Benchmarking road freight transport

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review of the first ten years of the UK Government's "transport key performance indicator (KPI)" programme which benchmarks the efficiency of road freight operations.Design methodology approach - Documentation on nine benchm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Benchmarking : an international journal 2009-08, Vol.16 (5), p.640-656
1. Verfasser: McKinnon, Alan C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 656
container_issue 5
container_start_page 640
container_title Benchmarking : an international journal
container_volume 16
creator McKinnon, Alan C
description Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review of the first ten years of the UK Government's "transport key performance indicator (KPI)" programme which benchmarks the efficiency of road freight operations.Design methodology approach - Documentation on nine benchmarking surveys is reviewed and combined with direct experience of programme's implementation to assess the general approach, the synchronised auditing procedure used, the choice of KPIs and resulting benefits to stakeholders.Findings - The programme illustrates how a benchmarking programme can become an instrument of government policy heightening awareness of best practice in freight transport and potential efficiency gains. It has been shown, across various industry supply chains, that similar distribution operations can have markedly different energy intensity. The programme has, nevertheless, been deficient in several respects. Too little attention has been given to the inter-relationship with other logistical activities, the causes of observed differences in efficiency and subsequent changes in company behaviour.Research limitations implications - Most of the benchmarking exercises have lacked follow-up surveys to enquire about the costs and benefits of company participation. Such surveys should become an integral part of future transport KPI projects.Practical implications - The UK Government has pioneered this form of transport benchmarking. Other governments and organisations can learn from its experience, particularly in dealing with the practical problems of recruiting companies, balancing government and industry requirements and ensuring consistency.Originality value - The government-sponsored programme of freight transport benchmarking reviewed in this paper is unique. This is the first attempt to summarise its achievements and findings since its launch in 1997.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/14635770910987850
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_5PHMMMR5_7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_4W2_5PHMMMR5_7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-faff43336ab4baa8743c86a33b192750aafe84447d5bf6fcd7857d3351a993563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuCV6PJTj6PWqwVuiiieAyzm6Rdbbcluwf990YqXoqnGZjnHR5eQs45u-KcmWsuFEitmeXMGm0kOyAjrqWhgllxmPd8pxngx-Sk798ZY4qbckQubkPXLNeYPtpuUaQN-iKm0C6WQzEk7PrtJg2n5Cjiqg9nv3NMXqd3L5MZnT_eP0xu5rThSmgaMUYBAAprUSMaLaAxCgFqbkstGWIMRgihvayjio3PmtoDSI7WglQwJnT3t-2H8Om2qc1eXy67OaVBSyfeSiefZlVVPUunM3-548M6JFz5v8ReGW7rY8bZPzhzPx3ux-Ab7fZflA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benchmarking road freight transport</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>McKinnon, Alan C</creator><contributor>Min, Hokey ; McKinnon, Alan C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, Alan C ; Min, Hokey ; McKinnon, Alan C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review of the first ten years of the UK Government's "transport key performance indicator (KPI)" programme which benchmarks the efficiency of road freight operations.Design methodology approach - Documentation on nine benchmarking surveys is reviewed and combined with direct experience of programme's implementation to assess the general approach, the synchronised auditing procedure used, the choice of KPIs and resulting benefits to stakeholders.Findings - The programme illustrates how a benchmarking programme can become an instrument of government policy heightening awareness of best practice in freight transport and potential efficiency gains. It has been shown, across various industry supply chains, that similar distribution operations can have markedly different energy intensity. The programme has, nevertheless, been deficient in several respects. Too little attention has been given to the inter-relationship with other logistical activities, the causes of observed differences in efficiency and subsequent changes in company behaviour.Research limitations implications - Most of the benchmarking exercises have lacked follow-up surveys to enquire about the costs and benefits of company participation. Such surveys should become an integral part of future transport KPI projects.Practical implications - The UK Government has pioneered this form of transport benchmarking. Other governments and organisations can learn from its experience, particularly in dealing with the practical problems of recruiting companies, balancing government and industry requirements and ensuring consistency.Originality value - The government-sponsored programme of freight transport benchmarking reviewed in this paper is unique. This is the first attempt to summarise its achievements and findings since its launch in 1997.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-5771</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4094</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/14635770910987850</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Freight forwarding ; Government ; Process efficiency ; Road transport ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Benchmarking : an international journal, 2009-08, Vol.16 (5), p.640-656</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-faff43336ab4baa8743c86a33b192750aafe84447d5bf6fcd7857d3351a993563</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14635770910987850/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14635770910987850/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11616,21676,27903,27904,52664,52667,53222,53350</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Min, Hokey</contributor><contributor>McKinnon, Alan C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, Alan C</creatorcontrib><title>Benchmarking road freight transport</title><title>Benchmarking : an international journal</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review of the first ten years of the UK Government's "transport key performance indicator (KPI)" programme which benchmarks the efficiency of road freight operations.Design methodology approach - Documentation on nine benchmarking surveys is reviewed and combined with direct experience of programme's implementation to assess the general approach, the synchronised auditing procedure used, the choice of KPIs and resulting benefits to stakeholders.Findings - The programme illustrates how a benchmarking programme can become an instrument of government policy heightening awareness of best practice in freight transport and potential efficiency gains. It has been shown, across various industry supply chains, that similar distribution operations can have markedly different energy intensity. The programme has, nevertheless, been deficient in several respects. Too little attention has been given to the inter-relationship with other logistical activities, the causes of observed differences in efficiency and subsequent changes in company behaviour.Research limitations implications - Most of the benchmarking exercises have lacked follow-up surveys to enquire about the costs and benefits of company participation. Such surveys should become an integral part of future transport KPI projects.Practical implications - The UK Government has pioneered this form of transport benchmarking. Other governments and organisations can learn from its experience, particularly in dealing with the practical problems of recruiting companies, balancing government and industry requirements and ensuring consistency.Originality value - The government-sponsored programme of freight transport benchmarking reviewed in this paper is unique. This is the first attempt to summarise its achievements and findings since its launch in 1997.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Freight forwarding</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Process efficiency</subject><subject>Road transport</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1463-5771</issn><issn>1758-4094</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuCV6PJTj6PWqwVuiiieAyzm6Rdbbcluwf990YqXoqnGZjnHR5eQs45u-KcmWsuFEitmeXMGm0kOyAjrqWhgllxmPd8pxngx-Sk798ZY4qbckQubkPXLNeYPtpuUaQN-iKm0C6WQzEk7PrtJg2n5Cjiqg9nv3NMXqd3L5MZnT_eP0xu5rThSmgaMUYBAAprUSMaLaAxCgFqbkstGWIMRgihvayjio3PmtoDSI7WglQwJnT3t-2H8Om2qc1eXy67OaVBSyfeSiefZlVVPUunM3-548M6JFz5v8ReGW7rY8bZPzhzPx3ux-Ab7fZflA</recordid><startdate>20090828</startdate><enddate>20090828</enddate><creator>McKinnon, Alan C</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090828</creationdate><title>Benchmarking road freight transport</title><author>McKinnon, Alan C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-faff43336ab4baa8743c86a33b192750aafe84447d5bf6fcd7857d3351a993563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Freight forwarding</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Process efficiency</topic><topic>Road transport</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, Alan C</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><jtitle>Benchmarking : an international journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKinnon, Alan C</au><au>Min, Hokey</au><au>McKinnon, Alan C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benchmarking road freight transport</atitle><jtitle>Benchmarking : an international journal</jtitle><date>2009-08-28</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>640</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>640-656</pages><issn>1463-5771</issn><eissn>1758-4094</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review of the first ten years of the UK Government's "transport key performance indicator (KPI)" programme which benchmarks the efficiency of road freight operations.Design methodology approach - Documentation on nine benchmarking surveys is reviewed and combined with direct experience of programme's implementation to assess the general approach, the synchronised auditing procedure used, the choice of KPIs and resulting benefits to stakeholders.Findings - The programme illustrates how a benchmarking programme can become an instrument of government policy heightening awareness of best practice in freight transport and potential efficiency gains. It has been shown, across various industry supply chains, that similar distribution operations can have markedly different energy intensity. The programme has, nevertheless, been deficient in several respects. Too little attention has been given to the inter-relationship with other logistical activities, the causes of observed differences in efficiency and subsequent changes in company behaviour.Research limitations implications - Most of the benchmarking exercises have lacked follow-up surveys to enquire about the costs and benefits of company participation. Such surveys should become an integral part of future transport KPI projects.Practical implications - The UK Government has pioneered this form of transport benchmarking. Other governments and organisations can learn from its experience, particularly in dealing with the practical problems of recruiting companies, balancing government and industry requirements and ensuring consistency.Originality value - The government-sponsored programme of freight transport benchmarking reviewed in this paper is unique. This is the first attempt to summarise its achievements and findings since its launch in 1997.</abstract><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/14635770910987850</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1463-5771
ispartof Benchmarking : an international journal, 2009-08, Vol.16 (5), p.640-656
issn 1463-5771
1758-4094
language eng
recordid cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_5PHMMMR5_7
source Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection; Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Benchmarking
Freight forwarding
Government
Process efficiency
Road transport
United Kingdom
title Benchmarking road freight transport
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T01%3A53%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benchmarking%20road%20freight%20transport&rft.jtitle=Benchmarking%20:%20an%20international%20journal&rft.au=McKinnon,%20Alan%20C&rft.date=2009-08-28&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=640&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=640-656&rft.issn=1463-5771&rft.eissn=1758-4094&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/14635770910987850&rft_dat=%3Cistex_emera%3Eark_67375_4W2_5PHMMMR5_7%3C/istex_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true