The CHIME Fast Radio Burst Population Does Not Track the Star Formation History of the Universe
The redshift distribution of fast radio bursts (FRBs) is not well constrained. The association of the Galactic FRB 200428 with the young magnetar SGR 1935+2154 raises the working hypothesis that FRB sources track the star formation history of the universe. The discovery of FRB 20200120E in associati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Astrophysical journal. Letters 2022-01, Vol.924 (1), p.L14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | L14 |
container_title | Astrophysical journal. Letters |
container_volume | 924 |
creator | Zhang, Rachel C. Zhang, Bing |
description | The redshift distribution of fast radio bursts (FRBs) is not well constrained. The association of the Galactic FRB 200428 with the young magnetar SGR 1935+2154 raises the working hypothesis that FRB sources track the star formation history of the universe. The discovery of FRB 20200120E in association with a globular cluster in the nearby galaxy M81, however, casts doubts on such an assumption. We apply the Monte Carlo method developed in a previous work to test different FRB redshift distribution models against the recently released first CHIME FRB catalog in terms of their distributions in specific fluence, external dispersion measure (DM
E
), and inferred isotropic energy. Our results clearly rule out the hypothesis that all FRBs track the star formation history of the universe. The hypothesis that all FRBs track the accumulated stars throughout history describes the data better but still cannot meet both the DM
E
and the energy criteria. The data seem to be better modeled with either a redshift distribution model invoking a significant delay with respect to star formation or a hybrid model invoking both a dominant delayed population and a subdominant star formation population. We discuss the implications of this finding for FRB source models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3847/2041-8213/ac46ad |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_3847_2041_8213_ac46ad</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2618556247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-53b14fc451cb27e3c6fa4b589ba1b5afd57df95e67d59f18b50e7210c8bb14493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtLAzEQxoMoWKt3jwHBk2vz3MdRa2sL9YG255BkE9zaNmuSFfrfu3WlXsTTfMz8vhnmA-Aco2uas2xAEMNJTjAdSM1SWR6A3r51uNeIH4OTEJYIEZTivAfE_M3A4WT6MIJjGSJ8kWXl4G3jW_3s6mYlY-U28M6ZAB9dhHMv9TuMrek1Sg_Hzq87YlKF6PwWOvs9XWyqT-ODOQVHVq6COfupfbAYj-bDSTJ7up8Ob2aJpjmOCacKM6sZx1qRzFCdWskUzwslseLSljwrbcFNmpW8sDhXHJmMYKRz1RpZQfvgottbe_fRmBDF0jV-054UpH2U85SwrKVQR2nvQvDGitpXa-m3AiOxi1HschK7zEQXY2u56iyVq393_oNf_oHLerkSBWECixlmoi4t_QKeqIA6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618556247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The CHIME Fast Radio Burst Population Does Not Track the Star Formation History of the Universe</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Rachel C. ; Zhang, Bing</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Rachel C. ; Zhang, Bing</creatorcontrib><description>The redshift distribution of fast radio bursts (FRBs) is not well constrained. The association of the Galactic FRB 200428 with the young magnetar SGR 1935+2154 raises the working hypothesis that FRB sources track the star formation history of the universe. The discovery of FRB 20200120E in association with a globular cluster in the nearby galaxy M81, however, casts doubts on such an assumption. We apply the Monte Carlo method developed in a previous work to test different FRB redshift distribution models against the recently released first CHIME FRB catalog in terms of their distributions in specific fluence, external dispersion measure (DM
E
), and inferred isotropic energy. Our results clearly rule out the hypothesis that all FRBs track the star formation history of the universe. The hypothesis that all FRBs track the accumulated stars throughout history describes the data better but still cannot meet both the DM
E
and the energy criteria. The data seem to be better modeled with either a redshift distribution model invoking a significant delay with respect to star formation or a hybrid model invoking both a dominant delayed population and a subdominant star formation population. We discuss the implications of this finding for FRB source models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-8205</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-8213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac46ad</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin: The American Astronomical Society</publisher><subject>Fluence ; Galaxies ; Globular clusters ; Hypotheses ; Magnetars ; Modelling ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Radio bursts ; Radio transient sources ; Red shift ; Star & galaxy formation ; Star formation ; Stellar evolution ; Universe</subject><ispartof>Astrophysical journal. Letters, 2022-01, Vol.924 (1), p.L14</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.</rights><rights>Copyright IOP Publishing Jan 01, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-53b14fc451cb27e3c6fa4b589ba1b5afd57df95e67d59f18b50e7210c8bb14493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-53b14fc451cb27e3c6fa4b589ba1b5afd57df95e67d59f18b50e7210c8bb14493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9725-2524 ; 0000-0002-2905-9239</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ac46ad/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902,38845,38867,53815,53842</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Rachel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bing</creatorcontrib><title>The CHIME Fast Radio Burst Population Does Not Track the Star Formation History of the Universe</title><title>Astrophysical journal. Letters</title><addtitle>APJL</addtitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J. Lett</addtitle><description>The redshift distribution of fast radio bursts (FRBs) is not well constrained. The association of the Galactic FRB 200428 with the young magnetar SGR 1935+2154 raises the working hypothesis that FRB sources track the star formation history of the universe. The discovery of FRB 20200120E in association with a globular cluster in the nearby galaxy M81, however, casts doubts on such an assumption. We apply the Monte Carlo method developed in a previous work to test different FRB redshift distribution models against the recently released first CHIME FRB catalog in terms of their distributions in specific fluence, external dispersion measure (DM
E
), and inferred isotropic energy. Our results clearly rule out the hypothesis that all FRBs track the star formation history of the universe. The hypothesis that all FRBs track the accumulated stars throughout history describes the data better but still cannot meet both the DM
E
and the energy criteria. The data seem to be better modeled with either a redshift distribution model invoking a significant delay with respect to star formation or a hybrid model invoking both a dominant delayed population and a subdominant star formation population. We discuss the implications of this finding for FRB source models.</description><subject>Fluence</subject><subject>Galaxies</subject><subject>Globular clusters</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Magnetars</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Radio bursts</subject><subject>Radio transient sources</subject><subject>Red shift</subject><subject>Star & galaxy formation</subject><subject>Star formation</subject><subject>Stellar evolution</subject><subject>Universe</subject><issn>2041-8205</issn><issn>2041-8213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtLAzEQxoMoWKt3jwHBk2vz3MdRa2sL9YG255BkE9zaNmuSFfrfu3WlXsTTfMz8vhnmA-Aco2uas2xAEMNJTjAdSM1SWR6A3r51uNeIH4OTEJYIEZTivAfE_M3A4WT6MIJjGSJ8kWXl4G3jW_3s6mYlY-U28M6ZAB9dhHMv9TuMrek1Sg_Hzq87YlKF6PwWOvs9XWyqT-ODOQVHVq6COfupfbAYj-bDSTJ7up8Ob2aJpjmOCacKM6sZx1qRzFCdWskUzwslseLSljwrbcFNmpW8sDhXHJmMYKRz1RpZQfvgottbe_fRmBDF0jV-054UpH2U85SwrKVQR2nvQvDGitpXa-m3AiOxi1HschK7zEQXY2u56iyVq393_oNf_oHLerkSBWECixlmoi4t_QKeqIA6</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Zhang, Rachel C.</creator><creator>Zhang, Bing</creator><general>The American Astronomical Society</general><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9725-2524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2905-9239</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>The CHIME Fast Radio Burst Population Does Not Track the Star Formation History of the Universe</title><author>Zhang, Rachel C. ; Zhang, Bing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-53b14fc451cb27e3c6fa4b589ba1b5afd57df95e67d59f18b50e7210c8bb14493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Fluence</topic><topic>Galaxies</topic><topic>Globular clusters</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Magnetars</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Radio bursts</topic><topic>Radio transient sources</topic><topic>Red shift</topic><topic>Star & galaxy formation</topic><topic>Star formation</topic><topic>Stellar evolution</topic><topic>Universe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Rachel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bing</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Astrophysical journal. Letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Rachel C.</au><au>Zhang, Bing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The CHIME Fast Radio Burst Population Does Not Track the Star Formation History of the Universe</atitle><jtitle>Astrophysical journal. Letters</jtitle><stitle>APJL</stitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J. Lett</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>924</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>L14</spage><pages>L14-</pages><issn>2041-8205</issn><eissn>2041-8213</eissn><abstract>The redshift distribution of fast radio bursts (FRBs) is not well constrained. The association of the Galactic FRB 200428 with the young magnetar SGR 1935+2154 raises the working hypothesis that FRB sources track the star formation history of the universe. The discovery of FRB 20200120E in association with a globular cluster in the nearby galaxy M81, however, casts doubts on such an assumption. We apply the Monte Carlo method developed in a previous work to test different FRB redshift distribution models against the recently released first CHIME FRB catalog in terms of their distributions in specific fluence, external dispersion measure (DM
E
), and inferred isotropic energy. Our results clearly rule out the hypothesis that all FRBs track the star formation history of the universe. The hypothesis that all FRBs track the accumulated stars throughout history describes the data better but still cannot meet both the DM
E
and the energy criteria. The data seem to be better modeled with either a redshift distribution model invoking a significant delay with respect to star formation or a hybrid model invoking both a dominant delayed population and a subdominant star formation population. We discuss the implications of this finding for FRB source models.</abstract><cop>Austin</cop><pub>The American Astronomical Society</pub><doi>10.3847/2041-8213/ac46ad</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9725-2524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2905-9239</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2041-8205 |
ispartof | Astrophysical journal. Letters, 2022-01, Vol.924 (1), p.L14 |
issn | 2041-8205 2041-8213 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_iop_journals_10_3847_2041_8213_ac46ad |
source | IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; IOPscience extra; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Fluence Galaxies Globular clusters Hypotheses Magnetars Modelling Monte Carlo simulation Radio bursts Radio transient sources Red shift Star & galaxy formation Star formation Stellar evolution Universe |
title | The CHIME Fast Radio Burst Population Does Not Track the Star Formation History of the Universe |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A41%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20CHIME%20Fast%20Radio%20Burst%20Population%20Does%20Not%20Track%20the%20Star%20Formation%20History%20of%20the%20Universe&rft.jtitle=Astrophysical%20journal.%20Letters&rft.au=Zhang,%20Rachel%20C.&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=924&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=L14&rft.pages=L14-&rft.issn=2041-8205&rft.eissn=2041-8213&rft_id=info:doi/10.3847/2041-8213/ac46ad&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2618556247%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618556247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |