Relations between Coronal Mass Ejections and the Photospheric Magnetic Field in Cycles 23 and 24

The number of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and their parameters and cycle variations were investigated and compared to the photospheric magnetic field evolution in cycles 23 and 24. The Coordinated Data Analysis Workshops (CDAW) catalog of white-light CMEs detected by the Solar and Heliospheric Obs...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2020-01, Vol.889 (1), p.1
1. Verfasser: Bilenko, Irina A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title The Astrophysical journal
container_volume 889
creator Bilenko, Irina A.
description The number of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and their parameters and cycle variations were investigated and compared to the photospheric magnetic field evolution in cycles 23 and 24. The Coordinated Data Analysis Workshops (CDAW) catalog of white-light CMEs detected by the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph coronagraphs and the data on the photospheric magnetic fields from the Kitt Peak Vacuum Telescope Spectromagnetograph (KPVT/Spectromagnetograph) and the Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigations of the Sun Vector-Spectromagnetograph (SOLIS/VSM) were used. The results suggest that not only did the number of CMEs increase in cycle 24, but that their parameters, cycle variations, distributions, and dependencies on the photospheric magnetic fields were also different. Various CME categories behave in different ways during solar cycles. The differences in the number and parameters of CMEs and their cycle variations may be related to the differences in the photospheric magnetic fields during the cycles. The strong photospheric magnetic fields maintained approximately the same strength from cycle 23 to cycle 24, whereas the weak fields became weaker and the area they occupied increased. Taking into account that the global magnetic field diminished from cycle 23 to cycle 24, the increase in the number of CMEs in cycle 24 can be understood. A detailed analysis of the similarities and differences in CME parameters and their cycle evolution indicates that, along with the influence of changes in the CME detection mode in 2004 and 2010, the changes in CME rate and parameters were also associated with real differences in the behavior of strong and weak photospheric magnetic fields in cycles 23 and 24.
doi_str_mv 10.3847/1538-4357/ab61fb
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_O3W</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_3847_1538_4357_ab61fb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2357567913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-b98cc5ba38134fc55ce97be6bb2ebccd73110289a961e5c22f3006beea2e093a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtLxDAQh4MouK7ePQb2at08-kiOsqwPWFFEwVtM0qnbpTY16SL735ta0YtIDpOZfL-BfAidUnLORVrMacZFkvKsmGuT08rsocnPaB9NCCFpkvPi-RAdhbAZWiblBL08QKP72rUBG-g_AFq8cN61usG3OgS83IAdn3Vb4n4N-H7tehe6NfjaRua1hT5eLmtoSlzH9M42EDDjXwGWHqODSjcBTr7rFD1dLh8X18nq7upmcbFKLC9EnxgprM2M5oLytLJZZkEWBnJjGBhry4JTSpiQWuYUMstYxQnJDYBmQCTXfIpm497Ou_cthF5t3NbHfwTFooIsLyTlkSIjZb0LwUOlOl-_ab9TlKjBoxqkqUGaGj3GyNkYqV33u_MffPYHrruNEkIqGk9XVvwT7RaAbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2357567913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relations between Coronal Mass Ejections and the Photospheric Magnetic Field in Cycles 23 and 24</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><creator>Bilenko, Irina A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bilenko, Irina A.</creatorcontrib><description>The number of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and their parameters and cycle variations were investigated and compared to the photospheric magnetic field evolution in cycles 23 and 24. The Coordinated Data Analysis Workshops (CDAW) catalog of white-light CMEs detected by the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph coronagraphs and the data on the photospheric magnetic fields from the Kitt Peak Vacuum Telescope Spectromagnetograph (KPVT/Spectromagnetograph) and the Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigations of the Sun Vector-Spectromagnetograph (SOLIS/VSM) were used. The results suggest that not only did the number of CMEs increase in cycle 24, but that their parameters, cycle variations, distributions, and dependencies on the photospheric magnetic fields were also different. Various CME categories behave in different ways during solar cycles. The differences in the number and parameters of CMEs and their cycle variations may be related to the differences in the photospheric magnetic fields during the cycles. The strong photospheric magnetic fields maintained approximately the same strength from cycle 23 to cycle 24, whereas the weak fields became weaker and the area they occupied increased. Taking into account that the global magnetic field diminished from cycle 23 to cycle 24, the increase in the number of CMEs in cycle 24 can be understood. A detailed analysis of the similarities and differences in CME parameters and their cycle evolution indicates that, along with the influence of changes in the CME detection mode in 2004 and 2010, the changes in CME rate and parameters were also associated with real differences in the behavior of strong and weak photospheric magnetic fields in cycles 23 and 24.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab61fb</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: The American Astronomical Society</publisher><subject>Active solar corona ; Astrophysics ; Coronagraphs ; Coronal mass ejection ; Data analysis ; Evolution ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetism ; Parameters ; Photosphere ; Photospheric magnetic fields ; SOHO Mission ; Solar coronal mass ejections ; Solar cycle ; Solar magnetic fields ; Spectrometry ; White light ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2020-01, Vol.889 (1), p.1</ispartof><rights>2020. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright IOP Publishing Jan 20, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-b98cc5ba38134fc55ce97be6bb2ebccd73110289a961e5c22f3006beea2e093a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-b98cc5ba38134fc55ce97be6bb2ebccd73110289a961e5c22f3006beea2e093a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9543-0542</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab61fb/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,38871,53848</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab61fb$$EView_record_in_IOP_Publishing$$FView_record_in_$$GIOP_Publishing</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bilenko, Irina A.</creatorcontrib><title>Relations between Coronal Mass Ejections and the Photospheric Magnetic Field in Cycles 23 and 24</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><addtitle>APJ</addtitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><description>The number of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and their parameters and cycle variations were investigated and compared to the photospheric magnetic field evolution in cycles 23 and 24. The Coordinated Data Analysis Workshops (CDAW) catalog of white-light CMEs detected by the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph coronagraphs and the data on the photospheric magnetic fields from the Kitt Peak Vacuum Telescope Spectromagnetograph (KPVT/Spectromagnetograph) and the Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigations of the Sun Vector-Spectromagnetograph (SOLIS/VSM) were used. The results suggest that not only did the number of CMEs increase in cycle 24, but that their parameters, cycle variations, distributions, and dependencies on the photospheric magnetic fields were also different. Various CME categories behave in different ways during solar cycles. The differences in the number and parameters of CMEs and their cycle variations may be related to the differences in the photospheric magnetic fields during the cycles. The strong photospheric magnetic fields maintained approximately the same strength from cycle 23 to cycle 24, whereas the weak fields became weaker and the area they occupied increased. Taking into account that the global magnetic field diminished from cycle 23 to cycle 24, the increase in the number of CMEs in cycle 24 can be understood. A detailed analysis of the similarities and differences in CME parameters and their cycle evolution indicates that, along with the influence of changes in the CME detection mode in 2004 and 2010, the changes in CME rate and parameters were also associated with real differences in the behavior of strong and weak photospheric magnetic fields in cycles 23 and 24.</description><subject>Active solar corona</subject><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>Coronagraphs</subject><subject>Coronal mass ejection</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetism</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Photosphere</subject><subject>Photospheric magnetic fields</subject><subject>SOHO Mission</subject><subject>Solar coronal mass ejections</subject><subject>Solar cycle</subject><subject>Solar magnetic fields</subject><subject>Spectrometry</subject><subject>White light</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtLxDAQh4MouK7ePQb2at08-kiOsqwPWFFEwVtM0qnbpTY16SL735ta0YtIDpOZfL-BfAidUnLORVrMacZFkvKsmGuT08rsocnPaB9NCCFpkvPi-RAdhbAZWiblBL08QKP72rUBG-g_AFq8cN61usG3OgS83IAdn3Vb4n4N-H7tehe6NfjaRua1hT5eLmtoSlzH9M42EDDjXwGWHqODSjcBTr7rFD1dLh8X18nq7upmcbFKLC9EnxgprM2M5oLytLJZZkEWBnJjGBhry4JTSpiQWuYUMstYxQnJDYBmQCTXfIpm497Ou_cthF5t3NbHfwTFooIsLyTlkSIjZb0LwUOlOl-_ab9TlKjBoxqkqUGaGj3GyNkYqV33u_MffPYHrruNEkIqGk9XVvwT7RaAbg</recordid><startdate>20200120</startdate><enddate>20200120</enddate><creator>Bilenko, Irina A.</creator><general>The American Astronomical Society</general><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9543-0542</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200120</creationdate><title>Relations between Coronal Mass Ejections and the Photospheric Magnetic Field in Cycles 23 and 24</title><author>Bilenko, Irina A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-b98cc5ba38134fc55ce97be6bb2ebccd73110289a961e5c22f3006beea2e093a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Active solar corona</topic><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>Coronagraphs</topic><topic>Coronal mass ejection</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetism</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Photosphere</topic><topic>Photospheric magnetic fields</topic><topic>SOHO Mission</topic><topic>Solar coronal mass ejections</topic><topic>Solar cycle</topic><topic>Solar magnetic fields</topic><topic>Spectrometry</topic><topic>White light</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bilenko, Irina A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bilenko, Irina A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relations between Coronal Mass Ejections and the Photospheric Magnetic Field in Cycles 23 and 24</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><stitle>APJ</stitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><date>2020-01-20</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>889</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><abstract>The number of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and their parameters and cycle variations were investigated and compared to the photospheric magnetic field evolution in cycles 23 and 24. The Coordinated Data Analysis Workshops (CDAW) catalog of white-light CMEs detected by the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph coronagraphs and the data on the photospheric magnetic fields from the Kitt Peak Vacuum Telescope Spectromagnetograph (KPVT/Spectromagnetograph) and the Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigations of the Sun Vector-Spectromagnetograph (SOLIS/VSM) were used. The results suggest that not only did the number of CMEs increase in cycle 24, but that their parameters, cycle variations, distributions, and dependencies on the photospheric magnetic fields were also different. Various CME categories behave in different ways during solar cycles. The differences in the number and parameters of CMEs and their cycle variations may be related to the differences in the photospheric magnetic fields during the cycles. The strong photospheric magnetic fields maintained approximately the same strength from cycle 23 to cycle 24, whereas the weak fields became weaker and the area they occupied increased. Taking into account that the global magnetic field diminished from cycle 23 to cycle 24, the increase in the number of CMEs in cycle 24 can be understood. A detailed analysis of the similarities and differences in CME parameters and their cycle evolution indicates that, along with the influence of changes in the CME detection mode in 2004 and 2010, the changes in CME rate and parameters were also associated with real differences in the behavior of strong and weak photospheric magnetic fields in cycles 23 and 24.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>The American Astronomical Society</pub><doi>10.3847/1538-4357/ab61fb</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9543-0542</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0004-637X
ispartof The Astrophysical journal, 2020-01, Vol.889 (1), p.1
issn 0004-637X
1538-4357
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_3847_1538_4357_ab61fb
source IOP Publishing Free Content
subjects Active solar corona
Astrophysics
Coronagraphs
Coronal mass ejection
Data analysis
Evolution
Magnetic fields
Magnetism
Parameters
Photosphere
Photospheric magnetic fields
SOHO Mission
Solar coronal mass ejections
Solar cycle
Solar magnetic fields
Spectrometry
White light
Workshops
title Relations between Coronal Mass Ejections and the Photospheric Magnetic Field in Cycles 23 and 24
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A16%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_O3W&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relations%20between%20Coronal%20Mass%20Ejections%20and%20the%20Photospheric%20Magnetic%20Field%20in%20Cycles%2023%20and%2024&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=Bilenko,%20Irina%20A.&rft.date=2020-01-20&rft.volume=889&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft_id=info:doi/10.3847/1538-4357/ab61fb&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_O3W%3E2357567913%3C/proquest_O3W%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2357567913&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true