-faff43336ab4baa8743c86a33b192750aafe84447d5bf6fcd7857d3351a993563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuCV6PJTj6PWqwVuiiieAyzm6Rdbbcluwf990YqXoqnGZjnHR5eQs45u-KcmWsuFEitmeXMGm0kOyAjrqWhgllxmPd8pxngx-Sk798ZY4qbckQubkPXLNeYPtpuUaQN-iKm0C6WQzEk7PrtJg2n5Cjiqg9nv3NMXqd3L5MZnT_eP0xu5rThSmgaMUYBAAprUSMaLaAxCgFqbkstGWIMRgihvayjio3PmtoDSI7WglQwJnT3t-2H8Om2qc1eXy67OaVBSyfeSiefZlVVPUunM3-548M6JFz5v8ReGW7rY8bZPzhzPx3ux-Ab7fZflA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benchmarking road freight transport</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>McKinnon, Alan C</creator><contributor>Min, Hokey ; McKinnon, Alan C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, Alan C ; Min, Hokey ; McKinnon, Alan C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review of the first ten years of the UK Government's "transport key performance indicator (KPI)" programme which benchmarks the efficiency of road freight operations.Design methodology approach - Documentation on nine benchmarking surveys is reviewed and combined with direct experience of programme's implementation to assess the general approach, the synchronised auditing procedure used, the choice of KPIs and resulting benefits to stakeholders.Findings - The programme illustrates how a benchmarking programme can become an instrument of government policy heightening awareness of best practice in freight transport and potential efficiency gains. It has been shown, across various industry supply chains, that similar distribution operations can have markedly different energy intensity. The programme has, nevertheless, been deficient in several respects. Too little attention has been given to the inter-relationship with other logistical activities, the causes of observed differences in efficiency and subsequent changes in company behaviour.Research limitations implications - Most of the benchmarking exercises have lacked follow-up surveys to enquire about the costs and benefits of company participation. Such surveys should become an integral part of future transport KPI projects.Practical implications - The UK Government has pioneered this form of transport benchmarking. Other governments and organisations can learn from its experience, particularly in dealing with the practical problems of recruiting companies, balancing government and industry requirements and ensuring consistency.Originality value - The government-sponsored programme of freight transport benchmarking reviewed in this paper is unique. This is the first attempt to summarise its achievements and findings since its launch in 1997.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-5771</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4094</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/14635770910987850</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Freight forwarding ; Government ; Process efficiency ; Road transport ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Benchmarking : an international journal, 2009-08, Vol.16 (5), p.640-656</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-faff43336ab4baa8743c86a33b192750aafe84447d5bf6fcd7857d3351a993563</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14635770910987850/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14635770910987850/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11616,21676,27903,27904,52664,52667,53222,53350</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Min, Hokey</contributor><contributor>McKinnon, Alan C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, Alan C</creatorcontrib><title>Benchmarking road freight transport</title><title>Benchmarking : an international journal</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review of the first ten years of the UK Government's "transport key performance indicator (KPI)" programme which benchmarks the efficiency of road freight operations.Design methodology approach - Documentation on nine benchmarking surveys is reviewed and combined with direct experience of programme's implementation to assess the general approach, the synchronised auditing procedure used, the choice of KPIs and resulting benefits to stakeholders.Findings - The programme illustrates how a benchmarking programme can become an instrument of government policy heightening awareness of best practice in freight transport and potential efficiency gains. It has been shown, across various industry supply chains, that similar distribution operations can have markedly different energy intensity. The programme has, nevertheless, been deficient in several respects. Too little attention has been given to the inter-relationship with other logistical activities, the causes of observed differences in efficiency and subsequent changes in company behaviour.Research limitations implications - Most of the benchmarking exercises have lacked follow-up surveys to enquire about the costs and benefits of company participation. Such surveys should become an integral part of future transport KPI projects.Practical implications - The UK Government has pioneered this form of transport benchmarking. Other governments and organisations can learn from its experience, particularly in dealing with the practical problems of recruiting companies, balancing government and industry requirements and ensuring consistency.Originality value - The government-sponsored programme of freight transport benchmarking reviewed in this paper is unique. This is the first attempt to summarise its achievements and findings since its launch in 1997.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Freight forwarding</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Process efficiency</subject><subject>Road transport</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1463-5771</issn><issn>1758-4094</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuCV6PJTj6PWqwVuiiieAyzm6Rdbbcluwf990YqXoqnGZjnHR5eQs45u-KcmWsuFEitmeXMGm0kOyAjrqWhgllxmPd8pxngx-Sk798ZY4qbckQubkPXLNeYPtpuUaQN-iKm0C6WQzEk7PrtJg2n5Cjiqg9nv3NMXqd3L5MZnT_eP0xu5rThSmgaMUYBAAprUSMaLaAxCgFqbkstGWIMRgihvayjio3PmtoDSI7WglQwJnT3t-2H8Om2qc1eXy67OaVBSyfeSiefZlVVPUunM3-548M6JFz5v8ReGW7rY8bZPzhzPx3ux-Ab7fZflA</recordid><startdate>20090828</startdate><enddate>20090828</enddate><creator>McKinnon, Alan C</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090828</creationdate><title>Benchmarking road freight transport</title><author>McKinnon, Alan C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-faff43336ab4baa8743c86a33b192750aafe84447d5bf6fcd7857d3351a993563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Freight forwarding</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Process efficiency</topic><topic>Road transport</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, Alan C</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><jtitle>Benchmarking : an international journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKinnon, Alan C</au><au>Min, Hokey</au><au>McKinnon, Alan C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benchmarking road freight transport</atitle><jtitle>Benchmarking : an international journal</jtitle><date>2009-08-28</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>640</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>640-656</pages><issn>1463-5771</issn><eissn>1758-4094</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review of the first ten years of the UK Government's "transport key performance indicator (KPI)" programme which benchmarks the efficiency of road freight operations.Design methodology approach - Documentation on nine benchmarking surveys is reviewed and combined with direct experience of programme's implementation to assess the general approach, the synchronised auditing procedure used, the choice of KPIs and resulting benefits to stakeholders.Findings - The programme illustrates how a benchmarking programme can become an instrument of government policy heightening awareness of best practice in freight transport and potential efficiency gains. It has been shown, across various industry supply chains, that similar distribution operations can have markedly different energy intensity. The programme has, nevertheless, been deficient in several respects. Too little attention has been given to the inter-relationship with other logistical activities, the causes of observed differences in efficiency and subsequent changes in company behaviour.Research limitations implications - Most of the benchmarking exercises have lacked follow-up surveys to enquire about the costs and benefits of company participation. Such surveys should become an integral part of future transport KPI projects.Practical implications - The UK Government has pioneered this form of transport benchmarking. Other governments and organisations can learn from its experience, particularly in dealing with the practical problems of recruiting companies, balancing government and industry requirements and ensuring consistency.Originality value - The government-sponsored programme of freight transport benchmarking reviewed in this paper is unique. This is the first attempt to summarise its achievements and findings since its launch in 1997.</abstract><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/14635770910987850</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1463-5771 |
ispartof | Benchmarking : an international journal, 2009-08, Vol.16 (5), p.640-656 |
issn | 1463-5771 1758-4094 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_5PHMMMR5_7 |
source | Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection; Emerald A-Z Current Journals |
subjects | Benchmarking Freight forwarding Government Process efficiency Road transport United Kingdom |
title | Benchmarking road freight transport |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T01%3A53%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benchmarking%20road%20freight%20transport&rft.jtitle=Benchmarking%20:%20an%20international%20journal&rft.au=McKinnon,%20Alan%20C&rft.date=2009-08-28&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=640&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=640-656&rft.issn=1463-5771&rft.eissn=1758-4094&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/14635770910987850&rft_dat=%3Cistex_emera%3Eark_67375_4W2_5PHMMMR5_7%3C/istex_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |